[06:38] <dholbach> good morning
[07:47] <iulian> Morning dholbach.
[08:16] <dholbach> hi iulian
[08:17] <Laney> hallo
[08:17] <Laney> happy friday my masters
[08:23] <geser> Laney: are you a slave then? :) (and a happy friday you too)
[08:25] <Laney> geser: feels like it :P
[08:26] <iulian> geser: I think by 'master' he meant a young boy... although he's not that young. *g*
[08:26] <iulian> Or is he? :)
[08:26] <Laney> haha
[08:26] <tumbleweed> naah, he's a slave
[08:26] <Laney> no, geser had it right
[08:59] <Laney> ScottK: do we ask for r-recommends testing for backports? /me can't remember
[08:59] <Laney> ScottK: wait, nm, the requestbackport blurb says not
[09:18] <Noskcaj> What is the process for having a package dropped from the ubuntu archive?
[09:19] <Noskcaj> libfame has been removed from debian and has no reverse depends other than it's own -dev package
[09:19] <Laney> file bug, get ack from ubuntu developer (via sponsors), subscribe ubuntu-archive
[09:20] <Laney> sponsor will usually do the last step for you
[09:20] <Noskcaj> ok
[09:23] <cjwatson> also
[09:23] <cjwatson> we process Debian removals in bulk
[09:23] <cjwatson> so actually you don't really need to file bugs unless they seem to be lagging
[09:24] <cjwatson> Noskcaj: http://packages.qa.debian.org/libf/libfame.html has never heard of libfame though - what's the actual package name here?
[09:25] <Noskcaj> libfame-0.9
[09:25] <cjwatson> http://packages.qa.debian.org/libf/libfame-0.9.html  still doesn't exist
[09:25] <cjwatson> source package name?
[09:25] <Noskcaj> It seems to have been out of debian since before oldstable
[09:26] <cjwatson> oh, hm
[09:26] <Laney> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libfame
[09:26] <cjwatson> usually it's on packages.qa anyway ...
[09:26] <Laney> is this a debian-multimedia sync?
[09:26] <geser> looks like it
[09:26] <Laney> removals-full doesn't have it
[09:26] <cjwatson> Yeah, so "has been removed from Debian" isn't actually true then
[09:26] <geser> last upload in edgy
[09:27] <cjwatson> I think it's still reasonable to clean up unused stuff we're carrying from that frankly rather misguided "sync from ALL the archives" experiment, but you'd indeed need to file a bug
[19:11] <sauerbraten> hello there! I came to ask you to update a package in the multiverse branch: http://packages.ubuntu.com/raring/sauerbraten
[19:11] <sauerbraten> I'm a big fan of this game (see my name), I'm not the developer though (that would be eihrul here on freenode). Since the package in ubuntu's repos is about 3 or 4 releases behind, could it please be updated so people don't download an old version of the game and wonder why there are no servers to play on?
[23:20] <sauerbraten> hello there! I came to ask you to update a package in the multiverse branch: http://packages.ubuntu.com/raring/sauerbraten
[23:20] <sauerbraten> I'm a big fan of this game (see my name), I'm not the developer though (that would be eihrul here on freenode). Since the package in ubuntu's repos is about 3 or 4 releases behind, could it please be updated so people don't download an old version of the game and wonder why there are no servers to play on?
[23:28] <Noskcaj> sauerbraten, I'll look into it, since good games helps us a lot, but it's probably too late in the cycle
[23:28] <sauerbraten> Noskcaj: thanks! any cycle would be great :)