benji | BradCrittenden: you can't seem to settle on a name here lately | 12:30 |
---|---|---|
benji | I have a small review up that could use your attention: https://code.launchpad.net/~benji/charmworld/migration-018-delete-bundles/+merge/181807 | 12:30 |
BradCrittenden | benji: yeah, i got the dropouts. | 12:30 |
benji | ooh, I hear that can be fatal | 12:31 |
BradCrittenden | the nick retention period is much longer than the time it takes me to reconnect so it won't let me have 'bac' | 12:31 |
=== BradCrittenden is now known as bac | ||
=== bac is now known as InigoMontoya | ||
* InigoMontoya prepare to die | 12:32 | |
benji | InigoMontoya: you can /release the nick by talking to NickServ and he'll let you have it back | 12:38 |
InigoMontoya | benji: no, it isn't a problem, i can usually get it back quickly. but i have to notice the problem after my client reconnects | 12:40 |
benji | why does your client choose the wrong nick? | 12:41 |
InigoMontoya | benji: b/c when it reconnects freenode has not yet released 'bac' and i guess i have the longer one as my alternate. | 12:41 |
benji | ah; I have some purge-all-past-incarnations commands that my client runs when I connect. That helps a bit with that. | 12:42 |
InigoMontoya | benji: moving on to other topics: i'm about ready to break out 'rev' as a separate field in the mongo doc. it seems crazy to go to all of the trouble i'm having just for this issue. | 12:42 |
InigoMontoya | benji: it can still be part of the _id as needed | 12:43 |
InigoMontoya | benji: reality-based objections? | 12:43 |
benji | makes sense; will you also have the search_id as part of the document, so you can search on it? | 12:43 |
benji | no, but Falcor isn't a fan of the idea | 12:44 |
benji | ah, who am I kidding, Falcor loves everyone | 12:44 |
InigoMontoya | unsure about search_id | 12:44 |
benji | I figured that since you want to search on everything but the revision, the search ID would be the way to go (since that's what it is) | 12:46 |
* sinzui sets charmworld to benji's 264 | 13:02 | |
sinzui | 364 I mean | 13:02 |
jcsackett | rick_h: if you can look at https://codereview.appspot.com/12935046/ again i updated it yesterday. | 13:02 |
rick_h | jcsackett: cool looking | 13:04 |
rick_h | jcsackett: ah, I saw jeff gave you a lgtm so I didn't go back to it | 13:04 |
jcsackett | rick_h: it's LGTM with your proposed changes; figured i would make sure you were happy with those changes. | 13:04 |
jcsackett | if you want to hand wave it i'm happy to go ahead and land it. :-P | 13:05 |
rick_h | ok, looking now | 13:05 |
sinzui | benji, I see from the log the migration was run. I still see the wiki bundle. This might be a timing issue because ingest starts *before* the website is brought back up | 13:07 |
rick_h | jcsackett: replied. | 13:08 |
jcsackett | rick_h: dig, thanks. | 13:08 |
jcsackett | jujugui: i need two reviews on https://codereview.appspot.com/12741050 and someone with IE to QA. it's an easy one--just a bunch of deletions. | 13:10 |
benji | sinzui: I would suspect timing. The migration is simple and its tests seem to be representative. If the bad bundle doesn't cause any errors, I would suspect re-ingestion. | 13:11 |
sinzui | benji, The ES data is different. The search that worked yesterday doesn't work. I think all is well. | 13:12 |
benji | cool! | 13:12 |
sinzui | benji, are bundles ingested first? | 13:12 |
benji | thanks for working on it | 13:12 |
benji | I don't know the order off the top of my head. | 13:12 |
* benji looks | 13:12 | |
sinzui | I think they are, meaning the first bundles will always be place before the website restarts | 13:13 |
benji | sinzui: it depends on the hash order of a dictionary, so it should be consistent, but is unspecified | 13:13 |
sinzui | benji, bac: do either of you have time to review https://code.launchpad.net/~sinzui/charmworld/provide-type-from-api-search | 13:27 |
frankban | bac, benji: when you have time, could you please review https://codereview.appspot.com/12802045 ? | 13:27 |
benji | sinzui: sure | 13:27 |
benji | frankban: sure | 13:27 |
InigoMontoya | frankban: sure | 13:27 |
=== InigoMontoya is now known as bac | ||
frankban | thank you both | 13:28 |
rick_h | kind of short notice http://www.yuiblog.com/blog/2013/08/23/save-the-date-yuiconf-nov-6-7 | 14:03 |
rick_h | hatch: ^ | 14:03 |
rick_h | hatch: Makyo updated the branch from yesterday with the bi-directional go constraint conversersion, refactoring, added the sandbox tests/adjustments. https://codereview.appspot.com/13084045 | 14:04 |
rick_h | hatch: Makyo appreciate a second look though I know I got LGTM yesterday. Feel like a lot's changed, but part of that is in my head | 14:05 |
Makyo | rick_h, on it | 14:13 |
jcsackett | jujugui: can i get two reviews on https://codereview.appspot.com/12741050, please? | 14:15 |
rick_h | jcsackett: will look in a sec | 14:15 |
jcsackett | rick_h: thanks. | 14:15 |
Makyo | jcsackett, on it. | 14:16 |
jcsackett | Makyo: thanks! | 14:16 |
sinzui | jcsackett, admin thinks you are on holiday today. Did you forget? | 14:20 |
jcsackett | sinzui: it's a half day, PM. | 14:23 |
jcsackett | leaving at noon. | 14:23 |
sinzui | jcsackett, sorry, I thought you had extended it to the whole day. | 14:23 |
sinzui | I think I am the only member of Orange working on Monday. | 14:24 |
sinzui | benji, about the access to _representation. I too was hoping that we would have solved this by now for bundles and charms. maybe both classes should have a property that returns dict(self._representation) | 14:28 |
benji | sinzui: that would be fine with me; I do worry a little about non-canonical key/values sneaking in, plus it would be nice to have the properies get a chance to return things. How about returning dict((key, getattr(self, key)) for key in self._COMMON_REPRESENTATION) | 14:31 |
rick_h | Makyo: did you do the IE QA on jcsackett's branch? | 14:34 |
sinzui | benji, yes, that is better. Maybe we want a guard in the class that ensures unwanted keys are always rejected. __init__ looks flawed. if it was ensured a sane dict, calling @representation or dict(Bundle(data)) could be trusted | 14:35 |
benji | sinzui: yep, I like putting the gate earlier too (dict(Bundle(data)) can actually be trusted now because it does its own filtering, but I get your point) | 14:36 |
sinzui | benji, okay. I will report a bug for this because I think we want to fix this bad pattern for charms and bundles. | 14:37 |
benji | sounds good | 14:37 |
Makyo | rick_h, ah, will do that now. | 14:40 |
rick_h | Makyo: that's ok, was wondering. My lbox submit finished so I can pull it into my colo now | 14:40 |
rick_h | I'll poke at it | 14:40 |
Makyo | rick_h, oh, alright. | 14:41 |
adeuring | bac, sinzui: could you trying the branch: lp:~adeuring/charmworld/1206659-spurious-errors ? it should fix a number of spurious failures, even some in tests that were not disabled in r362, but I'd like some independent test runs before I claim that everything is fixed... | 14:42 |
bac | adeuring: sure! | 14:42 |
sinzui | thank you adeuring | 14:42 |
bac | adeuring: how long does 'make test' take to run on your slow and fast machines? | 14:45 |
Makyo | luca, ping | 14:45 |
luca | Makyo: heya | 14:45 |
Makyo | luca, the upgrade service ux appears in two different places in the mockup. I like the second one better - after all of the unit management stuff - because this is by service, not by units, and having it mixed in confused even me for a bit. Can I go with that one? | 14:47 |
Makyo | luca, on https://www.dropbox.com/s/d6sc200adk2dszs/juju-gui-2-inspector-09.jpg | 14:47 |
luca | Makyo: they are the same but different :D | 14:48 |
luca | Makyo: There is 2 use cases going on here | 14:48 |
luca | Makyo: #1 I need to upgrade my servicer | 14:48 |
luca | Makyo: #2 I need to revert my service | 14:48 |
Makyo | luca, Why is it mixed in with units? | 14:49 |
luca | Makyo: When there is a new upgrade that the user hasn't seen yet, the "A new upgrade is available" populates near the top | 14:49 |
luca | Makyo: there isn't really a "mixed in with units" thing, they are just notifications, it's all about hierarchy | 14:49 |
Makyo | luca, I keep getting wireframes with no explanation and being told to implement. I'd appreciate a call. | 14:50 |
Makyo | jujugui call in 10 kanban now. | 14:50 |
luca | Makyo: Ah, thats fine. We actually worked with gary on this and most of this way his idea, I would of thought he would of briefed you guys on it before delegating it out. | 14:50 |
Makyo | luca, nope. | 14:51 |
luca | Makyo: right, when are you available? | 14:51 |
Makyo | luca, now for 9 minutes, and in an hour and nine minutes for several hours. | 14:51 |
adeuring | bac: the slow one needs ca 100 seconds (...and I just noticed another test failure...) | 14:51 |
bac | adeuring: i'm running the tests but they are taking forever to run | 14:51 |
adeuring | ..and the fast machine now show a ton of errors even for trunk... | 14:51 |
bac | adeuring: in past 'make test' took about 74 seconds for me. this one is taking minutes | 14:52 |
adeuring | bac: interesting. I changed a status check when a temporary index is created for a test. Could be related. | 14:53 |
bac | adeuring: still on the first line of dots of test output | 14:55 |
adeuring | bac: Then just abort it... | 14:55 |
bac | adeuring: even if all tests pass, this is too painful | 14:55 |
adeuring | right | 14:55 |
Makyo | jujugui call in 1 | 14:59 |
bac | adeuring: try scripts/reset-db? | 15:06 |
bac | adeuring: in a bind, i've rm /var/lib/elasticsearch too | 15:06 |
adeuring | bac: yes | 15:07 |
adeuring | i tried both, but i did not restart mongodb, as suggested by sinzui | 15:07 |
Makyo | rick_h, constraints are passed from pyjuju in the get_service call, and are hooked up, at least in the inspector. | 15:19 |
Makyo | rick_h, will check go too. | 15:19 |
rick_h | Makyo: k, cool. Yea I figure pyjuju worked and maybe we never got around to checking/working on -core? | 15:19 |
Makyo | rick_h, yeah, will do that now. | 15:20 |
bac | sinzui: you said "it is not in saucy". were you referring to pyjuju or core? that is, what is in saucy? | 15:25 |
sinzui | pyjuju is not in saucy | 15:26 |
rick_h | sinzui: ah, that makes sense | 15:27 |
rick_h | sinzui: I heard it the other way as well | 15:27 |
sinzui | sorry for speaking in curtisese | 15:27 |
hatch | rick_h: I'm going to revert the inspector and then I can help you out | 15:32 |
rick_h | hatch: k, all good. | 15:33 |
Makyo | Bleh, debug-log no longer uses newlines, nearly impossible o read. | 15:34 |
rick_h | joy | 15:34 |
hatch | matt I crested a card in urgent and put our heads on it for the IE10 QA | 15:35 |
Makyo | hatch, Cool, thanks/ | 15:36 |
hatch | crested a card | 15:37 |
hatch | hmm | 15:37 |
hatch | lol | 15:37 |
Makyo | rick_h, I am getting constraints from core, too, but they're showing up strangely. It looks like core responds only in MB, but GUI expects GB for memory, so it says I created a machine with 2048GB of memory. I hope that's not the case :) | 15:39 |
rick_h | Makyo: hah, ok. Good to know. Maybe that follow up card isn't much work then. | 15:39 |
rick_h | Makyo: curious to trace how it was getting the data format and fitting it to the UX | 15:39 |
hatch | 2048GB of ram....that must be rick_h's new desktop | 15:40 |
rick_h | hah, I'm about 2012 short | 15:40 |
hatch | lol | 15:40 |
rick_h | err, 2016 that is. /me can't do match on fridays | 15:41 |
Makyo | rick_h, It looks like it's just populated in the service model's attrs and bound in the inspector from there. | 15:41 |
rick_h | Makyo: cool | 15:41 |
rick_h | Makyo: yea, I saw some stuff in the utils that generates titles and such for the UX so maybe it's doing it there. | 15:41 |
Makyo | luca, ping; I'm free if you've got some time before your end of day. | 15:42 |
luca | Makyo: ok, I'm in a meeting with Mark S at the moment but I'll join guichat when I'm out. | 15:43 |
Makyo | luca, alright, thanks. | 15:43 |
benji | frankban: I finally finished looking at your branch, it looks good | 15:48 |
frankban | benji: great, thanks | 15:50 |
luca | Makyo: I'm on GUI chat | 16:06 |
Makyo | bcsaller, in guichat if you want to join | 16:06 |
rick_h | Makyo: after your call, was that -core constraint working done via the gui? e.g. you deployed and set a constraint from the gui and then when you opened it back up it was loaded ok, just off as far as units? | 16:18 |
Makyo | rick_h, deployed from command line in a real env. `juju deploy --constraints mem=2G cs:precise/mysql` | 16:19 |
rick_h | Makyo: ok, I'd be curious then if settnig via the gui does work since that's where I was looking for us to translate the names of the constraints to the Go format. | 16:19 |
rick_h | hatch: running out to grab some food. Looks like my last branch had the wrong 'structure' for constraints and so needing to clean that back up. Latest work is in lp:~rharding/juju-gui/ghost-constraints-1125352 if you want to poke and if you wanted to pair on it in a bit. | 16:24 |
hatch | rick_h: ok sure - I have a few emails to write then I'll be on it | 16:24 |
rick_h | hatch: np, biab | 16:25 |
hatch | hmm | 16:45 |
hatch | fresh trunk test failures.... | 16:45 |
hatch | I'm always confused how this happens | 16:52 |
hatch | oh it did fail in CI too | 16:56 |
hatch | it was just masked by the selenium failures | 16:56 |
rick_h | hatch: details on what I broke? | 16:56 |
bac | frankban: review done | 16:56 |
hatch | rick_h: I think it was a bad merge | 16:57 |
rick_h | hatch: hmm, yea that sucks. I mean it has to merge/pass tests to land so confused | 16:57 |
hatch | rick_h: https://gist.github.com/hatched/13dd112c33c1263476f4 | 16:57 |
frankban | bac: thanks! | 16:57 |
hatch | oh woops | 16:57 |
hatch | heh | 16:57 |
hatch | the 'expected' is the Constraints object | 16:57 |
hatch | ^ rick_h | 16:58 |
rick_h | hatch: yea, looking | 16:58 |
rick_h | hmm, those are tests I changed and such but not seeing the /actual/expected | 16:58 |
rick_h | hatch: but I can pull down trunk again and see if I can replicate it locally. Sec | 16:59 |
hatch | thanks | 17:01 |
rick_h | hatch: ok, I have the same error here. Will hack a branch to see what's up/fix it. | 17:01 |
* rick_h wonders how the $@#$@# it landed then. | 17:02 | |
hatch | yeah right!?!? | 17:02 |
hatch | maybe you had an old test server running :D | 17:02 |
hatch | that caught bcsaller once hehe | 17:02 |
rick_h | oh, and the lbox hit that vs its own? | 17:02 |
hatch | yup | 17:02 |
rick_h | hmm, guess that's possible. I was running tests. | 17:03 |
rick_h | hatch: cool, easy fixes. Must have done that I guess. Sorry about that :/ | 17:07 |
hatch | yeah....you'll pay for this.... | 17:07 |
hatch | with your cpu.....mohohahahahahaha | 17:08 |
hatch | I figure that would be from Futurama | 17:08 |
rick_h | haven't I already suffered enough on this card? plus more lboxing...the punishment! | 17:08 |
hatch | pssht lboxing for you is what....20s? :P | 17:08 |
rick_h | no, stupid bzr/launchpad/branching :/ | 17:08 |
hatch | ahhh right right | 17:09 |
hatch | rick_h: gave you an lgtm | 17:12 |
rick_h | hatch: cool thanks. | 17:12 |
rick_h | hatch: ok, fix heading down for that. | 17:17 |
hatch | great - once it lands I can then revert the flag branch | 17:17 |
rick_h | it's in trunk at least. bzr pull will have it and you can start | 17:17 |
hatch | cool proposing | 17:18 |
hatch | jujugui fyi I'm putting bugs which will block the release in maintenance/urgent | 17:21 |
rick_h | hatch: k | 17:21 |
hatch | jujugui review for reverting the inspector as the default https://codereview.appspot.com/12739049/ | 17:23 |
hatch | Makyo: I can't find any IE10 specific bugs \o/ lemme know what your result is whenever you get a chance | 17:25 |
rick_h | hatch: looking | 17:26 |
hatch | landing thanks for the reviews Makyo rick_h | 17:27 |
Makyo | My IE is so small :S I should see if I can get VB to pretend like I have a bigger monitor. The unit details view goes off the edge of the screen. | 17:38 |
Makyo | Happens in all browsers, ditto with fullscreen. I think I just have it smaller than our minimum size is all | 17:42 |
Makyo | hatch, maybe worth a card, but I don't think I'd consider it a blocker. Looks fine once I get above something like 1024x768 :P | 17:44 |
hatch | haha that's pretty small | 17:46 |
=== rogpeppe3 is now known as rogpeppe | ||
Makyo | hatch, yeah. vbox just picked up a small default. | 17:49 |
Makyo | hatch, also, relation labels are too high. Also small. Probably defaulting to a baseline at the bottom rather than the middle. | 17:50 |
Makyo | hatch, no blockers, though. Everything looks/works fine otherwise. | 17:50 |
hatch | awesome! :D | 17:59 |
hatch | thanks for that | 17:59 |
rick_h | man, almost have my own charmworld/juju-gui running in lxc containers but can't configure the juju-gui to set the charmworld url away from manage.jujucharms.com | 18:00 |
hatch | rick_h: sounds like a bug to me :) | 18:01 |
rick_h | hatch: trying to set via cli and see if it works | 18:03 |
rick_h | hatch: yea, worked via cli. hmmm, need a release to check if it works via the inspecgtor | 18:04 |
rick_h | http://uploads.mitechie.com/lp/lxc-jujugui.png so that's all in lxc containers. Charmworld hadn't finished ingesting and such. However cool to run it all locally. | 18:08 |
rick_h | pretty quick overall | 18:08 |
rick_h | so thanks for the charm-school jcastro ^ | 18:08 |
hatch | that is awesome :) I need to do that at some point | 18:10 |
rick_h | 20GB of ram left, time to try to run 100 juju-guis | 18:11 |
hatch | very odd issue with the CI failures this time | 18:11 |
hatch | I guess I'll retrigger it and see what happens | 18:11 |
hatch | rick_h: so where are we with the ghost constraints stuff? Anything i can help with? | 18:11 |
rick_h | hatch: sorry, took a break to watch the charm school on lxc stuff to test things coming up. | 18:12 |
rick_h | hatch: so we're doing ok. Fixing the constraints object conversion to work | 18:12 |
rick_h | python works, go api fails. | 18:12 |
hatch | who needs Go anyways | 18:13 |
rick_h | heh, my branch is going to leave the api set to go in the config-debug per our discussion today | 18:14 |
hatch | I think I missed that discussion | 18:15 |
hatch | guichat to bring me up to speed? | 18:15 |
rick_h | sure | 18:15 |
hatch | awesome HTC is going to fix the mrs phone - now I can go get a new phone haha | 18:32 |
hatch | canceled CI trying again... | 18:42 |
rick_h | hatch: ok, might need a chat after all. Data seems to go in, won't come back out | 18:43 |
hatch | rick_h: ok in a few minutes just eating a sandwitch :) | 18:45 |
rick_h | hatch: rgr | 18:45 |
hatch | arg I don't know what's up with this CI | 18:51 |
hatch | rick_h: ok sandwitch done ....guichat? | 18:56 |
rick_h | hatch: rg | 18:57 |
rick_h | rg | 18:57 |
rick_h | damn rgr | 18:57 |
bac | benji, sinzui: in our google doc, we agreed the api endpoint should be plural "bundles" but it is still "bundle". any objections to me fixing it? | 19:41 |
benji | bac: are we going to change "charm" to "charms"? | 19:41 |
benji | wait, there already is a "charms" | 19:42 |
benji | bac: we changed it the other way, API2 had "charms" but API3 has "charm" | 19:42 |
sinzui | bac, charms/ is a searchable collection, charm/ is an individual charm | 19:42 |
sinzui | bac /search is a collection of all bundles and charms and it replaces charms/ | 19:43 |
bac | sinzui, benji: looky here: https://docs.google.com/a/canonical.com/document/d/17bgbReU6JJMoUHSJeo8egG5zoSM0fpPIs7U8F1-Piyk/edit#heading=h.u3246vho9aig | 19:43 |
sinzui | bundle/ would provide a single bundle I think | 19:43 |
bac | fourth bullet point | 19:43 |
bac | http://staging.jujucharms.com/api/3/bundles/~abentley/wiki-bundle/1/wiki | 19:43 |
sinzui | bac, I know.bundles/ is fine because we moved charms/ to search/ | 19:44 |
benji | bac: I don't really care much one way or the other, just making the current state known | 19:44 |
sinzui | bac, benji. I don't have an opinion about the plural of bundle(s)/, but I want it to be consistent with charm/ which is what we have now | 19:45 |
benji | +1 | 19:46 |
sinzui | we can rename charm to charms/ in api3 | 19:46 |
bac | sinzui: well it is easier to fix the google doc than the code | 19:46 |
* sinzui is dizzy from seeing all his work not come to fruition today | 19:46 | |
bac | actually, no because we have: | 19:47 |
bac | http://manage.jujucharms.com/~sinzui/bundles/mysql/5/tiny/json | 19:47 |
bac | http://manage.jujucharms.com/bundles/mysql/tiny/json | 19:47 |
bac | so, in the branch i'm about to propose they are all going to be 'bundles' | 19:48 |
bac | if we want to change them to 'bundle' we can do that, after updating the doc | 19:48 |
bac | i gotta land this thing! | 19:48 |
sinzui | bac, sure. We will revisit all the URLs in SEO soon anyway | 19:49 |
sinzui | bac, I can review your branch if you want https://code.launchpad.net/~bac/charmworld/official-bundle-json/+merge/181909 | 20:00 |
* sinzui needs a break from failing to show interesting bundles | 20:00 | |
bac | sinzui: it has conflicts. i'll let you know when it is fixed -- thanks! | 20:00 |
bac | sinzui: conflicts fixed | 20:26 |
bac | sinzui: sorry the diff is so long | 20:26 |
sinzui | bac: np | 20:28 |
sinzui | bac, can you review https://code.launchpad.net/~sinzui/charmworld/api3-interesting/+merge/181910 ? It is very short because I got lost | 20:28 |
bac | sure | 20:28 |
sinzui | bac, I replied with 2 questions | 21:17 |
bac | sinzui: ok | 21:20 |
bac | sinzui: thanks for the mongo sort reminder. i'd tried that yesterday, before i made basket_revision a field. i'll make that change now. | 21:28 |
bac | sinzui: as to the other, yes basket_with_revision is a better name | 21:29 |
sinzui | bac okay. I was only asking questions. Make changes as you like; r=me | 21:29 |
bac | sinzui: would you update https://docs.google.com/a/canonical.com/document/d/17bgbReU6JJMoUHSJeo8egG5zoSM0fpPIs7U8F1-Piyk/edit# with check marks? | 21:56 |
sinzui | bac, The 3 interesting parts aren't done-done | 21:56 |
sinzui | I did verify routing with versions is good | 21:57 |
bac | sinzui: 4b and 4c aren't done? | 21:57 |
sinzui | bac, api supports them, but until we change ingest and views to collect the data, no one will see which is new or popular | 21:58 |
sinzui | well...considering how new bundles are, we might not ever see popular bundles | 21:59 |
bac | good point sinzui. | 22:01 |
* bac dog walk | 22:01 | |
sinzui | bac, I deployed your changes to staging. They work for the most part, but I think there is something amiss with the basket-name: http://staging.jujucharms.com/~abentley/bundles/wiki-bundle/1/wiki/json is not found and a search for abentley finds a bundle without a basket. | 22:17 |
sinzui | bac, I need to make dinner so will sign off. I think we need to update ingest or the model to handle the / in the basket. I see this in the DB: { "_id" : "~abentley/wiki-bundle/1/wiki", "owner" : "abentley", "basket" : "wiki-bundle/1"} | 22:21 |
sinzui | well, before I go I will delete the bundle from staging so that we can check with a fresh ingest. | 22:22 |
hatch | man there has to be something wrong with canonistack | 22:23 |
sinzui | hatch, how do you mean | 22:25 |
hatch | the ci just hangs after loading in the selenium deps | 22:25 |
hatch | and I can't find anything wrong with it | 22:25 |
hatch | it's like it can't create a new instance or something | 22:26 |
sinzui | hatch, are the deps enormous? | 22:27 |
hatch | I don't think so it always gets to "FInished processing dependencies for selenium==2.33.0" | 22:27 |
hatch | then sits there for 45mins until it times out | 22:27 |
sinzui | hatch, I wonder if there is a network issue. I thought this might be an issue with the charm payload. which is bug 1156649 | 22:33 |
_mup_ | Bug #1156649: pyJu fails to deploy/upgrade charm with 32MB payload <juju:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1156649> | 22:33 |
hatch | hmm nope it's not even getting that far | 22:34 |
hatch | I think I'll bench this and make a card | 22:34 |
hatch | start on it again on monday | 22:34 |
sinzui | hatch, I think you are getting much farther since you have an instance doing an install | 22:34 |
sinzui | have a nice weekend | 22:34 |
hatch | you too! | 22:35 |
sinzui | bac: I have good news and bad news. Since I did not go away as I claimed I was, I was here fir the reingest of the bundle. It works! this means we need a migration to purge all bundles before your changes are activated. Oh, but since I happen to know benji landed just such a migration 9 hours ago, we can just pretend you have. I am confident that no bundles will be in the db when we restart production. | 22:38 |
sinzui | bac have a nice weekend. | 22:39 |
* benji is glad to be part of the good news for once. | 22:41 | |
* bac missed the bad news | 22:51 | |
bac | it sounded like good news & good news | 22:52 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!