=== jono is now known as Guest37503 [10:39] mlankhorst, hello :) [10:40] mlankhorst, was there are a reason not to sync libx11? [10:42] while building it in a ppa it bails on xsltproc with "... Bus error ...", maybe you saw something like this yet? https://launchpadlibrarian.net/152123093/buildlog_ubuntu-saucy-i386.libx11_2%3A1.6.2%2Bgit20131002.18a5278b-0ubuntu0ricotz_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz [11:35] a3/away [11:35] uh [11:36] ricotz: yes that was exactly the reason [11:36] bug in w3m somewhere or something, and i cant reproduce it.. [11:37] well the current version fails just as well [11:38] doko poked me about it [11:44] mlankhorst, i see, i thought so :\ [12:01] anyone here with gen5 intel, arrandale/ironlake? [12:01] aka original 'core' [12:10] there are updates to w3m available in debian [12:10] -8 -> -11 [12:10] a couple of patches to fix "potential segfault" too [12:11] i'll sync it [14:25] w3m update is now in proposed [14:38] ok, syncpackaged libx11 [14:40] cool [14:41] to the ppa first? [14:41] naw [14:43] we already know the only thing that broke libx11 was w3m, so if it's still broken some other solution has to be found anyway [14:46] right [15:07] and building [15:14] https://launchpadlibrarian.net/152143920/buildlog_ubuntu-saucy-i386.libx11_2%3A1.6.1-1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz [15:14] looks like 0.5.3-11 is still borked [15:14] bah [15:20] we should just upload libx11 and create it without the .txt documentation [15:22] blah tomorrow, afk [15:24] xorg-sgml-doctools could be synced too (doesnt solve the libx11 issue though) [15:28] the specs aren't getting built on debian? [15:29] then again I don't see why not [15:29] tjaalton, yeah, according to the build log they aren't built there [15:30] Functional specs building enabled: no [15:32] tjaalton, could be they are disabled due build-indep and the binary amd64 upload already contained the arch-all packages [15:32] probably [15:32] but it has no build logs available [15:33] yes, because they were uploaded and built locally [15:33] bah :) [15:34] right, it runs debian/rules build-arch [15:37] oh well, it builds on sbuild just fine [15:37] heh, it builds fine here too, but the builders dont like it ;) [15:38] maybe even another ancient kernel issue [15:39] https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9515 [15:39] bugzilla.samba.org bug 9515 in Build "can not build samba4 in the RHEL5.3" [Normal,New] [16:10] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libx11/+bug/1163805 looks like it happens a lot.. [16:10] Ubuntu bug 1163805 in libx11 (Ubuntu Raring) "libx11 ftbfs in raring (building the docs)" [High,Invalid] [16:22] Sarvatt, hey :), how are you? [19:02] I have a question about Mir [19:02] I noticed that to support the Raspberry Pi, you need to add a backend to weston [19:03] Since weston is just a reference compositor, does that mean that every compositor implementation would need to add hardware specific code? [19:03] Does using Mir improve that? In other words, if a compositor uses Mir, does that get abstracted? [19:04] perhaps I'm misunderstanding something fundamental? [19:08] mir only(?) has an egl backend, so the platform needs to have drivers to provide that [19:10] oooohhh...they're not using egl on the raspberry pi...I see [19:10] gl(es) [19:10] sry [19:10] i've no idea if it can work [19:10] er, yeah, gl [19:15] so for weston the default backend is drm, but rpi doesn't have open driver aiui [19:15] *drivers [19:34] tjaalton: so it mir gains an alternate backend because it needs a funky driver for hardware support, and some compositor is using mir, it gets that backend support for free, right? [19:38] tjaalton, btw, could you still sync libevdev? [19:41] ricotz: done, no guarantees [19:41] mdeslaur: well, it's the drivers that need to learn new tricks, not the way around I think [19:41] but yes, like you said aiui [19:42] also I think you'd get less vague answers on #ubuntu-mir :) [19:42] tjaalton, thanks, it builds and doesnt have any rdepends yet, so i hope it gets accepted [19:42] tjaalton: thanks! [19:43] tjaalton, have you done it for xorg-sgml-doctools too yet? [19:43] nope [19:44] fixed [19:44] thanks [19:44] mlankhorst: the package-status page still seems to not update the debian versions :/ [20:00] hm meh :/ [20:01] sorry, bike broke and I had to walk home for an hour instead [20:01] not in the best of moods [20:03] take your time :) [20:04] I wonder why it doesn't update debian versions though, afaict it can pull all the versions from launchpad just fine [21:09] ok libx11 ubuntu1 uploaded, i killed the .txt files [21:10] looks like just retrying the build could've worked [21:10] i bet we could kill libx11-doc without anyone caring [21:10] well i did retry the build, no luck [21:10] ok [21:10] and in the ppa i tried like 5 times [21:11] heh.. [21:11] i blame the buildd [21:12] or did they all fail? [21:12] only fails with w3m on i386 [21:12] unfortunately the -doc is only built on i386 [21:12] hah [21:12] but it's a arch all package [21:12] right