[01:18] <cjwatson> ekarlso-: Which builder was that on?
[01:19] <cjwatson> ekarlso-: (In general, quoting the .../+build/... URL is more helpful than quoting the build log, since that tells us which builder has a problem)
[01:28] <cjwatson> ekarlso-: It looks as though you've already retried it, but there'll be a Builder: line in the failure mail you got.
[01:30] <cjwatson> ekarlso-,tsimpson: Regarding the number of build slaves, there is a plan in progress to move them to a private cloud.  In the meantime, some of the problems are due to failing builders for various reasons, which then require manual intervention to fix (hard to come by at the weekend); I'm currently trying to get https://code.launchpad.net/~cjwatson/launchpad/failure-count-reset/+merge/183320 landed which should help.
[01:32] <cjwatson> And then of course there's all the big packages that people think are appropriate to build frequently from recipes for multiple series ...
[01:35] <tsimpson> cjwatson: how ironic is it that I got a timeout with that link
[01:36] <cjwatson> tsimpson: Not very, since appserver timeouts are entirely unrelated to build farm load :)
[01:37] <cjwatson> It worked again after a try or two
[01:37] <tsimpson> yeah, I think the LP infrastructure needs some love
[01:38] <cjwatson> ...
[01:38] <tsimpson> it seems to be falling over more and more often
[01:39] <cjwatson> From my POV it's been improving
[01:39] <cjwatson> There's been maintenance work on the librarian SAN today so it's possible that there are issues left over from that
[01:40] <tsimpson> well I'm (probably nostalgically) comparing from way back when it was all new and shiny
[01:40] <cjwatson> I think you're experiencing rose-tinted hindsight.  It's much more useful now than it was then
[01:41] <tsimpson> oh more useful, certainly
[01:41] <cjwatson> The occasional timeout is annoying but nearly all the timeouts I see nowadays are solved by a reload
[01:41] <cjwatson> There are many fewer cases nowadays where it just plain doesn't work
[10:54] <ari-tczew> have we libav9 transition this cicle?
[11:07] <ekarlso-> https://launchpadlibrarian.net/149070511/buildlog_ubuntu-precise-amd64.gearmand_1.1.9~20130802-2_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz < anyone help me whi this is failing ?
[11:29] <Peace-> hi i was trying to create a hotspot but ... wlan0: AP mode support not included in the build
[11:29] <Peace-> this is the stuff 07:00.0 Network controller: Atheros Communications Inc. AR9485 Wireless Network Adapter (rev 01)
[11:36] <mitya57_> ekarlso-: conftest.c:58:29: fatal error: hiredis/hiredis.h: No such file or directory ← missing BD or -I flag?
[11:41] <cjwatson> no, this is the actual fatal error
[11:41] <cjwatson> configure: error: could not find gperf
[11:41] <cjwatson> this is a rare case where you're better off reading the log from the top
[11:42] <cjwatson> so that looks like missing Build-Depends: gperf
[11:42] <cjwatson> (it's possible that the missing hiredis/hiredis.h is a problem too - it's just not the one that caused it to error out)
[12:30] <ice9> Only apps written by the Ubuntu SDK will run on both Mobile and PC?
[12:35] <smartboyhw> ice9, yes
[12:36] <smartboyhw> Well, at least accepted by the store
[12:37] <ice9> smartboyhw, when Ubuntu mobile OS is release, how all the current apps will be converted to Ubuntu SDK, that's ton of work for all developers
[12:37] <ice9> Or we will see another alternatives for the current apps
[12:37] <smartboyhw> ice9, well, the applications that are in the Ubuntu Software Store currently might not be in mobile
[12:38] <smartboyhw> Some of them really can't be ported
[16:18] <ldsh> Hello, is it done on purpose that it is not possible to screenshot drop-down menu ?
[18:44] <micahg> ari-tczew: re libav9, not looking like it
[18:45] <ari-tczew> micahg: ok