/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2013/08/28/#ubuntu-release.txt

robert_ancellslangasek, it looks like the dependencies are built on version-1 of mir, which is the problem. I'll email didrocks and see if the autolander is malfunctioning on this00:01
slangasekrobert_ancell: ok.  AIUI didrocks is on vacation this week, so if this needs to go through now-ish and is otherwise ok, you might just want to do a no-change rebuild of unity-mir to saucy?00:03
robert_ancellslangasek, ah, ok00:03
robert_ancellthanks!00:03
Laneydo we have germinate output for touch builds?09:04
Laneydoes it even use germinate?09:05
infinityLaney: It uses metapackages (ubuntu-touch) instead of tasks right now.09:07
infinityThough, that should probably change.09:07
Laneyyeah I wanted it for the "why is this package in the image" part of the output09:07
Laneyoh well09:07
infinityLaney: So, the answer is "sort of".  It has a seed, and the meta source uses germinate, but we don't germinate its tasks and use them to build images.09:08
=== exekias_ is now known as exekias
xnoxThis cycle redhat-cluster got split into separate packages, and some portions dropped. One of the re-introduced packages from the split is dlm, which is needed to build clvm binary from lvm2 package.09:58
xnoxi have now uploaded lvm2 with build-dep on libdlm-dev, can dlm please be promoted back to main?09:59
xnoxbug 121313209:59
ubot2`Launchpad bug 1213132 in dlm (Ubuntu) "[MIR] dlm" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/121313209:59
xnoxbuild-dep https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lvm2/2.02.98-1ubuntu509:59
cjwatsondoko_: xnox done10:24
cjwatsonerr10:24
cjwatsonsorry doko_10:24
cjwatsonxnox: done10:24
cjwatsoncould somebody NEW-process packagekit-qt for me?  I was the sponsor10:25
Riddellinfinity, slangasek: I think we'd like to be part of all alphas/betas10:25
Riddellcjwatson: I'll take a look10:25
cjwatsonta10:26
jbichacan you let eclipse-cdt migrate to saucy? it's depwait on armhf because of eclipse10:36
cjwatsonthat amounts to a request to remove eclipse-cdt/armhf, I guess?10:37
jbichayes10:38
cjwatsonI'll get back to you once lillypilly gets back to me10:38
=== sergiuse1s is now known as sergiusens
* Laney calls for beta 1 participants11:41
Laneyjust noticed that the schedule has a freeze tomorrow and I signed up for this one11:41
ogra_didnt we just have an alpha ?11:42
Laneydepends how you define 'just', I suppose11:42
Laneyjuly 25th11:43
ogra_a blink of an eye ago :)11:43
ogra_geez, time flies if you play with phones11:43
Laneyyou might be getting confused with 12.04.311:43
ogra_nah ... but i was convinced the alpha was this month11:43
ogra_obviously not :)11:44
mlankhorstquick must get 9.2 in soo nthen :P11:50
Laneypheature phreeze11:51
mlankhorstcan llvm-3.3 be moved to main?11:56
mlankhorsthttps://launchpad.net/ubuntu/saucy/+source/mesa/9.2-1ubuntu112:48
ogra_does anyone have an idea whats up with alsa-lib in proposed ? http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html shows it as valid candidate .... and i cant find any blockers, but it still didnt come out12:48
ScottKogra_: Looking at http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_output.txt - it looks like it succeeded on the last run.12:50
ogra_ScottK, yeah, looks like it went in now12:51
ogra_i'm just to impatient :)12:51
=== doko_ is now known as doko
Mirvslangasek: can you join the Qt 5.1 session in one hour to comment on the regressions it has, like would it be better to have it with known regressions that developers and then kicked to fix or FFe when everything has been fixed?13:00
Mirvor not like regressions it itself has, but that it causes to other components13:00
ScottK5.1.1 is out, BTW.13:02
MirvScottK: yep, building in https://launchpad.net/~canonical-qt5-edgers/+archive/qt5-daily - it's essentially the same as ~20130820 snapshots but with one Mac OS related commit added13:05
ScottKDid you merge from Debian?13:06
ScottKIf we're going to get ahead of them again, we ought to pick up their packaging changes.13:06
MirvScottK: most 5.1.0 changes have been merged by me or mitya5713:08
ScottKOK.  Great.13:08
Mirvat least the important ones (qtbase, qtdeclarative)13:08
mlankhorstScottK:13:20
mlankhorstcan you move llvm-3.3 to main?13:20
ScottKIs there an approved MIR?13:20
mlankhorstScottK: it replaces llvm-3.2 as dep for mesa13:30
mlankhorstI think a mir for a version bump is a bit of overkill :)13:32
mlankhorsthttp://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2013/08/21/%23ubuntu-devel.txt from earlier conversaion about it13:33
ollihi there13:34
ollithostr_1, and I wanted to check with the release team to see if FFe https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1215980 and FFe https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/121539713:35
ubot2`Launchpad bug 1215980 in Ubuntu "[FFe] Freeze exception for converged indicators" [Undecided,New]13:35
ubot2`Launchpad bug 1215397 in Ubuntu "[FFe] Freeze exception for converged scope packages" [Undecided,New]13:35
roaksoaxhowdy! Is there someone who can take care of a package in the NEW queue? It is a soon to be dependency for MAAS: djorm-ext-pgarray13:39
ScottKmlankhorst: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/llvm-3.3 is curiously empty.13:40
cjwatsonI think he must mean llvm-toolchain-3.313:41
ScottKYes, that seems more likely.  Thanks.13:42
mlankhorstoops yeah that one :)13:42
ScottKmlankhorst: Did you upload mesa to build-dep on it yet?13:43
ScottKIf you didn't, it'll just fall right back to Universe.13:43
LaneyRiddell: can I bounce your mail to the list for the record, please?13:43
Laneyyou sent it just to me13:43
mlankhorstScottK: yes13:44
mlankhorstit's build-dep waiting13:44
ScottKOK.13:44
RiddellLaney: done13:45
Laneymerci13:45
ScottKmlankhorst: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/llvm-toolchain-3.3/+publishinghistory13:48
mlankhorstcheers13:48
ollijust noticed by question above was incomplete, so let's try again: are there any issues or missing information with FFe 1215980 and 1215397?13:59
olliby/my13:59
* olli gets coffee13:59
mlankhorstdo the archive builds auto retry?14:00
Laneyfrom dep wait they do14:00
mlankhorstah k, it should be good to go then :)14:00
Mirvanyone up to the Qt 5.1 session? https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/368836c93bc010c273ce53686164a50dd2e47904?authuser=0&hl=en14:01
ScottKMirv: What plugin do I need to install?14:03
ScottKNevermind.  Figured it out.14:04
slangasekMirv: I'm afraid I'm running video on the foundations track, can't easily join14:07
mlankhorsthm, looks like like llvm-3.3-dev depends on libjsoncpp0 too, yikes..15:21
mlankhorstalthough it seems that llvm-3.2 already required libjson, it was just not an external dependency15:31
mlankhorstan internal json copy was used instead15:34
mlankhorstit would be easy to use the internal copy again though, if it's preferred that libjson doesn't get to main15:40
xnoxmlankhorst: libjson? upstart is already using a json library. Or is it something else?16:02
Laneylibjsoncpp16:03
Laneyaccording to that binary package name anyway16:03
xnoxLaney: ah, so not the libjson-c2 / json-c. mlankhorst use json-c =))))16:04
mlankhorstxnox: I'd rather not rewrite support :P16:05
mlankhorstxnox: is it easy to change in llvm by just replacing deps?16:06
slangasekI imagine the API is different16:08
mlankhorstguess so :/16:09
mlankhorstcan I revert the change and use the included copy?16:10
slangasekmlankhorst: given that libjsoncpp is in the archive, we (or rather, the security team) would prefer to just support that package instead of having an embedded copy in llvm to support16:11
mlankhorstok16:11
ScottKSomeone even faster than me on bind9.19:58
cjwatsonI run new-binary-debian-universe pretty much out of my hindbrain20:00
cjwatsonConscious thought is occasionally involved but only if it looks weird ...20:00
xnoxPlease de-new upstart, we decided that the $world should not depend on dconf & glib, thus the tiny dconf bridge is in a separate binary package.20:57

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!