[06:46] <ppisati> moin
[06:58] <smb> ppisati, morning
[07:12] <smb> infinity, You are still slacking on sponsoring (of course me, thats all I care)
[07:16] <infinity> smb: You know, you could say something nice.  Butter me up.  Tell me I'm pretty.
[07:17] <smb> infinity, You know after so long I think I have lost my sense of diplomacy. :-P
[07:18] <infinity> smb: *cough*
[07:18] <infinity> smb: Hey, we got your crash stuff in, one thing at a time.
[07:18] <infinity> Honestly, I'd like to get you PPU rights for Xen* stuff anyway.
[07:19] <infinity> Probably should just add it to the kernel set.
[07:20] <smb> infinity, Oh yes, was that after 2 months of begging or more. :) Yeah well its just that I think I would love one or two real reviews of my approaches to weed out the small lapses that might have crawled in
[07:21] <infinity> smb: *nod*... I agree that reviewing is sane and reasonable here.
[07:21] <infinity> smb: Keep pestering.  You're not actually annoying me.  Just makes me feel bad when I can't always make the time. :P
[07:21] <smb> infinity, So maybe I should try to get apw on the MRE ones as they are not that crazy / new
[07:22] <smb> At least one by one. For Xen-4.3 its now down to a FFE :(
[07:22] <smb> infinity, Heh I try my very best Mrs. Sophie
[07:23] <infinity> smb: The 4.3 FFe will be approved, as long as you also promise to make sure deps/rdeps all work.
[07:23] <smb> infinity, I am pretty sure they work as before *cough*
[07:23] <infinity> That's some curious phrasing.
[07:24] <smb> I tried xcp/xen-api and it was not working too well with Xen-4.2
[07:24] <smb> and the same way with Xen-4.3
[07:24] <smb> All the things we found in rdeps at least now have compiled in my PPA
[07:26] <smb> infinity, I tried to document that in the FFE (can give you the link if you want to, though I suppose you have a search for them)
[07:28] <infinity> smb: The bug URL wouldn't hurt.  I'm scatterbrained this week.
[07:29] <smb> infinity, vJetlag? :) https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xen/+bug/1218817
[07:29] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 1218817 in xen (Ubuntu) "[FFE] Update to Xen-4.3 in Saucy" [High,New]
[07:29] <smb> Reminds me I had planned on vJetlag or vHangover for this week...
[07:50] <apw> ppisati, moin, hows arm today
[07:51] <ppisati> apw: looking at it right now
[07:52]  * apw is aware it is early :)
[07:52] <apw> oh so painfully aware
[08:28] <ppisati> apw: looks good
[08:29] <ppisati> apw: tested on omap, vexpress, calxeda cx1000 and cx2000 (midway), both generic and generic-lpae
[08:29] <ppisati> brb
[08:29] <apw> ppisati, cool so you resolved your calxeda issues without change to the code
[08:35] <ppisati> apw: it was the conserver
[08:35] <ppisati> apw: sometimes that thing goes belly up and i can't connect to some node
[08:35] <ppisati> apw: it takes some kicking
[08:36] <ppisati> apw: and then it works
[08:36] <ppisati> $omehow
[08:38] <smb> ^ Does this mean it works like the otheros or by inserting coins to run
[08:38] <apw> smb, :)
[08:39] <apw> ppisati, heh nice ... i love quality (switch it on and off 3 times and it will probabally work) h/w
[08:41] <smb> Maybe they have to put a huge blender next to it... just for some motivational benefit :)
[08:57] <apw> blendtek to the rescue
[12:17]  * henrix -> lunch
[12:49] <jsalisbury> apw, when you have a chance, can you take a look at bug 1220616 ?  It sounds like 3.11.0-4 may be missing some modules?
[12:49] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 1220616 in linux (Ubuntu) "missing modules in linux-image-3.11.0-4-generic" [High,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1220616
[12:55] <smb> jsalisbury, I think that might just be a misunderstanding and the linux-extra package
[12:57] <jsalisbury> smb, ok.  that would make sense if the lowlatency kernel didn't use a linux-extra package and -generic did.
[12:58] <smb> jsalisbury, I believe that is the case. 
[12:58] <smb> A sec, lets check
[12:59] <jsalisbury> smb, yeah, it looks like the modules may be here instead: http://packages.ubuntu.com/saucy/amd64/linux-image-extra-3.11.0-4-generic/filelist
[12:59] <smb> jsalisbury, Yep and linux-lowlatency looks to be producing only headers and image
[12:59] <jsalisbury> smb, great, thanks for the help!
[13:00] <smb> no problem
[13:08] <rtg> apw, push Ubuntu-3.11.0-5.10 to master ?
[13:13] <smb> rtg, He is currently away. And are you expected to be here either? 
[13:16] <rtg> smb, yep
[13:17] <smb> rtg, Hm ok, in that case maybe you want to check the calendar entry you made because I changed it according to what I thought was better than a one hour holiday
[13:18] <rtg> smb, hmm, I might have changed plans and just forgot to update the calendar. sorry.
[13:19] <smb> rtg, Meh, just the email sound longer than that and seemed to make more sense. :) 
[13:19] <smb> rtg, Anyway google says apw should return online soonish
[13:20] <apw> smb, heheh move and lunch done... i am here
[13:21] <apw> rtg will do
[13:21] <apw> rtg, done
[13:40] <apw> rtg, you must remind me which of the PPAs you drop the pre-release lts backports
[13:40] <rtg> apw, I was just about to upload the saucy LTS
[13:41] <rtg> https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat/+archive/s-lts-backport
[13:41] <apw> rtg, i assumed you were, and that was why you noticed master being not pusjed
[13:41] <rtg> apw, gotta test build first
[13:46] <apw> great
[18:35]  * apw calls it a day
[18:37]  * rtg -> lunch
[20:08] <arges> sforshee: ping
[20:24] <Whoopie> Hi, since updating to 3.8.0-30-generic on precise, my dell laptop crashes on resume from hibernate. I could localize the culprit to be latest zram updates as removing the zram-config package fixes the crashes.
[20:25] <Whoopie> I found bug report 1215513 which also identifies zram as an issue. Could the ubuntu devs perhaps look at this issue? Thanks a lot.
[22:03]  * rtg -> EOD