[02:10] Can someone please make jackd2 rebuild? The build crashed because libopus-dev wasn't ready at the time [02:25] Noskcaj: I've hit "Retry this build" for jackd2 1.9.9.5+20130622git7de15e7a-1 [02:25] sladen, thanks [02:27] Noskcaj: "Missing build dependencies: libopus-dev" [02:28] sladen, I'm stupid, issue is opus isn't in man [02:28] *main [03:13] sarnold: Looks like another MIR is waiting on you (bug #1196967) ... No pressure. :) [03:13] bug 1196967 in opus (Ubuntu Saucy) "[MIR] opus (b-d of jackd2)" [High,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1196967 [03:16] kirkland, Did you ever finish the vmware for testdrive? === statik_ is now known as statik === brainwash_ is now known as brainwash === freeflying_away is now known as freeflying === jelmer_ is now known as jelmer [12:56] If a bug report and stack trace from a PPA package is received, will the Apport retracing service use the appropriate -dbg package from that PPA? [12:57] *well, crash report and stack trace === wedgwood is now known as Guest43744 === doko__ is now known as doko [13:56] W: Possible missing firmware /lib/firmware/radeon/KAVERI_sdma.bin for module radeon [13:56] W: Possible missing firmware /lib/firmware/radeon/KAVERI_rlc.bin for module radeon [13:56] W: Possible missing firmware /lib/firmware/radeon/KAVERI_mec.bin for module radeon [13:56] W: Possible missing firmware /lib/firmware/radeon/KAVERI_ce.bin for module radeon [13:56] W: Possible missing firmware /lib/firmware/radeon/KAVERI_me.bin for module radeon [13:56] W: Possible missing firmware /lib/firmware/radeon/KAVERI_pfp.bin for module radeon [13:56] 13.10 [13:56] ?? [13:59] Peace-, it's OK to ignore [13:59] Kaveri hasn't even existed yet-.- [13:59] ok smartboyhw tx [14:03] Kaveri, huh? That’s Finnish for a pal. === freeflying is now known as freeflying_away [15:47] In theory, would it be possible to boot 13.10 in a non-pae system, using an appropriate 486 kernel from debian? === Guest43744 is now known as wedgwood === tkamppeter_ is now known as tkamppeter [20:20] ping mardy [23:37] pitti: re: psql version. I don't think we care enough about it to justify an FFe. [23:38] jamespage: ^^ any thoughts? Original message was: 15:44 rbasak: ^ do you care much about which psql version is in saucy? ( [23:38] I had thought not, given that the non-LTSes are not a very attractive server pla [23:38] tform anyway)