[02:56] <darkxst> jbicha, any idea on this? http://paste.ubuntu.com/6104366/
[02:57] <darkxst> that is building folks btw
[03:01] <bjsnider> i'm assuming that's not actually true and the header is really there
[03:07] <darkxst> of course the header is there, but its looking for a system installed header which is not there!
[03:09] <bjsnider> you're building folks-telepathy and it need flks-dev
[03:10] <bjsnider> oh, i see, it's all in the same tarball
[03:16] <darkxst> yup!
[03:17] <bjsnider> frustrating to try to browse the git version of that file, because it doesn't exist
[03:17] <bjsnider> i guess it's the whole vala thing
[03:18] <bjsnider> might be useful to see if that file's changed in any way in between releases
[03:21] <darkxst> well there is https://git.gnome.org/browse/folks/commit/?id=311690817f40affee131cbd64870f9f5c4d32196 which was supposed to fix this very issue
[03:23] <FiremanEd> bug 1224574
[03:23] <ubot5`> Error: Launchpad bug 1224574 could not be found
[03:24] <bjsnider> so i wonder if the path was just folks.h in that case would it work
[03:35] <darkxst> nah, its probably needs something added to Makefile.am, but I have no idea what
[03:37] <darkxst> FiremanEd, that is a private bug, no one can see it!
[03:37] <bjsnider> i guess it would build with the headers for folks 9.4
[03:37] <bjsnider> although it would break because of symbol mismatches and whatnot
[03:37] <darkxst> sure, but can't do that, Ubuntu packages build in a sandbox
[03:38] <bjsnider> 9.4 built fine?
[03:38] <darkxst> 0.9.2 was the last version
[03:38] <darkxst> (in ubuntu archives)
[03:38] <bjsnider> oh, that's a big gap
[03:38] <bjsnider> that sucks
[03:39] <bjsnider> could be all kinds of stuff different
[03:39] <darkxst> there were api breaks after 0.9.2
[03:39] <bjsnider> better get in touch with gnome devs about it
[03:39] <darkxst> it requires e-d-s 3.9 for one
[03:39] <darkxst> yeh I filed a upstream bug
[03:40] <bjsnider> 2 to 5, i mean that's a lot of changes
[03:41] <bjsnider> wait, only 3 months
[03:42] <bjsnider> only 3 weeks between 4 and 5
[03:44] <darkxst> yeh they are just development releases, inline with 3.9
[03:46] <jbicha> I don't think folks actually needs e-d-s 3.9 (try patching the bumped requirement out of configure.ac)
[03:51] <darkxst> jbicha, https://git.gnome.org/browse/folks/commit/?id=57621de89d49b06a1db7436de346afdd866b1637
[14:54] <Ashok> Hii
[14:55] <Guest95834> i have followed this link to install gnome3... but after rebooting , the screen looks same that comes originally with ubuntu 13.04
[14:55] <Guest95834> http://ubuntuguide.org/wiki/Ubuntu_Raring_Introduction#Gnome_Project
[14:56] <Guest95834> i have followed method 1 to install gnome 3
[14:58] <Guest95834> anyone online.... ?
[16:18] <xan_IT> hi to all, there is a bug that i think is in gnome3 ppa, any help here?
[16:19] <xan_IT> when i try to enable gedit plugin
[16:33] <xan_IT> http://pastebin.com/1wfmAg5S
[16:33] <xan_IT> when i try to enable gedit-latex plugin
[16:37] <jbicha> yeah, gedit-latex is broken in saucy
[16:41] <xan_IT> i use 12.04
[16:41] <xan_IT> 13.04
[16:45] <xan_IT> jbicha it's normal?
[16:45] <jbicha> ok, if you're using 13.04 with the gnome3 ppa, gedit-latex is broken
[16:46] <xan_IT> i use 13.04 with gnome3 ppa
[16:46] <jbicha> I think the gedit-latex developers aren't even using gedit 3.8 themselves yet and are unaware that their plugin isn't working
[16:47] <xan_IT> ok
[16:47] <xan_IT> the version inside universe is the last?
[16:48] <jbicha> no, but since 3.8.0 doesn't work either I didn't bother uploading it
[16:52] <xan_IT> ok
[16:57] <xan_IT> jbicha you are sure that doesent works on 13.04 gnome3ppa? here https://git.gnome.org/browse/gedit-latex/tree/NEWS here are wrote Port to python 3,
[16:57] <xan_IT> it's not that the problem?
[17:00] <jbicha> they didn't finish the port
[17:01] <xan_IT> ok, sorry for time
[23:36] <darkxst> there is no network icon on the live cd now ;(
[23:43] <darkxst> jbicha, oh network-manager is missing
[23:43] <darkxst> but installing it pulls in network-manager-gnome ;(
[23:55] <bjsnider> that could be a bit of a problem