[09:35] <luca___> if I want to add 20 units to postgres do I type "juju add-unit postgres"
[09:36] <luca___> gary_poster: rick_h Makyo ^
[09:36] <Makyo> juju add-unit -n 20 postgres I think
[09:36] <Makyo> luca___, juju add-unit postgres -n 20
[09:37] <Makyo> luca___, Or either works.  The docs are conflicting :P
[09:37] <luca___> Makyo: I see, thank you
[09:40] <luca___> someone needs to juju add-unit luca's brain -n 20
[09:48] <Makyo> If I could scale up like that, I imagine this would all be a lot easier.
[10:06] <Makyo> hatch, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mC4Z8uIoVcQ
[10:06] <Makyo> For whenever.
[10:21] <huwshimi> rick_h: http://10.20.69.166:2464/
[11:02] <luca__> huwshimi: Scale up with these constraints?
[13:06] <huwshimi> Does anyone remember writing this comment in the inspector CSS? "The height of each list is 35px so setting this to help the auto max height script."
[13:11] <rick_h> huwshimi: I think that is from the auto adjusting height stuff right?
[13:14] <huwshimi> rick_h: If you get a chance could you come over and explain what's going on there?
[13:15] <rick_h> huwshimi: yea
[13:15] <huwshimi> rick_h: No hurry
[13:15] <rick_h> yea, trying to figure out if we're having an 'all' meeting or not
[13:21] <Makyo> frankban, categoryWrapperNode.filter(function(d) { return d3.select(this).classed('landscape-needs-reboot'); })
[13:32] <sinzui> jcsackett, hangout?
[13:41] <benji> bac: I finished my Makefile branch: https://code.launchpad.net/~benji/charmworld/makefile-tweaks/+merge/184105
[13:41] <benji> I would enjoy a review if you have time.
[13:42] <bac> benji: ok.  i'm reviewing abel's branch atm
[13:42] <benji> thanks
[13:42] <bac> benji: my icon2 branch is ready too.  i'm going to kill the initial MP
[13:42] <benji> bac: I'll review it 
[13:42] <benji> (just let me know when and where)
[13:55] <huwshimi> If anyone wants to review my charmworld redesign branch it's here: https://code.launchpad.net/~huwshimi/charmworld/charmworld-styling/+merge/184078
[13:56] <huwshimi> Don't worry, it's only a 11,237 line diff.
[14:00] <benji> huwshimi: I'll take a look.
[14:00] <benji> If I'm not back in three weeks tell my family that I love them.
[14:01] <Makyo> frankban, https://gist.github.com/makyo/6450487
[14:02] <huwshimi> benji: Haha, thanks. My apologies.
[14:02] <benji> I wonder if I can get this diff up on Rietveld.  It would be nice to do this as an in-line review.
[14:13] <bac> benji: makefile branch approved but with one question about use in production.
[14:13] <benji> cool, I'll look
[14:14] <hatch> gary_poster, review done
[14:15] <gary_poster> thank you I saw hatch :-)
[14:15] <bac> benji: looks like huwshimi's branch breaks the makefile wrt css
[14:15] <benji> bac: yeah, I was just noticing the same thing
[14:15] <bac> benji: quick, land yours and maybe that'll fix it
[14:16] <benji> heh, I doubt it
[14:16] <huwshimi> bac, benji: Oh did I not remove some bootstrap paths or something?
[14:17] <rick_h> hatch: can you QA my branch that gary reviewed please? https://codereview.appspot.com/13368049/
[14:18] <bac> huwshimi: there is a rule that depends on theme.less but it has been removed
[14:19] <huwshimi> oops
[14:19] <bac> huwshimi: so is the css all static now?  not less and not generated?
[14:20] <huwshimi> bac: Yeah, in fact we just load the CSS hosted on ubuntu.com
[14:20] <benji> eww, the charm is written in shell script
[14:21] <Makyo> hatch, https://codereview.appspot.com/13563043
[14:23] <jcsackett> sinzui: so, juju is now throwing "found no instances" i assume because i'm no longer shuttled. however, nova lists nothing for me as well. do we have nothing live, or is my nova lying?
[14:25] <sinzui> jcsackett, you are being lied to. There nova list shows me 6 staging machines, 2 qa machines and a bac instance
[14:25] <jcsackett> sinzui: ok, so juju is probably configured right, but not canonistack itself. interesting.
[14:27] <sinzui> This morning I source orange stack, set JUJU_HOME to the dir to my env.yaml, ran sshuttle, did juju status
[14:29] <benji> huwshimi: If you can fix that make issue it would help me in the review (I'm trying to get the diff up on Rietveld so I can do in-line comments)
[14:30] <huwshimi> benji: Sure, will take a look now.
[14:30] <benji> cool
[14:30] <jcsackett> sinzui: right, i was going to shuttle, but i don't want to ping you every time i need to get the IPs to do so. so time to debug nova.
[14:43] <bac> huwshimi: thanks for the rework of the charm and bundle pages.  sorry they were such a mess to start.
[14:46] <bac> adeuring: may i assign the ES test problem card to you on the kanban board?
[14:47] <adeuring> bac: well... not sure if this fits into the tasks I am supposed to works on in the next time. sinzui: ^^^
[14:47] <bac> adeuring: i figured your current branch did the work.
[14:48] <bac> adeuring: i'm just trying to clean up the board and thought you should get credit for work already done.
[14:48] <adeuring> bac: no, not at all. I suspect that we need to not only use the ES call health() but to also check the index status, as descriibed here http://www.elasticsearch.org/guide/reference/api/admin-indices-status/
[14:48] <abentley> orangesquad: Here's a blog post that I believe describes how the launchpad jenkins plugin is used.  http://qualityhour.wordpress.com/2012/06/14/continuous-integration-with-jenkins-and-launchpad/
[14:48] <bac> benji: i think you can just remove the CSS rule from huwshimi's makefile.  the css is all static now.
[14:49] <benji> bac: he's looking at it; I figured he would know what was up better than I
[14:50] <adeuring> bac: the challenge with this APU call is to figure out what information is relevant. And perhaps also, _if_ this URL provides relevant information...
[14:51] <huwshimi> bac: No problems at all!
[14:52] <huwshimi> benji: I've got caught up here a bit. I think you can probably remove any/all css rules there, but I was going to grab Rick to make sure I wasn't breaking anything, but he's caught up with something now.
[14:53] <benji> huwshimi: ok, I'll take a look
[14:54] <adeuring> bac: ah, i misunderstood your question. I thought you refered to email. Yes, the pending MP should fix some problems that occur even when the ES server is "stable".
[14:59] <jcastro> hey gary_poster 
[14:59] <jcastro> I found an interesting thing
[15:00] <jcastro> https://chinstrap.canonical.com/~liam/cassandra-setup.jpeg
[15:00] <jcastro> I asked the guys in IS to make me a diagram on how we do cassandra for a blog post
[15:00] <jcastro> and this is what they came up with
[15:00] <jcastro> but like the GUI doesn't show units and relationships together, so the diagram looks rather lame in comparison
[15:00] <jcastro> I know we don't really target "make it look impressive when there's a ton of units" as a use case
[15:01] <jcastro> but I thought I'd point it out
[15:02] <Makyo> hatch, https://codereview.appspot.com/13515044
[15:10] <Makyo> jujugui Review please for flagging a service as charm_changed https://codereview.appspot.com/13560043/
[15:17] <gary_poster> jcastro, hey. Fair enough. :-)  Yeah, I don't expect we'll get a unit view any time soon.
[15:29] <bac> sinzui: now that staging is up and happy, i'd like to get production on the same rev 381.  anything i should know besides just following your google doc?
[15:29] <sinzui> bac: Nothing special today
[15:30] <bac> okey doke, off to file an rt
[15:31] <sinzui> bac: I ponder making staging again at EOD because I think we want to use a floating IP. I will also need to land a branch to make migration 18 safe for fresh deploys.
[15:42] <huwshimi> benji: Did you have any luck with the makefile?
[15:42] <benji> huwshimi: yep, tests running now
[15:43] <huwshimi> benji: Great!
[15:43] <benji> huwshimi: tests passed
[15:43] <benji> I'm going to try to get this up on Rietveld now.
[15:43] <huwshimi> benji: Have fun!
[15:43] <huwshimi> benji: I think 10,000 lines of that review are removing bootstrap, so it's not as bad as it seems.
[15:44] <bac> benji: are you going to be able to get to my bundle-icon branch or should i ask an orangish person?
[15:44] <benji> bac: oh, I didn't know it was ready.  I asked for you to tell me where it was when it was ready.
[15:44]  * benji looks at the backscroll to see if he missed something.
[15:44] <bac> benji: yeah, it's been ready.  sorry i didn't give you an url...its in the normal spot
[15:45] <bac> benji: https://code.launchpad.net/%7Ejuju-jitsu/charmworld/trunk/+activereviews
[15:45] <benji> thanks
[15:46] <bac> benji: only 244 lines of that are code, the rest svg
[15:46] <benji> cool, looking now
[15:56] <Makyo> jujugui https://codereview.appspot.com/13566044 quick review please, I broke zooming :(
[16:07] <benji> bac: the branch looks good
[16:07] <bac> thanks
[16:14] <benji> bac: I added a card for the docstringageddon
[16:15] <bac> benji: great.  we're much better at making cards than finishing them.  :(
[16:15]  * bac points finger at self
[16:15] <benji> heh
[16:16] <bac> benji: no call today, right?
[16:16] <benji> as far as I know
[16:16] <bac> nice.  /me -> lunch
[17:06] <Makyo> jujugui quick fix for services appearing to jump on drag https://codereview.appspot.com/13547045
[17:09] <benji> Makyo: I did a review (no QA)
[17:54] <bac> hi sinzui, fyi production has been updated https://pastebin.canonical.com/96998/
[17:55] <bac> we should have a charm icon contest.  i vote bip for most engaging.  http://manage.jujucharms.com/charms/precise/bip
[19:03] <bac> hi benji, there is a problem with your makefile for the run target.  es_update instead of es-update.  i've fixed it in my branch.
[19:10] <benji> bac: ooh, thanks; I'll sneak a quick change into trunk
[20:26] <bac> benji: something is clearing out my local db between runs.  could it be a change to the makefile?
[20:26] <bac> benji: could be an undesired behavior in production.
[20:26] <benji> bac: I don't see how.  
[20:27] <benji> bac: between runs i.e., "make run"?
[20:27] <bac> benji: perhaps 'make test' / 'make run' cycles.
[20:31] <bac> benji: a mostly mechanical change: https://code.launchpad.net/~bac/charmworld/singularize-bundle/+merge/184181
[20:32] <benji> bac: I'll take a look.  Re. db clearage: I just did a "make run" and checked that the apache charm page worked, did a "make test" (the tests passed), and then another "make run" and the apache page was still working
[21:00] <bac> thanks for the review benji
[21:01] <benji> my pleasure
[21:07] <bac> benji: it is ES that is getting blown away.  do a run / test / run and then do a search for 'precise'
[21:07] <bac> benji: i wonder if it is es-update.  it sure takes a long time now
[21:07]  * bac dogs walk
[21:09] <benji> bac: yep, I think I have the same thing happening, all searches return no results