=== robert__ is now known as nudtrobert | ||
slangasek | ^^ this gets the cross-compiler in sync with gcc-4.7-source for release, which is probably a good idea; I actually want them in sync to try to pin down an issue where gcc-4.7 is reportedly behaving differently for certain code for native vs. cross building | 01:52 |
---|---|---|
slangasek | (and the native compilation is giving buggy results, but that's beside the point... we don't know that the compiler itself is at fault) | 01:53 |
slangasek | oh, is the final freeze still advisory for universe? ok then | 01:54 |
darkxst | Is there some reason that there arent yet Ubuntu GNOME RC builds? | 03:03 |
infinity | darkxst: We created the milestone, and are just letting them cron in at their usual time. | 03:05 |
infinity | darkxst: Which for ubuntu-gnome, appears to be 15:32 UTC... A bit of a wait. | 03:06 |
infinity | darkxst: I can do a manual spin for you, if you have confused testers. | 03:06 |
infinity | darkxst: Spinning you a set now. | 03:08 |
=== henrix_ is now known as henrix | ||
darkxst | infinity, thanks ;) | 04:40 |
ScottK | infinity: Thanks. | 04:51 |
infinity | Can someone do a quick review of that gdb upload I just made? | 06:04 |
slangasek | infinity: doh - right, I forgot about the efi binary new, didn't I | 06:33 |
slangasek | infinity: gdb> looking | 06:33 |
slangasek | or not | 06:33 |
infinity | slangasek: Does anything read /lib/init/fstab other than mountall, and ever before /etc/groups is available? | 06:49 |
slangasek | infinity: well, I had a conversation with stgraber and hallyn about possibly making lxc read it, but no. Also, how can /etc/group ever not be available? /etc must be on the rootfs | 06:50 |
infinity | slangasek: Well, it could be unavailable if something pulled that file and mountall into an initrd, for instance. | 06:50 |
infinity | slangasek: (Which doesn't ever happen currently, I assume?) | 06:51 |
infinity | slangasek: Anyhow, was just asking because of the "gid=tty" instead of "gid=5" in there, which would go awry if one couldn't resolve "tty" to anything useful. | 06:51 |
slangasek | infinity: yes, no mountall in initramfs | 07:03 |
infinity | I'm beggining to think maybe I should revert the pt_chown change for now. | 07:04 |
infinity | And maybe fix mount to add gid=5,mode=0620 to the "defaults" set. | 07:04 |
infinity | There's this curious feature where, even if your base system is booted and mounted correctly, if you "mount -t devpts devpts-foo foo/", all instanced of devpts (including the base system) pick up the new defaults. | 07:05 |
infinity | And lose the gid/mode bits. | 07:05 |
infinity | Which has always been true, but then pt_chown picked up the slack for this misconfiguration in the past. | 07:05 |
infinity | slangasek: On the other hand, Fedora already pushed this out as a security update a couple of months ago, and basically said "if stuff breaks, mount /dev/pts correctly, derp" in their announcement. :P | 07:09 |
didrocks | infinity: if you are still around, the mir one is for this touch image ^ (it's just a build-dep of xorg, but the fix is for touch only), not seeded anyway | 08:27 |
shadeslayer | stgraber: poke poke | 08:28 |
infinity | didrocks: I'm not here, and you can't prove it. | 08:28 |
infinity | didrocks: Oh, also: congrats. Where was my invite? :) | 08:29 |
didrocks | infinity: ahah, thanks a lot! :-) | 08:29 |
ogra_ | hey, i accidentially triggered an ubuntu-gnome build, hope i didnt cause havoc with this | 09:29 |
cjwatson | slangasek: Probably ought to be changed, yes. Can you file a bug and I'll do it next cycle? I don't think I should mess with it now for 13.10 | 09:32 |
infinity | ogra_: They'll probably live. There's going to be a cronned one today too, anyway. | 09:35 |
xnox | infinity: well i have two installer bugs fixed now, and if/when ubiquity upload will happen today. I'd love to respin all ubiquity images and test them before departing for the weekend. | 09:39 |
xnox | unless too late. | 09:39 |
infinity | xnox: Not too late. I'm sure this won't be the last installed upload of the cycle (though one can always hope). | 09:40 |
infinity | s/installed/installer/ | 09:40 |
infinity | xnox: The freeze pretty much explicitly doesn't apply to installers, since this is when we get all the good/juicy bugs. | 09:40 |
xnox | infinity: oh and base-files are not in yet, so yeah we will be respining =) | 09:42 |
infinity | Indeed, I'll upload that on the weekend, probably. | 09:42 |
infinity | Or maybe today sometime. | 09:43 |
infinity | Since I lost a bunch of my weekend to flying in the wrong direction. | 09:43 |
infinity | Silly timezones. | 09:43 |
=== tkamppeter_ is now known as tkamppeter | ||
Mirv | ↑ and ↓ indicators + unity stacks, fully tested on desktop, best autopilot results ever so seems pretty nice. indicators also tested on touch (manually) for the parts that are affected. | 10:19 |
Mirv | of course the best AP tests comes down to unity7 team fixing AP false alarms, but still, makes for nicer numbers | 10:20 |
mhr3 | Mirv, so are there any issues with landing it? | 10:21 |
Mirv | mhr3: not that I know of, as mentioned good AP results, manual testing on touch fine. | 10:22 |
mhr3 | Mirv, cool, pls ping me if there's any problem with it | 10:23 |
Mirv | mhr3: sure. if release team has any worries, they'll tell us here. | 10:23 |
asac | cjwatson: http://paste.ubuntu.com/6221814/ | 10:30 |
asac | those are components that didnt make it it seems. | 10:31 |
asac | cjwatson: what are the options? what do you need from us? | 10:31 |
cjwatson | It was only 15 minutes ago :) I'll review | 10:34 |
asac | cjwatson: ok cool. let me know. especially if we need to divert one of those to -updates or wait much longer | 10:34 |
asac | thanks | 10:34 |
cjwatson | (I'm mostly fixing a problem with the publisher right now, so if anyone else can help ...) | 10:35 |
asac | cjwatson: what kind of help? I assume that is "anyone from release team"? | 10:35 |
cjwatson | Yes | 10:35 |
cjwatson | asac: Is ido one of yours as well? | 10:35 |
asac | cjwatson: so thats all that is comnig from CI | 10:35 |
asac | we unfortunately have still desktop stuff in CI | 10:35 |
asac | fortunately actually, but in this case a bit awkward | 10:35 |
asac | asking didrocks | 10:36 |
seb128 | ido has a desktop bug fix | 10:36 |
seb128 | it doesn't impact touch | 10:36 |
asac | cjwatson: ido is also coming from CI, but its pure desktop only | 10:36 |
cjwatson | seb128: Do you know if the fix in ido affects anything in screenshots? | 10:36 |
cjwatson | It's fine otherwise | 10:37 |
seb128 | cjwatson, it means the indicator-session avatar icon being properly aligned if you use a non default font size | 10:37 |
seb128 | I doubt we have any screenshot of the bug | 10:37 |
cjwatson | Ah, so not screenshots | 10:37 |
asac | so yeah we missed ido | 10:37 |
seb128 | means->makes | 10:37 |
seb128 | asac, I'm glad you uploaded it :p | 10:37 |
seb128 | that bugs annoys me ;-) | 10:37 |
seb128 | asac, btw "unfortunately have still desktop stuff in CI" ... does it mean you plan to drop CI for desktop components? | 10:38 |
seb128 | cjwatson, thanks | 10:38 |
Daviey | /37 | 10:41 |
cjwatson | asac,didrocks: all accepted now | 10:57 |
didrocks | cjwatson: thanks a lot :) one worrying things less :) | 10:57 |
asac | cjwatson: awesome! | 10:57 |
asac | what an amazing day | 10:57 |
asac | i will have to buy flowers for my wife still :P | 10:57 |
* asac puts that on his "nice to have TODO list" :) | 10:58 | |
didrocks | asac: "nice to have" only? | 10:58 |
didrocks | I think qtdeclarative-opensource-src is unseeded, right? | 10:58 |
* didrocks checks | 10:58 | |
cjwatson | can't be unseeded if it's in those packagesets | 10:59 |
cjwatson | but it looks fine, is it OK from the touch POV? | 10:59 |
didrocks | cjwatson: yeah, it's fixing the "unity8 is taking 100% of GPU" :) | 10:59 |
didrocks | CPU* | 10:59 |
didrocks | thanks colin! | 11:00 |
didrocks | ok, now touch-only uploads, all tested, fine, let's publish them | 11:00 |
asac | didrocks: yeah i should prioritze that more appropriately :) | 11:01 |
didrocks | heh | 11:03 |
cjwatson | infinity: Did you retry the failures due to lp-buildd vs. pt_chown? | 11:12 |
infinity | cjwatson: The one or two I knew about. Were there many? | 11:13 |
cjwatson | I only knew of the ones you told me about :-) | 11:13 |
infinity | Fair. I did those. :P | 11:14 |
Mirv | thanks seb128 cjwatson asac didrocks :) | 11:44 |
Mirv | I even got to eat proper food today, so I'm even more happy | 11:45 |
didrocks | Mirv: lucky you! :) | 11:46 |
seb128 | Mirv, yw ;-) | 11:48 |
jamespage | openstack just pushed out a second rc for glance with a number of critical and high bug fixes - zul preparing and reviewing now | 13:16 |
zul | glance | 14:07 |
zul | oops | 14:07 |
didrocks | I think platform-api is what is freezing location-service ^ | 14:43 |
=== doko_ is now known as doko | ||
xnox | ubiquity ^ diff will be large, but it's really one bugfix per commit on lp:ubiquity. Also note that majority of the diff is debconf-updatepo, which means unfortunately that many strings were not possible to translate up to now. | 14:45 |
shadeslayer | cjwatson: any reason why kubuntu-active ISO's aren't built? | 14:48 |
didrocks | (thanks to whoever accepted location-service ;)) | 14:51 |
infinity | shadeslayer: I believe kubuntu-active was marked disabled in the ISO tracker, because someone didn't want them to be in milestones/release. Has that position changed? | 14:51 |
infinity | shadeslayer: Active wasn't in any of the alphas or betas, only dailies. | 14:53 |
cjwatson | shadeslayer: check the build failures | 14:53 |
cjwatson | shadeslayer: it's been failing for a while | 14:53 |
shadeslayer | I don't know where :( | 14:53 |
cjwatson | I hadn't had a chance to look | 14:53 |
infinity | Oh, did you literally mean "not built" rather than "not posted to the tracker"? | 14:53 |
cjwatson | http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/livefs-build-logs/ somewhere | 14:53 |
shadeslayer | infinity: yes | 14:54 |
shadeslayer | ahhh | 14:54 |
shadeslayer | contour | 14:54 |
shadeslayer | cjwatson: infinity could you trigger a build now? | 14:54 |
shadeslayer | should be fixed | 14:54 |
cjwatson | as of when? today? | 14:55 |
shadeslayer | I pushed fixes early today | 14:55 |
shadeslayer | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plasma-mobile/1:0.5-0ubuntu2 | 14:55 |
cjwatson | doing | 14:55 |
shadeslayer | thx | 14:55 |
infinity | I don't see how that would fix it. | 14:56 |
infinity | shadeslayer: If both contour and plasma-active are being installed, you've not improved the situation by adding an unversioned Breaks. | 14:57 |
shadeslayer | infinity: contour is no more | 14:57 |
shadeslayer | dropped it from the seed | 14:57 |
shadeslayer | removed from archive | 14:57 |
shadeslayer | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kubuntu-meta/1.291 | 14:57 |
shadeslayer | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/contour/+publishinghistory | 14:58 |
cjwatson | I guess we'll find out | 14:58 |
infinity | shadeslayer: Ahh, that was a bit more informative than the plasma-mobile link. ;) | 14:58 |
shadeslayer | :) | 14:58 |
shadeslayer | sorry about only providing half the info | 14:59 |
lool | Hey, I've added a block ubuntuone-credentials hint to test it while it's in -proposed (it's not under cu2d CI) | 15:18 |
lool | (dobey is the uploader and has tested it "upstream" / in trunk) | 15:18 |
lool | (it's only seeded in touch) | 15:18 |
cjwatson | thanks | 15:19 |
xnox | stgraber: updating ubuntu-meta does "* Added shotwell to desktop-recommends [powerpc]" yet i was just removed "* Removed shotwell from desktop-recommends [powerpc]" by your last upload. is that correct? | 15:33 |
cjwatson | xnox: Looks like it was removed from powerpc at one point and then restored | 15:36 |
xnox | cjwatson: ok. uploaded. | 15:36 |
cjwatson | maybe? | 15:36 |
xnox | it's recommends and powerpc.... maybe it was removed/FTBFS at the time of last upload?! | 15:37 |
cjwatson | Yeah, https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/saucy/powerpc/shotwell, deleted from release entry #7 | 15:37 |
xnox | cjwatson: otherwise it's a FTBFS fix. | 15:38 |
dbarth | hi | 15:38 |
lool | 17:36 -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntuone-credentials (saucy-proposed/universe) [13.10-0ubuntu1 => 13.10-0ubuntu2] (ubuntuone) | 15:38 |
lool | what does the ubuntuone package set mean? | 15:38 |
lool | does it have special rules for reviews or something? | 15:38 |
cjwatson | I think it's for upload perms | 15:38 |
dbarth | can i bring the case of bug #1206268 to your attention again | 15:38 |
ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1206268 in webbrowser-app (Ubuntu) "[MIR] unity-webapps-qml" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1206268 | 15:38 |
xnox | don't think so, just uploads perms & release-bug tracking / owners. | 15:39 |
mterry | Heyo folks! There is a change that dbarth and folks would like to make to the ubuntu-sdk package. ^ This would involve dropping a Recommends from that seed, and then changing qtmultimedia to stop building a certain package only referenced by the sdk metapackage. How doable is that (we have branches, just looking for approval) at this stage? | 15:39 |
xnox | mterry: are all changes required reviewable somewhere? is it all the branches attached on the bug report? | 15:40 |
xnox | mterry: can you comment links with merge proposals against seeds and/or all packages involved? | 15:40 |
xnox | (comment on the bug that is) | 15:40 |
lool | stgraber: There might be some possible improvements to the autoaccept script if you like to: ubuntuone-credentials is only seeded in touch, but is stuck in queue because it's in a special upload packageset (ubuntuone) | 15:41 |
xnox | cause it's hard to see what the scope of changes is.... | 15:41 |
mterry | xnox, sure. let me link | 15:41 |
stgraber | lool: I'll whitelist that one | 15:41 |
dbarth | mterry: should Mirv also comment on the bug directly, with the plan he proposed earlier in the thread? | 15:42 |
lool | stgraber: thanks | 15:42 |
stgraber | lool: added to whitelist now | 15:43 |
ogra_ | can someone please let livecd-rootfs through ? | 15:43 |
ogra_ | (first is adding click packages to the manifest, second is a fix for a serious touch bug) | 15:44 |
mterry | dbarth, the plan is basically "land these three branches" | 15:45 |
stgraber | looking | 15:45 |
mterry | xnox, three branches added to bug in comments | 15:45 |
mterry | robru, ^ btw | 15:47 |
stgraber | ogra_: I'm a bit concerned by that manifest change, won't that break Ursinha's script and anything that expects packages listed in the manifest to be avaiable from the archive? | 15:47 |
ogra_ | stgraber, it wont break my script, Ursinha's is still not merged afaik | 15:47 |
ogra_ | stgraber, and jibel picks his data from my location | 15:47 |
ogra_ | stgraber, in any case we need that info in the manifest | 15:48 |
stgraber | well, I'd argue we should have a separate manifest file for click | 15:48 |
ogra_ | sure, we can do that later | 15:48 |
stgraber | cjwatson: I'd like your opinion on this if you have a minute? | 15:48 |
ogra_ | stgraber, this is the quick variant to get it in before release | 15:49 |
ogra_ | stgraber, i'l happily teach cdimage about a new file and how to publish it in T | 15:49 |
cjwatson | stgraber: I recommended the approach ogra_'s taken - I think manifest consumers should be prepared for the packages to be either .deb or .click | 15:49 |
dbarth | mterry: right | 15:50 |
cjwatson | If it breaks anything then surely it'll be straightforward to fix | 15:50 |
cjwatson | try: except: | 15:50 |
ogra_ | the format is the exact same too | 15:50 |
stgraber | cjwatson: is there an easy way for something reading the manifest to determine whether it's a .deb or .click? | 15:50 |
ogra_ | <pkgname> <version> | 15:50 |
cjwatson | stgraber: "does it exist in the archive as a .deb" | 15:50 |
cjwatson | I mean, it has to go looking for the changelog anyway, it can just check, no? | 15:51 |
ogra_ | stgraber, most likely the namespace will be com.ubuntu.foo.bar.* | 15:51 |
cjwatson | ogra_: that's definitely not a reasonable thing to check for in the consumer | 15:51 |
cjwatson | if it would be helpful to prefix the package name with "click:" or something, that would be possible | 15:51 |
stgraber | sure, it's just going to be tricky to know whether something is a click package or a package coming from a PPA (even though we're not supposed to ever use PPA, the past as showed that we sometimes do) | 15:51 |
cjwatson | I dunno, I guess a separate file would be possible, I'd just like to avoid a proliferation of output files | 15:52 |
cjwatson | I think it's confusing | 15:52 |
ogra_ | in any case a separate file is nothing for the week before release imho | 15:52 |
stgraber | I think I'd be fine with a click: prefix as it shouldn't break ogra_'s script and will let other parsers easily detect click and either act on it or ignore them | 15:52 |
ogra_ | i dont want to do big plumbings in cdimage that close to release | 15:52 |
stgraber | xnox: do we really have to introduce a new string in ubiquity that close to release? | 15:56 |
stgraber | xnox: hmm, well, it doesn't really matter since none of the ubuntuone strings were translated anyway... I guess it's going to be one of those releases... | 15:57 |
xnox | stgraber: note that none of the other strings introduced this cycle in ubiquity didn't make it into .pot and were not translated due to not running debconf-updatepo this cycle at all. So in fact I am introducing new strings anyhow in that plugin. | 15:57 |
ogra_ | stgraber, so do you let it in ? i urgently need the second fix | 15:58 |
ogra_ | oh | 15:58 |
xnox | stgraber: it only affects ubuntu images, as nobody else seeded ubiquity-ubuntuone plugin. | 15:58 |
* ogra_ notes the mail | 15:58 | |
ogra_ | sigh | 15:58 |
stgraber | ogra_: I'll accept your /system/bin/sh change and reject the other | 15:58 |
ogra_ | k, thanks :) | 15:58 |
xnox | stgraber: yeah, it is shame that translations will be bad..... (note U1 api only returns back errors in english =/ ) | 15:58 |
stgraber | ogra_: hmm, actually I can't since you stacked the /bin/sh one on top of the manifest one... (I was hoping it was the other way around and I could simply pull the old one from the reject queue) | 15:59 |
stgraber | ogra_: if you re-upload adding a click: prefix to the manifest entries, I'll accept it. Alternatively, just upload the /bin/sh fix and I'll accept that. | 15:59 |
ogra_ | ok that has to wait 1h then ... | 16:00 |
stgraber | ogra_: why? | 16:00 |
* ogra_ has meetings now | 16:00 | |
stgraber | ah ok | 16:00 |
ogra_ | i'll re-work the click part ... | 16:00 |
ogra_ | since we need that | 16:00 |
stgraber | thanks | 16:00 |
ogra_ | (i doubt any of the scripts can handle columns in the package name though) | 16:01 |
stgraber | ogra_: ping me once it's back in the queue if I don't notice and I'll make sure it's reviewed quickly | 16:01 |
stgraber | ogra_: well, either they really care about the source name existing and they'll fail either way or they don't and a click: prefix won't make any difference | 16:01 |
cyphermox | ^ didrocks: signon-ui as requested | 16:07 |
stgraber | I'm reviewing it now | 16:07 |
cyphermox | stgraber: thanks | 16:07 |
ogra_ | stgraber, cjwatson http://paste.ubuntu.com/6223092/ does that look ok to you ? | 16:09 |
alex-abreu | cyphermox, is the ball rolling for webbrowser-app ? | 16:10 |
stgraber | ogra_: did you mean "while read line"? | 16:10 |
cyphermox | alex-abreu: best I can tell you is it *did* for image 94, I don't know more | 16:11 |
ogra_ | stgraber, not really, i tested that variant locally | 16:11 |
stgraber | ogra_: hmm, actually, both do the same, ignore me ;) | 16:11 |
ogra_ | but i can tiurn it into a while loop :) | 16:11 |
stgraber | it's just the first time I see it done with for I believe ;) | 16:11 |
ogra_ | stgraber, heh, now that i think about it, me too :P | 16:11 |
stgraber | ogra_: anyway, yes, that looks good to me | 16:12 |
ogra_ | great, committing and uploading 2.194 then | 16:12 |
stgraber | ogra_: you know that you can just squash all the changes and upload 2.192 right? as none of those got accepted into the archive | 16:13 |
stgraber | cyphermox: are you familiar with the actual changes in that upload? | 16:13 |
ogra_ | stgraber, i'm to lazy to roll back the bzr branch | 16:13 |
stgraber | ogra_: ok :) | 16:13 |
ogra_ | its upstream committed | 16:13 |
ogra_ | :) | 16:13 |
cyphermox | stgraber: I tested that you could still create accounts and such, and ran the autopilot tests | 16:14 |
stgraber | cyphermox: I'm not entirely confident that this is a bugfix only upload based on the wording of the changelog and the number of qml changes, does that upload cause any kind of user visible change? | 16:14 |
didrocks | thanks cyphermox! | 16:15 |
cyphermox | stgraber: not that I noticed | 16:15 |
cyphermox | didrocks: do you know more? ^ | 16:16 |
stgraber | it's a bit hard to figure it out from the diff with all of those qml files being renamed/split/merged... | 16:17 |
stgraber | ogra_: just to confirm, that click change is in a touch specific section of auto/build, right? | 16:18 |
ogra_ | stgraber, yep. ubuntu-touch and armhf even | 16:18 |
stgraber | ok, thanks | 16:19 |
stgraber | ogra_: there you go ^ | 16:20 |
* ogra_ hugs stgraber | 16:20 | |
ogra_ | thanks :) | 16:20 |
cjwatson | ogra_: "for line in read" runs the loop body once with $line set to "read" | 16:21 |
cjwatson | ogra_: that needs to be a while loop instead | 16:21 |
cjwatson | (I tested this ...) | 16:21 |
ogra_ | cjwatson, eeek | 16:21 |
ogra_ | will fix in a minute | 16:21 |
cjwatson | $ (echo foo; echo bar; echo baz) | for line in read; do echo $line; done | 16:21 |
cjwatson | read | 16:21 |
cjwatson | I would be very surprised if any POSIX shell did otherwise | 16:22 |
ogra_ | http://paste.ubuntu.com/6223144/ | 16:22 |
didrocks | stgraber: only on touch AFAIK | 16:23 |
didrocks | cyphermox: ^ | 16:23 |
stgraber | ogra_: those don't look prefixed to me | 16:23 |
cjwatson | ogra_: that only works at all by sheer coincidence | 16:24 |
cjwatson | And indeed will never be prefixed | 16:24 |
ogra_ | http://paste.ubuntu.com/6223153/ | 16:24 |
cjwatson | ogra_: What that does is cause the shell to evaluate the output of "click list" as a file name, attempt to redirect stdin from it, and then emit an error message saying that that (ridiculous) file name doesn't exist | 16:25 |
cjwatson | ogra_: still broken | 16:25 |
cjwatson | ogra_: you need: | 16:25 |
stgraber | ogra_: FWIW I tend to prefer: Chroot chroot "click list | while read line; do ...; done | 16:25 |
cjwatson | Chroot chroot "click list" | while read line; do ...; done | 16:25 |
ogra_ | ok | 16:25 |
cjwatson | And indeed your second version is broken for the same reason - <"$(...)" is basically nonsensical shell :) | 16:26 |
stgraber | right and cjwatson's will actually work since he didn't forget a " :) | 16:26 |
shadeslayer | cjwatson: ISO seems to have built \o/ | 16:26 |
cjwatson | shadeslayer: cool | 16:26 |
ogra_ | ok, final attempt http://paste.ubuntu.com/6223157/ | 16:26 |
cjwatson | should work yes | 16:27 |
didrocks | thanks stgraber | 16:37 |
thostr_ | we got a test failure on ppc https://launchpadlibrarian.net/153485520/buildlog_ubuntu-saucy-powerpc.mediascanner_0.3.93%2B13.10.20131011-0ubuntu1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz | 17:06 |
thostr_ | however, mediascanner is currently not utilized by any desktop, it's only used for phone where it works | 17:06 |
thostr_ | so, could we ignore the test error under those circumstances? | 17:07 |
cjwatson | We can remove the binaries on powerpc | 17:07 |
cjwatson | Sorting that out now | 17:07 |
cjwatson | It just needs unity-scope-mediascanner removed too | 17:08 |
thostr_ | cjwatson: thanks | 17:09 |
cjwatson | done now pending the next publisher cycle | 17:09 |
stgraber | hmm, interesting, pre-release freeze isn't considered as development by Launchpad? | 17:13 |
stgraber | >>> list(lp.distributions['ubuntu'].getDevelopmentSeries()) | 17:13 |
stgraber | [] | 17:13 |
stgraber | (I noticed because I had to pass -s saucy to a few of our tools recently and finally got around to checking why) | 17:14 |
slangasek | stgraber: correct | 17:14 |
cjwatson | stgraber: .current_series | 17:18 |
cjwatson | stgraber: I fixed ubuntu-archive-tools for that fairly recently - you may want to update | 17:18 |
cjwatson | (r775 last week) | 17:18 |
stgraber | cjwatson: haha, I was indeed a bit behind on ubuntu-archive-tools! thanks for the fix | 17:22 |
xnox | looks like ubiquity 2.15.23 has landed, can we respin all ubiquity images? | 17:24 |
stgraber | we're still on cronned run | 17:25 |
xnox | stgraber: i know, but it has so many fixes and duplicate bugs are kept being filed. | 17:25 |
xnox | stgraber: can ubiquity images that have already been build today be respun? e.g. ubuntu-desktop at least? | 17:26 |
stgraber | xnox: ok, I'll trigger a rebuild of all images listed on the manifest | 17:26 |
xnox | stgraber: thanks. | 17:26 |
stgraber | done (selected all the desktop images listed under the Final milestone) | 17:27 |
rtg | infinity, re: bug #1236666 - should I request a sync ? get the source deb and upload manually, or go away and never mention it again ? | 18:04 |
ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1236666 in msr-tools (Ubuntu) "[Feature] update msr-tools package to revision 1.3" [Low,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1236666 | 18:04 |
mdeslaur | can I upload a fix for python-xlib? (LP: #1231453, and LP: #1221514). Looks like it's seeded on the edubuntu dvd. | 18:31 |
ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1231453 in python-xlib (Ubuntu) "get_full_property() throws exceptions" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1231453 | 18:31 |
ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1231453 in python-xlib (Ubuntu) "duplicate for #1221514 get_full_property() throws exceptions" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1231453 | 18:31 |
mdeslaur | stgraber: ^ | 18:34 |
infinity | rtg: Sell me on why we want a new version 6 days before release, and what it won't break. | 18:35 |
stgraber | mdeslaur: sounds reasonable | 18:40 |
mdeslaur | stgraber: thanks, uploaded | 18:40 |
rtg | infinity, why is msr-tools in main ? the new 1.3 version doesn't look like it has any compelling new features to warrant uploading right now. 14.04 ought to be soon enough. | 19:34 |
infinity | rtg: It's in main for cpu-checker | 19:35 |
infinity | rtg: Which, in turn, is in main for qemu. | 19:35 |
infinity | rtg: Which is in main because we hate our users and refuse to support Xen. | 19:36 |
infinity | QED. | 19:36 |
rtg | infinity, ok, I'll take option 3 (i.e., go away) | 19:36 |
infinity | rtg: Sure. It's not modified in Ubuntu, so it'll autosync when we open 14.04. | 19:36 |
rtg | yep | 19:36 |
jdstrand | infinity: fyi, got approval from #ubuntu-ci-eng for the apparmor upload | 21:05 |
jdstrand | infinity: http://paste.ubuntu.com/6224151/ | 21:05 |
jdstrand | $ apt-cache depends apparmor|grep python | 21:06 |
jdstrand | Depends: python3 | 21:06 |
jdstrand | before: | 21:06 |
jdstrand | $ apt-cache depends apparmor|grep python | 21:06 |
jdstrand | Depends: python | 21:06 |
jdstrand | infinity: so, does your comment in #ubuntu-devel mean I can upload? | 21:06 |
* jdstrand uploads | 21:10 | |
jdstrand | if there is a problem, reject it | 21:11 |
knome | hmph, apparently ubiquity slideshow translations weren't uploaded since a few weeks. | 21:12 |
stgraber | knome: hmm, that's unfortunate... let me do that quickly now | 21:27 |
knome | stgraber, cheers :) | 21:27 |
ScottK | jdstrand: Seems fine. | 21:42 |
stgraber | knome: uploaded | 21:42 |
ScottK | Oh, someone got it already. | 21:43 |
stgraber | yeah, I did | 21:43 |
jdstrand | stgraber, ScottK: thanks! :) | 21:43 |
stgraber | ^ that diff will likely be quite massive, it's a translation update from LP, so I'd recommend just checking that I'm not doing anything else :) | 21:44 |
knome | stgraber, thanks again! :) | 21:45 |
lool | hint-unblocked ubuntuone-credentials (touch only) | 21:48 |
slangasek | stgraber: diff looks fine, but is kind of late? Why didn't the translation updates get done before final freeze? | 22:11 |
slangasek | and do we know for sure that we're having another set of images rolled, so that we should definitely accept this now? | 22:11 |
slangasek | lool: what unblocking is needed? the fact that it's touch only means it should go through automatically, and anyway I don't see it uploaded | 22:19 |
lool | slangasek: just a followup to: 17:18 < lool> Hey, I've added a block ubuntuone-credentials hint to test it while it's in -proposed (it's not under cu2d CI) | 22:19 |
slangasek | lool: ah | 22:20 |
lool | slangasek: I did my own blocking and unblocking basically, but wanted to keep the RT in the loop for hints | 22:20 |
slangasek | ack :) | 22:20 |
stgraber | slangasek: right, we apparently dropped the ball on that one and nobody updated the translations in weeks... knome noticed a bit earlier today | 22:28 |
slangasek | stgraber: so we're planning full ISO respins to pick this up? | 22:28 |
stgraber | slangasek: we're still running on cron at the moment and infinity is planning to turn off cron probably tomorrow/sunday | 22:29 |
slangasek | ok | 22:29 |
slangasek | accepting, then | 22:29 |
stgraber | thanks | 22:29 |
knome | slangasek, ta | 22:30 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!