[19:19] <harlowja> smoser hopefully the commit should be ok now :-p
[19:19] <harlowja> can do schema stuff later
[19:19] <harlowja> u think schema stuff way to go?
[19:33] <smoser> harlowja, i like the 'validate'
[19:33] <smoser> and i'm fine with 'json-schema'
[19:33] <harlowja> cool
[19:33] <smoser> a module wouldn't have to use json-schema
[19:33] <smoser> but probaly would
[19:33] <smoser> (and could run the schema and then further test some stuff in its validate)
[19:34] <smoser> you tihnk it seems sane ? i hope?
[19:34] <smoser> and did you look at the opennebula stuff ?
[19:34] <smoser> i'm really leaning towards just pulling their stuff in.
[19:34] <harlowja> haven't check opennebula stuff recently
[19:34] <harlowja> :-/
[19:34] <harlowja> ya, no need for module to use json-schema, just provide its own validate() method
[19:34] <harlowja> that the cloud-init stages can call before running
[19:35] <smoser> why's it called 'json schema' ?
[19:35] <smoser> really its just 'dict, list, string, int' schema
[19:35] <smoser> right?
[19:36] <harlowja> ya
[19:36] <harlowja> :-p
[19:36] <harlowja> got me, i guess the RFC is for json , but not really limited to
[19:36] <harlowja> http://json-schema.org/
[19:37] <harlowja> sorry, not RFC, ' IETF published draft '
[19:37] <harlowja> *whatever that is, ha
[21:04] <smoser> harlowja, 
[21:04] <smoser> http://paste.ubuntu.com/6085177/
[21:04] <smoser> adding that
[21:07] <smoser> harlowja, is there a better way to read /sys ? 
[21:07] <smoser> should i use read_file_or_url there ?
[21:07] <smoser> for mocking / wrapping / test purposes
[21:09] <smoser> harlowja, please think, respond, and i'll update and merge your code and then we'll have "random seed" support on azure too 
[21:09] <smoser> wee!
[21:15] <harlowja> haha
[21:16] <harlowja> weee
[21:18] <harlowja> smoser why not just load_file ?
[21:18] <harlowja> u can still mock load_file ot
[21:18] <harlowja> *out
[23:29] <smoser> duh. load_file. yeah.