| dholbach | good morning | 07:01 |
|---|---|---|
| obounaim | Hi | 12:50 |
| obounaim | What is the difference between "https://merges.ubuntu.com/universe.html" and "https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/saucy/+localpackagediffs" | 12:51 |
| siretart | obounaim: the mechanism and tools that create them | 12:55 |
| === ikonia_ is now known as ikonia | ||
| === dholbach_ is now known as dholbach | ||
| === kees_ is now known as kees | ||
| === and`_ is now known as and` | ||
| === ampelbein_ is now known as Ampelbein | ||
| === slangase` is now known as slangasek | ||
| Noskcaj | slangasek, debian will only take the autoconf patch if they have an explanation of why it exists. Is there one? | 20:30 |
| slangasek | Noskcaj: not from me; it's not my patch. You'll need to look at the package history | 20:31 |
| Noskcaj | slangasek, i did, i couldn't find anything other than a changelog entry. I was hoping you'd know. | 20:31 |
| slangasek | afraid not | 20:32 |
| slangasek | did you check the bzr history? | 20:32 |
| Noskcaj | yeah, nothing | 20:32 |
| slangasek | Noskcaj: so this patch was added back when Scott was actively maintaining libtool, at least if Ubuntu if not in Debian. But I can't sort out why it was ever needed. I would suggest dropping the patch and making autoconf a sync. | 20:36 |
| slangasek | autoreconf already supports autodetecting if libtool is used, and if it's not used I don't see why we care about running libtoolize | 20:36 |
| Noskcaj | ok. Should i file a sync bug now or wait until the next debian release? | 20:37 |
| slangasek | Noskcaj: the sync should be done instead of the merge you proposed, AFAICS | 20:38 |
| Noskcaj | ok, i'll do that later today. | 20:38 |
| slangasek | cool, thanks | 20:38 |
| Noskcaj | bug 1214138 | 21:09 |
| ubottu | bug 1214138 in autoconf (Ubuntu) "Sync autoconf 2.69-1.1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1214138 | 21:09 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!