/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2013/08/23/#ubuntu-ops.txt

ubottuFloodBot1 called the ops in #ubuntu-ops-monitor (repeated abuse from maxi12)00:46
bazhang<HypnotiX> does anyone know if there is any difference between IE browsers in native windows and windows on a virtual box ?07:29
bazhangis that really on topic for #ubuntu ?07:29
bazhangseems more like a #vbox issue07:29
h00khey Pici, there was a banforward you had set on here earlier, I was looking for that user and was not able to get the bansearch syntax correct.13:42
h00kPici: any protips?13:42
h00kPici: specifically rscnt13:42
Picih00k: how were you trying to search?13:43
h00kPici: lemme check my logs, I closed that irssi window13:44
Picih00k: I generally use the web interface to search for old bans,  I'm not sure what the correct syntax for ubottu is.13:44
h00kPici: I tried @bansearch nick #channel and it was matching the CURRENT ident of the user, which obviously was not banned,13:45
h00kso then I was trying to wildcard parts of the ident that made sense, but it was telling me syntax is wrong13:45
h00kPici: web interface it is.13:45
h00kPici: specifically rscnt13:47
ikoniathat guy13:50
ikoniaI removed the forward and changed it to a ban13:50
ikoniahe joined this channel, I asked if he wanted to resolve the ban, he said he was happy being banned13:50
ikoniaso I changed to to a ban rather than a forward and set a 3 month expire on it13:50
Piciokay13:50
ikoniaI think pici owned the ban13:51
ikonia(the orignial one)13:51
ikoniabut that maybe why h00k can't find it13:51
h00kOh, I can't search like that with the bansearch13:51
h00kcould be, I found it with the web bantracker.13:52
h00kI was all, "Hey, I'll give this thing a shot..."13:52
h00kand that's what I get :(13:52
Pici:(13:54
h00kIt'd be cool if it worked, though.14:08
Priceyh00k: Were you looking for the currently set ban that matched an online user? Or were you searching for old stuff?15:52
PriceyOr... could you just not find it in the bantracker..15:52
h00kPricey: nah, I was looking for an existing ban with it, not using the bantracker. It's definitely in the bantracker and I've found it.15:53
h00kI thought maybe it'd be a quick way to check, quicker than logging into bantracker, searching the web page, etc, than just switching active window, search user, channel, done15:54
Priceyh00k: A quick way to check if the user was banned?15:54
h00kPricey: yes15:55
Priceyh00k: Try something like this: https://github.com/bburhans/.irssi/blob/master/scripts/bansearch.pl15:55
tsimpson@help bansearch15:55
ubottu(bansearch <nick|hostmask> [<channel>]) -- Search bans database for a ban on <nick|hostmask>, if <channel> is not given search all channel bans.15:55
tsimpson^also15:55
h00kYeah, that's what I used, but it was matching their current ident which was not banned15:56
h00ker, current hostmask rather.15:57
Priceyh00k: Oh so you did want to search for a historical ban that didn't match anymore...15:57
h00kPricey: correct, their hostmask changed, hence why they were in the channel15:57
h00kPricey: and someone reported they were banned, so I just wanted to resolve that current nick involving a ban15:58
h00kI'll check bansearch.pl out, looks useful15:58
Pici♥ bansearch.pl15:58
h00kyep.15:58
Priceyfwiw, I normally ignore "he's meant to be banned!!!" unless they're being a prat.15:59
h00kI usually do too, they were being 'okay' at that point, even though they were ban evading, but couldn't hurt to check15:59
h00kPricey: so, the bansearch will search for active/current bans on a person's CURRENT hostmask16:01
h00kis what I've determined, I think.16:01
Priceyh00k: yes16:01
h00kmakes sense.16:01
h00kthanks, Pricey.16:09
h00khelpful.16:09
bazhangfelishia's story is ever changing17:02
k1l*sigh*17:03
k1lroot@... and telling not using backtrack :/17:03
bazhangnext iteration is KFreebsd debian17:03
bazhangwith backtrack and mint repos17:04
k1lon a hacked pc in a polive station. or something like that17:05
k1l*police17:05
bazhangbacktrack irc channel does not allow root irc; oh the irony17:05
k1lthey know why17:05
bazhangschool library computer17:05
bazhanghe wants help breaking school policy on a non-supported distro17:06
DJonesI seem to remember removing them from #u in the end over the school computer issue a week or so back17:06
bazhangubottu, random HURD KFreeBSD17:07
ubottuHURD17:07
ubottubazhang: I am only a bot, please don't think I'm intelligent :)17:07
bazhangoy yeah!17:07
DJonesYep, BT id 5689617:08
DJonesAnd now Felishia is booting xubuntu 13.04, but a few minutes ago was on LUcid and couldn't get into grub to boot anything else, but they still want help with the same grub problem?17:19
k1li think its a live xubuntu now17:21
bazhangget a gui working on server?19:00
bazhangthat seems strange19:01
ikoniaI don't see a problem with a gui on a server,19:01
ikoniaI suspect he'd just be better installing the desktop edition19:01
bazhanghe messed up his install very badly19:01
ikoniaoh good.19:01
bazhangubuntu-desktop, already the newest version19:01
DJonesIs this the one that installed a LTS server because they wanted something that would be supported for 5 years rather than the 2-3 years of desktop19:03
DJonesHmmh, yes it is19:04
ikoniaoh dear, this is the support process failure19:04
bazhangcannot configure the server without a gui19:09
bazhanguh what19:09
ikoniahe's got a point, some applications require a gui19:09
ikoniahe just didn't work it well first time19:09
bazhanghe wants 5 years on a 3 year support?19:09
ikoniaI think he's confused how it works19:10
ikoniathat's all19:10
bazhangvery19:10
k1li think 90% of the reason why a gui is on a server is jdownloader :/19:12
ikoniayou see it quite common on Oracle machines as you need a good setup estate to do silent installs easy19:13
ikoniaso most people just use the gui19:13
ikoniaand outside reponse files/silent installs there is no other way19:13
ikoniaI'm going to have to back away now as I'm too close to just saying "shutup shutup shutup" to the well meaning people offering nonsense help and advice19:14

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!