| stgraber | hey there, just tried using a standard generic kernel on my wandboard (imx6) and I'm getting this in dmesg followed pretty shortly by a full system hang: http://paste.ubuntu.com/6216221/ | 00:54 |
|---|---|---|
| stgraber | that's with the latest saucy kernel though I actually never managed to get a stable distro kernel to work on that one | 00:55 |
| stgraber | taking the same 3.11 kernel built by fedora (so probably slightly different kernel config) works fine | 00:55 |
| stgraber | (but I'd rather use the Ubuntu one from the archive since it gives me aufs and overlayfs which are rather nice on a system I use as a buildd) | 00:55 |
| stgraber | infinity: not sure if that rings a bell ^ | 00:58 |
| infinity | stgraber: I suspect you'll find that our kernel and fedora's differ a lot more than just in configs. :/ | 00:59 |
| infinity | stgraber: But not familiar with that bug in particular, no. My imx6 has been idle a while. | 00:59 |
| stgraber | yeah, I'm already trying to get a config diff here and it seems rather massive, then I have no idea how many patches fedora has on top of upstream | 01:00 |
| infinity | stgraber: Anyhow, file a bug, point to the sources matching the working Fedora kernel. I suspect it might take someone with a bit of smarts very little time to diff A B, compare to backtrace, and see where we might have gone wrong. | 01:00 |
| stgraber | and the current upstream git is failing to build for me (fails in some devicetree code) so I can't test if 3.12-rc4 is any better | 01:01 |
| stgraber | bug 1237733 | 01:21 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1237733 in linux (Ubuntu) "Kernel hangs on wandboard (freescale imx6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1237733 | 01:21 |
| === fmasi_afk is now known as fmasi | ||
| * henrix -> lunch | 11:59 | |
| === fmasi is now known as fmasi_afk | ||
| apw | * powerpc | 12:36 |
| apw | blktap (2.0.90-2ubuntu1): blktap-utils | 12:36 |
| apw | bah | 12:36 |
| === psivaa is now known as psivaa-afk | ||
| ppisati | why is there an ubuntu-desktop metapkg but no ubuntu-server metapkg? | 14:28 |
| ppisati | i see the edubuntu-server* but no ubuntu-server | 14:29 |
| ppisati | weird | 14:29 |
| ppisati | actually the edubuntu pkgs are not meta | 14:30 |
| === psivaa-afk is now known as psivaa | ||
| === ricmm_ is now known as ricmm | ||
| manjo | ppetraki, around ? | 15:09 |
| ppetraki | manjo, uh yeah | 15:19 |
| manjo | oh | 15:19 |
| manjo | ppisati, around ? | 15:19 |
| ppisati | manjo: what? | 15:20 |
| manjo | ppetraki, there is a thread with Andre ... seems like we need an option for virtio console | 15:21 |
| manjo | ppisati, ^ | 15:21 |
| ppisati | manjo: http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git?p=ubuntu/ubuntu-saucy.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/master-next | 15:21 |
| ppisati | manjo: build it and check it out | 15:21 |
| manjo | awesome! thanks | 15:22 |
| bjf | kamal, what's the story on bug 1162026 and bug 1163720 ? | 15:44 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1162026 in linux (Ubuntu Raring) "backlight not adjustable after screen turns off and then back on" [Medium,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1162026 | 15:44 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1163720 in Linux "Brightness control broken on XPS13 with 3.8.0-16 and 3.8.0-22" [Medium,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1163720 | 15:44 |
| * kamal throws self from top of nearest spire . . . | 15:45 | |
| * ppisati goes out for a bit | 15:46 | |
| bjf | kamal, the "issue" for me is that these have been backported to precise, are in the precise changelog, there is no precise task on the bug and they need verification | 15:47 |
| bjf | kamal, i guess that should be "issues" :-P | 15:47 |
| manjo | ppisati, what branch is it on ? master-next ? | 15:47 |
| ppisati | manjo: yes | 15:48 |
| kamal | bjf, ok, I think 1162026 is actually fixed nowadays (do you want to create a precise task for it? same for quantal, I suppose?) | 15:49 |
| * ppisati notes my push-to-talk button is broken | 15:50 | |
| ppisati | :P | 15:50 |
| bjf | kamal, i really just care that the "verification" tag gets added to the bug so that my report turns green | 15:50 |
| kamal | bjf, 1163720 is an open issue (problem exists upstream also) ... I don't actually know if that bug can manifest on precise or not (I really don't even want to go find out). | 15:51 |
| kamal | bjf, oh, so you just want me to verify it then change the verification-{needed/done}-precise tag ? no new task line required? | 15:51 |
| apw | if the bug is being released into precise in an lts kernel or similar then we should have tasks for it , so that launchpad has something to close | 15:52 |
| bjf | kamal, really both should happen but the tag is what i care most about | 15:52 |
| bjf | kamal, what apw said | 15:52 |
| apw | kamal, if you cannot nominate let me know what you need adding to what bug and i'll slam them in | 15:53 |
| bjf | kamal, i've taken care of adding the precise series to the bugs | 15:57 |
| kamal | bjf, ok thanks ... but I'm scratching my head about 1163720 ... its certainly _not_ fixed at this point, but that fact should not make "this fix will be dropped from the source code, and this bug will be closed" occur! | 15:59 |
| kamal | bjf ... because "this fix" wasn't actually supposed to be the fix for that bug. | 16:00 |
| kamal | bjf, can I just take away "Fix Released" from 1163720? (make it "In Progress" or something?) ... and remove the verification-needed-* tags? | 16:02 |
| bjf | kamal, well ... wasn't it fix released for raring? (or are you telling me it's not?) | 16:04 |
| apw | kamal, it ought to have only flagged up on bjfs list cause it has the bug number in the commit log right? | 16:05 |
| kamal | bjf, 1163720 is *not* fixed for any release at all | 16:05 |
| bjf | kamal, when i read that bug it looked like the commit fixed the original issue and then there was a new issue | 16:05 |
| apw | kamal, not even saucy ? | 16:05 |
| kamal | bjf, apw: the commit just shouldn't have referenced 1163720 at all | 16:05 |
| bjf | kamal, ok, fair enough | 16:06 |
| kamal | that bug does still exists in saucy (and upstream) | 16:06 |
| apw | ommit 8029954e6aa79d3fdc44b0353f6c9c4a8a656725 | 16:06 |
| apw | Author: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@canonical.com> | 16:06 |
| apw | Date: Fri Jul 19 15:02:01 2013 -0700 | 16:06 |
| apw | drm/i915: quirk no PCH_PWM_ENABLE for Dell XPS13 backlight | 16:06 |
| apw | 16:06 | |
| apw | kamal, that one lists it | 16:06 |
| apw | so the tools assume it is fixed | 16:06 |
| kamal | apw, that was a mistake on my part then. | 16:06 |
| bjf | kamal, then in that case i would think the right thing to do is to change the status to in-progress | 16:06 |
| apw | kamal, and we need to find out which bug you meant to put in there | 16:07 |
| bjf | kamal, and we'll just ignore the verification tags for this bug for this cycle | 16:07 |
| bjf | apw, that commit has 3 bugs listed i believe | 16:07 |
| kamal | apw, bjf, yes, that commit already has (also) the correct buglink | 16:08 |
| apw | bjf, yeah, it does indeed, there will be some fallout to fix the bugs it does not fix | 16:08 |
| kamal | bjf, ok, I will change 1163720 to "In Progress", and I think I should remove the verification tags from it also (yes?) | 16:10 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| === ChickenCutlass is now known as ChickenCutlass_l | ||
| * cking -> EOD | 17:34 | |
| eridu | hey ubuntu kernellers, I'm tedks on launchpad, and I mistakenly closed this bug after corresponding with jsalisbury about it: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1133087 | 17:56 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1133087 in linux (Ubuntu) "Ubuntu shows grains like screen after the splash from kernel (3.8.0-5)" [High,Fix released] | 17:56 |
| jsalisbury | eridu, ok. I'll take a look. | 17:57 |
| eridu | it turns out that after installing the generic linux package and upgrading via apt, I installed the Ubuntu linux-image package, but wouldn't boot from it. So I made a mistake by closing that bug. With the latest (as of now) version of linux-image, I can't get to X on my system. | 17:57 |
| eridu | jsalisbury: thanks -- sorry for screwing this up, I'm still willing to test any bisected kernels you throw my way. and I'll double-check the uname this time :-) | 17:58 |
| jsalisbury | eridu, np. I'll re-open the bug and add some comments. | 17:58 |
| eridu | awesome, thanks. | 18:00 |
| === ChickenCutlass_l is now known as ChickenCutlass | ||
| * rtg -> lunch | 19:05 | |
| rtg | bjf, care to chime in on this thread so I can get it out of my inbox ? https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel-team/2013-September/032841.html | 20:27 |
| bjf | looking, i thought it was handled so i deleted it already | 20:28 |
| rtg | bjf, just looking for the 2nd opinion | 20:28 |
| bjf | rtg, didn't we ask for more testing on that? | 20:32 |
| rtg | bjf, He says he tested on 4 other platforms | 20:32 |
| bjf | rtg, i ack'd it | 20:34 |
| rtg | bjf, k | 20:34 |
| * rtg -> EOD | 21:27 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!