[08:12] i've synced db6.0 twice now. so the older one can be dropped. but i'd like the ^ one to be accepted please =) [08:13] xnox: done [08:13] Daviey, how would the SRU team feel about backporting the 1.9.0 openvswitch from raring to 12.04 to support the lts-raring enablement kernel? [08:14] cjwatson: cheers! [08:14] it supports 3.8 natively and I feel its actually much lower risk and trying to backport the multitude of cherry-picks that don't apply cleanly to the 1.4.x codebase we have in 12.04 [08:18] jamespage: Hmm, a dedicated NEW versioned package name (like linux), or bumping the version? [08:21] Daviey, hmm [08:23] Daviey, I was thinking a straight backport to updates [08:23] jamespage: Dual supporting both is more favourable IMO, but lack of dynamic dependencies makes this kinda hellish.. I can't think of a good user experience fix for handling this gracefully [08:23] Daviey, the other option which is not ideal is to provide 1.9.0 via precise-backports [08:23] so that 1.4.0 continues to exist for those that want to stick with 3.2 [08:24] but lts-raring users have to use the backports version.... [08:24] I'd need to run that past the backports team obviously [08:25] jamespage: Probably a good idea to bring this to the TB mailing list, outlining the issue and possible solutions [08:25] actually that might work better - I suspect that for the saucy enablement kernel I'll need to backport 1.10 which drops the brcompat module [08:25] Daviey, OK - I'll send something this morning [08:26] jamespage: Well, straight backports cannot really solve this, can it? Unless you still do the compat work in the current openvswitch package? [08:26] Daviey, ? [08:26] its already backwards compatible [08:27] i.e. 1.10 works on the 3.2 kernel [08:27] jamespage: Current ovs in precise works with current lts kernel, but not raring backport? [08:27] Oh! [08:27] Daviey, yes [08:27] The version we have in precise is good up to the quantal hwe kernel [08:27] but that was painful and we have to carry a large number of patches [08:28] (and I got it wrong first go) [08:29] jamespage: Right.. and you want to avoid that again... and I agree the regression potential of trying to cherry pick that much is a problem. [08:29] So what i am saying is, making use of backports will mean that -updates doesn't work with the most recent HWE kernel. [08:31] jamespage: AND, we ned to move quite quickly... 12.04.3, scheduled for next Thursday (is that still correct?).. will not work with openvswitch as it has the raring kernel, right? [08:31] Daviey, no [08:32] I'm wrong? [08:40] jamespage: Am i wrong? [08:41] Daviey, the version of openvswitch in 12.04 will not work with the raring HWE kernel [08:41] well the user space tools might with the native kernel module [08:41] but the openvswitch-datapath-dkms module which is the one everyting uses will not [08:42] jamespage: Right.. the native support doesn't have GRE support, right? [08:42] Daviey, thats correct [08:43] Daviey, hmm - I wonder whether we can skew the userspace tools against the dkms module version [08:43] Daviey, that way we could provide a versioned openvswitch-datapath-dkms-lts-raring package only [08:44] Yeah, I think that is what I was thinking earlier.. but create a good user experience as we cannot do dynamic depends [08:44] err, creates a poor* [08:52] Daviey, well we have todo an explicit install of the dkms package anyway [08:52] Daviey, so its not that much different [08:54] jamespage: true.. Yeah, I think that is the best balance [08:55] Daviey, just testing that now [08:55] We get raring-hwe compatibility, with no risk of current users. [08:55] I'd also say that it is a manageable workflow in the future [08:57] could an archive admin add "poppler-qml-plugin" to the whitelist of source packages coming from cu2d? maybe cjwatson? both didrocks and seb128 are away today. [09:08] Mirv: Sorry, I would help.. but I do not know how cu2d works, and I have been unable to find any docs. [09:08] Daviey, userspace tools for 12.04 appear to be functional with newer dkms versions! [09:10] Daviey: yeah the slight problem here is that I don't know where/what the whitelist didrocks touches is, but cyphermox told it's on the archive machines and not part of cu2d system (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DailyRelease) as such [09:10] jamespage: Super, that is good news. I'd be happy processing this approach myself, unless anyone else objects. [09:11] Daviey, great - I'll not bother emailing the TB as we have a low risk approach now [09:11] marvellous [09:11] * jamespage thinks its good to talk these things through! [09:13] Mirv: Yeah, I'm not even sure I can do that.. I'd rather not poke around, and risk getting it wrong. Sorry. :( [09:15] Daviey: I totally understand, that's why the idea of getting that Thing documented is a good one :) [09:20] It's something that gets committed to bzr and then pulled on lillypilly [09:20] * Laney waves hands and flails [09:43] Daviey: hi! Maybe you could help us in some other way! Do you have a minute? :) [09:44] Daviey: in the daily-release process, we have a requirement that whenever there is a packaging change in a package that is ready for releasing, we need and archive-admin-or-similar to ACK the change - so that no 'risky' packaging change gets released into Ubuntu [09:44] Daviey: normally didrocks or seb128 do those, but now they're both gone [09:46] Daviey: we have one thing like this now, it's really a one-liner that we already acknowledged, but we still need some core-dev to ACK it as well [09:47] Daviey: I know it's hard to ACK something when you don't know the code, but it's just to make sure nothing unwanted gets into the archive [09:47] Daviey: https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/view/cu2d/view/Head/view/Indicators/job/cu2d-indicators-head-3.0publish/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/packaging_changes_libusermetrics_1.1.1+13.10.20130816-0ubuntu1.diff [09:47] Could you take a look? ;) === tkamppeter_ is now known as tkamppeter [09:55] Daviey, I've emailed upstream just to validate the approach we discussed [09:55] I might be missing something re userspace/kernel module compatibility [09:56] sil2100: Well, reviewing the packaging diff represented there - it looks like something i'd be happy sponsoring. [09:57] Daviey: ! [09:57] Daviey: thank you! [09:57] Mirv: puublish! [09:57] jamespage: well.. this base approach gives us some known compatibility.. in the worsed case, we'd need to also add a raring-hwe user space tools - right? [09:57] * sil2100 goes into slow-motion [09:57] Daviey, yes [09:58] Mirv: noooooow~! [09:59] Daviey: thanks! [09:59] sil2100: oh, you were shouting here :) [10:00] ;) [10:19] Mirv: I'm at DebConf and I don't know much about cu2d anyway, sorry. [10:20] sil2100: This process should involve verification by somebody with upload privileges, not by an archive admin (a much smaller and much more contended set of individuals) [10:20] For the record [10:31] cjwatson: Yeah, i almost said that - but i think sil2100 knew that, as he quantified with "need some core-dev to ACK it" .. I assume it's not in a pkg set. [10:59] cjwatson: ok thanks anyway, and happy debconfing. and yes, the thing sil2100 asked for requires just core-dev. [10:59] it's good that didrocks is away for a small while before real vacation, so that we notice these beforehand :) [11:15] Indeed :) [11:15] Actually, once again we need a core-dev to ACK another packaging change [11:15] A quick one again [11:39] core-devs> #ubuntu-devel [13:38] ogra_: hi! Are you still around? [13:38] ogra_: we have another near-deadline packaging ACK that needs ACKing, maybe you could help this time as well ;) ? [13:39] ogra_: https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/view/cu2d/view/Head/view/Unity/job/cu2d-unity-head-3.0publish/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/packaging_changes_libunity_7.0.11+13.10.20130816.2-0ubuntu1.diff [13:41] sil2100, i assume this has been tested (cant really judge the sed lines so i need to truset a testrun you did ) [13:41] *trust [13:42] ogra_: it passed our testing (failures in the acceptance threshold) [13:42] sil2100, fine, then, go ahead [13:42] ogra_: thanks! You're a life saver [13:45] Daviey, ^^ updated iscsitarget for lts raring hwe kernel [13:49] jamespage: reviewed and ^ [13:49] Daviey, thanks muchly! === rtg_ is now known as Guest11042 [14:52] jdstrand, hi [15:00] tkamppeter: hey [15:22] sil2100: Mirv: when you need a core-dev to review things before upload, that I or kenvandine can do [15:22] so, for the cu2d magic that apparently is needed on lillypilly [15:22] \o/ [15:23] seems like that would be just a matter of a bzr pull for the cupstream2distro-config branch somewhere on the machine [15:23] cyphermox: first of all, do you have a moment for a quick pkg ACK? See #ubuntu-desktop ;) [15:23] cyphermox: awesome [15:23] cron should be able to say exactly where, but I don't know how didrocks did it, and I don't have that kind of god powers [15:23] needs documenting for bus factor reasons [15:23] Ok [15:24] Laney, cyphermox: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DailyRelease/FAQ#Adding.2BAC8-removing_components_to_a_stack this documents some parts probably [15:25] right [15:25] it is documented, just in a non-obvious way [15:26] I totally read over that without noticing >.< [15:35] hehe [15:35] Right, it's not being explicitly mentioned anywhere [16:10] jdstrand, did you have a look into the openjpeg MIR, bug 711061? [16:10] Launchpad bug 711061 in openjpeg (Ubuntu) "[MIR] libopenjpeg2" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/711061 [16:12] Laney: so, is that wiki page enough information? [16:12] dunno [16:12] I don't even know what is being requested. :P [16:13] tkamppeter: no. let me see if I can get someone else to do it [16:17] cyphermox: that branch is on 608 but trunk is 655 [16:39] jdstrand, OK. [17:07] Laney: if you could bzr pull on that branch I suspect it will be enough [17:07] I don't know what it means and so I'm reluctant to do so === bjf is now known as bjf[afk] [21:00] anyone know whats up with x11-utils migration? autopkgtest for gvfs 1.17.2-0ubuntu6: RUNNING but it looks like it succeeded in jenkins unless i'm misunderstanding it