[00:24] <bigjools> roaksoax: in case you are not really asleep yet, there's one more fix that needs to get in to maas, the WSGIImportScript change to fix the bson problem.  It's possibly only a small packaging change for the Apache config.
[00:24] <bigjools> might have to SRU it though
[00:24] <bigjools> either way, it's urgent of course
[01:44] <jpds> bigjools: Any idea how I can figure out why MAAS is no longer serving TFTP?
[01:44] <jpds> pserv.log shows: TFTP Listener started at 172.30.171.5:69
[01:45] <jpds> But it's not.
[01:46] <jpds> Oh, wait, might have fied it.
[01:46] <bigjools> can you co..
[01:53] <jpds> So, I chwoned pserv.log back to maas:mas.
[01:53] <bigjools> ...
[01:53] <jpds> But it still can't do its thing: chinstrap.canonical.com/~jpds/maas.png
[01:54] <jpds> Interesting how it doesn't say that it's starting up...
[01:55] <bigjools> restart it
[01:55] <bigjools> it didnt shut down
[01:56] <jpds> If i stop it, I get another  Received SIGTERM, shutting down. line.
[01:56] <jpds> start doesn't being anything up.
[01:56] <bigjools> when you stop it, do you see the process actually go away?
[01:56] <jpds> Yep, it's no longer listening on port 69.
[01:57] <bigjools> that means nothing, is the process still there?
[01:57] <jpds> No, no pserv.
[01:57] <bigjools> ok
[01:57] <jpds> $ sudo service maas-pserv start
[01:57] <bigjools> what user does it run as?
[01:57] <jpds> I have a process, port 69, user maas.
[01:57] <jpds> Nothing in logs.
[01:58] <bigjools> is the log file +w?
[01:58] <jpds> Yep.
[01:59] <bigjools> apparmor ?
[01:59] <bigjools> having said that your last error was hours ago
[01:59] <bigjools> so once it's up, can you use a cmd line tftp client?
[02:00] <bigjools> looks like that part worked actually, from the bios screen
[02:00] <bigjools> unless the dots mean it's waiting and not downloading
[02:05] <jpds> Interestinly, if I download from the cmd line, I actually get logs in pserv.log.
[02:05] <jpds> Sorry, suffering the _worst_ Internet connection I've seen here.
[02:06] <davecheney> jpds: do you have negative bandwidth ?
[02:06] <jpds> davecheney: I wouldn't be surprised, took me 5 minutes to write that last line it kept dropping out.
[02:07] <jpds> tftp> get pxelinux.0
[02:07] <jpds> Received 26837 bytes in 0.0 seconds
[02:07] <jpds> Works fine, VM on the same phyiscally host as the MAAS VM, doesn't work... :-/
[02:08] <bigjools> sounds like your VM network setup is wrong then
[02:08] <jpds> bigjools: They're both sitting on br0.
[02:09] <bigjools> well something is wrong
[02:17] <jpds> bigjools: Can you see anything breaking if I "sudo -u postgres pg_dump maasdb" and import that into a new MAAS install?
[02:18] <bigjools> yes
[02:18] <bigjools> but if all the nodes are Ready then it's ok
[02:18] <bigjools> I  think
[02:22] <jpds> They're ready, I don't want to re-enlist everything though.
[02:27] <jtv> Does anybody know why bug 1232174 was reset from Fix Committed to Triaged?
[02:29] <bigjools> nfi
[02:29] <bigjools> does it work?
[02:29] <bigjools> btw our sampledata seems screwed
[02:29] <jtv> I thought it did, but...  Wanted to try just now, but couldn't get a large canonistack instance.
[02:30] <bigjools> you get "#### INVALID STRING ####" in the node listing for each node's name
[02:30] <jtv> I think that's hard-coded IDs in the sample data fixture.
[02:30] <bigjools> clicking on them gets a crash
[02:30] <jtv> Yes.
[02:31] <jtv> Say the sample data creates a nodegroup, and the database assigns it ID 3.
[02:31] <jtv> Unfortunately the fixture assumes it gets ID 1.
[02:31] <jtv> I don't know how exactly that would work, given referential integrity, but ISTR that was how it happened.
[02:53] <roaksoax> bigjools: yep that's on my radar
[02:53] <bigjools> roaksoax: cool, SRU?
[02:53] <roaksoax> bigjools: i think we might be able to get in critical fixes
[02:54] <bigjools> even more better
[03:00] <roaksoax> bigjools: what other critical fixes we have?
[03:01] <bigjools> roaksoax: that's the only one I know of
[03:01] <bigjools> I'm doing some doc changes now but that won't affect the release
[03:01] <roaksoax> bigjools: this aaffects maas-import-ephemerals, and I';m filking a new one
[03:01] <roaksoax> https://bugs.launchpad.net/simplestreams/+bug/1237990
[03:02] <roaksoax> bigjools: i think we should unify maas-import-pxe-files and maas-import-ephemerals config to be just one
[03:03] <bigjools> roaksoax: +1
[03:03] <bigjools> it will happen when we convert mipf
[03:07] <roaksoax> bigjools: https://bugs.launchpad.net/maas/+bug/1238376
[03:08] <roaksoax> bigjools: is the bug clear or am I too tired?
[03:08] <bigjools> reading
[03:10] <bigjools> roaksoax: hmmm,  jtv any comments ^
[03:11]  * jtv reads
[03:13] <jtv> If you still have the shell-style config for maas-import-ephemerals, it includes the maas-import-pxe-files by default.
[03:14] <jtv> So AFAICS the bug only applies to a fresh install.
[03:14] <jtv> And there, the behaviour seems reasonable per se — as long as we can make the configuration clear to the user.
[03:15] <roaksoax> jtv: might also affect in upgrades I think I had issues with upgrades as well
[03:15] <roaksoax> that's how I think I discovered it first
[03:15] <jtv> Let me just check the old config file...
[03:15] <roaksoax> i can't really remember though
[03:15] <roaksoax> jtv: but either way, on a fresh install, if before we used to modify 1 file, now we need to modify 2
[03:15] <roaksoax> which can become painful
[03:15] <jtv> The old /etc/maas/import_ephemerals config started with:
[03:16] <jtv> [ ! -f /etc/maas/import_pxe_files ] || . /etc/maas/import_pxe_files
[03:16] <roaksoax> jtv: right but that upgrade should remove import_pxe_files
[03:16] <roaksoax> err
[03:16] <roaksoax> import_ephemerals
[03:16] <jtv> It moves it, but after reading the variables it sets.
[03:16] <roaksoax> technically speaking, and due to packaging standards, it shold be removfed on upgrade IIRC
[03:16] <jtv> So the resulting config _should_ include any settings from /etc/maas/import_pxe_files
[03:17] <roaksoax> right
[03:17] <roaksoax> jtv: so I've seen upgrades where it generated a new pserv.yaml
[03:17] <roaksoax> while I've seen others that didn't
[03:17] <roaksoax> i think it requires more corner case escenarios
[03:17] <roaksoax> but the thing is that should not happen in fresh installs either
[03:17] <roaksoax> because we are supposed to only run maas-import-pxe-files which also runs maas-import-ephemerals
[03:18] <jtv> What exactly should not happen in fresh installs?
[03:18] <jtv> If you've seen a fresh install rewrite pserv.yaml, that's a bug.
[03:18] <roaksoax> jtv: not  fresh, an upgrade
[03:19] <roaksoax> jtv: in fresh install.. because we run maas-import-pxe-files, which runs maas-import-pepehemrals, then it should inhering
[03:19] <roaksoax> whatever config for release is in /etc/maas/import_pxe_files
[03:19] <jtv> It doesn't.  I think we should update the documentation for this.
[03:20] <roaksoax> jtv: right, it doesn't iunherit, so that *is* a bug
[03:20] <roaksoax> jtv: that's a "regression"
[03:20] <roaksoax> from how it used to work
[03:20] <jtv> Or "change in behaviour" as we software engineers like to justify ourselves.  :)
[03:20] <roaksoax> a regression because maas-import-pxe-files *does* run maas-import-ephemerals
[03:20] <roaksoax> lol
[03:21] <roaksoax> jtv: yeah unfortantely users say otherwise and I deal with that :)
[03:21] <roaksoax> but anytways
[03:21] <roaksoax> simply because maas-import-pxe-files runs maas-import-ephemerals, then it is a regression and should be fixed
[03:21] <roaksoax> jtv: that's why i suggested bigjools to somehow unify the config between maas-import-pxe-files and maas-import-ephemerals
[03:21] <roaksoax> but either way that's an standing bug
[03:22] <roaksoax> jtv: there's users been hitting that issue already (internal and in important projects that caused blockers)
[03:22] <jtv> That's fast.
[03:22] <jtv> We have been unifying the config, but this is a transitional issue.
[03:22] <roaksoax> so I'm happy it wasn't just me
[03:23] <roaksoax> jtv: yeah, transitional should mean backwards compatible
[03:23] <roaksoax> and fresh installs are not
[03:23] <roaksoax> and might affect upgrades
[03:23] <roaksoax> i;m not 100% sure it doesn't cause I found the issues on an upgrade
[03:23] <jtv> It shouldn't be too hard to preserve the old behaviour — it's just a bit ugly to keep running one shell config but moving the other into the unified config.
[03:23] <roaksoax> yeah
[03:23] <roaksoax> anyway
[03:23] <roaksoax> i'm off to bed
[03:24] <roaksoax> have a good night
[03:24] <jtv> It's important to know when you hit those issues.
[03:24] <jtv> Good night... dream of MAAS.  :)
[03:24] <jtv> ¡Buenas!
[03:24] <bigjools> nn roaksoax
[04:09] <bigjools> https://code.launchpad.net/~julian-edwards/maas/more-docs/+merge/190525  but no rush I am going to eat
[04:34] <jpds> Any way I can force a rewrite of dhcpd.conf ?
[04:37] <jpds> I tried editing eth0 on the web UI, but it's not writing dhcpd.conf for some reasons.
[04:37] <jpds> reason*
[04:58] <jpds> Did it by hand, and got MAAS to work.
[05:59] <bigjools> jpds: edit the cluster IIRC
[06:01] <jpds> bigjools: Yeah, I tried that, it doesn't write the file.
[06:02] <jpds> Tried removing the interface too.
[06:02] <jpds> And readding it.
[06:04] <bigjools> why did you need to rewrite it?
[06:04] <jpds> bigjools: I didn't have one, this is a fresh MAAS install.
[06:04] <bigjools> sounds like your cluster's celeryd is not workig
[06:05] <jpds> maas-cluster-celery start/running, process 599 - hmm.
[06:05] <bigjools> or perhaps dhcp not set to managed?
[06:05] <jpds> Ah, /var/log/maas/celery.log as HTTPErrors.
[06:06] <bigjools> or the cluster is not accepted
[06:07] <jpds> INFO/PoolWorker-4] The DHCP leases file does not exist.  This is only a problem if this cluster controller is managing its DHCP server.  If that's the case then you need to install the 'maas-dhcp' package on this cluster controller.
[06:07] <bigjools> if editing the cluster doesn't write it one of those conditions is not met
[06:07] <jpds> It is installed, so I guess the file was just missing to begin with.
[06:09] <bigjools> that error is orthogonal to this
[06:12] <jpds> Aha, i seem to have a pending cluster.
[06:18] <bigjools> jtv: we don't have any loud announcement of pending clusters do we?
[06:18] <jtv> No, they're just listed on the settings page.
[06:37] <bigjools> jtv: "  If multiple tags attached to a node have the kernel_opts defined, the first one ordered by name is used."
[06:37] <bigjools> ok?
[06:39] <jtv> bigjools: yes, thanks
[06:39] <bigjools> cheers
[07:21] <kampy> hi all
[07:21] <kampy> i have installed maas
[07:21] <kampy> but facing issues with dhcp
[07:22] <kampy> when i am trying to get ip for  machine through dhcp
[07:22] <kampy> i am geting the ip from the range i have configured in /etc/dhcp/dhcpd.conf
[07:22] <kampy> but when i am trying the same conf through maas
[07:23] <kampy> it is not able to fetch the ip
[07:23] <kampy> please help me in configuring dhcp with maas correctly
[07:24] <kampy> http://maas.ubuntu.com/docs/install.html#configure-dhcp followed the steps in this link
[10:11] <jpds> bigjools: I think DOWNLOAD in masa-import-pxe-files should have a -c by default.
[11:45] <rvba> Hi smoser, I'm getting this http://paste.ubuntu.com/6221791/ when running the import script… I assume this is a transient issue… ?
[12:49] <jamespage> rvba, smoser's not around today
[12:49] <jamespage> rvba, I'd hoped that commits to published simplestream data might be atomic - does it resolve if you re-run straight away?
[12:50] <rvba> jamespage: I ran the script twice… but maybe this is due to the caching proxy we use in the lab… I'm investigating…
[12:51] <jamespage> rvba, that could certainly created some issues depending on config
[14:17] <nesusvet> Hello everyone!
[14:18] <nesusvet> I tryied to deploy the node, but after deployment it returns: 2013-10-11 07:15:54 DEBUG juju.state open.go:88 connection failed, will retry: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:37017: connection refused
[14:18] <nesusvet> I guess there a problem in different version on the mongodb
[14:20] <nesusvet> and I guess I should add the stable-juju repository to this file: /etc/apt/sources.list before installation, but I don't know how
[15:00] <jtv> nesusvet: sounds like something the Juju folks would be better able to diagnose.  It doesn't seem to be anything in MAAS per se.
[15:00] <nesusvet> thanks
[15:11] <jtv> rvba: just hit that checksum error too
[15:11] <jtv> On a "precise" download this time.
[15:12] <jtv> But also 20131010, strangely enough.
[15:15] <jtv> roaksoax: are you here?  If so, could you review a packaging change for me?  It's https://code.launchpad.net/~jtv/maas/pkg-bug-1238376/+merge/190658
[15:17] <roaksoax> jtv: branch needs fixing
[15:17] <roaksoax> huge diff :)
[15:17] <jtv> Uh-oh
[15:17] <jtv> I bet I proposed for the wrong branch!
[15:18] <jtv> roaksoax: hoping this one'll work out better... https://code.launchpad.net/~jtv/maas/pkg-bug-1238376/+merge/190694
[15:18] <jtv> Definitely a smaller diff...
[15:19] <jtv> roaksoax: I also landed another critical fix in r1702, so maybe I should just bump the revision number to that...
[15:19] <jtv> Thanks for the review.
[15:28] <roaksoax> yep
[15:29] <roaksoax> jtv: if you guys can make a list of critical bug fixes would be great
[15:31] <jtv> roaksoax: there's no "us guys" at the moment I'm afraid...  I think the rest of the squad's gone home, and I'm about to do the same.
[15:32] <jtv> I know there's bug 1238376 and 1238681.
[15:33] <roaksoax> jtv: next week is fine
[15:33] <roaksoax> over email better ;)
[15:34] <jtv> roaksoax: this listing should give you a pretty good idea, on an ongoing basis: https://bugs.launchpad.net/maas/+bugs?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&search=Search&field.status%3Alist=FIXCOMMITTED&field.status%3Alist=FIXRELEASED&field.importance%3Alist=CRITICAL&field.importance%3Alist=HIGH&assignee_option=any&field.assignee=&field.bug_reporter=&field.bug_commenter=&field.subscriber=&field.structural_subscriber=&field.tag=&field.tags_combinator=ANY&fie
[15:34] <jtv> ld.has_cve.used=&field.omit_dupes.used=&field.omit_dupes=on&field.affects_me.used=&field.has_patch.used=&field.has_branches.used=&field.has_branches=on&field.has_no_branches.used=&field.has_no_branches=on&field.has_blueprints.used=&field.has_blueprints=on&field.has_no_blueprints.used=&field.has_no_blueprints=on
[15:35] <jtv> Hum.  Pretty long URL.
[15:35] <jtv> Call it http://bit.ly/1bLZzBX for short.
[15:36] <jtv> roaksoax: that's critical bugs, fix committed & fix released, sorted from most recently changed to less recently changed.
[15:40] <matsubara> roaksoax, have you seen this before: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/6222957/?
[15:40] <matsubara> roaksoax, triggered during a test run for the saucy daily package
[15:42] <roaksoax> jtv: awesome! thanks yoiu
[15:42] <roaksoax> matsubara: looking
[15:42] <roaksoax> matsubara: yeah, it is pretty self explanatory
[15:42] <roaksoax> matsubara: do you have the images for the release?
[15:42] <matsubara> roaksoax, well, it did run maas-import-pxe-files
[15:42] <roaksoax> matsubara: make sure the directory and images exist
[15:43] <matsubara> so I guess maas-import-pxe-files is failing quietly
[15:43] <roaksoax> matsubara: probably is, or maas-import-ephemerals
[15:45] <matsubara> roaksoax, there's a /var/lib/maas/ephemeral/precise/ephemeral/i386 dir but there's not a amd64 dir
[15:45] <roaksoax> matsubara: so you only imported i386 images
[15:45] <roaksoax> you need both, amd64 and i386
[15:47] <matsubara> roaksoax, the test ran maas-import-pxe-files, that should be enough to get both right?
[15:47] <matsubara> I'm investigating why it didn't, just wondered if you had seen it before
[15:47] <roaksoax> matsubara: by default it should get both yes
[15:48] <roaksoax> matsubara: but if you modified the config to only get i386 then it would fail that way
[16:30] <roaksoax> smoser: can i mark this bug as fix released? 1218530
[16:30] <roaksoax> bug #1218530
[18:52] <adam_g> roaksoax, ping
[18:52] <roaksoax> adam_g: pong
[18:53] <adam_g> roaksoax, do you have any curtin'd insatlled 12.04 machines up atm?
[18:53] <roaksoax> adam_g: nope
[18:55] <adam_g> roaksoax, ah, k
[18:56] <roaksoax> adam_g: btw i have a fix for the upmi thing but havent tested yet
[18:56] <adam_g> roaksoax, oh right i saw you pinged me
[18:56] <adam_g> roaksoax, unfortuantely i wont be able to test today
[18:56] <roaksoax> adam_g: no worries ;)
[18:57] <roaksoax>  
[19:13] <matsubara> roaksoax, I'm still getting the checksum failure running maas-import-pxe-files while using a proxy (after I cleared the cache). rvba mentioned he tried on a canonistack instance and the script completed successfully. Could be a bug of the script interacting with a proxy? Or perhaps I'm not cleaning the cache properly (although I do see lots of TCP_MISS in the squid logs, so it indicates the cache has been cleared fine)
[19:13] <roaksoax> uhmmm
[19:13] <roaksoax> matsubara: remove squid cache with rm -rf
[19:14] <roaksoax> and restart squid and retry?
[19:14] <matsubara> that's what I tried
[19:14] <matsubara> I stopped squid, removed the cache_dir and restarted
[19:14] <matsubara> but got the error again
[19:14] <matsubara> but I'm seeing in the squid log: 11/Oct/2013:15:10:16 -0400.124      0 10.98.0.90 TCP_MEM_HIT/200 2221 GET http://maas.ubuntu.com/images/ephemeral/releases/streams/v1/index.sjson - NONE/- text/plain
[19:14] <matsubara> and 11/Oct/2013:15:10:16 -0400.387    163 10.98.0.90 TCP_REFRESH_UNMODIFIED/200 13497 GET http://maas.ubuntu.com/images/ephemeral/releases/streams/v1/com.ubuntu.maas:download.sjson - DIRECT/91.189.90.19 text/plain
[19:15] <matsubara> so, maybe it's using some other cache I'm not aware of. squid's memory cache? sudo service squid3 stop should clear the cache in memory, no?
[19:15] <roaksoax> matsubara: check in /var/lib/cache/squid....
[19:15] <roaksoax> or somewhere around there for the actual squid cache
[19:16] <matsubara> -bash: cd: /var/lib/cache: No such file or directory
[19:16] <roaksoax> matsubara: restart squi-deb-proxy
[19:16] <matsubara> yeah, the config is pointing to /var/spool/squid3 and that's the one I removed
[19:17] <matsubara> squid deb proxy too? this is just regular squid, not the deb-proxy one
[19:17] <matsubara> I mean, the maas-import-pxe-files uses the squid cache not the s-d-p one, AFAICT
[19:17] <matsubara> s-d-p is used for the archive stuff
[19:17] <matsubara> (I'll try restarting s-d-p in anyway)
[19:17] <roaksoax> matsubara: we dont ship anyconfig for squid3
[19:18] <roaksoax> only for squid-deb-proxy
[19:18] <matsubara> roaksoax, that's in the QA lab, it's not part of maas, we use a cache there to speed up maas-import-pxe-files
[19:19] <roaksoax> ok so if the logs say theres a hit on the cache then probably the cache was not cleaned
[19:19] <roaksoax> i dunno where rlse would it be
[19:19] <roaksoax> but thats weird
[19:20] <roaksoax> tzzzzt
[19:42] <adam_g> roaksoax, do you know much about curtin in terms of its preseed data/cloud-config?
[19:42] <adam_g> i know smoser is out
[19:43] <roaksoax> adam_g: no unfortunately
[19:44] <roaksoax> what do you need to do?
[19:44] <adam_g> roaksoax, do you know if the /etc/maas/preseeds/curtin_userdata is userdata that is executed during provisioning?
[19:44] <adam_g> trying to work around https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1238915 by adding a curtin hook to just remove that file after install / before first boot
[19:45] <adam_g> adding a final_command seems like it shoudl work
[19:45] <roaksoax> adam_g: yeah it is
[19:45] <roaksoax> so thats where you eould put lay
[19:45] <roaksoax> te_commands
[19:45] <roaksoax> err
[19:45] <roaksoax> late_commands
[19:46] <adam_g> roaksoax, http://paste.ubuntu.com/6223940/
[19:46] <adam_g> roaksoax, late_commands is a DI thing right?  that doc makes it look like curtin's final_command is the same thing
[19:47] <roaksoax> adam_g: correct
[19:47] <adam_g> roaksoax, ill add that to curtin_userdata and see if it works
[19:50] <roaksoax> it should
[19:51] <roaksoax> i think stokachu did it for vlan config
[21:37] <Tim> Quick Question: Is there a way to set a password for commissioned nodes?
[21:39] <Tim> I need to access the node locally because networking doesn't come up properly after reboot
[21:48] <Nik_> Not sure if I understand the question, but ubuntu user gets the ssh key placed in their authorized keys
[21:49] <Tim> No?
[21:49] <Tim> I understand, but I can't ssh
[21:49] <Tim> I have to log in locally
[21:49] <Tim> Nik_: hence the password
[21:49] <Nik_> Oh i see...
[21:49] <Nik_> If you are local, you can go into maintenance mode
[21:49] <Nik_> and set any password
[21:50] <Nik_> You'll get root access
[21:50] <Tim> maintenance mode?
[21:50] <Nik_> Umm.. that kernel boot option
[21:50] <Tim> ah
[21:50] <Tim> in grub?
[21:50] <matsubara> Tim, this might help: https://lists.launchpad.net/maas-devel/msg00808.html
[21:51] <Nik_> yeah something like that
[21:51] <Nik_> It's called single-user mode or maintennace mode
[21:51] <Nik_> You get a shell prompt and no drives mounted
[21:51] <Nik_> maybe this can help: http://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/linux-reset-forgotten-root-password/
[21:51] <Tim> matsubara: Interesting, thanks for the link
[21:51] <Tim> Nik_: I'll try that as well
[21:51] <Nik_> You got juju working or just maas?
[21:52] <matsubara> np
[21:52] <Tim> Nik_: I'm tryinig to get juju working, but since networking does come up on my node after reboot juju deploy times out
[21:52] <Tim> *does not
[21:52] <Tim> Its a problem with out 10gb switch
[21:53] <Tim> if anyone cares
[21:53] <Nik_> I see. Well hopefully I understand how maas works and how things happen with PXE enough for this to fork for you :)
[21:54] <Nik_> And I didn't check mat's link. That may help too
[21:54] <Tim> Nik_: Lol. I wouldn't worry about, I've got the pxe covered. It sounds like I might just be able to manually set the password using your suggestion
[21:54] <Tim> and if not, modify the preseed file via matsubara's suggestion
[21:55] <Tim> It took long enough to get MAAS and juju working
[21:55] <Tim> it would really suck if this was what killed it
[21:56] <AskUbuntu> MAAS Set password for node | http://askubuntu.com/q/356936
[21:56] <Tim> Yes, that was me
[21:56] <Tim> I asked that
[22:03] <Tim> Nik_: Damn, skips the GRUB screen during boot
[22:12] <Nik_> You can try hold shift I think
[22:13] <Nik_> though that may be  a no-go on ubuntu...
[22:13] <Nik_> http://askubuntu.com/questions/71867/grub-menu-doesnt-appear-when-pressing-shift
[22:14] <Nik_> :(
[22:20] <Tim_> Yeah, tried that
[22:20] <Tim_> either it wasn't passed via KVM, or it doesn't work
[22:47] <Tim_> Nik_: Thanks! that worked!
[23:06] <Nik_> Tim_: Glad to hear! Anyways, I'm off for today. Hopefully you get your all solved :)