[03:54] <Terry_Guo> Hi there, I want to enable my ppa for armhf, but the build will take 10+ hours. can I do this? Thanks.
[08:13] <czajkowski> davmor2: it's never my fault any more :)
[08:14] <czajkowski> Terry_Guo: no it needs to be under 4 hrs
[14:56] <psusi> so.. apport removes the original core dump once it retraces it... how can I pry it out of launchpadlib?  the stack trace just isn't enough, I need to poke around the core a bit
[14:56] <dobey> i don't think you can
[14:58] <psusi> is there someone here with god powers who can? ;)
[14:59] <cjwatson> pretty sure it's actually DELETEd from the db
[15:00] <cjwatson> IIRC you need to get apport not to retrace that next time, and wait for another report.  ask pitti/bdmurray
[15:00] <dobey> yeah, afaik, deleted attachments are gone for good
[15:02] <psusi> you sure?  it feels like it works the way private bugs do... no subscription, no access
[15:03] <psusi> the bug link redirects you to some restricted url with a magic cookie
[15:03] <cjwatson> if you have a link I can take a look
[15:03] <cjwatson> (to the bug)
[15:03] <psusi> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1231288/+attachment/3841761/+files/CoreDump.gz
[15:04] <cjwatson> I see no redirect
[15:04] <cjwatson> That's just a plain "no such object"
[15:05] <psusi> also one of the dups had its core dump removed and no full stack trace done and was marked as a dup... but based on the limited stacktracetop, it isn't a dup
[15:05] <psusi> right... you don't get the redirect because the file has been removed from the report...
[15:05] <cjwatson> for that you will have to ask apport people
[15:06] <psusi> click on the stacktracetop and you get a redirect
[15:06] <cjwatson> it's not part of Launchpad
[15:06] <cjwatson> psusi: there's no stacktracetop in bug 1205815 ...
[15:06] <psusi> err, ThreadStacktrace
[15:06] <cjwatson> apart from the plain-text mention in the description
[15:06] <cjwatson> ditto
[15:06] <cjwatson> I bet if you reload in a different tab you'll find it's not there
[15:07] <psusi> ohh, the redirect seems to be different now that I made the report public... it had restricted in the hostname or something before
[15:07] <psusi> and a cookie as a & parameter
[15:08] <cjwatson> private objects tend to be in the restricted librarian, yes.  but in this case, it's inaccessible because it's been deleted (by apport-retrace), not because of any privacy setting.
[15:09] <psusi> is there somewhere the apport people hang out?
[15:10] <cjwatson> (at least I believe so.)
[15:10] <cjwatson> psusi: #ubuntu-devel - I already suggested talking to pitti
[15:11] <cjwatson> can't find the deletion code in the retracer right now.  hopefully I'm not misremembering.
[15:11] <cjwatson> (in a meeting)
[15:14] <cjwatson> oh yes, found it
[15:14] <cjwatson>                 if a.title == 'CoreDump.gz':
[15:14] <cjwatson>                     try:
[15:14] <cjwatson>                         a.removeFromBug()
[15:14] <cjwatson> which deletes the LFC reference immediately
[15:15] <psusi> right... removes the reference from the bug report... but it is still burried somewhere in the librarian right?  just no reference to it any more
[15:16] <cjwatson> it is I suppose possible that it hasn't been GCed yet, but since it's private you can only get at it through the webapp, and the webapp isn't going to let anyone have it since it isn't referenced from anywhere with any sharing enabled ...
[15:16]  * psusi misses the old netware salvage utility... find those unlinked files and recover those babies
[15:17] <cjwatson> wgrant might know if there's a way, but my suspicion is that you're out of luck
[15:19] <cjwatson> but, removed at 07:39, and librarian-gc runs at 10:15
[15:19] <cjwatson> I suspect it's already eaten your lunch
[15:27] <kirkland> is there any way to post something at the top of my projects' Answer pages that says "Please stop asking questions here and go to AskUbuntu!" ?
[15:28] <smartboyhw> kirkland, wow, what happened?
[15:28] <smartboyhw> (/me thinks you can only make it in the description of your project, BTW0
[15:33] <kirkland> Hmm, okay, looks like I can disable answers... I really just want to leave a symlink to the other location
[15:51] <dpm> hi all, would anyone know what this error coming from a package on the core apps PPA could be? It seems the amd64 and i386 builds succeeded, but the armhf one had a chroot problem? -> http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/6159236/
[16:24] <dobey> dpm: try to rebuild the failed arm build. looks like it was a problem setting up the chroot
[16:25] <dpm> thanks dobey, will give that a go
[16:37] <cjwatson> dpm: IS has fixed the failure and I'm mass-retrying everything affected now.
[16:39] <dpm> thanks cjwatson
[22:22] <harlowja> a qq for any launchpad experts if anyone is around
[22:22] <harlowja> is there a way to have a blueprint in launchpad span multiple projects?
[22:28] <lifeless> harlowja: no
[22:28] <harlowja> durn