[05:35] <pitti> Good morning
[05:35] <doug5> pitti, morning
[05:54] <jibel> Good morning
[06:00] <pitti> jibel: hm, the update-manager autopkgtests keep installing 0.191 from saucy release instead of 0.193 from saucy-proposed
[06:01] <pitti> jibel: I'll investigate
[06:03] <jibel> pitti, Err http://ftpmaster.internal saucy-proposed Release.gpg  Unable to connect to ftpmaster.internal:http:
[06:03] <pitti> oh, that would be it
[06:03] <jibel> from u-m autopkgtest console output
[06:03] <jibel> why only -proposed would fail?
[06:04] <jibel> pitti, I restarted the test
[06:04] <pitti> jibel: doesn't help, I already re-tried 3 times
[06:04] <pitti> jibel: well, it would keep the previous Packages indexes
[06:04] <jibel> pitti, okay, I'll file a ticket and notify IS
[06:05] <pitti> auto-package-testing@alderamin:~$ elinks http://ftpmaster.internal
[06:05] <pitti> -> connection refused
[06:06] <jibel> pitti, ah, that would explain all the 'RUNNING' we had yesterday
[06:06] <pitti> in other news it seems that -s got broken, investigating that then
[06:06] <pitti> jibel: ah, because it tested older versions
[06:07] <jibel> yes, this is another fix I'll land this week
[06:08] <jibel> jiufeng will wait until the right versions are available before starting the tests instead of triggering them immediately when a new request comes up
[06:08] <pitti> jibel: I actually thought britney wasn't supposed to request them until the version is available and installable?
[06:08] <pitti> we still seem to get failures due to uninstallability, altough the last one that I can remember was 2 weeks ago
[06:10] <pitti> aha - it wants 2000 MB free in /run/shm, but I only have 1876
[06:11]  * pitti sets it in ~/.adtrc and is happy again
[06:42] <DanChapman> Good Morning all
[06:43] <elfy> morning DanChapman
[06:44] <JackYu> morning:)
[06:54] <Noskcaj> DanChapman, Any progress on testdrive? I'd rather wait until GTK3 is finished to send off my "What testdrive should become" email
[06:58] <DanChapman> Noskcaj: I couldn't get the branch which is ported to GTK3 to run . I plan to take a look at it this week mate, should be thursday if all goes to plan :-)
[07:04] <Noskcaj> DanChapman, Aweseome
[07:04] <Noskcaj> *awesome
[08:05] <smartboyhw> phillw, so, you made the Ubuntu Release Team quite unhappy...
[08:05] <smartboyhw> phillw, don't forget, you can actually re-spin images yourself.
[12:19] <smartboyhw> balloons, ping pong, you should not be on holiday today:P
[12:19]  * patdk-wk sends smartboyhw on holiday
[12:19] <patdk-wk> shoudl get the same net effect
[12:20] <smartboyhw> patdk-wk, unfortunately, there is no holiday for me now
[12:21] <patdk-wk> don't worry, we have no idea about your holidays over there :) just make one up :)
[12:22] <patdk-wk> oh, I have next saturday off :)
[12:22] <smartboyhw> patdk-wk, I have one on the 20th I think
[12:22]  * smartboyhw forgotteen
[12:22] <patdk-wk> on the 14th :)
[12:22]  * patdk-wk gets older
[14:03] <balloons> ohh smartboyhw you are around again
[14:03] <smartboyhw> balloons, heh heh heh heh heh heh heh heh heh heh heh heh heh heh heh
[14:03] <smartboyhw> balloons, so, good holidays?
[14:06] <balloons> smartboyhw, yep, holiday was nice
[14:07] <smartboyhw> balloons, so, you are supposed to send out the "BIG promotion" mail eh?
[14:07] <balloons> smartboyhw, yes indeed
[14:07] <smartboyhw> balloons, \o/
[14:07] <smartboyhw> balloons, it's Beta 1 this week:P
[14:08] <balloons> have to move all the stuff from uds to work items
[14:08] <balloons> lots of stuff
[14:08] <smartboyhw> balloons, \o/
[15:01] <smartboyhw> balloons, I heard that Elementary OS is investigating into using Autopilot.
[15:05] <balloons> o?
[15:05] <smartboyhw> balloons, yes
[15:06] <balloons> cool, the more the merrirer
[15:06]  * smartboyhw still waits for balloons's mail:P
[15:06] <elfy> wb balloons
[15:06] <DanChapman> afternoon balloons :-)
[15:06] <smartboyhw> Wow, chilicuil and SergioMeneses almost joined at the same time
[15:07] <DanChapman> and elfy
[15:07] <smartboyhw> Hello DanChapman
[15:07] <smartboyhw> and elfy
[15:07] <elfy> smartboyhw: that'll be a fail then ... chilicuil and SergioMeneses joined the channel hours after I did ;)
[15:07] <elfy> I was just away :)
[15:08] <SergioMeneses> jajaja
[15:08] <smartboyhw> elfy, heh heh heh heh heh heh heh heh heh heh heh heh heh heh heh heh heh heh
[15:08] <DanChapman> i ment afternnon elfy
[15:08] <SergioMeneses> party time is over
[15:08] <smartboyhw> chilicuil, SergioMeneses you fail:P
[15:08] <DanChapman> smartboyhw: hey
[15:08] <chilicuil> smartboyhw: x_x
[15:08] <SergioMeneses> lol
[15:09] <smartboyhw> chilicuil, XD
[16:56] <balloons> hey elfy DanChapman :-)
[16:57] <DanChapman> balloons: howdy o/
[16:58] <balloons> I had a pc die on me, something isn't right with it
[16:59] <DanChapman> oh dear, thats not so good. You got it running ok now?
[17:02] <balloons> No, so I've been on the laptop.. it's just not nearly as nice imho
[17:03] <elfy> they rarely are imho
[17:48] <balloons> elopio, ping
[17:51] <elopio> balloons: pong
[18:03] <balloons> elopio, so it seems the weird tab switching failures are still happening to the core apps
[18:03] <elopio> balloons: according to nik90 on the autopilot channel, they have fixed it.
[18:04] <balloons> elopio, weird..
[18:05] <balloons> ok, I'll assume it's all safe again
[18:18] <elopio> balloons: can you review this please? to see if you like it
[18:18] <elopio> https://code.launchpad.net/~elopio/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/logging/+merge/183733
[18:26] <elopio> balloons: also, this https://code.launchpad.net/~elopio/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/fix1220346-pointing_device/+merge/183719
[18:27]  * balloons looking
[18:27] <balloons> ohh i saw that second one already
[18:28] <balloons> +1 on it would be nice to have access to the screen keyboard
[18:30] <balloons> elopio, problems with this do you think? mock_model.return_value = 'not desktop'
[18:31] <elopio> balloons: I didn't like it, but it seems each phone returns something different.
[18:31] <balloons> I spoke with thomi at one point about getting actual device names returned via the  platform model call
[18:31] <elopio> balloons: hum, my nexus4 returns 'nexus4'.
[18:31] <elopio> 'Nexus 4'
[18:33] <balloons> it's just a test I suppose :-)
[18:34] <balloons> elopio, ohh, you grab the docstring too in logging, that's neat
[18:35] <elopio> balloons: it's just testing the two workflows we have: 1 on the desktop, 1 other.
[18:35] <elopio> maybe later it would make more sense make a switch statement with all the available devices.
[18:35] <balloons> right.. It's not an issue for us to solve, as we don't currently define anything beyond that
[18:35] <balloons> we as in, autopilot I mean to say
[18:35] <elopio> but I see more problems on that, because we are going to be always outdated.
[18:35] <elopio> maybe, what we are missing is an api method that tells us if the platform has a touch interface.
[18:36] <balloons> well, I mean something perhaps that says this is a tablet or phone.. or at least this device supports multitouch, osk, etc, etc
[18:36] <elopio> there are desktop monitors that can be touched, and there are phones that can't.
[18:36] <balloons> indeed
[18:36] <elopio> yes, we are definetly missing something.
[18:37] <balloons> perhaps thomi will solve that when he adds the accelerometer stuff
[18:38] <elopio> yes, all those things are related. Selenium has something called capabilities
[18:39] <elopio> to check if a browser can do javascript, and things like that.
[18:39] <elopio> and then they have drivers for each browser.
[18:40] <elopio> it might make sense to group some capabilities on device drivers, and select which tests to run based on that. Or which devices to use, like on-screen keyboard vrs external keyboard.
[20:27] <elfy> balloons: ping
[20:27] <balloons> elfy, pong
[20:28] <elfy> hi balloons - quick question - how do I add upgrade tests to our dailies (and possibly the b1)
[20:28]  * knome is all ears because he couldn't answer that question
[20:29]  * elfy is asking because knome made him :p
[20:30] <balloons> hmm.. I wonder if you are able
[20:30] <knome> i should be... but tell me. :)
[20:30] <balloons> ahh I see..
[20:30] <balloons> yep, you should be able to
[20:30] <balloons> Upgrade Xubuntu amd64	Upgrade	xubuntu release	iso	Active
[20:30] <knome> and i think smartboyhw was able too, or then he just asked somebody else to
[20:31] <knome> balloons, yeah... but not for b1
[20:32] <balloons> so you have to add a build on the builds page for it
[20:32] <knome> mhm
[20:32] <balloons> it's defined as belonging to you, so you should have control
[20:32] <knome> yup
[20:32] <balloons> so shall I do it or ?
[20:32] <knome> i just did it
[20:33] <knome> and they are visible
[20:33] <elfy> where - I don't see them
[20:33] <knome> http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/302/builds
[20:33] <knome> under the upgrade product
[20:33] <knome> oh wait
[20:34] <knome> i added a different version number
[20:34] <knome> does that hurt?
[20:34] <knome> :)
[20:34] <balloons> knome, no it doesn't.. the upgrades are done on a weekly basis
[20:35] <knome> oki
[20:35] <knome> i figured out it's not a biggie
[20:35] <elfy> aaah - see them now
[20:36] <knome> balloons, we're not setting up download links for upgrade tests?
[20:36] <balloons> new build I should say.. well I lie, they are done when the package for it changes
[20:37] <balloons> knome, no, but you could.. in general upgrades referred to using the update manager or otherwise upgrading that way
[20:37] <balloons> we added the from image testcase a little while back as well
[20:37] <knome> mhm
[20:39] <elfy> I'll get a call to arms for upgrade now
[20:40] <knome> and regular tests as well, we only have 5/10 done!
[20:40] <elfy> for the beta ?
[20:40] <knome> yep, for the beta
[20:41] <elfy> how long does the beta stay there for by the way
[20:41] <knome> until release
[20:41] <elfy> oh right
[20:41] <knome> so a few days left
[20:41] <knome> same with the upgrade tests
[20:41] <knome> except if we rebuild of couse, that resets all counts
[20:42] <elfy> yep - I got that bit in my head :)
[20:43] <knome> balloons, how are other things?
[20:43] <elfy> I do wish the dates on the release schedule actually made some sense in regard to when things get released and finished
[20:43] <balloons> knome, not too bad, yourself? Recovering from a holiday which is always fun, haha
[20:43] <knome> good here as well
[20:43] <balloons> also trying to fix my main workstation which decided to go belly up
[20:44] <knome> heh
[20:44] <knome> that's always nice..
[20:44] <elfy> it's the 3rd September and the release schedule says the 5th for Beta1
[20:44] <knome> that's correct
[20:47] <elfy> so the date is the end?
[20:47] <elfy> would be useful in the title ...
[20:48] <knome> it's the end of testing
[20:48] <elfy> oh - never looked at it that way - that'll be the Release Date then ...
[20:48] <elfy> d'oh
[20:48] <knome> yeah ;)
[20:49] <elfy> knome: I've sent a quick note to our list
[20:49] <knome> oki:)
[20:50] <elfy> I'll check the results tomorrow afternoon/evening and fill in the gaps for 64/32bit
[20:50] <knome> mhm
[20:52] <elfy> gtg
[20:52] <elfy> back tomorrow
[20:52] <knome> have fun :)
[21:10] <SergioMeneses> hi guys! anyone knows something about this error http://people.ubuntu.com/~sergiomeneses/share/Screenshot%20from%202013-09-03%2016:07:00.png
[21:10] <SergioMeneses> testing on testdrive
[21:16] <balloons> SergioMeneses, a graphical display bug
[21:16] <balloons> ?
[21:28] <SergioMeneses> balloons, I thinks so, because all installation has the same error but it is something graphical, it doesnt interrupt the installation process
[21:29] <SergioMeneses> ...installation done
[21:29]  * SergioMeneses rebooting 
[21:31] <SergioMeneses> balloons, it's only the installation, once installed, everything looks perfect
[21:36] <balloons> ahh, well, hmm
[21:43] <SergioMeneses> balloons, that was rare