[07:25] <DanChapman> Morning :-)
[07:28] <smartboyhw> Hello DanChapman
[07:33] <DanChapman> smartboyhw: Hey, how are you?
[07:34] <smartboyhw> DanChapman, good
[07:35] <DanChapman> smartboyhw: so whats the reason for wanting to de-canonicalize testdrive? I think i missed it the other day
[07:35] <smartboyhw> DanChapman, it's not in main, not included in the main Ubuntu disk, blah blah blah
[07:36] <DanChapman> smartboyhw: ahh ok. I thought it would be something like that :-)
[07:44] <smartboyhw> DanChapman, how's your work on porting Testdrive to GTK3?
[07:47] <DanChapman> smartboyhw: I got a little more done late last night but I have got to finish off the autopilot gtk emulators and testsuite first so we can get it merged into autopilot-gtk
[07:48] <smartboyhw> DanChapman, OK, no worries
[07:48] <smartboyhw> Autopilot is the priority:)
[09:57] <rigved> hello everyone
[09:59] <smartboyhw> Hello rigved
[10:02] <rigved> smartboyhw: hello
[10:03] <rigved> i want to do some testing as part of the ubuntu global jam.
[10:03] <rigved> i can do on my laptop and on in a VirtualBox VM
[10:03] <smartboyhw> rigved, great!
[10:04] <rigved> both can only run i386 arch, though
[10:04] <smartboyhw> rigved, no worries.
[10:04] <smartboyhw> See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Jams/Testing for deatils
[10:04] <rigved> smartboyhw: yes. i went through that.
[10:04] <rigved> http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/270/builds/53639/testcases
[10:05] <rigved> is the correct page for saucy testing?
[10:13] <rigved> what is the differnce between http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily-live/20130915/saucy-desktop-i386.iso and http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily-live/current/saucy-desktop-i386.iso ?
[10:18] <toddy> rigved: I think current is always the newest and change every day and the link with the saucy 20130915 is tomorrow the same. today it must be the same. tomorrow it is not the same.
[10:21] <rigved> toddy: oh ok. so, i have the images from "/current/" (synced just an hour back) and was planning on using those instead of the ones from "20130915".
[10:21] <rigved> toddy: thanks
[10:25] <rigved> so, i am doing the test cases from this link now: http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/270/builds/53639/testcases
[10:26] <rigved> in virtualbox first
[13:07] <rigved> i found this bug: #1225669 while running through the testcase description.
[13:14] <smartboyhw> rigved, ouch, we haven't documented that yet. Will be fixing soon.
[13:26] <rigved> smartboyhw: i just filed a bug report for it. i hope that's fine?
[13:27] <smartboyhw> rigved, it's absolutely brilliant that you filed the bug:)
[13:28] <rigved> smartboyhw: awesome
[13:28] <rigved> :)
[22:29] <rigved> please check http://packages.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/300/builds/50386/testcases/1424/results
[22:30] <rigved> there is a duplicate testcase mentioned in the above URL
[22:31] <rigved> Test-case name: nautilus/TC-NFM-008 and Test-case name: nautilus/TC-NFM-009 are the same
[22:31] <rigved> sorry, i mean the testcases are the same on this URL: http://packages.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/testcases/1424/info