[00:00] <chiluk> well let's call this a bug fix... since those can keep going in
[00:01] <bdmurray> the saucy debdiff is missing any patch tags
[00:02] <chiluk> I usually just debdiff  old.dsc new.dsc > debdiff
[00:02] <chiluk> what flags do you want?
[00:03] <bdmurray> http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep3/
[00:04] <bdmurray> Its less important for stable releases, but very useful for the development release.
[00:05] <chiluk> this is my first upload needing to be applied to development release...
[00:09] <chiluk> or at least I've never been told about this requirement before.
[00:10] <chiluk> bdmurray, ya know what, I'm going to go for a swim, and I'll take a look at that patch doc afterwards or tomorrow... have a good night man.
[00:11] <bdmurray> chiluk: you too
[21:59] <chiluk> bdmurray, I updated the patches for http://pad.lv/1150413
[21:59] <chiluk> they now include dep3 info in the quilt patch.
[22:00] <chiluk> I'm all ears on any other suggestions on how I can provide better patches.
[22:08] <bdmurray> chiluk: thanks, the dep3 info is only really necessary for the development release for the stable releases its just nice to have
[22:09] <chiluk> yeah it is nice to have.
[22:09] <chiluk> It wasn't much more effort to update the other debdiffs.
[22:10] <chiluk> bdmurray is there anything else you would have had to do to my debdiffs that I should be doing?
[22:12] <bdmurray> chiluk: no, I think its good otherwise
[22:14] <chiluk> cool thanks...
[22:15] <chiluk> bdmurray, I guess there was one possible sore point.. in the dep3 Origin I put all the links on one line.... like this :+Origin: upstream, https://gitorious.org/procps/procps/commit/a45dace4b82c9cdcda7020ca5665153b1e81275f, https://gitorious.org/procps/procps/commit/95d0136281ec00c68e2994d708fec4dd28275453
[22:15] <chiluk> is that correct?
[22:23] <bdmurray> chiluk: I'm not certain most things seem to indicate that there should be multiple instances of a field if there is more than one thing
[22:24] <bdmurray> chiluk: It actually might be useful to know the Applied-Upstream information 'It may contain the upstream version expected to contain this patch'.  That we know whether or not to keep it in T.
[22:25] <chiluk> 3.3.8
[22:25] <chiluk> contains the later of the two commits
[23:42] <phillw> hi bug team, can someone mark a bug up as a duplicate, please.
[23:45] <phillw> ignore that.. I found the tag!