/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2013/08/29/#ubuntu-devel.txt

ESphynxCould this be turned on by default if running on nVidia hardware or something?00:08
RAOFMaybe.00:09
RAOFIt's probably a performance drain, though.00:09
ESphynxRAOF: I'd rather have my text editor working at 60 frames a second than being unusable at 120 frames / second00:13
RAOFYeah, but this doesn't apply to just your text editor :/00:14
ESphynxRAOF: It applies to all programs I run on this sytem.00:14
ESphynxi.e. on all systems using nVidia drivers, which is probably at least half of what I consider a usable machine00:15
ESphynxI'm all for a proper fix, but until then this ought to be enabled.00:15
=== bfiller is now known as bfiller_afk
=== sergiuse1s is now known as sergiusens
ESphynxafter the last dist-upgrade, I can't login with Gnome Flashback (No effects) anymore :S all black02:52
ESphynxor if installing ccsm could do that :S (Saucy)02:53
jbichaESphynx: I believe that's bug 121799102:54
ubottubug 1217991 in upstart (Ubuntu) "Regression: gnome-flashback* fails to init with latest upstart" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/121799102:54
ESphynxthanks jbicha...02:55
ESphynxand what I thought was a workaround isn't working half the time for my update bug02:55
ESphynxSo the only DE that actually was usable for me is now b0rked.02:58
jbichaESphynx: the bug description has an easy workaround but the bug will be fixed soon03:00
ESphynxjbicha: k. thanks. I really wish this Compiz bug was fixed though :S03:00
ESphynxthen I could try to figure out what's up with my other resizing/maximizing bug in Unity :P03:01
stgraberjbicha: the fix is wrong, those session names don't exist03:02
stgraberjbicha: so I'll need to actually figure out what's wrong with flashback running under upstart before I can get it fixed. I'll try to take a look tomorrow.03:03
ESphynxstgraber: The fix works for me.03:04
ESphynxrenaming the 2 to -flashback rather than -fallback03:04
stgraberESphynx: sure it does, it's just not a fix03:06
stgraberESphynx: renaming the entries is the exact same as removing them03:06
stgraberwhich means, disabling the feature03:06
stgraberwhat we want is for the feature to be enabled and working and for that upstart-xsession is perfectly correct, it's just something else down the line that's failing and needs debugging and fixing03:07
jbichastgraber: thanks03:07
ESphynxBut Gnome fallback is what seems to start for me?03:07
stgrabersure, just not under upstart03:08
ESphynxah ok03:08
stgraberjbicha: I know it used to work but I probably tested this before the whole flashback rename. It looks like something is confused by the names not being consistent, but it's not obvious what since it's not hardcoded in any of the places I'd have expected. Anyway, should take me a few minutes to figure out and fix once I reproduce the problem here (won't do that just now but will do it first thing tomorrow).03:09
ESphynxthanks stgraber03:11
Mirvmitya57: thanks! I agree quickcontrols is needed / very useful to have.03:34
superm1Laney: i just noticed that you had done a few uploads to mythtv without pushing the changes upstream or pull requests to the packaging branch so they just got clobbered in my upload, can you please forward the patch upstream and do pull requests if you'll be uploading in the future?03:44
smoseranyone know where files listed at the end of https://i148673231.restricted.launchpadlibrarian.net/148673231/asobibi-installer-log-2013.08.29.txt?token=a6a5ce59d6d6f063bd4bf36e1805942a come from ?04:04
smoser/usr/lib/finish-install.d/60cleanup04:04
smoser/usr/lib/finish-install.d/90base-installer04:04
smoser/usr/lib/finish-install.d/10open-iscsi04:04
infinitysmoser: base-installer and open-iscsi...04:09
infinitysmoser: And.. Not sure where 60cleanup comes from, off the top of my head.04:10
infinitysmoser: Oh, finish-install, oddly enough. :P04:11
smoseryeah. that was funny. i realized that too04:12
smoserthanks infinity . kind of hoped no one would see my question. with the answer so clearly there :)04:12
pittiGood morning04:35
pittityhicks: thanks for fixing the d-bus stderr issue!04:35
=== Dr_Who is now known as tgall_foo
tyhickspitti: no problem! :)04:35
pittiand bluez et al are happy04:36
sarnold\o/04:40
FourDollarsThere is no Patch Pilot now. :(06:14
infinitytvoss: Yo, WTF mate.06:57
tvossinfinity, ?06:57
infinitytvoss: Why is location-service pulling in some ruby doc generation business?06:57
tvossinfinity, we can get rid of that :)06:57
tvossinfinity, want me to do that?06:57
infinitytvoss: That seems like an odd choice for a Canonical project. :P06:57
tvossinfinity, heritage, will fix it. hang on06:57
infinitytvoss: If you can make with the getting rid of somehow, sure.06:57
infinitytvoss: Beats doing MIRs for a few dozen ruby gems.06:58
tvossinfinity, indeed ;) sorry for the confusion06:58
Laneysuperm1: I certainly did forward the logind patch08:01
Laneymight have missed the packaging branch though, sorry08:01
debfxWhoopie: I've uploaded a new virtualbox package with your vnc extension patch08:07
=== Nitrodex is now known as Guest92121
=== smb` is now known as smb
xnoxFourDollars: sup? need sponsoring? =)09:14
FourDollarsxnox: Yes. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pristine-tar/+bug/121819709:16
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1218197 in pristine-tar (Ubuntu) "pristine-tar: command failed when using git-buildpackage on the xz tarball." [Undecided,In progress]09:16
ESphynxxnox: can we get 0.44.09 in next week since it's mostly a bugfix release? ;) I'm going to require some sleep at some point :(09:17
ESphynxxnox: The big thing about this release is fixing real annoyances/usability issues with Ubuntu & Mint's DEs :P09:18
asacogra_: what happened to the builds? floodgating worked it seems :)09:18
xnoxFourDollars: you do want to subscribe "~ubuntu-sponsors"  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SponsorshipProcess such that it gets on the list to sponsor: http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/sponsoring/09:18
asacogra_: err... moving to touch09:18
FourDollarsxnox: I see. Thank you.09:19
xnoxFourDollars: alternative to subscribing, you can do merge proposal. But you based on upstream branch, instead of lp:ubuntu/pristine-tar =/ so will not work.09:21
xnoxFourDollars: and you are after an SRU?09:21
FourDollarsxnox: I based on lp:ubuntu/precise/pristine-tar/ .09:23
xnoxFourDollars: oh, ok. You did push branch to upstream project, $ bzr push lp:~/ubuntu/precise/pristine-tar/fix-lp-bug  is better & then one can click to create merge proposal against lp:ubuntu/precise/pristine-tar09:24
FourDollarsxnox: Like lp:~fourdollars/ubuntu/precise/pristine-tar/fix-lp-bug-1218197 ?09:25
xnoxFourDollars: yeap =)09:26
FourDollarsxnox: OK.09:26
tvossinfinity, https://code.launchpad.net/~thomas-voss/location-service/remove-dep-on-ruby-ronn/+merge/18284409:26
FourDollarsxnox: done.09:26
infinitytvoss: Looks reasonable to me.09:27
tvossinfinity, let's wait for ci to kick in and then top-approve09:27
xnoxFourDollars: it looks like you didn't use "debcommit", or manually specify on $ bzr commit --fixes lp:NNNNNNN, thus the branch didn't get automatically linked to the bug report. Linked the new branch in.09:29
xnoxFourDollars: ... and created merge proposal.09:29
FourDollarsxnox: I do use "debcommit". @_@a09:30
xnoxhm, strange.09:30
FourDollarsxnox: It takes some time to sync. :)09:30
FourDollarsxnox: Refresh the page now. You should see it.09:30
xnoxmaybe ;-)09:30
xnoxbut i did manually add bug report # on the page.09:31
FourDollarsxnox: OK. Thank you for the guiding.09:32
tvossinfinity, jenkins is happy09:56
tvossinfinity, https://code.launchpad.net/~thomas-voss/location-service/remove-dep-on-ruby-ronn/+merge/18284409:56
infinitytvoss: Do you need an explicit ACK from me there, or are you good to go?10:00
infinityOh, I guess I'm not in a team that was asked for a review anyway. :P10:00
tvossinfinity, hang on :)10:01
tvosssil2100, Mirv lp:~thomas-voss/location-service/remove-dep-on-ruby-ronn10:01
sil2100tvoss: looking10:02
Mirvthanks10:05
tvossinfinity, the fix is top-approved10:24
infinitytvoss: I'm going to nod and pretend I know what that means, and assume it means "it'll be in the distro soon".10:25
thotzQuestion: Is it possible to add GIMP 2.8.6 to saucy. Could someone do that? It really would fix severial bugs see #120773410:25
tvossinfinity, yup, that's all you need to know10:25
thotzhttps://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gimp/+bug/120773410:25
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1207734 in gimp (Ubuntu) "Update GIMP to version 2.8.6" [Wishlist,Triaged]10:25
seb128thotz, I can have a look10:26
infinitythotz: You might want to poke jbicha when he's online, should be a trivial merge.10:26
infinity... or seb128 can do it. :)10:26
seb128infinity, hey10:26
seb128infinity, can you review youker-assistant in saucy NEW for me?10:26
seb128infinity, I fixed some copyright issues/sponsored it for the UbuntuKylin guys, but since I did the upload I would prefer for another archive admin to review10:27
thotzthank you10:27
seb128infinity, they are eager to see it in apparently, it has been taking a while because of review feedback/things to fix10:27
infinityseb128: I'm running off to bed to attempt a nap, but if you don't find another victim, I can do it tomorrow.10:27
seb128infinity, thanks10:27
thotzshould i contact jeremy?10:28
seb128infinity, have a good nap/night ;-)10:28
seb128thotz, no, I'm doing the gimp update10:28
thotzseb128: Thank you very much. I don't know if you have seen, I try go through the GIMP bugs.10:30
seb128thotz, thanks for helping there!10:30
thotzseb128, If I have some time I'm also trying to build development version from git, but I have no packaging experience. I have built yesterday GIMP 2.9 from GIMP... really promising :)10:33
thotzseb128, thank you too!10:35
zygahi10:43
zygacurrent daily ubiquity installer seems broken, at least two things that I can see are affected: networking configs don't work (policykit rejects control attempts) and the top panel is sized incorrectly, being approximately 10x larger10:44
xnoxzyga: both of which are filed bugs on ubiquity. The top panel is caused/assigned by/to larsu. The other one, missing proper logind integration10:45
xnoxzyga: but maybe policykit policy also need changing.10:45
rbasakIs there a magic way to do a no change rebuild for a package that has no Ubuntu delta? Or do I need to do it manually, and then make sure to resync tha package manually again at some future date?10:46
cjwatsondch -R10:46
cjwatsonThat'll append build1 which doesn't inhibit autosyncs10:46
=== Sweetsha1k is now known as Sweetshark
rbasakAh, so the version number is special? I understand now. Thanks!10:47
cjwatsonYes.  The thing that inhibits autosync is the presence of the "ubuntu" substring in the version.10:47
zygaxnox: cool, so I won't go hunting or reporting them, thanks10:48
ekarlso-do I need to have my secret key on the machine I use for signing packages ?10:50
cjwatsonYes.10:50
cjwatsonIf you like, you can do the signing on a machine other than the one where you build the package, using either "debsign -r" or "debrsign" depending on the direction (see their manual pages).10:51
rbasakI use debsign -r to avoid this. But I must trust the machine I'm using, since I guess it could trojan some other thing to sign.10:51
=== gusch is now known as gusch|lunch
asacogra_: i think a script to show diffs on the packages file for two builds would be nice :)11:16
asac-> move touch11:16
nemo"You are running the upgrade over a remote ssh connection with a frontend that does not support this. Please try a text mode upgrade with 'do-release-upgrade'.11:16
nemo"11:16
nemouh... since when?11:16
nemossh -Y headless-server  sudo update-manager, click yes on partial upgrade11:17
nemofirst time I've ever seen that. someone change something?11:17
zyga"Warning: fake initctl called, doing nothing", after saucy install, does anyone know what that is?11:19
nemo"ERROR:root:upgrade over ssh not alllowed" grrrr why :(11:19
* nemo greps11:19
nemobesides the typo11:20
cjwatsonzyga: A broken install11:22
cjwatsonzyga: If the installer finished properly it would have put the real initctl back11:22
zygaah11:22
zygayeah, the installer got stuck later and I just rebooted11:22
nemo# check if the frontend supports ssh upgrades (see lp: #322482)11:24
nemohm11:24
ubottuLaunchpad bug 322482 in update-manager (Ubuntu Jaunty) "distribution upgrade via update-manager fails over remote GDM" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/32248211:24
nemooh. yeesh.11:25
nemothat should just be a warning11:25
nemoI can bloody well make my own decision on this based on the stuff being upgraded11:25
nemoobv something that is going to screw w/ network will mess me up...11:25
* nemo sighs and edits DistUpgradeController.py11:26
nemoI mean, seriously, for me to do this from a console would require a ridiculous amount of work11:26
wgrantxnox: You can't import a non-branch head using the ,branch= syntax.11:27
nemothe weird thing is it recommended I use curses UI, when as far as I can tell, the bug could possibly mess you up there too11:27
wgrantxnox: It has to be under refs/heads11:27
xnoxwgrant: ack.11:27
nemobut, yeah, setting aside disagreeing w/ solution, logging.error("upgrade over ssh not alllowed")  has a typo in "allowed"11:29
Mirvany core-dev up for sponsoring? https://code.launchpad.net/~timo-jyrinki/ubuntu/saucy/qtpim-opensource-src/new_snapshot/+merge/182874 - built & tested11:32
xnoxwgrant: sucks to be me =(11:32
wgrantxnox: Indeed :(11:33
cjwatsonDistUpgradeViewText is in View.SupportSSH, so the curses UI ought to bypass this check11:34
cjwatsonI think you can change it in DistUpgrade.cfg though11:35
cjwatsonFixed the typo in lp:ubuntu-release-upgrader11:36
wgrant,branch=refs/dgit/sid works.11:38
wgrantxnox: Does that look right?11:42
xnoxwgrant: nope. it imported HEAD.11:43
xnoxwgrant: 191 should be the last commit on https://code.launchpad.net/~xnox/dgit/sid11:44
wgrantOh, I am stupid.11:46
=== oSoMoN_ is now known as oSoMoN
nemocjwatson: yeah, I didn't want to use the curses UI, and given the launchpad issue, I don't see why the curses UI would help11:48
nemocjwatson: looks like any remote connection would hit probs if eth0 was killed :)11:48
nemocjwatson: setting that line to if false worked fine tho ;)11:49
nemowould have preferred it had been a warning11:49
wgrantxnox: The slashes need to be escaped as %2F, but somehow refs%2F causes the branch name to appear to be None. Investigated.11:52
wgrants/ed/ing/11:55
wgrantxnox: A patch to make it work is trivial, but I need to think a bit about the implications12:01
xnoxok.12:01
nemoso. there's this script that was causing a rather misleading motd... /usr/lib/update-notifier/update-motd-fsck-at-reboot12:04
nemoreason it is misleading is it appears that if the last check was <1h ago, it won't even check the filesystem values12:05
nemoso I rebooted several times, thinking there was an issue12:05
nemoyou'd think the script could also check uptime?12:05
nemojrib: oh. and hi. I see you're here too :)12:06
jribnemo: heh12:07
jribnemo: I'd urge you to debug and file a bug ;)12:07
nemowell, I'd say the clear prob is if [ $(($stampt + 3600)) -lt $now ] || [ $stampt -gt $now ]; then12:08
nemowhere stampt is stat -c %Y of the scary message12:08
nemojrib: admittedly I don't know of a "nice" way to get the boot time...12:14
nemoapart from12:14
nemodate +%s -d "$(last | head -n 1 | awk '{print $5,$6,$7,$8}')"12:14
nemowhich I just stitched together and seems pretty ugly12:14
nemoyou'd thing it would be in sysctl or something...12:14
nemoI have no idea if that is even a locale specific format :-/12:14
nemo(the date string)12:15
nemobut anyway, assuming oh,  boott=$(date +%s -d "$(last | head -n 1 | awk '{print $5,$6,$7,$8}')")12:15
nemothen they should recheck if $boott gt $stamptt12:16
nemoah well. whatev12:16
nemohm. that's not even a nice use of last12:17
nemoI need a grep for reboot in there, and a skip of generation if it isn't.12:17
nemosomething in sysctl would definitely be nicer. or maybe if ubuntu just wrote boot time to a file that its own script could check :)12:17
=== _salem is now known as salem_
seb128mardy, hey, do you have an idea when you are going to have time for that shotwell patch update (asking because FF is today), do you want a bug report to track it?12:27
=== gusch|lunch is now known as gusch
=== Dr_Who is now known as tgall_foo
pkernSo there's a patches.xml file on patches.ubuntu.com, but it redirects to people.ubntu.com/patches/.13:18
pkernAlso: Are there patch files for Ubuntu releases as well?13:19
cjwatsonThat's ... huh13:19
cjwatsonIt's a permanent redirect from /patches which is apparently misfiring13:20
cjwatsonI think I'll just comment it out, it's amazingly stale13:20
superm1Laney: hmm, I wonder why upstream missed it then.  Do you remember where you forwarded it?  I just filed a new bug with it (http://code.mythtv.org/trac/ticket/11794) that they set the milestone to before 0.27 releases, so we'll pull it back in the next upload13:37
Laneysuperm1: maybe a github project13:38
cjwatsonpkern: The broken redirect is fixed now, thanks13:38
cjwatsonNot sure about your other question13:38
cjwatsonIf you mean per-release patches, we normally only run merge-o-matic against the latest development series, so no13:38
superm1Laney: oh yeah i see it now.  They don't track pull requests as much as they should and prefer bugs for tracking stuff like that.  Thanks.13:39
=== iahmad is now known as iahmad|afk
=== kentb-out is now known as kentb
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha
dobeyinfinity: just dput ubuntuone-credentials 13.08-0ubuntu1. we'll see if it makes it to NEW14:05
dobeyinfinity: email i got said it's in new for saucy-proposed14:25
seb128cjwatson, slangasek: is somebody from foundation leading https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/client-s-32v64-bit ? (it ended up in the client track but you guys probably have more background/opinions on the topic than us)14:50
seb128(that's in 15 minutes in client2)14:50
cjwatsonI have to be in a different session, sorry14:50
seb128xnox, stgraber: ^?14:51
xnoxseb128: i don't have any rights to start hangout.14:51
slangasekseb128: I can be there if I can get someone else to run the camera for the foundations session14:51
seb128xnox, the track hosts start the hangouts (e.g me for that one)14:51
slangasekseb128: do you want to trade tracks for next hour? :)14:52
seb128xnox, but I don't know enough about the topic to lead the session...14:52
seb128slangasek, I can host yours, sure14:52
slangasekok, cool14:52
seb128slangasek, so I'm hosting the checkbox one and you take on the 32v64 bit, right?14:53
slangasekseb128: exactly14:53
slangasekthanks :)14:53
seb128slangasek, excellent, thank you!14:53
=== freeflying is now known as freeflying_away
=== doko_ is now known as doko
stgraberdpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/unity-webapps-common_2.4.16+13.10.20130829.2-0ubuntu1_all.deb (--unpack):16:10
stgraber trying to overwrite '/usr/share/icons/hicolor/128x128/apps/ubuntuone-music.png', which is also in package unity-asset-pool 0.8.24daily13.06.10-0ubuntu116:10
stgraberit's one of those auto-landed packages so I have no idea who to nag/blame about this...16:12
ChrisTownsendstgraber: Here's a start: https://code.launchpad.net/~abreu-alexandre/webapps-applications/add-default-apps/+merge/18264616:12
stgraberright, unfortunately robru doesn't appear to be around16:13
=== jtechidna is now known as JontheEchidna
=== bfiller is now known as bfiller_afk
pkerncjwatson: Well, I solved my problem (where is file X used) by using Debian's codesearch, downloading all Ubuntu patches and grepping. ;)17:35
cjwatsonHeh17:36
xnoxpkern: jdstrand can run greps on full ubuntu unpacked trees. they do take some time though.17:57
jdstrandI'm not sure that should be advertised as a public resource :P17:58
xnox=)))))17:58
jdstrandit's all very manual-- I don't mind doing it as a favor, but it isn't something can just do. codesearch for Ubuntu would be nice17:59
jdstrands/can just do/I can just do all the time/17:59
xnoxjdstrand: Laney has a codesearch instance running in canonistack =) not sure how fully operational it is.17:59
jdstrandoh, that would be nice to poke at18:00
sarnoldoh man, that'd be nice. I love debian's codesearch18:01
cyphermox@pilot in18:09
=== udevbot changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Ubuntu 13.04 released | Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support or app devel) | build failures -> http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of lucid -> raring | #ubuntu-app-devel for app development on Ubuntu http://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment | See #ubuntu-bugs for http://bit.ly/lv8soi | Patch Pilots: cyphermox
sarnoldseb128: retracers seem dead again -- any chance of asking IS to monitor the cranky things to auto-restart when they wedge? :)18:21
* dholbach hugs cyphermox18:26
cyphermoxdholbach: hey, just trying to read the list is painful, so many pings about other stuff :)18:26
dholbachI know18:26
dholbachI did quite some sponsoring in the last days to get stuff in before feature freeze18:27
dholbachbut during UDS it's a bit crazy admittedly18:27
dholbachI'll do the rest of my session tomorrow18:27
pkernxnox: Before I do that I set up a private instance of codesearch. -_-18:30
pkernjdstrand: How large is it?18:33
jdstrandpkern: I don't have a private instance of codesearch. I use debmirror to mirror all of lucid-saucy for amd64 and i38618:36
pkernjdstrand: I mean the unpacked tree.18:36
jdstrandpkern: I use scripts to unpack on the fly and then delete after the package is searched18:37
jdstrandpkern: so I don't unpack all the sources18:37
jdstrand(at the same time)18:38
seb128sarnold, talk to slangasek, he sort of suggested he was wanting to help keeping those running ;-)18:38
slangasekhnngh18:39
slangasekand no email notification of it hanging, eh18:39
sarnoldslangasek: hello :) about those retracers...18:39
slangasekseb128: I also always forget what machine it's running on, remind me?18:39
seb128slangasek, porter-i386.c.c18:39
seb128I removed the lock18:39
seb128but I think it's hitting a bug it doesn't like18:40
seb128bug #121690118:40
ubottubug 1216901 in linkchecker (Ubuntu) "linkchecker-gui crashes on startup" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/121690118:40
slangasekok18:40
seb128the bt isn't very useful though :/18:40
seb128slangasek, do you want to have a look to the issue or should I just untag the bug so the retracer doesn't keep banging on it?18:41
seb128well, I guess we can untag & have a look as well18:41
slangasekseb128: I won't have time to look at it very quickly, so please untag it for now anyway18:41
bdmurraybarry: the tracebacks in https://errors.ubuntu.com/problem/15bc0ab1791f275923e1d66575637a22e2b24b7d look suspcious to me - as in I wonder about the systems18:41
seb128doing18:41
=== bfiller_afk is now known as bfiller
barrybdmurray: that looks very suspicious.  it looks typical for a 3rd party extension module not checking a set exception somewhere18:49
stgraberbarry, lool: should we schedule an hangout for after the closing plenary?19:02
=== slomo_ is now known as slomo
barrystgraber: i'm available19:03
loolstgraber: ok19:10
ekarlso-"Source/binary (i.e. mixed) uploads are not allowed." how can I get dput to only select the source ?!19:14
shadeslayerekarlso-: just run debuild -S -sa on the source19:15
shadeslayeror -sd if you just want to upload a package which already has the tar on launchpad19:16
cjwatson-sd is basically never necessary19:16
cjwatsonbut yeah, -S is the key bit19:16
shadeslayercjwatson: oh, so -sa uploads the tar but launchpad is clever enough to not make a copy?19:17
cjwatsonyou can upload a duplicate orig.tar as long as it's identical19:17
ekarlso-I used the dpkg-buildpackage binary19:17
cjwatsonI usually use debuild -S and only use -sa if needed19:17
ekarlso-is that the same thing19:18
shadeslayercjwatson: aha I see19:18
cjwatsonekarlso-: Launchpad doesn't accept binary uploads, they have to be source-only.  No it isn't the same19:18
cjwatsonYou can use dpkg-buildpackage -S, though debuild -S is usually easier19:18
cjwatson(it's a slightly smarter wrapper)19:18
ekarlso-how can I have it not try to sign it ?19:18
cjwatson-uc -us19:18
cjwatsonor just ignore the signing failures19:18
cjwatsonyou still have to sign it before uploading to LP of course19:19
shadeslayer^^19:19
ekarlso-debuild -S -uc -us the ?19:19
cjwatsonyeah19:19
ekarlso-what's Standards-Version ?19:19
ekarlso-my build fails on that now :p19:20
cjwatsonsee the Debian policy manual19:20
cjwatsonhttp://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/19:20
cjwatsonspecifically http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html#s-f-Standards-Version19:20
cjwatsonand http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#s-standardsversion19:20
cjwatson(the latter's a better reference, sorry)19:20
ekarlso-should it fail on 3.9.3 ?19:21
cjwatson3.9.3 is fine19:22
ekarlso-mine fails telling me it is outdated..19:23
cjwatsonthat's not a failure19:23
cjwatsonit's quite important to distinguish errors from warnings or informational messages ...19:23
cjwatsonthe current version is 3.9.4 but you should check the policy manual's upgrading checklist before blindly changing the number19:23
cjwatsonthe point is to remind people to check changes in policy19:24
ekarlso-cjwatson: how come ? ;)19:24
cjwatsonbecause that's the point of standards-version - it's the latest version of the policy manual you've checked your package against19:24
cjwatsonit isn't supposed to be a paperwork exercise in updating the number :)19:24
cjwatsonif it's a little out of date, so be it, it's not a failure19:25
stgraberlool, barry: I'll invite the two of you to an hangout in the next 5min19:58
loolstgraber: ok19:58
=== Zic is now known as Guest41094
barrysounds good20:02
dobeykenvandine: so where's the rum?20:08
kenvandinedobey, i could use some :)20:22
dobeyheh20:23
dobeyunfortunately i don't have any soda or ice20:24
dobeyand a little too early, and air too dry inside, to drink it straight20:25
=== Zic is now known as Guest54718
=== salem_ is now known as _salem
=== freeflying_away is now known as freeflying
ekarlso-https://launchpadlibrarian.net/148814928/buildlog_ubuntu-precise-i386.cyassl_2.7.0-1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz < anyone help me on why that is failing ?22:03
ekarlso-it works when building locally22:03
sarnoldekarlso-: that looks like building an i386 binary on an amd64 host -- have you tried reproducing an i386 build on an amd64 host locally?22:09
=== marrusl is now known as marrusl_afk
=== marrusl_afk is now known as marrusl
ekarlso-sarnold: I the package should only be amd64...22:24
sarnoldekarlso-: aha. you may need to specify that in the control file..22:30
ekarlso-sarnold: how ?22:32
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk
YokoZarslangasek: I uploaded all the relevant wine bits today :)23:14
slangasekYokoZar: hurrah23:17
YokoZarI couldn't find the wiki page about deleting packages, but I presume it's just "file bug, subscribe ubuntu-archive"23:17
sarnoldekarlso-: I believe the keyword is 'amd64', in this field: http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html#s-f-Architecture23:18
slangasekYokoZar: yes23:19
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!