=== lulu is now known as Guest18260
[01:53] <excalibr> Hello..
[01:56] <excalibr> in /etc/lsb-release, what does your DISTRIB_ID string says? Ubuntu-GNOME or Ubuntu-Gnome?
[02:02] <darkxst> excalibr, its actually just 'Ubuntu'
[02:09] <excalibr> darkxst: what about other strings? anything that identifies the os as ubuntu-gnome?
[02:09] <darkxst> nope, not in lsb-release atleast
[02:13] <excalibr> not in /etc/os-release too?
[02:36] <darkxst> excalibr, nothing there either
[08:25] <ricotz> darkxst, hi
[08:30] <darkxst> hey ricotz
[08:49] <darkxst> ricotz, I gotta run now, will be back this time tomorrow night.
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
[09:08] <ricotz> darkxst, alright, keep an eye on make check in gjs
[09:09] <ricotz> darkxst, the mozjs24 works as expected, but the api changes are a pita without proper docs
[13:27] <danyR_> hello. I want to run GNOME 3.10 on an Ubuntu 13.10 basis, with no traces of Unity. What's my best choice? Downloading a 13.10 Beta/Daily and then installing GNOME 3.10 using the PPA? Thanks
[13:27] <smartboyhw> danyR_, yes. Downloading Ubuntu GNOME 13.10 Beta 2 + GNOME 3.10 with PPA.
[13:28] <danyR_> smartboyhw: Thanks, here I go
[15:58] <davidbrooke> I have been using ubuntu-gnome 13.10 since beta and I'm very happy with it! Much thanks and great work!
[19:45] <roasted_> hi
[19:48] <roasted_> just thinking out loud - is it pretty much impossible to derail ubuntu gnome from getting released at the same time as the other *buntu's? Reason I ask is staggering Ubuntu GNOME's release to be, say, 3 months later would introduce more time to get the latest Gnome into Ubuntu GNOME, so that way it's not... "brand new" but with yesterday's Gnome. Just a thought.
[20:43] <SonikkuAmerica> roasted: I'd say it's about the Ubuntu core more than it is about the DEs associated with each flavor. Maybe we should bug the cave-people at GimpNet.