[00:14] <xnox> stgraber: feature freeze.
[00:17] <xnox> as in I thought the blocks are in because of feature freeze, but i am probably wrong. do we do blocks, or force everything to go into unapproved?
[00:19] <cjwatson> we don't block for feature freeze, nor unapproved.
[00:19] <cjwatson> the blocks are for beta freeze.
[00:22] <xnox> ok. i must be confused then.
[05:06] <darkxst> Can we get upgrade test-cases added for Ubuntu GNOME on isotracker?
[05:11] <darkxst> balloons, ^
[05:12] <jbicha> darkxst: I think I found a button to do that in the iso.qa admin
[05:12] <jbicha> http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/admin/config/services/qatracker/products
[05:15] <darkxst> jbicha, button clicked! no idea where the testcase went though, I can't see it!
[05:16] <jbicha> it was added to http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/270/builds/52446/testcases
[05:17] <darkxst> jbicha, no, I did it on amd64]
[05:17] <darkxst> oh but it got added to both i386+amd64
[05:20] <jbicha> I did the other one to test the button
[05:23] <darkxst> ah!
[22:43] <tumbleweed> why do we have http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/germinate-output/ubuntu-gnome.saucy.new/ ? (and relatedly why is ubuntu-gnome.saucy broken)
[23:40] <stgraber> queuebot (and my IRC session) is going offline for a couple of hours