| phillw | darkxst: Hi, with Ali being ill, is there anything I can do to help? I'm thinking of updating http://ubuntugnome.org/ to reflect the fact that the Release Candidate is imminent (although it seems to be delayed as per http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/305/builds | 01:26 |
|---|---|---|
| darkxst | phillw, hi | 03:02 |
| darkxst | yeh that would be good, I've been flat out dealing with insurance/looking for a new ca | 03:03 |
| darkxst | car | 03:03 |
| phillw | darkxst: I'll need editing privs for http://ubuntugnome.org/ I promise I will not break it! | 03:10 |
| darkxst | phillw, sure, your launchpad ID is phillw? | 04:40 |
| darkxst | phillw, images are now spun | 04:43 |
| darkxst | would be awesome if you could also send out a testing announcement to ubuntu-gnome and ubuntugnome-qa (launchpad list) | 04:44 |
| phillw | darkxst: they seem to be having a bad RC day, they were all due 21:00 UTC yesterday. I am still awaiting for any sort of explanation. | 04:44 |
| darkxst | phillw, apparently they set them up, but were just waiting on the cron jobs | 04:45 |
| darkxst | i.e they didnt force re-spins | 04:45 |
| darkxst | phillw, you should have access to the website now | 04:45 |
| === ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-gnome to: Ubuntu GNOME Development & Support | Latest Stable Release: 13.04 | Latest Development Release: 13.10 RC: Now in Testing | Download from http://ubuntugnome.org/download/ | Pastes to http://paste.ubuntu.com | http://ubuntugnome.org/community/ | ||
| darkxst | ricotz, hi | 06:15 |
| ricotz | darkxst, hey :) | 06:16 |
| darkxst | how is your automake/conf foo? | 06:16 |
| darkxst | I have gnome-shell running on js24, but libshell-js needs to be ported to cpp | 06:17 |
| ricotz | reasonable good i think | 06:17 |
| darkxst | and for some reason or another it still wants to link to C libraries | 06:17 |
| darkxst | well while compiling (not actual linking) | 06:18 |
| ricotz | so you don't have g-s *running* on js24 yet? | 06:18 |
| darkxst | ricotz, I do | 06:19 |
| darkxst | I moved shell-js into gjs as a module | 06:19 |
| darkxst | but Jasper doesnt like that | 06:19 |
| ricotz | hmm, i see | 06:19 |
| ricotz | do you rebased the gjs mozjs24 branch to master yet? | 06:20 |
| darkxst | not yet, but will over the weekend | 06:20 |
| darkxst | had a crazy week dealing with car insurance | 06:20 |
| darkxst | and lookng for new car | 06:20 |
| ricotz | ah, sorry to hear that, i hope you were not at fault | 06:21 |
| darkxst | and the wip/js24 gjs branch is missing some patches as well anyway | 06:21 |
| darkxst | nope, it was just parked outside my house and someone decided to crash into it and write it off | 06:21 |
| ricotz | ok, i guess i could take a look if the branches are up2date | 06:21 |
| darkxst | ricotz, I can push the missing patches now, but rebase will have to wait until sat or sun | 06:22 |
| ricotz | don't push the shell-js "import" though | 06:23 |
| darkxst | I wont | 06:23 |
| darkxst | pushed | 06:25 |
| darkxst | you can probably ignore the stuff in shell-global.c (just comment it out for now) | 06:25 |
| darkxst | its shell-js.c which needs to be built as cpp | 06:25 |
| ricotz | darkxst, regarding gjs motjs24, i noticed the makefile changes could need some cleaning | 06:26 |
| darkxst | right, probably, there is definately a mix of CFLAGS vs CPPFLAGS, beyond that I dont have too much experience with automake | 06:28 |
| darkxst | and also gjs/jsapi-private.cpp can probably be removed as well now (no need to wrap up c++ functions anymore) | 06:29 |
| ricotz | ok | 06:41 |
| ricotz | i will take a look | 06:42 |
| ricotz | i also pushed a gjs js24 snapshot to my unstable ppa | 06:42 |
| ricotz | btw the package bump to "*0e" is not related to the js24 switch, it just indicates actual abi/api breaks of gjs | 06:43 |
| darkxst | ricotz, ok | 06:47 |
| darkxst | btw currently one failing test if js24 isnt built with --disable-intl-api | 06:48 |
| darkxst | (I think the test is wrong, and give ICU handles locales now, it should be ok to just fix the test, but I need to test this | 06:49 |
| darkxst | ) | 06:49 |
| ricotz | i see, although this prevents statically linking icu or requiring > 50.2 | 06:49 |
| ricotz | meaning the package is built with --disable-intl-api | 06:49 |
| darkxst | ricotz, ICU should be required at all with --disable-intl-api | 06:50 |
| darkxst | shouldnt | 06:50 |
| ricotz | yes, that is what i meant | 06:50 |
| darkxst | I told the mozilla guys an in-tree ICU won't fly | 06:51 |
| darkxst | it shouldnt be a problem to get patches backported though | 06:51 |
| darkxst | though it would likely hold up any release | 06:52 |
| ricotz | yeah, given the later buildsys commits they "know" | 06:52 |
| darkxst | they are also happy to disable ICU by default if that works out easier | 06:52 |
| ricotz | ok, i hope i will have time later to look into g-s | 06:53 |
| darkxst | ok thanks | 06:58 |
| Tomo | Hey guys, I have a problem connecting to the internet, there is a DHCP running on the network so it should connect automatically. I have a dual boot with windows 8 and ubuntu 12.04 where everything works fine. Could it be some incompatibility deu the new kernel on 13.10? Thaks! | 09:35 |
| Tomo | I tried to set the network manually and that didn't work either. The network indicator always says "Connecting" | 09:37 |
| darkxst | Tomo, doesnt sound specific to ubuntu GNOME, you will likely get more help in #ubuntu | 09:39 |
| Tomo | darkxst, ok sorry for posting in wrong channel :) | 09:40 |
| Naviathan | Good Morning (Eastern US). I've been running Ubuntu Gnome 13.04 for a while now and I just realized 13.10 was out. With mainline Ubuntu I could just run a dist-upgrade and it would take me to the next version. That appears to not work on here. | 13:20 |
| Naviathan | What's the easiest route to upgrade without wiping my system? | 13:21 |
| mgedmin | oh, 13.10 is out already? awesome | 13:22 |
| mgedmin | apt-get dist-upgrade was never supported and could break your system; you're supposed to do sudo do-release-upgrade if you want to upgrade from the command line | 13:22 |
| mgedmin | but I don't think Ubuntu GNOME 13.10 has been released already | 13:23 |
| Naviathan | Well, it hasn't been "released", but the 13.10 beta is out. | 13:24 |
| mgedmin | in fact I don't see 13.10 on http://releases.ubuntu.com/13.10/; what is there is just the "final beta" | 13:24 |
| mgedmin | http://www.ubuntu.com/ talks about "Ubuntu Server 13.10", giving me the impression it was out already :/ | 13:24 |
| Naviathan | I wasn't aware of the "do-release-upgrade" script either. Man I'm slipping. | 13:24 |
| mgedmin | or not used to reading documentation :) | 13:25 |
| mgedmin | if you want to upgrade into a pre-release version, you can do do-release-upgrade -d (and if you want a GUI upgrade, it's update-manager -d) | 13:25 |
| Naviathan | got it. Thanks. | 13:26 |
| bjsnider | i think an rc is close | 13:27 |
| Naviathan | agreed. Usually by the RC things are pretty stable. | 13:27 |
| Naviathan | update-manager -d worked. It's pulling down 13.10 now. | 13:28 |
| phillw | mgedmin: the RC is out in the wild for the final testing, head over to http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/305/builds to grab a clean ISO :) | 13:46 |
| Tee | good morning | 15:10 |
| Tee | I installed ubuntugnome but now I have shell 3.8. Is this right? | 15:11 |
| mgedmin | sounds about right: ubuntu gnome 13.04 has gnome-shell 3.8.3 (if you enable the gnome3 ppa) or 3.6.3 (if you don't) | 15:28 |
| mgedmin | the upcoming ubuntu gnome 13.10 will have gnome-shell 3.8.4 (without a ppa) | 15:30 |
| mgedmin | there's gnome 3.10 in the staging PPA: https://launchpad.net/~gnome3-team/+archive/gnome3?field.series_filter=saucy | 15:30 |
| JoaoSantana | hi all | 18:41 |
| * snwh is away: Away | 21:36 | |
| Robbilie | heyho just a short question, where can i find an installation with gnome 3.10? :) | 22:58 |
| Robbilie | anyone here active? :D | 23:06 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!