/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2013/10/06/#ubuntu-devel.txt

mingany way to let the revision begins with  1 except I delete the .dzr directory after i get the source code with "bzr branch" ?05:46
slangasekming: no, and as I mentioned the other day, that's the wrong goal.  The only way to get a different revision 1 is to /not share history/, which is contrary to the purpose of a distributed VCS06:02
infinityming: I can't fathom why you'd WANT to reset the revision to 1.06:10
mingI am looking for a job and "they" ask me to do something to test me.06:11
infinityming: If you're looking for a job with someone who wants you to remove history and attribution from code you fork, you might want to look for a better job.  Just sayin'. :P06:12
slangasekexcept that based on the branches ming linked to earlier, I suspect this is related to UbuntuKylin06:13
slangasekso I think we might want to address these strange branch management practices... :)06:13
mingYes, you are right...06:13
infinityIndeed we might, then.06:13
mingI send an email to one of them, they say don't need to delete .bzr.06:14
mingI am interesting in open source things. In china, it's hard to get a job like this.06:15
mingbut in the project page you can see they have different revison  all begin with 1,how they did it without remove .bzr directory?06:17
infinityExample branch?06:19
minghttps://code.launchpad.net/chinese-calendar06:19
infinityIt looks like instead of branching, people sometimes bzr export, then push it as a new branch, or similar.  Which is something approaching insane.06:22
infinitySince one can't then consolidate those branches.  And you lose all the history.06:22
infinitySo, yeah, as slangasek says, perhaps someone should address this practise, not continue it.06:22
sarnold(but might make some amount of sense if all N people working on the chinese calendar are actually competing against each other rather than cooperating on its construction)06:23
infinitysarnold: It's a project with a free license, and only one "official" version in the archive.  Competition aside, they can clearly still yank each other's code, and only one trunk gets uploaded.06:24
infinitySo, making merging back and forth harder just seems gratuitously silly. :P06:24
sarnoldespecially if the winner and the winner's code is intended to be merged back in..06:25
mingMaybe they think of something else...06:27
ming‬another question ,how to build a deb and when user  install it, an icon displays on user's desktop ? Maybe you think this looks strange too. But for Chinese user,it's a good thing...06:34
infinityming: If every package did that, users would have hundreds of icons on their desktop.  What makes yours more important?06:35
infinityming: (This is why our current design just plain doesn't do that at all)06:35
mingI know you people think like this.06:37
mingbut for China user, if there is no icon on desktop,they will can't find the software...06:38
infinityming: So, you're implying that every piece of software installed in a default install (like I said, hundreds of applications) should have an icon on the desktop?06:39
mingof course not.06:39
infinityWe do highlight a select few productivity apps (libreoffice, firefox..) and put them in the launcher by default as a hint.06:40
infinityKylin could, of course, hand-pick a few different defaults (and may well do so, I've never installed it and looked).06:40
mingMaybe WPS office and something else.06:40
smartboyhwJackYu, ^06:41
infinityBut individual packages adding themselves to the desktop or launcher leads to the "my application is more important than yours, so I get to be prominent" madness that, if taken to its obvious conclusion, leads to hundreds/thousands of icons.06:41
mingI agree with you as well, but...06:41
mingNow I should know how to do.06:42
mingsome important software maybe will do like this to help people use their computer easily.06:43
mingTo common user, they will be confused if there is no icon after they installed the software.06:46
JackYuming, maybe you cloud add a Desktop Entry.07:00
mingi know this.07:01
mingit's a .desktop file.07:02
mingAre u the Administrator of UbuntuKylin Members ?07:02
mingHe named JackYu, too.07:03
mingI hava some ideas now. I am reading Debian Policy Manual .07:04
JackYuming, as far as I know, there is no requirement for revision starting from 1.07:07
mingJackYu, maybe the man I asked mad a slip of the tongue while I think too much about this.07:10
JackYuming, should be that:). It's strange...07:13
JackYuming, what's you LP id?07:15
mingJackYu, it's anywnztj.07:16
mingWhat's wrong?07:16
JackYuming, nothing, just a look:).07:17
mingJackYu,:-))07:17
JackYuslangasek, infinity, sarnold, smartboyhw, hi, the UbuntuKylin test dose NOT require the revision restarting from 1. Furthermore, it is not a good answer if doing like that:).07:31
smartboyhwJackYu, heh heh heh07:32
JackYusorry for the delayed reply, I'm in a conf:(07:32
smartboyhwConf on Sundays, baed07:32
smartboyhw*bad07:32
=== freeflying_away is now known as freeflying
=== freeflying is now known as freeflying_away
maxiaojunseems like debian is no longer a frontier for foss packaging?12:14
maxiaojunfor example https://help.ubuntu.com/community/InternetRelayChat mentions hexchat12:17
maxiaojunfedora and opensuse have hexchat in repo, not the case for debian and ubuntu12:18
brainwashmaxiaojun: bug 99501812:20
ubottubug 995018 in xchat (Ubuntu) "[needs-packaging] HexChat" [Wishlist,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/99501812:20
smartboyhwThere is actually a ITP bug in debian too12:27
smartboyhwJust that nobody touched it12:27
smartboyhwmaxiaojun, ^12:28
maxiaojunseems like debian is no longer a frontier for foss packaging?12:30
infinity...12:30
infinityBecause one thing you want packaged isn't?12:30
maxiaojunexamples are many, i just hit this one today though12:31
infinityAs it's always been in Debian, things get packaged when someone who's using it wants to package it.12:31
infinityI don't use it, therefor I wouldn't package it.12:31
maxiaojunmaybe those want a unix-ish "desktop" still use debian, other desktop users don't12:32
maxiaojunubuntu has many desktop users, but when people want something packaged, the answer is 'hey, go to debian first'12:33
tumbleweedmaxiaojun: that's because packages that are only in Ubuntu tend to go unmaintained12:34
infinitySomeone does appear to be maintaining hexchat packages in a PPA, at least.12:35
infinityhttps://launchpad.net/~gwendal-lebihan-dev/+archive/hexchat-stable12:35
infinityAnd quite actively so.12:35
maxiaojuntumbleweed: same thing for debian12:35
tumbleweedmaxiaojun: no, in Debian packages have maintainers12:35
tumbleweedit's their job to keep a package in shape12:35
maxiaojuntumbleweed: zombie maintainers are many12:36
tumbleweedsure, but at least we know to remove the package, when the maintainer has been gone for a while12:36
maxiaojuntumbleweed: really?12:37
tumbleweedyes12:37
tumbleweedalso, it's not like it's any harder to do things in Debian, and you get more users for free12:37
maxiaojundebian stuck with texlive 2009 for ~3 years? have you removed it?12:37
tumbleweedmaxiaojun: um, I don't know what makes you think that12:38
tumbleweedhttp://packages.qa.debian.org/t/texlive-base.html12:38
maxiaojunit seems ok now12:38
maxiaojunbut don't you find it strange that u 12.04 has texlive 2009?12:39
infinityNot really.12:39
tumbleweednot particularly. texlive is huge & crazy12:39
infinityDebian had moved on to 2011 at that point, but I chose not to do the transition in the middle of an LTS cycle.12:40
cjwatsonsometimes there are good reasons too.  groff was at an old version for a long time, but it wasn't because I was inactive12:40
infinityNew versions aren't always the right answer to everything.12:40
cjwatsonby just pointing at versions without looking at the backstory, you're basically cherry-picking headlines over substance.12:41
infinityErm, aren't we upstream for software-properties?12:41
cjwatsonPretty sure we are yes12:41
infinityWe sure are.12:42
* infinity rejects smoser's upload.12:42
maxiaojunok, i admit that i didn't check changlog for texlive12:42
maxiaojunhttp://ftp-master.metadata.debian.org/changelogs//non-free/r/rar/rar_4.2.0-1_changelog12:42
infinitysmoser: Can you commit a sane version number to lp:software-properties and reupload?12:43
maxiaojunthis one is a real example, rar 4.0b2 4.0b3 broken for many languages that are non-English/non-ASCII/non-OEM-encodable for ~ 2 years12:44
=== freeflying_away is now known as freeflying
infinityOkay, massive props for patches with ASCII art in them.12:47
infinityhttp://launchpadlibrarian.net/152578059/libwacom_0.7-1_0.7-1ubuntu1.diff.gz12:47
maxiaojunanother good example is ibus-* packages, do you think LI Daobing, as a maintainer, still cares even a little bit?12:48
* infinity goes to bed before maxiaojun decides to point out any packages he maintains.12:50
maxiaojunI'm not criticizing LI Daobing. I'm criticizing the so-called maintainer system. Basically LI was an advocate of IBus at 2009-2010, made many initial packages. And he didn't do anything after 2010. While he is still listed as maintainer.12:52
maxiaojunhttp://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=tegaki12:54
maxiaojunHave you found that  tegaki-zinnia-traditional-chinese comes so late? because LI didn't package it. And no one bothered to fix this.12:57
maxiaojunin fact it is not fixed in debian still http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=tegaki12:58
maxiaojuntumbleweed: you still advocate for the maintainer system?13:03
smartboyhwmaxiaojun, I advocate for the team maintainer system...13:04
tumbleweedinfinity: double plus good? :P13:04
maxiaojunmany debian teams look zombie or half-zombie13:05
tumbleweedmaxiaojun: but you can join them, if you want to help. teams almost always welcome any newcomer13:05
maxiaojunbtw, is eglibc dead or I'm just to lucky to observe http://www.eglibc.org/ down?13:13
=== freeflying is now known as freeflying_away
melodiehi20:29
achernyaHello. Can I help you?20:31
melodiehi achernya nice of you. I was looking if I could see seb128 but he does not seem to be here now20:39
melodiehere it says he was the last to work on the package: http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/changelogs/pool/main/l/lightdm/lightdm_1.2.3-0ubuntu2.3/changelog20:40
melodieand I meet with an issue with the latest lightdm version : however I'm not sure only lightdm is concerned, there is libgobject which goes along20:40
melodieI meant liblightdm-gobject-1-020:42
=== tkamppeter__ is now known as tkamppeter
melodieis the Ubuntu project going to use systemd instead of upstart?21:52
tumbleweedunlikely21:54
melodiehow come I've seen packages containing the "systemd" chain character, in the installed packages?21:56
tumbleweedI don't quite understand that, but I assume you're seeing some of the things that we do use, from the systemd source21:57
melodieI am in a wonder about it, also because the gui application for configuring the services in Ubuntu has been broken and left as is in Ubuntu since several years now. :[21:59
melodieI am looking forward to finding a way to point to some threads which source this statement21:59
melodiegn23:33

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!