[08:58] <cjwatson> doko: ruby2.0 - is that really a good idea at this point?  won't it require lots of changes to module packages?
[08:59] <doko> cjwatson, just the core package, which shouldn't require any changes
[08:59] <cjwatson> doko: well, if it doesn't have a decent set of modules, is there a point in providing it for saucy?
[08:59] <cjwatson> doko: I guess I'm looking for your reasoning
[09:00] <doko> well, my reasoning is having it there for experimentation, like we had python3.0 packages before (without any set of modules). but certainly it can wait
[09:03] <cjwatson> doko: hmm.  well, ok, but you get to clear up any excitement in -proposed that results from it :)
[09:04] <doko> cjwatson, ok, moving the exitement to saucy :-)
[09:22] <Jack_Yu> cjwatson, hi
[09:26] <cjwatson> Jack_Yu: yes?
[09:26] <cjwatson> (you can just say what you want straight away rather than waiting for me to reply)
[09:26] <Jack_Yu> cjwaston, would please help to mark the FFE request at bug #1226492 ?
[09:26] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 1226492 in UbuntuKylin "[FFE]upload fcitx-qimpanel into archive" [High,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1226492
[09:27] <cjwatson> Jack_Yu: If you want attention for an FFe request, please subscribe ubuntu-release to it
[09:27] <Jack_Yu> cjwatson, :)
[09:28] <Jack_Yu> cjwatson, done:0
[09:28] <cjwatson> Jack_Yu: I'm afraid I don't really have time to look this over just now, but if you subscribe ubuntu-release to it, it will go into the queue
[09:28] <Jack_Yu> cjwatson, OK, thanks.
[09:30] <cjwatson> doko: if you're feeling energetic about ruby, there's a pile of ruby-* modules stacked up in -proposed with a collection of odd build failures associated with them :-(
[11:05] <doko> cjwatson, ok, looking after the python builds
[12:25] <jamespage> hey release team
[12:25] <jamespage> I'm preparing an upload for 1.14.0 of juju-core - this is the stablization release for the 1.13.x series currently in saucy.
[12:25] <jamespage> its bug fixes only (but still quite a large diff) - can I get an ack here please?
[12:26] <tumbleweed> if it's bug fixes only, it doesn't require an FFe
[12:26] <tumbleweed> 1.14.0 is a odd version for a bugfix only release
[12:26] <jamespage> tumbleweed, its a 'stable' release
[12:27] <jamespage> they get cut from the previous interim release (1.13.x)
[12:27] <jamespage> features now get developed in 1.15.x series
[12:28] <jamespage> tumbleweed, the slightly unusual versioning was why I was looking for an ack here
[12:28] <tumbleweed> we don't care too much about the version, it's about the contents
[12:29] <jamespage> tumbleweed, OK, I'll go ahead and upload then
[12:29] <jamespage> ta
[12:29] <tumbleweed> np
[12:29]  * tumbleweed should catch up with my email so I can actually review FFes
[13:48] <cjohnston> cjwatson: this isn't completely your realm, but I think it's somewhat relevant to the things you do.. If you get a minute to take a look at bug #1225442
[13:48] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 1225442 in Ubuntu Website "Checksums/keys should be hosted officially and on HTTPS" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1225442
[13:51] <cjwatson> cjohnston: It's a FAQ
[13:51] <cjwatson> cjohnston: At some point I'll find the last time I answered this and copy/paste
[13:51] <cjohnston> :-)  thanks
[14:45] <cjwatson> jibel: Do you remember how the rsync access control for autopkgtest submissions on 10.189.74.2 works?  We have a new archive offload box being set up to get things off lillypilly; I've confirmed that we can rsync off 10.189.74.2 but am not sure whether we'll be able to rsync on there
[14:45] <cjwatson> jibel: And I kind of don't really want to submit a job just to find out
[14:45] <cjwatson> jibel: Also, is there anything on that host that pulls things from lillypilly by name or IP?
[15:11] <cjwatson> cjohnston: Actually not quite so much of a FAQ as I thought now that I've read it more carefully.  Replying
[15:11] <cjohnston> Thanks cjwatson :-)
[15:23] <jibel> cjwatson, you can verify it works from the new box by rsyncing a file to 10.189.74.2/adt/in/ as long as the file doesn't end with .state. Nothing is pulled from lillypilly
[15:24] <cjwatson> jibel: seems to work, please clean up adt/saucy/in/foo :-)
[15:25] <jibel> cjwatson, and I see it too :) removed
[15:33] <doko> jamespage, any update on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/saucy/+source/mysql-5.5/+bug/1162139 ?
[15:33] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 1162139 in mysql-5.5 (Ubuntu Saucy) "mysql-5.5 still built using GCC-4.4, should be built with the default GCC" [Critical,Triaged]
[16:48] <sil2100> Hello everyone! Anyone from the SRU team can help with reviewing https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/1043627 for SRU?
[16:48] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 1043627 in nux (Ubuntu Raring) "[SRU] Add XIM Support to Nux" [Undecided,Confirmed]
[16:48] <sil2100> (precise)
[16:48] <sil2100> infinity: (again) ^
[21:22] <knome> hey robert_ancell
[21:22] <knome> robert_ancell, thanks for helping us out with bug 1204486 - we now have at least a workaround, we think
[21:22] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 1204486 in LightDM GTK+ Greeter "Unable to select alternate languages at login screen" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1204486
[21:26] <robert_ancell> knome, np
[23:11] <adam_g> anyone more familiar with workings of udev + lvm able to weigh in on the regression potential of the patch on bug 1223576 ?
[23:11] <ubot2`> adam_g: Error: Could not gather data from Launchpad for bug #1223576 (https://launchpad.net/bugs/1223576). The error has been logged
[23:28] <jbicha> ScottK: is there anything else you need for bug 1092719?
[23:28] <ubot2`> jbicha: Error: Could not gather data from Launchpad for bug #1092719 (https://launchpad.net/bugs/1092719). The error has been logged