/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2013/09/03/#ubuntu-release.txt

slangasekcjwatson: aha, thanks00:42
darkxstHi, can we get gdm, gnome-session and gnome-shell-extensions unblocked for ubuntu GNOME bug 121240804:17
slangasekdarkxst: done05:41
darkxstslangasek, thanks!05:42
LaneyNot sure I want to read up. :P08:00
mlankhorstdon't do it!08:02
Laneyslangasek: I just applied the same algorithm we've done before, and followed the release schedule. Sure, we can discuss adjusting it in future.08:02
mlankhorstRiddell: if it works probably08:03
Laneyslangasek: (I agree that it's probably overly conservative but we didn't work out anything more limited up to now)08:12
LaneyFurthermore there was a bug where a load of Touch and Ubuntu-only patches showed up in Edubuntu images which bloated the hint a lot08:13
smartboyhwLaney, phillw is a bit tempermental some times, so don't put the "insult" in your mind too much:(08:13
LaneyI didn't get to update it as the Edubuntu respin hadn't popped out before I had to leave yesterday08:13
LaneyThe script works off tumbleweed's parsed image manifest data08:14
xnoxsmartboyhw: i'd rather see phillw stop insulting, rather than other people "dealing to ignore those".08:14
smartboyhwxnox, I do too08:14
LaneyNever mind, I'm not bothered.08:14
highvoltage+108:14
highvoltagealso, happy birthday xnox!08:15
LaneyThanks to everyone for replying though.08:15
LaneyAll the expected images there now?08:15
smartboyhwxnox, happy birthday:)08:15
* Laney gives xnox the birthday bumps08:15
Laney18 today!08:15
infinityLaney: Oh please, I doubt he's a day over 15.08:16
* infinity tickles xnox.08:16
xnox:-P08:16
* xnox *giggle*08:17
smartboyhwHow old IS xnox BTW:P08:17
LaneyNobody knows. He has fake ID.08:17
xnoxsmartboyhw: 7808:17
LaneySee!08:17
smartboyhw-.-08:17
xnoxLaney: s/ID/IDs/08:17
infinityHe *claims* to be 25, but that's clearly a lie.08:17
czajkowskialoha08:17
infinityEveryone always overshoots their first fake ID to try to be "realistic".08:18
infinity"Oh, I can't claim to be 18, that's too obvious, I'll go for 35."08:18
czajkowskiI'm pretty sure xnox and Laney need to still carry their ID around today :)08:22
LaneyMine's embarrassing because I haven't learned to drive so I just have the learners license with a big red "L" on it08:23
infinityLaney: Is the big red L on your forehead?  That would be really embarrassing.08:24
LaneyThey told me I was too drunk when I tried to get that tattoo08:25
iulianHeh.08:25
xnoxLaney: i used to walk around with citizen card as proof of age.08:31
smartboyhwskaet, thank you for the link08:40
smartboyhwLaney, speaking of which: Should upgrade testcases be enabled for flavours?08:41
Laneyshadeslayer: Can be. You want?08:43
Laneyshadeslayer: sorry08:44
Laneysmartboyhw: ^08:44
* smartboyhw thinks Laney pinged the wrong person:P08:44
smartboyhwLaney, well, I'm still asking the Ubuntu Studio people, since we disabled it for 13.0408:44
smartboyhwBut, other flavours would want it I think08:44
mlankhorstinfinity: oh I'm still curious about saucy->precise xserver backport.. there is going to be nastiness with pointer barriers one way or another. :P I was thinking of copying libxi/x11 unrenamed from saucy, and give unity an internal copy of the old function calls, deciding at runtime which pointer barrier api to use..08:45
LaneyDidn't have it for A208:45
LaneyI checked raring beta 1 and it didn't get great coverage then08:45
Laneybut I'm happy to copy them if (a) I find out how and (b) people ask for it08:45
Laneyassuming they can't do it themselves that is08:45
LaneyLooks like you can ;-)08:58
smartboyhwLaney, yes08:58
smartboyhwBut, I think the flavour leads will forget that:P08:58
smartboyhwI mean, adding the upgrades08:58
Laneysmartboyhw: If you like, you can mail the list to remind.08:59
smartboyhwLaney, syre08:59
Laney"Ubuntu Studio decided to enable upgrade test cases because of blah blah blah. You might want to do the same, but you don't have to."08:59
darkxstLaney, smartboyhw, we added uprade test cases for Ubuntu GNOME09:38
Laneyokey pokes09:38
smartboyhwdarkxst, no need to tell me, it's your team's own decision and discretions:P09:38
darkxstjust saying its not like it need release team intervention!09:39
* Laney nods09:41
mlankhorstinfinity: want to know what's even more fun? backporting llvm-3.3 to precise :P10:05
mlankhorstit seems to want a newer binutils..10:06
Riddellmlankhorst: I think putting in symlinks from the pvr directory to the mesa libwayland would solve it, how does that sound?10:11
Riddellstgraber: I'm getting lost in iso tracker again, how do I enable upgrade for kubuntu?10:14
ogra_Riddell, is that libwayland in all mesa installs ?10:14
ogra_i.e from which package does it come ?10:15
Riddellogra_: yeah it's part of libegl1-mesa-drivers10:15
ogra_if its the generic mesa package such a symlink will likely breal Mir10:15
ogra_*break10:15
ogra_as i said yesterday, we might need a new alternative for something like "system-compositor-lib" or some such to solve that cleanly10:16
smartboyhwRiddell, in "Builds" of the adminstration tab just check the "Upgrade" products, type in the version no. and choose the correct milestone10:16
mlankhorstRiddell: I think you need to move wayland-egl out from mesa-egl dir10:16
mlankhorstif it's a generic support library that works regardless of egl implementation10:17
Riddellsmartboyhw: ^^ got it, after some trips :)10:20
smartboyhwRiddell, um, I think you better alter Lubuntu's upgrade build10:20
smartboyhwSince I saw an Lubuntu message in there10:20
Riddellsmartboyhw: yeah I removed it again10:20
smartboyhwRiddell, good:)10:21
mlankhorstoh right I don't need newer binutils, it was just used for -fuse-ld=gold in link flags10:22
ogra_hmm, i merged initramfs-tools-ubuntu-touch  and ubuntu-touch-generic-initrd ... which results in initramfs-tools-ubuntu-touch producing a new binary, shouldnt it get stuck in NEW due to that ?12:03
ogra_(i dont see it in the NEW queue)12:03
cjwatsonNot if the same binary was already in the archive from another source package.12:04
ogra_ok12:04
ogra_great !12:04
* ogra_ files a removal bug for the ubuntu-touch-generic-initrd source then12:04
ogra_bug 1220218 for any archive admin around12:08
ubot2`Launchpad bug 1220218 in ubuntu-touch-generic-initrd (Ubuntu) "please remove the ubuntu-touch-generic-initrd source package from the archive" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/122021812:08
ogra_stgraber, ^^^ since it makes your life easier :)12:09
cyphermoxLaney: hey :)12:30
Laneycyphermox: hi, was at lunch13:06
LaneyIf it's about NM it is due to the beta freeze13:06
cyphermoxLaney: hey ;)13:06
cyphermoxyeah, just making sure13:06
Laneywell, that and the fact that adt-britney is incorrectly saying that the test fails13:06
cyphermoxwell, it used to fail13:06
Laneysure but the latest one is ok13:07
Laneycyphermox: anyway, do you need it now or is tomorrow OK?13:07
cyphermoxasap would be better, this is stuff for the phone, but I wouldn't feel OK telling you to override things like this, let me check with others13:08
=== psivaa is now known as psivaa-lunch
tumbleweedis something broken with Debian imports atm?13:19
seb128tumbleweed, what debian imports?13:19
tumbleweedthe debian archive gets imported into LP13:19
cjwatsontumbleweed: The relevant machine was only just recovered after a failure that required physical intervention13:19
tumbleweedaah, thanks13:19
cjwatsontumbleweed: And I don't think the cron job has run yet13:20
cjwatsonBut it's up13:20
cjwatson(i.e. I can rsync logs off it)13:20
=== psivaa-lunch is now known as psivaa
smartboyhw^ It's me, all the testcases passed, so don't be surprised that I marked it so early14:15
zul^^^ Can I get an archive admin to review python-dogpile.cache and python-dogpile.core please they are new build deps for keystone14:32
ogra_xnox, why would removing the old source pakcage require any changes in phablet.u.c ? i hope you only use the binary15:05
xnoxogra_: if binary simply moved to a different source package, it should be fine. I didn't realise that.15:07
infinitymlankhorst: That binutils versioned build-dep is probably bogus, but the -fuse-ld=gold will need to be backed out.  I might just do that in saucy too, so you can backport unmangled.15:07
ogra_xnox, right, else i would have not filed the removal bug yet :)15:07
ogra_and committed goit changes first15:07
ogra_*git15:08
xnoxogra_: ok, cool =)15:08
infinity * only build android-tools-adbd on armhf, i386 and amd64 until powerpc15:15
infinity    tablets and phones show up on teh market.15:15
infinityogra_: ^-- Why that abritrary restriction?15:15
ogra_infinity, because itr FTBFS ... there was a fix from lool later that makes it build15:16
ogra_probably the Architecture field wasnt updated along ?15:16
infinityogra_: The changelog might have wanted to say that, then, not the other. :P15:16
ogra_it saidf exacvtly what i uploaded at that point15:16
ogra_well, modulo mentioning FTBFS15:17
loolinfinity: BTW it should be almost syncable15:17
infinityNo, I mean, it should say "disable because it's broken" not some nonsensical "disable because devices don't exist".15:17
ogra_lool, ?15:17
loolinfinity: haven't rechecked in the last month or so15:17
ogra_i thought it was synced ages ago15:17
loolinfinity: at some point, Debian version was just missing testing from either ogra or rsalveti15:17
loologra_: was it?15:17
ogra_lool, i thought so, but i might be wrong15:17
ogra_(i dont think i have looked at that package since this upload above)15:18
infinityOf course, that FTBFS being fixed wouldn't help now, since it now depends on libhybris-utils, which is only on 3 arches.15:18
infinityFor similar odd reasons, I'm guessing?15:18
ogra_likely15:19
ogra_libhybris needs android headers i think15:19
ogra_well, thought utils probably doesnt15:19
infinityMeh.  Too much to unwind right now.15:21
infinityogra_: All this boils down to "initramfs-tools-ubuntu-touch should be arch-restricted".15:21
infinity(Or the whole stack it depends on shouldn't be)15:21
ogra_infinity, the binary it produces is armhf15:21
ogra_the script package it produces was supposed to be arch all but that didnt work out thanks to launchpad15:22
ogra_bug 106318815:22
ubot2`Launchpad bug 1063188 in Launchpad itself "Launchpad doesn't try to build the "all" packages if i386 isn't in the Architecture field" [Low,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/106318815:22
infinityogra_: Okay, but it produces a powerpc.deb that depends on something that can't be installed.  I'm not sure I need the history why. :P15:23
* infinity just fixes.15:23
ogra_oh15:24
ogra_heh, i totally didnt get your point15:24
ogra_yeah fix away+15:24
loolinfinity: I just did a quick grep in hybris to see how arch specific it was, and it does indeed seem to have specific linker code for ARM, x86 and some SH code; like ELF fields and types; I'm not sure whether we want to invest in porting to powerpc15:44
infinitylool: Yeah, not deeply concerned.  It's something I could poke at when I'm bored some day.  For now, I just arch-restricted the thing that was depending on it.15:45
mdeslaurLaney: nas is stuck in -proposed, reason says "Not touching package due to block request by laney (contact #ubuntu-release if update is needed) "15:52
mdeslaurLaney: could you push it?15:53
Laneymdeslaur: yep15:53
mdeslaurLaney: thanks15:53
mlankhorstinfinity: heh.. https://launchpadlibrarian.net/149247846/buildlog_ubuntu-precise-amd64.mesa-lts-saucy_9.2-1ubuntu1~~2ppa1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz llvm-3.3 has a dependency on zlib1g-dev? :P15:57
infinitymlankhorst: That -lz is coming from llvm, not mesa?16:01
mlankhorstinfinity: hm good question, more digging is needed16:04
mlankhorstinfinity: positive :p16:06
mlankhorst~$ llvm-config-3.3 --ldflags16:06
mlankhorst-L/usr/lib/llvm-3.3/lib  -lz -lpthread -lffi -lrt -ldl -lm16:06
mlankhorsthm weird16:07
mlankhorstit doesn't link it on saucy16:07
mlankhorstmeh nm then, I'll just add zlib1g-dev to the backported llvm-toolchain16:08
mlankhorstsorry for the noise :)16:12
mlankhorst*gone*16:12
slangasekLaney: for my edification, what/where's the script that's used for assembling the freeze block list?  Does it look at ubuntukylin at all currently?16:30
Laneyslangasek: It's just something I threw together, and it's supposed to16:30
LaneyI can pastebin it if you'll be nice. :-)16:30
LaneyThere are some kylin things in the block so I believe it is at least partially working for that purpose16:31
Laneyhttp://paste.ubuntu.com/6059440/16:31
LaneySeems Edubuntu and Lubuntu alternates are missing test results17:16
LaneyIf we can get those and the other remaining in over the UK night then we should be able to do B1 quite early tomorrow, all being well17:17
* Laney goes away for a bit, SMS me if the world ends or anything17:18
jbichaLaney: but tomorrow's Wednesday?17:25
infinityDays of the week are confusing.17:26
skaetjbicha,  release is scheduled for Thursday17:26
adam_gcan someone please nack that misdirected dput ^17:57
slangasekadam_g: looking18:01
slangasekadam_g: done18:01
adam_gslangasek, thanks18:01
xnoxLaney: highvoltage: cjwatson: jbicha: For the bug 1218175 I have now implemented package split: ubuntuone plugin is in a separate package, which can be seeded / unseeded as needed.19:33
ubot2`Launchpad bug 1218175 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "u1: Allow Ubuntu flavors to opt out of U1 feature" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/121817519:33
xnoxnot sure if you want this uploading, as the plugin will need to go through new and seeds will need to be adjusted.19:35
jbichaxnox: a separate package won't work for Edubuntu19:37
xnoxjbicha: yes it will. ubiquity-frontend-gtk does not depend on it. it needs explicit seed, and i believe you can blacklist / negate install in the seed.19:37
xnoxjbicha: ubuntu-desktop will not depend on that plugin.19:38
jbichaok19:38
slangasekthat aside, I would be surprised if the edubuntu folks would actually want to maintain a delta with the Ubuntu Desktop wrt such features of the installer (regardless of whether they're personally happy with those features)19:39
xnoxslangasek: well edubuntu did request to remove that plugin, and they have their own custom plugins in ubiquity already (for task selection, server install & config, etc.)21:13
slangasekxnox: ok.  Hadn't seen that request from edubuntu, and only the G+ post was referenced above21:14
stgraberslangasek: we already maintain a delta to drop the shopping lens and drop the amazon and ubuntuone launcher entries by default as we don't think any of those are suitable for our target audience.21:14
slangasekalright21:15
slangasek(pff, what's wrong with having the kids shopping while at school ;)21:15
stgraber:)21:15
xnoxstgraber: separate package would work, for edubuntu seeds right? (negating / blacklisting from the cd?!)21:20
stgraberxnox: sure, we could just have edubuntu-live conflict with it then21:21
stgraberxnox: so ubiquity could recommend that package (but not depends or the conflict would make ubiquity go away)21:21
xnoxstgraber: no, ubiquity will not recommend it.21:22
slangasekyou aren't really meant to use conflicts in seeds, though, and blacklists in seeds only result in failures when those packages show up - they don't work for the actual exclusion21:22
xnoxstgraber: it should be explicitly seeded, which will happen for ubuntu-live / kylin for example21:22
slangasekjust not depending on it is better, which seems to be the plan21:22
slangasekcjwatson: so bug #1219589 is getting some static regarding getting the UbuntuHashes page updated.  The ubuntu-docs team doesn't seem to actually have access to update the darn thing.  Who does / how should we know who does? (checklist page points the finger at ubuntu-docs currently)21:23
ubot2`Launchpad bug 1219589 in ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) "ubuntu-12.04.3-desktop-amd64.iso md5sum missing from https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuHashes" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/121958921:23
slangaseksarnold: ^^ ;)22:15
sarnoldslangasek: ah! :) thanks :)22:16
czajkowskiinfinity: ping a ling22:20
czajkowskiinfinity: I swear if I broke LP and builds you'd appear :)22:21
bdmurrayslangasek: could you have a look at update-manager in the raring proposed queue?23:04
=== sergiuse1s is now known as sergiusens
=== jbicha is now known as Guest59609
=== Guest59609 is now known as jbicha_
jbicha_phillw: I think your release announcement yesterday is easy to misinterpret, see http://lubuntublog.blogspot.com/2013/09/beta-1-is-out.html23:56
slangasekbdmurray: update-manager-0.186.2/tags seems to be some added cruft in the upload?23:58
slangasekbdmurray: not sure if you want to reupload to fix23:58
bdmurrayslangasek: yeah, I'll reupload23:59

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!