[07:39] <toabctl> I deleted a package from my ppa yesterday but when I try to upload the package again, I get "File puppet-razor_0.9.0.orig.tar.gz already exists ..."
[07:39] <toabctl> but the file is not there. the ppa is empty: http://ppa.launchpad.net/telekomcloud/eisbrecher/ubuntu/pool/main/p/puppet-razor/
[07:39] <toabctl> any idea how to solve this?
[07:41] <maxb> By design, you're never allowed to re-upload a file name with different contents
[07:42] <maxb> Because this would break the uniqueness of versions
[07:46] <toabctl> maxb: but I deleted the package so the orig.tar.gz should also be deleted
[07:46] <wgrant> It is remembered forever.
[07:46] <maxb> Yes. You're still never allowed to replace it with different content
[07:46] <wgrant> You can't have the same version twice with different content.
[07:48] <toabctl> wgrant: so I have to introduce a epoch in the version number, right?
[07:49] <wgrant> toabctl: An epoch is an absolute last resort; if you don't know 100% for sure that you want an epoch for a very good reason, you definitely do not want an epoch.
[07:49] <wgrant> How did there end up being two different 0.9.0s?
[07:49] <wgrant> You'd usually rename it to 0.9.0+repack, or something like that.
[07:52] <toabctl> wgrant: I just used a wrong tarball for the first upload
[11:42] <DarkPlayer> hi, i have a problem with a git sync. The sync status is "The next import is scheduled to run as soon as possible." since 15 hours, is there currently any problem?
[11:43] <wgrant> DarkPlayer: Yeah, there's a roughly 20 hour backlog at the moment. I'm not quite sure what's going on, but I'm investigating.
[14:17] <janimo> is there a way to get to private Launchpad branches with https transport?
[14:17] <janimo> I get redirected to branch/location/+login  when doing a bzr branch
[14:18] <mgz> you need to use the bzr+ssh transport
[14:19] <mgz> which means you need the ssh private key of a user who's got access to the branch and the matching ssh public key on their launchpad account
[14:19] <mgz> this can be a bot though, we do that for several branches
[14:27] <janimo> mgz, I have ssh access there and access to the branch.
[14:28] <janimo> mgz, it's just this is from a remote server and I did not know whether I should use my ssh key there or I can get away with https
[14:31] <dobey> janimo: i wouldn't copy the key to the remote server, but if it's a secured machine/vm, you can probably ssh -A to it for a session, to be able to branch the branch
[14:31] <janimo> dobey, indeed I did not want to copy my private key, but I had to look into (Again) how to use my local one. Thanks for the tip
[14:32] <mgz> janimo: I use ssh agent forwarding in that scenario
[14:33] <mgz> not everyone is enamoured of that, but it works nicely for this case, if you're logged into the machine with your creds anyway when running bzr commands
[14:33] <janimo> mgz, ack, thanks. I'll just have to ask the admins to open  bzr+ssh in the firewall
[14:34] <janimo> mgz, yes, logged into an internal canonical server
[14:34] <mgz> it's just ssh, so if you can ssh out to anywhere, ther'll be fine (so, just port 22)
[14:34] <mgz> IS are pretty anti-agent forwarding... but they may have another suggestion for you
[14:35] <janimo> mgz, I am fine with any approach as long as it works :)
[14:36] <mgz> most machines inside the firewall have access to bazaar.launchpad.net on 22, they probably don't need to change anything there
[18:11] <cjohnston> Ursinha: ping
[18:11] <Ursinha> cjohnston, hi
[18:12] <cjohnston> Ursinha: hey there :-)   is it possible to tell who accepted a blueprint for a sprint?
[18:12] <Ursinha> hmm
[18:13] <Ursinha> good question
[18:13] <Ursinha> looking
[18:14] <cjohnston> Ursinha: we have quite a number of blueprints accepted for next weeks UDS that don't look like they should be
[18:15] <Ursinha> cjohnston, let me poke local launchpad to figure this out, a moment
[18:15] <cjohnston> ack
[18:24] <DarkPlayer> wgrant: any news on the git sync problem? Launchpad tried to sync but this somehow failed without an error.
[18:28] <czajkowski> DarkPlayer: I'd be surprised if we saw wgrant on at this hour of the night for him
[18:29] <czajkowski> DarkPlayer: he did say a 20hr backlog at least
[18:31] <DarkPlayer> czajkowski: sorry it's 20:31 here
[18:33] <Ursinha> DarkPlayer, he should probably be around in ~5h