=== lulu is now known as Guest18260 | ||
excalibr | Hello.. | 01:53 |
---|---|---|
excalibr | in /etc/lsb-release, what does your DISTRIB_ID string says? Ubuntu-GNOME or Ubuntu-Gnome? | 01:56 |
darkxst | excalibr, its actually just 'Ubuntu' | 02:02 |
excalibr | darkxst: what about other strings? anything that identifies the os as ubuntu-gnome? | 02:09 |
darkxst | nope, not in lsb-release atleast | 02:09 |
excalibr | not in /etc/os-release too? | 02:13 |
darkxst | excalibr, nothing there either | 02:36 |
ricotz | darkxst, hi | 08:25 |
darkxst | hey ricotz | 08:30 |
darkxst | ricotz, I gotta run now, will be back this time tomorrow night. | 08:49 |
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
ricotz | darkxst, alright, keep an eye on make check in gjs | 09:08 |
ricotz | darkxst, the mozjs24 works as expected, but the api changes are a pita without proper docs | 09:09 |
danyR_ | hello. I want to run GNOME 3.10 on an Ubuntu 13.10 basis, with no traces of Unity. What's my best choice? Downloading a 13.10 Beta/Daily and then installing GNOME 3.10 using the PPA? Thanks | 13:27 |
smartboyhw | danyR_, yes. Downloading Ubuntu GNOME 13.10 Beta 2 + GNOME 3.10 with PPA. | 13:27 |
danyR_ | smartboyhw: Thanks, here I go | 13:28 |
davidbrooke | I have been using ubuntu-gnome 13.10 since beta and I'm very happy with it! Much thanks and great work! | 15:58 |
roasted_ | hi | 19:45 |
roasted_ | just thinking out loud - is it pretty much impossible to derail ubuntu gnome from getting released at the same time as the other *buntu's? Reason I ask is staggering Ubuntu GNOME's release to be, say, 3 months later would introduce more time to get the latest Gnome into Ubuntu GNOME, so that way it's not... "brand new" but with yesterday's Gnome. Just a thought. | 19:48 |
SonikkuAmerica | roasted: I'd say it's about the Ubuntu core more than it is about the DEs associated with each flavor. Maybe we should bug the cave-people at GimpNet. | 20:43 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!