[02:51] wgrant: is there a reason why 2 i386 and 2 amd64 buildds don't appear to be picking up builds? [03:03] micahg: They do that sometimes. [03:04] Only wani10 looks abnormally broken, though. [03:05] wgrant: was referring to the archive buildds actually [03:05] micahg: Oh, that's the 80% rule [03:05] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libsigrokdecode/0.2.0-2 [03:05] A single PPA cannot consume more than 80% of the available buildds for an architecture. [03:06] I know that too :0 [03:06] Oh, there are primary archive builds pending? [03:06] yes [03:07] No idea, will investigate later. [03:07] thanks === tasdomas_afk is now known as tasdomas === stub` is now known as stub === smartboyhw_ is now known as smartboyhw === jamesh_ is now known as jamesh === mpt_ is now known as mpt [10:44] Hi all... There is some know issue about mail report? Today I have no mail with new bugs from my subscription... [11:24] WebbyIT: Bug subscriptions are working fine at the moment. What's your Launchpad username, and do you have an example of a bug that you think you're missing an email from? [12:16] hi wgrant, sorry for the delay. My LP on launchpad is rpadovani, [12:17] For example I have not mail about bug #1219704 and #1219718 [12:17] bug 1219704 in Ubuntu Calculator App "Clear and all clear buttons should set the current calculation to 0" [Low,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1219704 [12:17] bug 1219718 in Ubuntu Calculator App "[Calculator app] Top label underline is too long" [Low,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1219718 [12:17] And also for this MR: https://code.launchpad.net/~smartboyhw/ubuntu-calculator-app/fix-lp-1219718 [12:19] Well, last mail from Launchpad that I receveid was sent on 31 of August [12:20] Since saturday I don't recevine any mai [12:20] *mail [12:26] Hey! I am having issues with my registered public key! I am trying to get the source package of secure-delete but I am unable to connect to it! http://pastebin.com/X6GLHTgd [12:26] Could sombody help me out? [12:28] Ritu: Please pastebin the output of "ssh -vvv bazaar.launchpad.net" [12:29] Ritu: And the output of "bzr lp-login" [12:30] http://pastebin.com/S5rBGX9L there you go! [12:31] http://pastebin.com/4SpDaDHi [12:33] Ritu: You have an SSH public key registered in Launchpad, but it doesn't seem to be installed in any of the standard places OpenSSH looks for public keys. Did you put it somewhere unusual? [12:34] Humm...I really am not sure about that! [12:34] Ritu: If it's an RSA key, the private key would normally be in ~/.ssh/id_rsa and the public key would normally be in ~/.ssh/id_rsa.pub. [12:34] Ritu: Could I have "ls -al ~/.ssh/" in a pastebin? [12:35] cjwatson: http://pastebin.com/6TW82v7K [12:36] Ritu: Right, your key isn't there. You'll need to find it and put it in the right place, or else generate a new one. [12:37] Ritu: The public key text on Launchpad suggests that you generated it on this machine, but perhaps you reinstalled the system after you generated it, or perhaps you put it somewhere non-default. [12:37] Yeah! So do I have to re register my key in the launchpad? [12:44] If and only if you generate a new one. [12:47] Oh I am planing to create a new one! I am unable to find the existing one. [12:51] Ritu: OK, you can follow https://help.launchpad.net/YourAccount/CreatingAnSSHKeyPair then [12:53] cjwatson: wouldn't the bazar tutorials do? [12:54] Sure, if you like, although http://doc.bazaar.canonical.com/bzr.2.6/en/mini-tutorial/index.html links to the page I gave. [12:58] cjwatson: Nice! :) [13:51] Are there any options to get faster PPA builds? [13:52] I'm currently getting an estimate of 5 hours to build something [13:55] ocharles: The build farm has had a number of problems keeping up recently, but we deployed a fix this morning which is holding together well, so the queue should actually drain now. [13:57] Mentioned in http://blog.launchpad.net/general/launchpad-build-farm-improvements [13:58] cjwatson: ah, this is good to know [13:58] I'll subscribe to this blog too [14:00] so in the future you don't expect the queue to be this long? [14:02] We still have some work to do, but based on behaviour since the deployment I do expect it to be better. For the last few weeks we've often been around half-capacity on virtual builders unless operators were really on top of whack-a-moling the failures. [14:03] ok, that sounds promising :) [14:04] but there is no commercial options to get priority? Currently we're sort of hinging deployments off Launchpad, so long build times block us. It's probably more sensible we host our debs for this purpose, but then we have to actually set up the ability to do builds [14:05] We can bump the score priority for archives belonging to users with commercial subscriptions. [14:05] (I don't know the exact details; our operators handle that, I believe.) [14:06] ok, that's something for us to consider then. but for now I'll wait and see how things perform over the next few weeks [14:06] thanks for the information! [14:06] If you find it's necessary then answers.launchpad.net/launchpad is probably a good place to request it. [14:20] cjwatson, can you help me? Since 31 of August I don't receive any mail from launchpad (bug in project that I subscribe, MR, etc...) [14:29] WebbyIT: I'm sorry, I don't currently have the expertise to diagnose mail problems [14:29] cjwatson, a chi mi devo rivolgere per risolvere in fretta? [14:30] cjwatson, sorry [14:30] cjwatson, Who should I contact to resolve quickly? [14:30] wgrant is probably your best bet, although it's not a good time of day for him. [14:30] Hmm [14:30] @ubuntu-it.org address [14:30] We've had problems with deliverability to there before. [14:31] WebbyIT: I'd suggest asking #canonical-sysadmin, assuming that that's a Canonical-maintained mail server. [14:32] Launchpad's certainly sending mail to that address. [14:32] wgrant, I have no problem with my mail, but I ask on #canonical-sysadmin, thanks === tasdomas is now known as tasdomas_afk === lordsame is now known as SergioMeneses === Sweetsha1k is now known as Sweetshark [20:04] Hi! [20:04] It seems that when non-subscribers mail our mailing list (divmod-users@launchpad.org), the e-mail is silently dropped [20:04] Are we misdiagnosing? Is this intentional? Can we configure it to behave differently? [20:04] thats correct and it cannot be configured [20:05] IIRC there is a bug about this [20:05] Hm. That's unfortunate. [20:05] but possibly marked wontfix [20:05] lvh: I agree :( [20:06] makes me wonder how many mails have just gone nowhere because someone thought it was a good place to ask questions [20:06] I know it's bitten me because I have lvh.io and lvh.cc; I was subscribed as one and tried to send as the other [20:55] I have two packages in my PPA, call them A and B. B build-depends on A. I made changes to A and rebuilt it, and now B needs to be rebuilt. Can I do that through Launchpad, or is it best to bump the version of B? [21:00] If B has already been built, then you must make a new source upload. [21:01] (The feature you want is one I've wanted for a long time; we designed it years ago but it never made it to implementation.) [21:02] cjwatson: deployment issues / issues with the builders or such? [21:03] (because if that were implemented that'd be pretty good for some of my PPAs) [21:03] TheLordOfTime: No, just never made it high enough up the to-do list [21:03] ah [21:03] cjwatson: so, basically, feature.abandoned == true? [21:15] TheLordOfTime: On the long-term backlog. I wouldn't consider it abandoned since I still intend to bring it up again once we have some more actually-urgent things out of the way [21:17] cjwatson: cool. [21:27] is there anything wrong with Launchpad importing new packages from Debian [21:28] https://launchpad.net/debian/+source/bignumber.js seems missing, but http://packages.qa.debian.org/b/bignumber.js.html exists [21:33] micahg: that package is new as of yesterday, maybe Launchpad hasn't caught up yet? [21:33] not that i know anything, just speculating [21:34] micahg: Yes, the machine that runs the imports is out of order and needs physical attention, which it is due to get tomorrow. [21:34] * cjwatson does know something, having checked on this earlier today. [21:35] cjwatson: ok, thanks === hloeung is now known as Guest6983 === Guest6983 is now known as hloeung