=== freeflying_away is now known as freeflying | ||
=== freeflying is now known as freeflying_away | ||
=== freeflying_away is now known as freeflying | ||
=== tkamppeter_ is now known as tkamppeter | ||
dholbach | good morning | 06:49 |
---|---|---|
dholbach | hey... can you guys please help with the sponsoring queue? | 07:38 |
dholbach | we're at 95 requests! | 07:39 |
Noskcaj | dholbach, I'm not sure if that's an achievement or a fail | 07:46 |
Noskcaj | bdrung, I've made the audacity branch, can you take a look? It should be in your emails | 07:47 |
dholbach | Noskcaj, a bit of both ;-) | 07:49 |
lifeless | asd | 08:22 |
lifeless | bah, sorry. | 08:22 |
rbasak | dholbach: how can I politely remove https://code.launchpad.net/~jackweirdy/vidalia/680192/+merge/178623 from the sponsorship queue? | 08:40 |
rbasak | (I'm not sure how MPs map into the queue) | 08:40 |
infinity | rbasak: Just reject the MP. | 08:41 |
rbasak | infinity: I don't see any obvious way to do that. Am I missing some permission somewhere? | 08:42 |
rbasak | I can only change status to Needs review, Merged, or Work in progress. | 08:42 |
infinity | Possibly. The 'status' field is editable if you have the right permissions on the branch. | 08:42 |
infinity | I'll reject it for you. | 08:42 |
rbasak | Thanks | 08:42 |
dholbach | rbasak, yes, if in doubt, just ask in here and somebody will do it for you | 08:46 |
dholbach | I think it's TB members and LP admins | 08:46 |
rbasak | I see. Thanks! | 08:46 |
dholbach | I'm not too happy with the setup myself and don't know the reasons for it, but on the other hand, there's always somebody around | 08:47 |
dholbach | infinity, happy birthday! :) | 08:47 |
infinity | dholbach: Nope, core-dev was added to the group a while back. | 08:47 |
dholbach | ah, awesome! | 08:47 |
infinity | (So please, stop bugging TB for it) | 08:47 |
infinity | rbasak: ^ | 08:47 |
rbasak | Thanks. | 08:48 |
* rbasak should do more core work and apply for core dev. | 08:48 | |
infinity | Yes, you should. | 08:48 |
dholbach | yeehaw | 08:48 |
infinity | You're one of the few left on my "would gladly sponsor for core dev" short list. | 08:48 |
rbasak | Thanks :) | 08:48 |
Noskcaj | Should FFe syncs have the sponsors team unsubscribed till the FFe is granted? | 09:11 |
iulian | Noskcaj: Yes because it wouldn't make sense to have the sponsors subscribed if there's nothing to sponsor. | 09:14 |
Noskcaj | iulian, ok, thanks | 09:14 |
asac | anyone knows if https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-patches was used at some point? it says HIGH VOLUME, but doesnt have an archive | 09:43 |
asac | or is archiving intentional disabled? | 09:43 |
cjwatson | asac: Yes, archiving is intentionally disabled, but mails still go out | 09:44 |
cjwatson | merge-o-matic sends mails there | 09:44 |
cjwatson | I know it still works because occasionally I get bounces :-) | 09:45 |
asac | cjwatson: ok... so its not an automatic debdiff service :)? had hoped for that | 09:45 |
asac | (for everyhting) | 09:46 |
asac | just mom | 09:46 |
cjwatson | You may be unaware of everything that MoM does ... | 09:46 |
cjwatson | It does more than just merges with respect to Debian | 09:46 |
asac | ok... dont need the details now | 09:47 |
cjwatson | The code predates me being involved in MoM, but I believe that it announces all changes in Ubuntu | 09:47 |
asac | interesting. i guess i might just try to subscribe :) | 09:48 |
cjwatson | Well, possibly not all; it probably won't mention syncs | 09:48 |
cjwatson | I tend to think that saucy-changes is a more useful list for this kind of thing, since you can check debdiffs for the tiny fraction that you actually care about | 09:48 |
ogra_ | ++ | 09:49 |
cjwatson | I think in the case of a merge from Debian, the patch on ubuntu-patches will only contain the new debdiff versus the base version in Debian | 09:49 |
cjwatson | But, ubuntu-patches basically is an automatic debdiff service, albeit probably a limited one in some ways | 09:50 |
* cjwatson tries to summon Monday morning brainpower to work on proposed-migration for the :any stuff | 09:52 | |
* ogra_ could only offer some of his jetlag | 09:53 | |
Noskcaj | Is it worth converting debdiffs to branches if i lack the power to upload them? | 09:55 |
cjwatson | No | 09:55 |
cjwatson | Debdiffs are just as easy to apply | 09:55 |
Noskcaj | ok | 09:55 |
Noskcaj | Can someone please explain why http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports links the oneric bug tracker? | 09:57 |
smartboyhw | dholbach, how do I tell in the sponsorship queue which packages can I sponsor? (It's nice to include that as a feature in the report) | 10:14 |
dholbach | smartboyhw, that'd be very hard to implement - right now it's a static page only | 10:14 |
smartboyhw | dholbach, OK | 10:15 |
smartboyhw | hmm, it's easy somehow | 10:16 |
=== doko_ is now known as doko | ||
=== MacSlow is now known as MacSlow|lunch | ||
pitti | Good morning | 12:15 |
mdeslaur | @pilot in | 12:15 |
=== udevbot changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Ubuntu 13.10 Beta 1 released | Archive: Open, FF | Devel of Ubuntu (not support or app devel) | build failures -> http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of lucid -> raring | #ubuntu-app-devel for app development on Ubuntu http://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment | See #ubuntu-bugs for http://bit.ly/lv8soi | Patch Pilots: mdeslaur | ||
=== _salem is now known as salem_ | ||
=== MacSlow|lunch is now known as MacSlow | ||
* dholbach hugs mdeslaur | 12:51 | |
* mdeslaur hugs dholbach back | 13:01 | |
nickguletskii | Hi, I would like to ask if there is a change of https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lm-sensors/+bug/987714 getting fixed in precise? This bug breaks multiarch support for no good reason (an empty file "is not in sync with other instances of the same package" somehow) | 13:21 |
ubottu | Ubuntu bug 987714 in lm-sensors (Ubuntu) "package libsensors4 1:3.3.1-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: conffile './etc/sensors.d/.placeholder' is not in sync with other instances of the same package" [Low,Triaged] | 13:21 |
nickguletskii | chance* | 13:22 |
cjwatson | nickguletskii: Hm, dpkg bug I think. Somebody should confirm in a chroot environment whether quantal's dpkg behaves the same way; I suspect it doesn't. | 13:34 |
nickguletskii | cjwatson: It seems that the quantal version of libsensors4 doesn't have that file, so I can't replicate. | 13:36 |
=== Guest8446 is now known as wedgwood | ||
nickguletskii | heh, weird, it does | 13:37 |
cjwatson | nickguletskii: You don't have to replicate with the quantal version of libsensors4 | 13:38 |
cjwatson | You can probably just take a precise chroot and manually upgrade it to quantal's dpkg | 13:38 |
nickguletskii | cjwatson: My bad, it does have .placeholder in .install, it just doesn't exist in the filesystem | 13:38 |
nickguletskii | cjwatson: You are right, this is probably a dpkg bug... | 13:38 |
OrokuSaki | @hallyn Hi! I was wondering if you could help me out with lxc 1.0 sometime.. its not working for me.. I am using 0.9X instead.. when I run lxc-info -n android, I don't have a pid. Kernel is 2.6.35.. Does this perhaps have to do with /sys/fs/pstore? My kernel does not have pstore.. I may try to backport it | 13:39 |
udevbot | Error: "hallyn" is not a valid command. | 13:39 |
OrokuSaki | Of couse, I don't have fanotify or apparmor either | 13:40 |
* cjwatson tries a test upgrade | 13:41 | |
cjwatson | (needs quantal's liblzma5 too) | 13:41 |
cjwatson | nickguletskii: Yep, quantal's dpkg is fine, so a backport *should* be possible; not trivial since the code was rearranged somewhat | 13:43 |
chrisccoulson | i've just rebooted my laptop, and it now only boots to a grub prompt. anyone like to help me out here? :) | 13:43 |
cjwatson | chrisccoulson: https://www.gnu.org/software/grub/manual/grub.html#GRUB-only-offers-a-rescue-shell | 13:43 |
chrisccoulson | cjwatson, thanks | 13:44 |
cjwatson | chrisccoulson: BIOS or UEFI? | 13:44 |
nickguletskii | cjwatson: so it's very unlikely that it will happen? | 13:44 |
cjwatson | nickguletskii: I didn't say that :-) | 13:44 |
chrisccoulson | cjwatson, UEFI | 13:45 |
cjwatson | chrisccoulson: With or without secure boot? | 13:45 |
chrisccoulson | cjwatson, it's with secure boot | 13:46 |
cjwatson | chrisccoulson: Just a theory but might you perhaps have saucy-proposed enabled, upgraded grub2 last Wednesday, and didn't upgrade between then and rebooting? | 13:46 |
nickguletskii | cjwatson: I can't find a relevant bug (I can only find the .placeholder problem in libsensors4)... Should I ask in #ubuntu-bugs about filling out a bug report? | 13:46 |
cjwatson | nickguletskii: Er, you don't need a new bug - I reassigned this one to dpkg | 13:47 |
chrisccoulson | cjwatson, yeah, that's entirely possible | 13:47 |
cjwatson | chrisccoulson: *ritual mockery for having saucy-proposed enabled* | 13:47 |
chrisccoulson | heh | 13:47 |
cjwatson | chrisccoulson: "configfile /EFI/ubuntu/grub.cfg" | 13:47 |
cjwatson | then get back into a real system and upgrade to a grub version actually intended for human consumption | 13:47 |
cjwatson | and disable saucy-proposed :) | 13:48 |
nickguletskii | cjwatson: thank you very much :) | 13:48 |
chrisccoulson | cjwatson, aha, that looks better. Thanks! | 13:48 |
* chrisccoulson owes cjwatson a beer | 13:48 | |
cjwatson | You can repay me by answering my question from last week :-) | 13:49 |
cjwatson | 11:41 <cjwatson> chrisccoulson: firefox-testsuite needs to be updated to depend on fonts-liberation, not ttf-liberation - I think I have commit access but which branch(es) do I need to commit to? | 13:49 |
nickguletskii | bye :) | 13:49 |
chrisccoulson | cjwatson, ah, i think i've committed that to trunk | 13:49 |
cjwatson | Oh good, thanks | 13:49 |
chrisccoulson | i was going to upload it when i do the firefox 24 upload later | 13:50 |
cjwatson | Yeah, no desperate rush, I just didn't want it to drift past release | 13:50 |
chrisccoulson | sure, no problem | 13:50 |
chrisccoulson | right, switching back to my proper machine now :) | 13:50 |
smoser | hm.. | 13:52 |
smoser | $ sudo ifquery --list --allow auto | 13:52 |
smoser | [sudo] password for smoser: | 13:52 |
smoser | ifquery: failed to lock lockfile /run/network/.ifstate.lock: Bad file descriptor | 13:52 |
smoser | that does'nt look right. expecially since | 13:52 |
smoser | /etc/network/if-up.d/upstart | 13:52 |
smoser | uses it. | 13:52 |
smoser | it seems /run/network/.ifstate.lock was created around the time my system booted. | 13:53 |
smoser | slangasek, ^ you have any explanation that make that just my system ? | 13:53 |
hallyn_ | OrokuSaki: (replied to the pm) | 14:13 |
smoser | bug 1226067 | 14:13 |
ubottu | bug 1226067 in ifupdown (Ubuntu) "ifquery fails with bad file descriptor" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1226067 | 14:13 |
hallyn_ | OrokuSaki: oh, looks like ppa version hasn't been built since i pushed the fix to git, lemme make sure | 14:14 |
hallyn_ | no, it hasn't. starting a build now | 14:15 |
OrokuSaki | Sweet! hallyn! thanks! =) | 14:37 |
=== sraue_ is now known as sraue | ||
slangasek | smoser: nothing specifically... if the lock file is hanging around, that seems like an 'ifup' call may have crashed? | 15:13 |
smoser | slangasek, maybe. reproduces in stock cloud iamge. | 15:13 |
smoser | slangasek, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifupdown/+bug/1226067 | 15:20 |
ubottu | Ubuntu bug 1226067 in ifupdown (Ubuntu) "ifquery fails with bad file descriptor" [Medium,New] | 15:20 |
smoser | nothing really sticks out at me in the system. | 15:20 |
lamont | if saucy complains that gnome-control-center-unity is not part of ubuntu, is that me, or saucy? | 15:28 |
smoser | arges, ping. | 15:29 |
arges | smoser: hi | 15:30 |
smoser | please see bug 1160490 | 15:30 |
arges | yes | 15:30 |
ubottu | bug 1160490 in ifupdown (Ubuntu Raring) "race condition updating statefile" [Medium,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1160490 | 15:30 |
arges | smoser: ok i see it | 15:31 |
arges | smoser: as an experiment can you test 0.7.44 from debian unstable? and see if it has the same issue? | 15:38 |
gQuigs | I was wondering if all the desktop related lucid bugs on here: http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/pending-sru.html could just be closed | 15:43 |
gQuigs | for example: xserver-xorg-video-openchrome, gnome-power-manager and moon (moonlight) | 15:43 |
gQuigs | I was told I would need someone on the SRU team to get close them out | 15:43 |
alberts | mdeslaur: Hi! Can you look at fix for nautilus - https://code.launchpad.net/~albertsmuktupavels/nautilus/white-screen-fix/+merge/180231 | 15:43 |
* mdeslaur looks | 15:46 | |
smoser | arges, well, 0.7.44-0ubuntu2 *does* have it (saucy) | 15:48 |
smoser | i can quick try with 0.7.44 from debian though | 15:48 |
arges | smoser: actually n/m, looking at the usptream changes | 15:48 |
smoser | arges, k. fwiw, reproduce was just 'boot a cloud image' | 15:49 |
smoser | (also i see this on my laptop though) | 15:49 |
arges | smoser: yea setting it up now and debugging | 15:49 |
mdeslaur | alberts: sorry, I don't have enough nautilus knowledge to be able to understand the impact of that fix. Perhaps you could get someone from the desktop team to approve it? | 15:55 |
alberts | mdeslaur: how to do that? | 15:58 |
arges | smoser: found a patch that fixes it | 15:58 |
arges | http://anonscm.debian.org/hg/collab-maint/ifupdown/rev/fb3055c2c4f0 | 15:58 |
arges | smoser: whats teh best way to approach this? create new debdiffs for the regression? | 15:59 |
smoser | for raring, i think you just upload a new package into -proposed. | 16:00 |
smoser | that has a new package version > propposed version | 16:00 |
alberts | mdeslaur: can you look also at this - https://code.launchpad.net/~albertsmuktupavels/ubuntu-themes/restore-space-between-applications-and-places-in-gnome-panel-raring/+merge/178242. It is simple fix which already is included in saucy, but I think it should be included in raring too. | 16:00 |
mdeslaur | alberts: for the nautilus issue, perhaps ask seb128 in #ubuntu-desktop about it? | 16:01 |
arges | smoser: ack. i'm on it | 16:01 |
mdeslaur | @pilot out | 16:01 |
=== udevbot changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Ubuntu 13.10 Beta 1 released | Archive: Open, FF | Devel of Ubuntu (not support or app devel) | build failures -> http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of lucid -> raring | #ubuntu-app-devel for app development on Ubuntu http://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment | See #ubuntu-bugs for http://bit.ly/lv8soi | Patch Pilots: | ||
alberts | mdeslaur: ok | 16:01 |
gQuigs | how about SRUs from 11.10? Can they just be closed? : see bug 853507 | 16:04 |
ubottu | bug 853507 in pcmanfm (Ubuntu Oneiric) "[SRU]pcmanfm crashed with SIGSEGV in fm_nav_history_get_cur()" [Low,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/853507 | 16:04 |
smoser | arges, but i think first thing is fix in saucy. i dont think SRU team will move that to -updates as athe bug is right now. | 16:06 |
arges | smoser: will do saucy first | 16:06 |
slangasek | smoser, arges: if you want the SRU team to know not to copy the package to -updates, you'd better set the verification-failed tags... | 16:15 |
smoser | done | 16:17 |
arges | slangasek: smoser: so i found the fix for the regression. how should i handle this? submit a new debdiff with both patches (the one that fixes the race and the fix for teh regression?) | 16:19 |
slangasek | arges: submit an incremental patch against the packages currently in saucy + -proposed | 16:19 |
arges | slangasek: ok this is in bug 1226067 | 16:19 |
ubottu | bug 1226067 in ifupdown (Ubuntu) "ifquery fails with bad file descriptor" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1226067 | 16:19 |
slangasek | yep | 16:20 |
arges | this might be a good testcase to add to ifupdown | 16:22 |
ari-tczew | ampelbein_: can we forward this one to Debian? or it's Ubuntu-specific? (https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/synfig/0.64.0-1ubuntu2) | 16:24 |
ampelbein_ | ari-tczew: As far as I can tell, debian doesn't have multiarched boost yet. | 16:25 |
ampelbein_ | Or has it? I didn't check for some time. | 16:26 |
ari-tczew | ampelbein_: I don't know, as well. | 16:27 |
ampelbein_ | ari-tczew: So, if Debian doesn't have it yet, the patch would be very wrong to send to debian. | 16:28 |
ari-tczew | sure | 16:29 |
arges | slangasek: ok. so bug 1226067 has the patches for P/Q/R as well (since they are affected.) | 16:43 |
ubottu | bug 1226067 in ifupdown (Ubuntu) "ifquery fails with bad file descriptor" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1226067 | 16:43 |
utlemming | anyone around to help debug 13.04 to 13.10 device permission issuses? | 17:39 |
utlemming | after upgrading from 13.04 to 13.10 I lost the ability to manage USB disks, use printers, audio, webcam and networking | 17:39 |
utlemming | pretty much discovered that 13.04 to 13.10 makes my laptop largely unusable | 17:39 |
utlemming | I was able to fix audio and webcam, but everything else is fubar'd | 17:40 |
utlemming | I am really thinking of reverting back to 13.04 | 17:40 |
smoser | arges, i'll upload to saucy "right now" unless someone else is doing that. | 17:48 |
arges | smoser: cool., nobody else is sponsoring afaik | 17:56 |
dobey | pitti, jibel: hey. i uploaded an ubuntuone-credentials last week, and for some weird reason, the autopkgtest run failed, but i got no e-mail about it failing. and the failure makes no sense to me. :( | 18:22 |
dobey | has uscan or something gone weird recently? i just did a bzr merge-upstream on a branch, and ".bz2" has been appended to the version number | 18:33 |
Laney | dobey: isn't it the missing make check target? | 18:34 |
dobey | Laney: that's what the error says, but given the exact same tests ran fine previously, and that the tests require a built tree and everything, i find it hard to believe that is a valid error. did adt-run do something to change to a different working directory without an unbuilt tree, to run the tests, recently? | 18:35 |
dobey | and that the only change in that upload was to add a dep in debian/control… | 18:36 |
Laney | * adt-run: Fail tests if they exit with nonzero if "allow-stderr" | 18:37 |
Laney | restriction is set. Thanks Robie Basak! (LP: #1210503) | 18:37 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 1210503 in autopkgtest (Ubuntu) ""allow-stderr" tests that produce stderr output always pass" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1210503 | 18:37 |
Laney | probably that | 18:37 |
Laney | I guess it erroneously used to pass | 18:38 |
dobey | oh, ugh | 18:39 |
dobey | Laney: of course, that still doesn't explain why I was never notified about the failure when it did start happening. :) | 18:43 |
=== bfiller is now known as bfiller_brb | ||
dobey | Laney: anyway, any idea about the ".bz2" being appended to the version when i do merge-upstream? | 18:43 |
Laney | No idea | 18:43 |
Laney | have a look at uscan --verbose --report {,--debug} | 18:44 |
=== ejat- is now known as ejat | ||
dobey | well, that verifies that it's apparently uscan doing it :-/ | 18:50 |
=== bfiller_brb is now known as bfiller | ||
=== kentb is now known as kentb-out | ||
=== salem_ is now known as _salem | ||
=== plars is now known as plars-afk |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!