/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2013/09/14/#ubuntu-devel.txt

stgraberanyone desktopy around who would be kind enough to fix indicator-power to stop bringing all of click, click-apparmor, ... on all Ubuntu desktop installs?01:41
stgraber(that's before I just go and revert the package by hand breaking the daily release stuff in the process)01:42
stgraberI'll upload the revert in 15min.01:47
cyphermoxstgraber: still around?02:09
cyphermoxmountall: mount /sys/fs/pstore [338] terminated with status 3202:09
cyphermoxmountall: Filesystem could not be mounted: /sys/fs/pstore02:09
cyphermoxdo you know what this is? ^^^02:09
cyphermoxstgraber: please hold off if it's not too late02:10
cyphermox(re indicator-power02:10
didrocksstgraber: what are you trying to fix exactly?02:13
didrocksdoes it impact the dashboard/user experience?02:13
didrockswe have click in main, so it's not an issue with main/universe02:13
didrocksthe next iso should build successfully, right?02:13
didrockseven if click isn't that useful yet on the desktop02:13
Noskcajroaksoax, kirkland: Perhaps we should make testdrive community run rather than canonical run, since it's not canonical maintained or in "main"02:16
NoskcajPlus i've found a guy who's willing to convert it to gtk302:17
jbichatestdrive is not run by canonical02:18
roaksoaxNoskcaj: it is community run nobody pays us to work on it02:19
roaksoaxi did it on my own free time02:19
Noskcajroaksoax, sorry, remove the canonical copyright02:19
cyphermoxstgraber: ignore my question about pstore, I just saw your lxc upload02:19
roaksoaxNoskcaj: the canonical copytight belongs there cause yhe projrct was modified aftrr i started at canonical02:20
jbichaand if you're interested in gtk3, see https://code.launchpad.net/~jbicha/testdrive/port-to-gtk3/+merge/7236902:20
roaksoaxhence the copyright02:20
jbichaI won't have time to work on it any more02:20
Noskcajjbicha, DanChapman has nearly finished the gtk3 port, he said it should be done this week02:21
stgraberdidrocks: we're after feature freeze and that change pulls a dozen new packages on my system02:25
stgrabercyphermox: I was just about to point it out :) unfortunately you'll need to manually apply the fix to your existing containers02:26
didrocksstgraber: I think we should try to check if this shouldn't be considered as a noop02:26
cyphermoxright, and to the template used to create the containers02:26
didrocksit's safe02:26
didrocksit doesn't impact user experience02:26
didrocksbasically, we're just doing more work for nothing02:26
didrocksand bringing pain to touch people02:27
stgraberdidrocks: well, I don't think it's a good idea to install extra packages offering extra APIs when we don't need to, it's making our images bigger and opening some new doors for potential security issues02:27
didrocksstgraber: we should see one converged world IMHO, but I'm surprized that slept in02:28
didrocksis this a direct dep?02:28
didrocksI'm seeing in debian/control:02:29
didrocks+ liburl-dispatcher1-dev02:29
didrocksnothing click*able02:29
stgraberdidrocks: indicator-power directly depends on some liburl stuff which brings in click indirectly02:29
didrocksah ok, so that one02:29
cyphermoxdidrocks: https://code.launchpad.net/~mathieu-tl/otto/fix-mountall-pstore-hang/+merge/18561202:29
didrocksI just checked it's in main02:29
didrocksdo you feel it's that important to fix?02:30
didrockshow critical is it in your opinion?02:30
didrocksif you can test this indicator-power on the phone without this dep and it doesn't regress anything, this will be helpful02:31
stgraberit's: indicator-power DEPENDS on liburl-dispatcher1-dev DEPENDS on liburl-dispatcher1 RECOMMENDS url-dispatcher DEPENDS on upstart-app-launch DEPENDS on click02:31
didrocksso if it's the case, please upload the revert and bring that to the Vcs if possible02:31
didrocksyeah, long chain of deps ;)02:31
stgraberwell, my position is, it's a change that brings an extra 10 packages on our default install without a freeze-exception (not that I'd grant one anyway), so it's a violation of the freeze and should be reverted.02:32
stgraberalso those packages currently have a standing FFe because they're touch-only02:33
didrocksstgraber: can we think in term of user impact?02:33
stgraberbringing them on the desktop would mean no more feature changes to any of them without a separate FFe02:33
didrocksstgraber: didn't slacker_nl and lukasz discussed during vUDS about those common components?02:34
stgraberdidrocks: I don't see the user impact if the work had been done properly so that the indicator only integrates with touch stuff when it's actually running on touch02:34
didrocksstgraber: can you test that?02:34
didrocksbefore reverting02:34
didrocksso that we don't break the baseline02:34
stgraberdidrocks: I'm sure that the revert will make it work no worse than it did this morning and the image was promoted back then, we'll just get back to having one non-working menu entry in the indicator02:35
didrocksstgraber: but we're still regressing if that's the case02:35
didrocksso we can put that on the list of things to look at02:36
didrocksensuring that it's working without it02:36
didrocksand then, doing the revert02:36
didrocksit sounds more sensible to me02:36
didrocksthan breaking for non critical issues compared to all other breakages we have02:36
didrocks(as this one is a noop)02:36
stgraberto be honnest, I care a whole lot more about us pushing extra unwanted packages on everyone's machine past feature freeze than breaking a single entry in our experimental images which didn't work in this morning's image anyway and hasn't been pushed to any actual user yet02:37
didrocksstgraber: I think we should all work to be successful on the phone rather than trying to break something without testing02:38
didrocksbut anyway, your pick02:38
stgraberwhich is why I'll upload the revert, if you disagree with that, I'll be happy to have a discussion with the rest of the release team about it02:38
didrocksstgraber: can you at least please merge that back upstream?02:38
stgraberI know exactly what I'll "break" on the phone, since I have a device next to me currently running the binary I'm about to revert the archive to02:38
stgraberdidrocks: and how do I do that? I suspect it's going to be much more complicated than my patch -p1 -R, won't it?02:39
didrocksstgraber: you can still upload directly02:40
didrocksstgraber: but please apply your patch to a branch that you propose upstream02:41
stgraberok, uploaded (that uploaded is very simply a patch -p1 -R of the previous one, except for debian/changelog)02:41
didrocksstgraber: can you please paste the branch so that I can approve it?02:42
stgraberdidrocks: hmm, the VCS branch for that source is wrong... well, I guess /13.04/13.10/ will do the trick02:43
didrocksstgraber: bzr branch lp:indicator-power?02:43
* didrocks checks02:43
didrocksstgraber: lp:indicator-power seems to contain the latest: indicator-power (12.10.6+13.10.20130913-0ubuntu1) saucy; urgency=low02:44
didrocksright?02:44
stgraberyeah, it's just the Vcs field that's wrong02:45
stgraberthe project trunk is right at least02:45
didrocksstgraber: oh, feel free to fix it ;)02:45
didrocksbonus point to bump the Standards-Version, I guess upstream won't ever do it :)02:45
stgrabersorry, I don't care nearly enough to make a second commit02:46
stgraberhttps://code.launchpad.net/~stgraber/indicator-power/revert-20130913/+merge/18561302:46
didrocksstgraber: approved, thanks02:47
=== freeflying_away is now known as freeflying
=== freeflying is now known as freeflying_away
=== freeflying_away is now known as freeflying
=== ^oVeRMiND^ is now known as oVeRMiND
ari-tczewhello. I've got a problem with DSO linking. FTBFS log: http://paste.ubuntu.com/6105990/ (../src/libudt.so: undefined reference to `pthread*) ../src/Makefile: http://paste.ubuntu.com/6105984/ I was trying to move -lpthread in another place in line 29, but still doesn't work. can anyone help me?12:34
ari-tczewerr, above is mentioned ../app/Makefile12:35
=== Nisstyre-laptop is now known as nisstyre
infinityari-tczew: See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=722958 for both my patch, and an educational discussion about the two ways you could have fixed it (you may find the latter useful for future similar bugs).20:14
ubottuDebian bug 722958 in udt "udt: Fails to build with --as-needed linker option (patch)" [Important,Open]20:14
* cjwelborn is bored20:19
* cjwelborn is bored20:20
ari-tczewinfinity: so you mean to replace -lpthread with -pthread?20:41
infinityari-tczew: As I pointed out in the bug, there are two ways to fix it.  I went with -pthread when I uploaded to Ubuntu though, yes.21:29
infinityari-tczew: (Obviously nothing for you to do here, since I already fixed it, just thought I'd point it out for educational reasons)21:29
susy41yhello everyone21:43
susy41ycan ask what is the topic room?21:43
susy41yhello21:47
ari-tczewinfinity: got it, thank you21:52
GuidoPallemansanyone from the site can explain why I get this error? http://imgur.com/9t8ZdMD22:02
GuidoPallemansHey guys, I'm still getting an error trying to upload an app: http://imgur.com/9t8ZdMD22:12

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!