/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2013/09/28/#ubuntu-gnome.txt

=== lulu is now known as Guest18260
excalibrHello..01:53
excalibrin /etc/lsb-release, what does your DISTRIB_ID string says? Ubuntu-GNOME or Ubuntu-Gnome?01:56
darkxstexcalibr, its actually just 'Ubuntu'02:02
excalibrdarkxst: what about other strings? anything that identifies the os as ubuntu-gnome?02:09
darkxstnope, not in lsb-release atleast02:09
excalibrnot in /etc/os-release too?02:13
darkxstexcalibr, nothing there either02:36
ricotzdarkxst, hi08:25
darkxsthey ricotz08:30
darkxstricotz, I gotta run now, will be back this time tomorrow night.08:49
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
ricotzdarkxst, alright, keep an eye on make check in gjs09:08
ricotzdarkxst, the mozjs24 works as expected, but the api changes are a pita without proper docs09:09
danyR_hello. I want to run GNOME 3.10 on an Ubuntu 13.10 basis, with no traces of Unity. What's my best choice? Downloading a 13.10 Beta/Daily and then installing GNOME 3.10 using the PPA? Thanks13:27
smartboyhwdanyR_, yes. Downloading Ubuntu GNOME 13.10 Beta 2 + GNOME 3.10 with PPA.13:27
danyR_smartboyhw: Thanks, here I go13:28
davidbrookeI have been using ubuntu-gnome 13.10 since beta and I'm very happy with it! Much thanks and great work!15:58
roasted_hi19:45
roasted_just thinking out loud - is it pretty much impossible to derail ubuntu gnome from getting released at the same time as the other *buntu's? Reason I ask is staggering Ubuntu GNOME's release to be, say, 3 months later would introduce more time to get the latest Gnome into Ubuntu GNOME, so that way it's not... "brand new" but with yesterday's Gnome. Just a thought.19:48
SonikkuAmericaroasted: I'd say it's about the Ubuntu core more than it is about the DEs associated with each flavor. Maybe we should bug the cave-people at GimpNet.20:43

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!