[10:46] <doko> ScottK, dh-python seems to be stuck in proposed
[10:48] <cjwatson> doko: I'm working on that right now
[10:48] <cjwatson> doko: Also all the other things with unsatisfiable Depends: foo:any
[10:48] <cjwatson> Just preparing a precise-amd64 chroot so I can build something to sync to lillypilly to test
[10:57] <cjwatson> doko: Any plans to fix the python2.7 and python3.3 autopkgtests?
[11:06] <doko> cjwatson, ahh, forgot about these ... maybe not today, but tomorrow
[11:10] <cjwatson> Thanks
[13:12]  * cjwatson curses the sheer number of places that need to be fixed for :any in britney
[13:33] <tumbleweed> :/
[13:35] <cjwatson> Oh, this looks betetr
[13:35] <cjwatson> *better
[13:35] <cjwatson>  <li>Maintainer: Debian Python Modules Team
[13:35] <cjwatson> -<li>alembic/i386 unsatisfiable Depends: python:any (>= 2.7.1-0ubuntu2)
[13:35] <cjwatson>  <li>Valid candidate
[13:56] <barry> any chance someone could free up nose2 from the new queue?  it was uploaded before ff but it's been sitting in new for a while now and i'd love to get this into saucy
[14:05] <cjwatson> I think I've unwedged :any dependencies now, after way more effort than that should have been.  Monitoring proposed-migration ...
[14:22] <cjwatson>  finish: [alembic,avahi,cherrypy3,dh-python,frog,gnucash,gourmet,graphviz,ibus-hangul,ibus-xkbc,cobbler,meld,python-cliff,python-django,python-drizzle,python-pip,python-virtualenv,python-whoosh,pywapi,qtpim-opensource-src,sabnzbdplus,schooltool,schooltool.lyceum.journal,schooltool.gradebook,schooltool.cando,terminator,ubuntu-touch-meta,xpra]
[14:22] <cjwatson> there we go, much better
[14:38] <jokerdino> any archive admin feeling charitable enough to take a look at this FFe? bug 1226059
[14:38] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 1226059 in unity-tweak-tool (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Please sync unity-tweak-tool 0.0.5 from upstream git" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1226059
[14:40] <cjwatson> s/archive admin/release team member/
[14:40] <smartboyhw> jokerdino, "The new version is focused on bug fixes only and has no new features." I'm not sure if that requires a FFe.
[14:40] <cjwatson> if the reporter wants release team attention then they should subscribe ~ubuntu-release ...
[14:40] <jokerdino> cjwatson: aw, oops
[14:41] <jokerdino> i was looking at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SyncRequestProcess
[14:42] <Laney> you want
[14:42] <Laney> !ffe
[14:42] <ubot2`> Feature Freeze Exception. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FreezeExceptionProcess for the freeze exception process.
[14:44] <jokerdino> right. So I unsubscribe ubuntu-sponsors and subscribe ubuntu-release then?
[14:53] <stgraber> ah, I was wondering why terminator only migrated a few minutes ago, but looking at the scrollback completely explains it :) thanks cjwatson
[15:00] <sgran> hi all
[15:00] <jokerdino> i ..uh am confused a little. Scott says it is not a FFe. What is the next course of action?
[15:01] <jokerdino> Do I get a sponsor or something?
[15:01] <smartboyhw> jokerdino, yes, you get a sponsor. It is of course not a FFe-.-
[15:01] <sgran> I'm less familiar with what is ok in ubuntu for things like -updates or -proposed for LTS, so I just wanted to ask
[15:01] <jokerdino> I pretty much did the same thing for syncing 0.0.4 last cycle.. :/
[15:02] <Laney> The Fs in FFe stand for Feature Freeze; you don't need an exception for updates which only contain bug fixes
[15:02] <Laney> so go straight to ubuntu-sponsors in that case
[15:02] <sgran> open-iscsi in precise has a hack to make it not start on hosts with / on iscsi, since it gets it wrong
[15:02] <sgran> this makes it impossible to run diskless compute nodes with openstack
[15:02] <sgran> (which just so happens to be what I'm doing at work ...)
[15:03] <sgran> a newer version does the right thing, the hack is removed, and all is well with the world
[15:03] <jokerdino> Laney: can i reset the bug status then? Scott set it to invalid.
[15:03] <sgran> I'm just curious if there is an avenue for the newer version to make it into precise, in some description
[15:04] <tumbleweed> sgran: how complex is the patch that does the right thing?
[15:04] <sgran> the difference between the version that is in precise and the version that works is quite large
[15:05] <sgran> I have not even tried to track down a single patch that fixes the issues in precise - there was lots of upstream work on this area in the meantime
[15:05] <sgran> in debian, I would start working with the maintainer to put this in backports, as it's too invasive for stable proper
[15:05] <sgran> I don't know what the options are in ubuntu
[15:05] <tumbleweed> we have backports too, which is appropriate for new versions like this
[15:06] <Laney> backports would be an option
[15:06] <Laney> jokerdino: sure, do that
[15:06] <sgran> great, how would I go about starting that ball rolling?
[15:06] <Laney> !backports
[15:06] <ubot2`> If new updated Ubuntu packages are built for an application, then they may go into Ubuntu Backports. See https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuBackports - See also !packaging
[15:07] <sgran> thanks
[15:07] <Laney> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBackports → tl;dr: apt-get install ubuntu-dev-tools; requestbackport -d precise -s <whatever> open-iscsi
[15:07] <Laney> sgran: ↑
[15:08] <sgran> Laney: perfect, thanks
[15:08] <Laney> np
[17:30] <jbicha> oh
[17:31] <jbicha> that gnome-disk-utility upload was intended for a ppa so gilir could test it first
[17:37] <jbicha> ScottK: if you're here I assume you want to kill it since the ffe wasn't approved yet
[17:40] <jbicha> ooh, it failed to build anyway, hmm
[19:08] <ScottK> jbicha: It's gone.
[21:34] <Noskcaj> My latest update has installed the ubuntu touch web browser. I'm on xubuntu 13.10 amd64.
[21:34] <Noskcaj> I have since installed it and it's dependencies
[21:37] <skellat> cjwatson: Might Noskcaj have encountered click packages accidentally being dragged in with his scenario?
[21:37] <Noskcaj> Also, will i need an FFe to merge the latest audacity 2.0.3-1 to 2.0.4-1ubuntu1? I've already prepared the branch
[21:47] <cjwatson> skellat: Not possible
[21:47] <cjwatson> skellat: (a) apt doesn't know about click packages so can never install them; (b) the Ubuntu Touch web browser is not currently being shipped on touch devices as a click package anyway
[21:54] <stgraber> that reminds me I need to figure out how system-image and ubuntu-system-settings somehow got into the Edubuntu DVD image