[12:55] <hggdh> phillw: now I am :-)
[12:55] <hggdh> bregma: can you give us some examples?
[12:56] <bregma> hggdh, https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/1192784
[12:56] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 1192784 in Unity "many toolbar icons" [Undecided,New]
[12:57] <bregma> I don;t want to dismiss this person's concerns, but I don't want to be offensive
[12:57] <hggdh> looking
[12:58]  * bregma is not in the habit of not being offensive
[12:58] <hggdh> bregma: we appreciate that :-)
[12:58] <phillw> hi hggdh from the feedback, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1066435 can be marked as verification done / fixed / released etc :)
[12:58] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 1066435 in linux (Ubuntu Saucy) "powerpc: "Fixing recursive fault but reboot is needed!"" [High,Fix committed]
[12:59] <hggdh> bregma: in this case, we need a bit more (and I agree the description is, ah, lacking...)
[12:59] <phillw> the tester has updated the bug (~ comments 90 and 91)
[13:00] <hggdh> bregma: unity version, and examples, at least
[13:01] <hggdh> bregma: so the usual way would be to start with "thank you for opening this bug and helping make Ubuntu better. Can you please provide us with (1) Unity version; (2) some examples (screenshots and/or short movies are OK); (3) can you expand your description?
[13:01] <hggdh> phillw: looking it up
[13:02] <bregma> hggdh, I'll do that, thanks...  too many hours triaging bugs left my brain hollow and empty
[13:02] <hggdh> bregma: heh, I fully understand :-)
[13:03] <phillw> some of the comments are via email to me, but I believe he has put sufficient information onto the bug report to back up his assertion that it is fixed (and is very glad that it is!)
[13:05] <hggdh> phillw: for the record (and future) you can do it yourself -- just change the tag 'verification-needed-saucy' to 'verification-done-saucy'
[13:05] <hggdh> phillw: the bug status should not be changed -- it will automagically (I hope) be set to fix released as soon as the packages are promoted from -proposed to -updates
[13:06] <hggdh> (it is fix committed right now because we have the package updated (and built)
[13:07] <hggdh> but not generically available
[13:08] <phillw> as it is a new kernel build, it has a zero chance of SRU, so it will only be available in 13.10 anyway :)
[13:09] <hggdh> there is always a chance for SRU but, for the kernel, this may be a bit more involved, and not worth the time
[13:16] <phillw> hggdh: indeed not. it was quite a major thing that they did for the PPC kernel, the ppc people will be quite happy to use 13.10 when it comes out :)
[13:17] <hggdh> phillw: I agree :-)
[14:16] <iceroot_> hi
[14:16] <iceroot_> is there something like that for ubuntu which checks automaticly the packages? http://lintian.debian.org/
[14:16] <Pici> we use lintian too
[14:18] <iceroot_> Pici: is there a site were i can see a statistic?
[14:20] <Pici> iceroot_: http://lintian.ubuntuwire.org/saucy/
[14:20] <iceroot_> Pici: thank you
[14:21] <iceroot_> btw 404 http://lintian.ubuntuwire.org/saucy/manual/index.html  (the link for the manual)
[14:21] <Pici> http://lintian.debian.org/manual/index.html
[14:21] <iceroot_> Pici: it was more a hint that there is something wrong :)
[14:22] <iceroot_> but thx