[00:13] <skellat> micahg: I'll FFe consent for Docs.  Please make sure to file a bug against xubuntu-docs so we remember to write something about gtk-theme-config in the 13.10 online documentation.
[00:14] <micahg> skellat: hrm?  doc freeze isn't for a while...
[00:14] <micahg>  21
[00:14] <micahg> 	
[00:14] <micahg> September 19th
[00:14] <micahg> 	
[00:14] <skellat> micahg: I meant Feature Freeze
[00:15] <skellat> Since that would really be a new feature on-image
[00:15] <micahg> FFe for gtk-theme-config?
[00:15] <micahg> ok
[00:15] <micahg> make it against xubuntu-meta and subscribe me please
[00:15] <skellat> And I'll consent as documentation
[00:24] <skellat> micahg: LP Bug #1219592
[02:20] <Unit193> skellat, knome: http://paste.openstack.org/show/GwJkok8M93DzaapXPQPc/
[03:58] <skellat> Unit193: Make sure you include a "Closes" for LP Bug #1219595 in the changelog if you commit and make a merge proposal 
[03:58] <skellat> Please
[04:00] <skellat> Of course, we also have LP Bug #1219593 to eventually deal with too
[04:00] <Unit193> +gtk-theme-config does stuffs with themes
[04:00] <Unit193> Done. :---D
[04:05] <skellat> Unit193: More like do something to ease things with release team over LP Bug #1219592
[04:06] <skellat> Thankfully we didn't have pre-existing documentation to edit
[08:36] <knome> Unit193, yeah, looks good
[08:37] <knome> Unit193, we should see if that plugin affects fb too
[18:02] <Unit193> knome: It doesn't.
[19:03] <knome> Unit193, ok, good
[19:11] <Unit193> (The Facebook plugin is shipped in pidgin-data, it's just xmpp.)
[19:12] <knome> oki
[19:12] <knome> i should probably update the slideshow then
[19:14] <Unit193> It says something about Twitter?
[19:14] <knome> yeah.
[19:15] <Unit193> I don't personally care about Twitter, Facebook, or Identi.ca (pump.io now)
[19:15] <knome> or i think we mention twitter
[19:15] <knome> i need to double-check
[19:16] <knome> want to do a merge proposal on your docs fix or should i just go ahead and fix it?
[19:22] <knome> Unit193, fixed it, attributed to you
[19:22] <knome> yyyup, we mention twitter in the slideshow.
[19:23] <Unit193> Eh, whatever works, it's just a simple fix.  Well, hopefully that's the last place we do. :P
[19:24] <knome> yeah
[19:26] <knome> ok, both are pushed
[20:00] <pleia2> knome: these moderator requests are bothering my OCD, can we figure out what to do with ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org emails? :)
[20:02] <knome> pleia2, if you can copy/fw them to micahg, i'm fine with deleting them.
[20:03] <knome> we should poke the website branch and stuff to include the license at some point
[20:04] <knome> ochosi, can you check if https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/xubuntu-s-artwork is accurate?
[20:04] <knome> ochosi, well mostly if the "new" greybird is already in
[20:04] <knome> ochosi, same if you know things about the -devel blueprint
[20:52] <ali1234> is there a blueprint for gtk3 indicators?
[20:58] <knome> ali1234, no, that's just a single work item
[20:59] <knome> blueprints are to track broader stuff
[20:59] <ali1234> ok, micahg mentioned creating one the other day
[21:00] <micahg> knome: it needs a bunch of things to happen (package, stage, test, fix bugs)
[21:00] <knome> micahg, "it"?
[21:00] <micahg> gtk3 indicators
[21:00] <knome> micahg, yep. but as i said later that evening, i kind of disagree more with the way the decision is made
[21:01] <knome> i understand your point of view and for me, it's only really important to get them for 14.04
[21:01] <micahg> did I miss something?
[21:01] <knome> i said i don't agree with your decision to not upload indicators to 13.10 (only backports)
[21:02] <knome> but after that, i told i kind of disagreed more in the way the decision was made (no discussion, just dropping a note)
[21:02] <micahg> I originally thought it was one patch + the plugin, it ended up being a few different packages that needed new versions
[21:02] <knome> sure, i understand
[21:02] <ali1234> regardless of when/where they go in, there is quite a list of things that need looking at
[21:02] <knome> ali1234, of course
[21:02] <micahg> once I saw the list of things needed, it seemed way too rushed for 13.10
[21:03] <knome> the decision itself is fine and with this timeframe, i don't know if there could've been any other way to resolve
[21:10] <skellat> knome: I have a merge request I submit for your consideration -- https://code.launchpad.net/~skellat/xubuntu-docs/xubuntu-docs/+merge/183544
[21:11] <knome> skellat, "new tool" sounds like we need to fix that next cycle
[21:11] <skellat> Hold on
[21:12] <skellat> Pushing new branch
[21:13] <knome> ta
[21:13] <knome> also wondering about the wording in offline-packages (mostly "no work-around")
[21:14] <knome> otherwise, it looks good to me (i'll do the actual review + merge tomorrow)
[21:14] <skellat> Okay
[21:16] <skellat> knome: Leaving a comment here saying you're okay with this exception would also be appreciated so that "we have our ducks in a row": https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xubuntu-meta/+bug/1219592
[21:20] <knome> done
[21:20] <knome> also linked the bug reports to https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/xubuntu-s-documentation
[22:37] <ali1234> what is gtk-theme-config supposed to actually do?
[22:41] <ali1234> only the custom highlight seems to do anything here