[09:06] <darkxst> ricotz, hi
[09:07] <darkxst> it seems that XDG_CURRENT_DESKTOP also is being found for g-c-c when loading from overview
[09:08] <darkxst> or something just broke ;(
[09:08] <darkxst> s/is/is not/
[09:23] <ricotz> darkxst, hi, i see
[09:24] <ricotz> darkxst, are you working on g-s-d?
[09:24] <ricotz> i might take a look later to resync it with ubuntu if needed
[09:24] <ricotz> (g-c-c was quite off in this regard)
[09:24] <darkxst> ricotz, I think the displayConfig stuff should be implemented in unity
[09:25] <darkxst> g-s-d does need to be resynced
[09:25] <darkxst> 3.9 packages were based of ppa packages before saucy upload happened so will be a bit of a diff
[09:25] <ricotz> darkxst, that would be great
[09:26] <ricotz> ok, i guess i will take a look then
[09:27] <darkxst> ricotz, thanks
[09:27] <darkxst> it was actually on my todo list, but somehow I decided to try port gjs to c++
[09:28] <ricotz> oh, why is that?
[09:28] <darkxst> mozjs 24 has removed the C API
[09:28] <ricotz> ah
[09:29] <darkxst> not that its even released yet, but I can make that happen
[09:29] <ricotz> i have played it a bit with it here
[09:29] <ricotz> meaning packaging it from the repo
[09:29] <ricotz> will need a newer icu which is easy to update
[09:30] <darkxst> yeh 99% of my versioning patches are now upstream
[09:30] <ricotz> but there are a lot of patches needed to be backported from trunk to get a useful tarball
[09:31] <darkxst> hmm? they should be in 24?
[09:31] <ricotz> the 24 branch isnt is a good "standalone" shape
[09:31] <ricotz> darkxst, no i mean e.g. icu patches
[09:31] <darkxst> oh that is entirely seperate to what I am talking about!
[09:32] <ricotz> i know
[09:32] <ricotz> but it prevents to have a tarball out of the 24 branch
[09:33] <darkxst> right
[09:34] <ricotz> so some of these -- http://paste.debian.net/plain/44690
[09:35] <darkxst> ricotz, have you opened upstream bug for this?
[09:35] <ricotz> darkxst, i guess porting gjs to c++ isn't needed, but probably not the favor of upstream
[09:36] <ricotz> isn't / is
[09:36] <ricotz> darkxst, no, i haven'Tt
[09:36] <ricotz> is there even a "mozjs24 release" bug yet
[09:36] <darkxst> nope, let me make one
[09:36] <ricotz> ok, g2g for now
[09:37] <ricotz> bbl
[09:37] <darkxst> cya
[10:03] <darkxst> ricotz, https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=919277, please add any other info you have there!
[12:52] <winb> The GNOME Classic session will be included in the 13.10 release ? Or just the beta?
[12:53] <winb> And where can I download the Ubuntu Gnome 12.04 ?
[12:54] <winb> It's not listed here http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-gnome/releases/
[14:04] <Andy80> hi guys
[14:05] <Andy80> after trying GNOME (the one available on ppa:gnome3-team/gnome3 for Ubuntu 13.04) also on a second PC I ask: why is it so instable?!
[14:05] <Andy80> every session I get "System errors"
[14:05] <Andy80> or apps that crash
[14:05] <Andy80> like tracker, evolution*
[14:05] <Andy80> gcs or something like that
[14:06] <Andy80> and note: the "staging" repository is not enabled
[15:45] <theenduser> ls -al
[15:45] <theenduser> lol I was way off
[18:21] <bjsnider> Andy80, there are known issues