[04:46] <micahg> hrm, are we going another release without libav9...
[06:15] <FourDollars> Who could review my fix at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pristine-tar/+bug/1101939 ?
[06:24] <FourDollars> woops, I should open another bug report.
[07:20] <freeflying> hi there, intended to upload a package, was rejected, seems my dev membership expired again without any notice
[11:50] <siretart> micahg: :-(
[11:51] <siretart> micahg: maybe we can go for libav10 in saucy+1 then
[11:51] <Laney> We /could/ still try for it now
[11:52] <Laney> but I checked out the state of the transition in Debian and it doesn't look so far along
[11:52] <Laney> so I'm not sure that's a wise idea at this point
[11:56] <siretart> Laney: maybe we could stage it in https://launchpad.net/~motumedia/+archive/libav9-saucy - I've tried that already for raring here: https://launchpad.net/~motumedia/+archive/libav9-raring
[11:56] <Laney> siretart: I think what's needed is people coming up with patches
[11:57] <siretart> indeed
[11:57] <Laney> I guess most of the Debian analysis will apply here too
[16:39] <ockham> could anyone pls upload gourmet 0.16.1 to saucy before FF?
[16:40] <ockham> packing is in ubuntu branch of github.com/thinkle/gourmet
[16:40] <ockham> *packaging
[16:41] <ockham> FF's at 8 pm UTC?
[16:44] <ockham> anyone? typing ftom my cell phone, battery almost empty
[16:46] <jtaylor> ockham: you can get a easy ffe for a while after ffe
[16:46] <jtaylor> 0.16.1 looks like bugfix?
[16:46] <jtaylor> that can also be done without one
[16:49] <jtaylor> hm I wonder if he still got that reply :/
[17:20] <ockham> i'm back. anyone willing to sponsor gourmet for me?
[17:21] <jtaylor> ockham: your upstream?, updating CHANGES would be nice
[17:22] <ockham> yeah. forgot about that this time. sorry, kinda embarrassing.
[17:23] <jtaylor> it would be good if it could be resynchronized with debian
[17:23] <jtaylor> seems the debian maintainer is responsive
[17:24] <ockham> i know. i've been trying to get the debian maintainer to adopt at least some of my changes
[17:24] <ockham> but he's kinda stubborn
[17:25] <ockham> see my related debian bug reports, past and present
[17:25] <jtaylor> k, so what changed in 16.1?
[17:26] <ockham> i've summed them up in the release notes at github
[17:27] <ockham> damn, leaving this wifi area soon. FF at 8 pm utc? can i talk to you later?
[17:27] <jtaylor> ockham: looks like bugfix only?
[17:27] <asomething> ockham, if you file a bug and subscribe ubuntu-sponsors, that will get it on the radar. since it looks like a bug fix release, it will still be ok after FF
[17:27] <jtaylor> those can be added after the ff
[17:28] <jtaylor> tumbleweed: you sponsored it last, want dibs?
[17:28] <ockham> okay. good to hear.
[17:28] <ockham> i contacted tumbleweed yesterday, but no reply yet
[17:28] <jtaylor> also new features can be added after ff if they have a good reason, the reason must be better the later it is
[17:28] <ockham> ok
[17:29] <ockham> thought i had to hurry, but in this case...
[17:31] <ockham> ok, thx everybody & bye for now.
[20:48] <tumbleweed> jtaylor: you're welcome to take it. I'm rather snowed under right now
[20:54] <Noskcaj> Are there any packages that have to et merged before the freeze? I've got nothing to do for the next hour
[21:41] <jtaylor> wtf its uds again?
[21:41] <jtaylor> second one I missed because I didn't even know its happening
[21:49] <Noskcaj> cjwatson, Do you mind if i attempt to merge debhelper?
[21:56] <TheLordOfTime> how can i force `debuild -S` to use a specific gpg key?  It says that it can't find a gpg privkey however there *is* one on the system.  I cant access my normal devscripts file but i would like to make the key be specified persistently so i don't have to provide it all the time.
[21:59] <jtaylor> thoe requirements seem mutually exclusive
[22:00] <jtaylor> an alias would work assuming you can modify your bashrc
[22:01] <jtaylor> but I wouldn'T see how you can do that but not the devscripts
[22:04] <TheLordOfTime> jtaylor, let me rephrase that.
[22:04] <TheLordOfTime> what do i need to put into devscripts to make it work?
[22:04] <TheLordOfTime> because on THIS system i don't have a devscripts file yet
[22:04] <TheLordOfTime> in my normal build system i do
[22:04] <jtaylor> DEBSIGN_KEYID=
[22:04] <TheLordOfTime> (but that system's not accessible so i need the format of what to enter)
[22:05] <TheLordOfTime> jtaylor, that worked, thanks
[22:07] <Noskcaj> cjwatson, I've merged debhelper at https://code.launchpad.net/~noskcaj/ubuntu/saucy/debhelper/saucy/+merge/183042 . Can you take a look?
[22:07] <Noskcaj> I'll be online but away, so if you need to contact me, please email me
[22:42] <cjwatson> Noskcaj: I don't think it's appropriate to merge debhelper at this point in the release cycle
[22:43] <cjwatson> At all
[22:43] <cjwatson> In general after Debian import freeze I don't think people should be focusing on merges - but debhelper in particular should be left alone unless there's a clear reason to merge it