| Noskcaj | there's a lot of builds that failed to upload at http://qa.ubuntuwire.org/ftbfs/ , can someone take a look? | 05:27 |
|---|---|---|
| === freeflying_away is now known as freeflying | ||
| cjwatson | Noskcaj: hmm | 08:59 |
| cjwatson | Module lp.archiveuploader.uploadprocessor, line 667, in process | 09:00 |
| cjwatson | [changes_file] = self.locateChangesFiles() | 09:00 |
| cjwatson | ValueError: need more than 0 values to unpack | 09:00 |
| cjwatson | WTF | 09:00 |
| cjwatson | Noskcaj: Oh, OK, this is a consequence of a recent launchpad-buildd regression (my fault), bug 1235038 | 09:01 |
| ubottu | bug 1235038 in launchpad-buildd "launchpad-buildd treats unknown DEPFAILs as OK" [Critical,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1235038 | 09:01 |
| cjwatson | Noskcaj: Just ignore them and treat them as if they were "Package is waiting on another package" for now | 09:02 |
| Noskcaj | ok, so they should all be ready by release? | 09:02 |
| cjwatson | Noskcaj: You misunderstand; those packages won't build either way, it's just the wrong error | 09:03 |
| cjwatson | Noskcaj: They're stuck on something else that's unavailable on the architectures in question | 09:03 |
| Noskcaj | oh, ok | 09:03 |
| smartboyhw | cjwatson, ew, now ardour3 sync causes i386 to FTBFS:( | 09:03 |
| cjwatson | (For the most part) | 09:03 |
| cjwatson | smartboyhw: Well, you wanted to ram this in late in the cycle ;-) | 09:04 |
| smartboyhw | cjwatson, well, I didn't expect that sync which fixes armhf and powerpc FTBFS i386 (only) | 09:04 |
| smartboyhw | Should have reverted:( | 09:04 |
| smartboyhw | I didn't request it myself | 09:04 |
| cjwatson | No need to revert, it's not problematically broken in the release pocket | 09:05 |
| smartboyhw | cjwatson, ah yeah:) | 09:05 |
| cjwatson | You have time to figure it out properly | 09:05 |
| cjwatson | Noskcaj: This will be fixed well before release in time to get all the build states into the correct kind of failure, though | 09:06 |
| cjwatson | I expect we'll roll out the fix next week (thereby annoying sysadmins even more, but there) | 09:06 |
| === lionel_ is now known as lionel | ||
| === freeflying is now known as freeflying_away | ||
| Laney | smartboyhw: seems possibly fixed in git, checking | 11:12 |
| smartboyhw | Laney, it is possibly fixed | 11:12 |
| smartboyhw | I'm just waiting for an actual release from Debian... | 11:13 |
| Laney | takes ages to build | 11:15 |
| smartboyhw | Laney, :( | 11:28 |
| lenios | how would you remove the executable-not-elf-or-script lintian warning on a package? i have a lot of png and js files and a few php files with this and i'm not sure of the best way to clean this up | 11:32 |
| jtaylor | chmod u-x file | 11:40 |
| cjwatson | just -x, u-x is unnecessarily specific | 11:42 |
| jtaylor | right | 11:42 |
| cjwatson | except in the rather unlikely event that *only* the owner has exec permissions | 11:42 |
| jtaylor | muscle memory from chmod u+x :) | 11:43 |
| Laney | smartboyhw: it built | 11:43 |
| Laney | shall I upload it? | 11:44 |
| smartboyhw | Laney, \o/ | 11:44 |
| smartboyhw | Yes please | 11:44 |
| Laney | Build needed 00:44:16, 1345940k disc space | 11:44 |
| Laney | come on laptop refresh | 11:44 |
| lenios | question would be where to do the -x | 11:44 |
| cjwatson | probably immediately after the upstream make install | 11:46 |
| cjwatson | e.g. perhaps in a dh_auto_install override | 11:46 |
| cjwatson | (in debian/rules) | 11:46 |
| lenios | what about overriding dh_fixperms? | 11:46 |
| cjwatson | I wouldn't; it's probably not the thing that's wrong | 11:47 |
| cjwatson | alternative: add a patch to the upstream build system to fix their foolish code installing it with exec perms | 11:47 |
| smartboyhw | Laney, you're uploading it through Debian or Ubuntu? | 11:47 |
| Laney | U | 11:47 |
| lenios | i can't control the upstream build system, but i can try to submit them a patch | 11:47 |
| Laney | I'm guessing the maintainer will upload it to Debian soon enough | 11:47 |
| smartboyhw | Laney, agreed | 11:48 |
| cjwatson | I mean, you obviously *can* override dh_fixperms for it, I just think it's no more sensible a place than e.g. overriding dh_installman | 11:48 |
| cjwatson | lenios: eh, you can surely patch it in your package | 11:48 |
| cjwatson | it might not be the easiest way, depending on the situation, but I've done that in the past | 11:48 |
| lenios | oh yes, i can patch it | 11:49 |
| lenios | that will need to be redone on each new package, but still | 11:49 |
| cjwatson | rebasing patches isn't normally that hard | 11:49 |
| cjwatson | like I say, not necessarily the best way depending on your situation, but it's an option. if you do it in debian/rules I would recommend it be somewhere immediately after and clearly associated with the buggy upstream installation code (if indeed that's where the bug is) | 11:50 |
| smartboyhw | Laney, thank you, now all architectures build and is now in -release. | 13:21 |
| Laney | happy days | 13:22 |
| smartboyhw | Laney, I need a FFe for the ardour3 inclusion in ubuntustudio-meta right? | 13:22 |
| Laney | Not sure | 13:23 |
| Laney | probably OK if the flavour developers want it | 13:23 |
| Laney | Got to go now | 13:24 |
| smartboyhw | Laney, ouch | 13:24 |
| smartboyhw | Just want you to ack the bug-.- | 13:24 |
| lenios | i asked upstream about the executable-not-elf-or-script warning, and they fixed it with a commit and now no more warnings :) | 13:30 |
| lenios | https://mentors.debian.net/package/phabricator if someone is interested in sponsoring it | 13:31 |
| smartboyhw | lenios, ask in #debian-mentors on OFTC:P | 13:34 |
| lenios | that would be a good idea :p | 13:34 |
| === sharms_ is now known as sharms | ||
| === em is now known as clickgay | ||
| === clickgay is now known as em | ||
| jokerdino | any sponsors around? need to upload a bug fix for unity-tweak-tool | 18:23 |
| chilicuil | hello, I'm interested in getting a new package for ubuntu saucy (probably by now too late?), I've gone through debian (mentors) and created the package, now I think is ready, however a week has gone and no one with permition to debian have look at it, I wonder if some one here can do it, and approve it or reject it, http://mentors.debian.net/package/youtube-cli / http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2013/09/msg00299.html | 21:03 |
| solirc | Hi! | 22:24 |
| solirc | I'm just getting started with PPAs and UDD. | 22:25 |
| solirc | And I manage to upload a custom version of ghc. | 22:25 |
| solirc | Not I'd like to do the same thing for cabal-install, but `bzr branch ubuntu:cabal-install` fails with | 22:26 |
| solirc | bzr: ERROR: Not a branch: "bzr+ssh://bazaar.launchpad.net/+branch/ubuntu/cabal-install/". | 22:26 |
| solirc | s/Not/Now | 22:26 |
| solirc | Ah, it is `bzr branch ubuntu:haskell-cabal-install` | 22:28 |
| solirc | even though the package is named `cabal-install` | 22:29 |
| * solirc looks entirely puzzled | 22:29 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!