[01:33] jbicha, so folks is failing to build because PKG_CONFIG_PATH is not set correctly, even though it is correct in the Makefiles, any idea on this? [01:36] jbicha, https://git.gnome.org/browse/folks/commit/?id=b1735191b8119484488c0deadd3e9c1b9ff38eb0, just doesnt seem available to the build system [02:43] darkxst, you could set "echo PKG_CONFIG_PATH" in rules before configure to see what it's using [02:44] forgot the $ [02:44] but you get it [02:46] I know what its using, but well the problem is its not exported [02:46] I did export PKG_CONFIG_PATH=$(DEB_BUILDDIR) in rules which worked atleast [02:56] wasn't this a problem in other folks packages, or has it all of a sudden reared its ugly head? [02:56] the last version that built error-free had some other way to find the pc file, or didn't require it at all? [02:57] the stuff that was failing was added since the last package [03:01] and it was just the pkgconfig calls from the gir scanner not picking up the correct PKG_CONFIG_PATH [03:23] i have to remember this if it comes up in the future [05:17] darkxst, hi [05:18] hi ricotz [05:19] Please use something like "Breaks: libecal-1.2-15 (>= 3.9)" [05:19] you can't just conflict with all previous versions since the e-d-s 3.8 packages are fine [05:21] but i guess there is no way that a normal package manager will solve this easily [05:26] ok I can change it [05:26] this will make it possible to install things without having to rebuild all rdepends since there are quite some [05:27] or should I just break on the broken package ie (= 3.9.91-0ubuntu1~saucy1) [05:28] but it will probably lead to a ppa-purge and reinstall for normal users anyway to get out of this [05:28] this wider break/replace might be better [05:28] since it won't leave people with 3.9.x versions [05:36] ok [05:40] darkxst, i am going to push some rebuilds for the gnome-desktop transition [05:41] ricotz, right go ahead, I was going to get to that, but got tied up with the folks mess ... [05:59] darkxst, what was the reasoning to update gnome-session to 3.9.x in saucy directly? [05:59] I have no idea about gnome-session update [06:00] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/saucy/+source/gnome-session/3.9.90-0ubuntu2 [06:00] oh, your name says otherwise ;) [06:01] gnome-session will require gnome-desktop 3.9 which isnt in saucy [06:02] that was just a simple patch to desktop file, jbicha uploaded 3.9.90 [06:02] ah ok [06:03] anyway 3.9.91 can't be uploaded to saucy [06:03] 3.9.91 is very broken anyway [06:03] because it need g-d3, or anything besides that? [06:05] gdm won't even run, failing with some X error [06:05] but I havent had a chance to look into it yet [06:07] I was building it against g-d 3.9.91 though [06:08] i see [06:09] maybe i will take a look later [06:13] ricotz, debdiff for 91 http://paste.ubuntu.com/6113710/ [06:15] darkxst, thanks, could you use a "normal" pastebin [06:15] i mean not something where you need to login to get a raw version [06:16] like paste,debian.net [06:16] sorry didnt realise that, that is stupid [06:17] "* debian/control.in: b-d on gnome-desktop3" >> "* debian/control.in: Bump b-d on gnome-desktop3" ? [06:18] yeah, that is why i never use this paste service [06:21] it depends on some change in 91 === c_smith is now known as c_smith_away [06:21] yes, adding "Bump .." make more sense [06:22] as in version numbers in the changelog? [06:23] that is another story which i would prefer myself [06:23] i mean the actual missing word "Bump" [06:23] g2g [06:24] oh oops ;) [06:54] darkxst, alright downgrading libebackend-1.2-6, libecal-1.2-15, libedata-cal-1.2-20 and libedataserver-1.2-17 to their 3.8.4 saucy versions resolves the e-d-s problem [09:40] darkxst, ping [09:40] darkxst, gnome-session 3.9.91 seems to work fine here [09:46] could be related to some fixes in mutter git if it really fails for you === tommie-lie1 is now known as tommie-lie [20:03] Knock knock :) [20:03] darkxst: are you there? [20:05] ok, darkxst is not here yet :) [20:05] jbicha: hi [20:08] hi amjjawad [20:09] darkxst: hi :) [20:09] hi, I'm half here [20:10] jbicha: hi, since you are half here, that is good :D I just need one Q :) [20:10] Ubuntu GNOME 14.04 will be an LTS release or not? [20:10] ricotz, ok, I was building against mutter 91, will try again [20:10] I won't be here for 14.04 [20:11] jbicha: then who will take care of your work?? [20:12] I believe Ubuntu GNOME is off to a great start, the first alpha was only released a year ago this month [20:13] as far as I know, jbicha and ricotz are the main devs, right? [20:13] you forgot darkxst [20:14] of course :) [20:14] so you are saying, you are handing over everything to darkxst and ricotz ?? [20:14] I was hoping that some of the Canonical guys (Laney & robert_ancell) would have chipped in more, but Ubuntu Phone was such a huge undertaking that there's been no time for them [20:15] no doubt about that [20:16] yes I've been telling people that I'm on my way out for several months [20:16] anyway, good luck jbicha wherever you go and hope your new challenge is something you are going to enjoy :) and yes, I have read your blog the other day :) [20:17] darkxst: it seems we are only few so shall we start the meeting or what? :D [20:17] amjjawad, sure, you know how to drive meetingology? [20:17] haha I was about to ask you to chair :P [20:17] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology [20:18] I did quick read here but have never chaired a meeting. Yes, I am the most one who used to talk/write with Lubuntu Meetings but never chared. Julien was the boss :) [20:19] amjjawad, you can chair then ;) [20:19] O_o [20:19] that is bad news haha [20:19] let me try ... haven't done that before [20:19] I don't know the command for saving the log to a wiki page? [20:22] #chair amjjawad [20:22] #startmeeting Ubuntu GNOME Team Meeting [20:22] Meeting started Mon Sep 16 20:22:54 2013 UTC. The chair is amjjawad. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology. [20:22] Available commands: #accept #accepted #action #agree #agreed #chair #commands #endmeeting #endvote #halp #help #idea #info #link #lurk #meetingname #meetingtopic #nick #progress #rejected #replay #restrictlogs #save #startmeeting #subtopic #topic #unchair #undo #unlurk #vote #voters #votesrequired === Maple__ is now known as [Rainbow_Dash] [20:24] Okay so it seems only few and Alfredo is not here :( [20:24] darkxst: I was about to discuss a bit of the structure of Ubuntu GNOME team but I guess I got the answer that I was in mind. jbicha has confirmed he is leaving and won't be available with 14.04. [20:25] So, my Q to you will be the same as I asked eariler ... will Ubuntu GNOME 14.04 be LTS? [20:25] because some users are asking me and I have no clear answer yet! [20:27] we don't really have the man power to commit to full LTS support right now [20:27] so it is unlikely that 14.04 will be an official LTS release [20:27] darkxst: I do know that which is sad but what if I can arrange that? can we go for it? [20:28] I mean, if I can recurit more people to join and help? [20:28] if yes, how much time do I have for that? [20:30] even if you could recruit more dev's we would need time to see they are committed long term! [20:30] darkxst: okay, then chances are so slim [20:31] so, do you think it is pointless to invest time for that? or perhaps it worths a try? [20:32] even if we don't do an official LTS release, we could still provide SRU's where possible [20:33] right, the community can provide updates to 14.04 LTS for the entire 5-year lifecycle if they want to [20:34] what I wanted to discuss today in this meeting not only the LTS topic but a somehow related topics :) [20:34] and obviously those running 14.04 will still benefit from the Ubuntu HWe updates etc [20:35] darkxst: yes, but then, the same issue with Lubuntu 12.04 which is based on a core system that is LTS but other LXDE packages are not supported for 3-5 years :( [20:36] anyway, the final answer for that is 14.04 is not going to be an official LTS. [20:39] what I wanted to highlight and it is no secert and very obvious but thought it is good to double highlight it :D [20:39] 1- We do need more testers [20:39] 2- we do need more contributor [20:39] contributors* [20:39] having that said, I will take care of these two tasks :) [20:40] darkxst: what do you think? [20:41] it would be great to find a couple more devs [20:42] It would also be good if we can find someone to take of triaging bugs from the ppa's [20:43] then, we agree to that :) [20:43] #action amjjawad to find more contributors to Ubuntu GNOME and more testers also people to help with other tasks [20:43] ACTION: amjjawad to find more contributors to Ubuntu GNOME and more testers also people to help with other tasks [20:44] #topic sub-teams [20:46] I am waiting the right moment to communite on the mailing list my next project for Ubuntu GNOME. After I have put so much time and energy on the Wiki Area, I do think it is time to use the same plan for Lubuntu and have sub-teams (Document, Test, etc) BUT for this to happen, I do need first to find more people to join! [20:46] but, I thought it is good idea to bring this to your attention, darkxst :) [20:47] I have already created 3 teams on Launchpad but did not send anything about it as I am waiting the right moment :) [20:48] we can always form more sub-teams as we grow [20:48] +1 [20:48] glad you liked the idea :D [20:49] Lubuntu had a successful story with sub-teams and I'd love to do the same with Ubuntu GNOME but we need to grow a bit bigger first hehe [20:50] #topic Slide Show Updates [20:50] darkxst: to keep you in the loop, I have worked on the slide show and send my suggestions to Alfredo and he will work on that and hopefully we can finish that before the freeze :) [20:51] ok, sounds good [20:51] :D [20:51] so, slide show is almost done [20:52] what about Wallpapers? I don't think there is enough time for that, right? [20:52] I mean, no time to include more for example? [20:53] as for 14.04, we will hopefully ask for the community input to submit some wallpapers as this will motivate them and attract them to join and help :) [20:54] sure, we just didnt have time in the end to set that up this cycle' [20:55] yep [20:55] I am so excited to start planning for 14.04 from now heheh [20:55] but I will take it easy :P [20:56] #topic Ubuntu GNOME Web Site [20:57] darkxst: thanks for the access, it was good to add two posts and yet again (as always), I have some ideas and plans for the Web Site but I do need 2 things [20:58] 1- Are we counting more on our website? or our mailing list? or our social media? what is the channel that represent our main channel and front line? [20:59] 2- Whatever I have in mind for the website, I do need some help and that means, I need to team up yet again with Alferdo to work on that by adding some nice stuff to the website! [21:01] re 1 I think they each serve a different purpose really [21:03] as we still in point 1, what do you expect from the website? or shall I just take care of that entirely and save you the trouble :P [21:04] you can take care of that [21:04] darkxst: ok, then I guess I need to be admin on the Launchpad Tea for the website [21:04] so I can add Alfredo and whoever else interested to work on that website [21:05] sure [21:05] https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-gnome-website/+members#active [21:07] and I guess this one as well: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-gnome-release/+members#active that is why I had no control panel on the ISO Tracker the other day with Beta 1 release :( [21:07] #action darkxst to give amjjawad access of admin on the Lauchpad area [21:07] ACTION: darkxst to give amjjawad access of admin on the Lauchpad area [21:09] if you need to add a new WordPress theme to the website, you'll have to submit a ticket to Canonical by emailing rt@ubuntu.com [21:09] jbicha: oh, that news to me [21:09] I guess this step is a must, correct? [21:12] amjjawad, Canonical host the website, we have no access beyond wordpress admin panel [21:13] I see :( [21:14] #action amjjawad to email Canonical - rt@ubuntu.com in case of adding new theme to Ubuntu GNOME Website [21:14] ACTION: amjjawad to email Canonical - rt@ubuntu.com in case of adding new theme to Ubuntu GNOME Website [21:16] #topic StartUbuntu [21:17] #link https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StartUbuntu [21:17] darkxst: jbicha not sure if you guys have seen my other project? which is not a personal project but rather a community project right now that some people are involved and helping [21:18] I'd like for Ubuntu GNOME to play a role on that project and I have asked Rafael, Lubuntu Artwork Team Leader who is so good friend of mine and teammate to work on some nice artwork that you can see on the Wiki Page :) [21:18] and, Ubuntu GNOME is there ;) [21:20] nice! [21:21] :) [21:22] final note, Facebook and Google+ Pages are having more and more activities and subscribers :) I am not dreaming of Ubuntu GNOME every night :P [21:23] amjjawad, great! [21:23] I am enjoying it but it sure adds so much tasks for me so once I will find more contributors, maybe they can also help with this area. Because I am also admin for Lubuntu Pages and Peppermint, I am having so much to handle [21:24] and, I have not heard from Matthew yet :( regarding our Twitter account [21:25] I am now dreaming* [21:25] try not to burn yourself out [21:25] #action amjjawad to send another email to Matthew regarding Ubuntu GNOME Twitter Account [21:25] ACTION: amjjawad to send another email to Matthew regarding Ubuntu GNOME Twitter Account [21:26] jbicha: phillw, my mentor, has always and still warning me about that :D hehe [21:26] but +1 I promise I will jbicha :) thanks a lot for the advice [21:27] so, anything else you would like to add guys before ending our first meeting? [21:30] darkxst: and jbicha anything else you guys would like to add before ending? :) [21:31] nope, go ahead and end meeting [21:33] okay, thank you so much darkxst and jbicha :) that was fun and a good meeting [21:33] #endmeeting [21:33] Meeting ended Mon Sep 16 21:33:10 2013 UTC. [21:33] Minutes (wiki): http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-gnome/2013/ubuntu-gnome.2013-09-16-20.22.moin.txt [21:33] Minutes (html): http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-gnome/2013/ubuntu-gnome.2013-09-16-20.22.html [21:40] hi everyone [21:40] wanted to stop by to ask whether gnome3 is also experiencing a logout-issue in saucy (possibly logind connected) [21:41] we're seeing this in xubuntu and from what i've heard ubuntu folks are experiencing this as well [21:41] so i wanted to ask around whether you're affected too [21:41] basically logging out takes ages (+8secs even on a fast machine) [21:41] and then our greeter is going sixes and sevens [21:41] so i suspect the session crashes or something [21:46] ochosi: hi [21:46] do you mean logout and then log back in? [21:46] just logging out takes that long [21:47] in sauc [21:47] y [21:47] because I don't logout for any reason, I have not noticed that [21:47] I just installed the latest build on my machine so I will have a look later and let you know :) [21:47] well testers started reporting it [21:47] bug report? [21:48] well currently it looks a bit unrelated, but it's this one (kinda) https://bugs.launchpad.net/lightdm-gtk-greeter/+bug/1204486 [21:48] Ubuntu bug 1204486 in LightDM GTK+ Greeter "Unable to select alternate languages at login screen" [Undecided,Confirmed] [21:48] i wanted to investigate a bit more before reporting a new bug [21:49] that is a duplicate bug for another one which affects Lubuntu [21:49] let me try to find that one [21:49] well lubuntu uses the same greeter [21:50] Ubuntu GNOME uses gdm so lightdm bugs likely don't affect our image's [21:51] you're using logind though [21:51] so in case it's a logind issue, it would affect you [21:52] (basically trying to narrow down the issue) [21:53] I am not sure if this is even similar or not - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/1213837 [21:53] Ubuntu bug 1213837 in lightdm (Ubuntu) "I cannot select an Xsession after logout from Lubuntu Saucy Daily" [Undecided,Confirmed] [23:15] ochosi, logout takes about 10secs here, but that is in a VM so not sure if its actually slow, or just the VM! [23:18] darkxst: it is just as slow on a real install [23:18] at least in xubuntu