/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2013/10/12/#ubuntu+1.txt

TOM_otakuxWOO, i just think there are nobody on the IRC :)00:28
johnjohn1011i'm here but just a user.  nothing to do with ubuntu00:30
TOM_otakuxyep, i am here because there are some error to ask :)00:31
TOM_otakuxbut the plasma-nm error has been solved now :)00:31
johnjohn1011six more days and you can go to #ubuntu and they will help you.00:34
eagles0513875_hi00:34
weather15Hello.00:35
johnjohn1011i will update 13.04 next weekend.00:35
eagles0513875_im 13.10 already :) works like a charm on my new laptop00:35
weather15I saw that according to the Ubuntu release schedule for 13.10 the release candidate should have been released yesterday. I tried browsing to cdimage.ubuntu.com, but I am only able to find beta 1 and beta 2.00:36
eagles0513875_i wonder if the found some last min issues with it00:37
johnjohn1011weather15: I think if you run the updates, you'll be at the rc level.  or download the daily00:37
weather15I found it strange, in the past usually an actua00:37
weather15l RCA is published.00:38
bazhangnot always00:38
weather15I saw a blog post from earlier in the week calling for people t get ready to test when the RC was released on Thursday.00:38
eagles0513875_hey bazhang  :)00:39
bazhangblog post from what website00:39
bazhanghi00:39
weather15I took a look at the known issues list yesterday and Idid not see anything that I think would cause a delay.00:39
fudusconcentrating on touch rather than legacy probably00:40
weather15bazhang: Planet Ubuntu00:40
johnjohn1011not really a whole lot different imho but they say a lot under the hood.  click packages!!00:40
fudusthe wikipedia and souncloud results appearing in dash is cute00:42
weather15Am I better off to download the daily build or beta 2?00:42
fuduschrome's global menu is broken in 13.10 though00:43
TOM_otakuxthe ubuntu rc did not release the iso file ?00:43
TOM_otakuxi have no error with google-chrome :)00:43
fudusapparently they're keeping gtk unity7 in 14.04 too?00:44
Daekdroomfudus, nope. 14.04 is using Unity 800:44
weather15TOM_otakux: I cannot find an RC ISO.00:46
johnjohn1011weather15: i don't think it matters if you do beta or daily, if  you do the updates.00:47
fudusUbuntu 14.04 LTS will have Unity 7 on top of xMir, while in 14.10 we will see Unity 8 and Mir00:47
TOM_otakuxso there only iso file , when the ubuntu is release?00:47
fudusanother year of gnome, yay00:47
johnjohn1011i hope xmir gets fixed00:48
Daekdroomfudus, I thought the plan was 13.10 with Unity 7 and XMir, and 14.04 LTS would have Unity 8 running on Mir (and XMir for some apps)00:49
fudusxmir had problems on desktop, so everything was pushed backwards00:49
johnjohn1011i think the issue was multiple monitors00:49
fudusand performance, i've tried usc and it caused lag in window moving00:49
fudushad to go back to normal x, which worked fine00:50
DaekdroomI didn't read anything about that changing plans for 14.04, but I'm not omniscient anyway.00:50
johnjohn1011hopefully 14.04 is rock solid stable.00:50
weather15I just went to the daily build download page. There is a note: "Warning: This image is oversized (which is a bug) and will not fit onto a standard 703MiB CD."00:51
Daekdroomweather15, use a DVD or a 1GiG+ thumbdrive00:51
fudusit is an old error message, cdr support was dropped in 13.0400:52
weather15Darkdroom: thannks for the tip. The current ISO comes in at 883MB.00:53
weather15I wonder if there is some sort of problem. Looking at cdimage.ubuntu.com there is only a server ISO for OMAP3 boards under the beta 2 directory.00:57
DaekdroomBeta 2 is only used now for flavours (Kubuntu etc), I think. They must have made an exception for that.00:58
weather15Is the release candidate stage only for flavours now too?00:59
Daekdroom!schedule00:59
ubottuSaucy Salamander (13.10) release milestones can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SaucySalamander/ReleaseSchedule00:59
DaekdroomNope. Ubuntu has it too.01:00
weather15Yesterday was the scheduled date for RC, I cannot find an ISO image on cdimage.ubuntu.com currently.01:00
trismhttp://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/305/builds01:00
trismsee: http://www.theorangenotebook.com/2013/10/testers-assemble-final-rc-testing-is.html01:01
weather15That's odd the ISO is in the daily-live directory.01:03
trismnot really, they always come from there, they just used to be copied elsewhere when they made the announcment which no longer happens01:04
weather15That the QA site links to.01:04
weather15Makes it a little confusing now.01:05
weather15Will now download and test.01:06
weather15Less than a week till release day now.01:06
Daekdroomweather15, they might move it to the RC directory only after they're done testing01:06
weather15That would make sense.01:06
snadgewhomever fixed the ctrl-alt-t shortcut in gnome flashback.. i love you07:01
snadgethat is all07:01
Sander^lapI have the newest kernel installed with dpkg -i.. I think it makes ubuntu raring display an error message. How do I remove it? and which kernel should I be using then?07:22
Sander^lapSorry.. I mean. Which kernel does raring use?07:23
Sander^lapJust so I dont remove the wrong kernel.07:24
alankilaTry something like apt-cache show linux-image07:24
Sander^lapversion 3.11.0.12.1307:25
alankilawell ... okay, that's not what I expected.07:26
alankilaDid you actually install it by apt? I thought dpkg -i is separate from apt database.07:26
Sander^lapYes. I did it with dpkg -i07:26
alankilahow about apt-cache policy linux-image07:26
Sander^lapoutside the repositories07:26
cebormy "show desktop icon" gets not sorted in the dash, is this an known bug and does a workaround exist?07:27
Sander^lapalankila, http://paste.ubuntu.com/6225764/07:28
alankilaI guess I don't understand apt. Sorry.07:29
alankilaanyway, try to find the previous kernel images with something like dpkg -l|grep linux-image07:29
alankilathe 3.11 is clearly one you'd want to remove.07:30
alankilayou probably have something like 3.2, 3.5 or 3.8 kernel also installed07:30
alankilaso removing 3.11, and everything related to that, ought to fall back to the prior kernel unless you actually uninstalled that.07:30
alankilaI guess this gives me a reason to try 3.12.0-rc4. Maybe a few btrfs crashes less in that kernel, 3.11 is hopeless...07:35
snadgeanyone know much about the state of radeon? .. i have a southern islands chipset (HD7870)07:58
snadgerunning current saucy.. i can only get 1920x1080 out of my samsung monitor which natively supports 1920x120007:58
snadgeof course fglrx works.. and supports my 2nd display (a 1920x1080 tv connected via hdmi)07:59
wilee-nilee!xrandr07:59
ubottuXRandR 1.2 is the new method of running dual screens in !X.  Information/HowTo here: http://wiki.debian.org/XStrikeForce/HowToRandR1207:59
snadgeok i think i have figured out what might be the problem.. i just turned my TV on, and its cloned08:00
snadgeso perhaps that is limiting my samsung to that resolution, for that reason.. xrandr gives me a strange output also08:01
snadgehttp://pastebin.com/ksKQLNRq08:02
snadgewilee-nilee, if the information at the top of the page is correct and i'm reading it correctly, that means xrandr doesnt work on radeon,on anything other than  r500/r600 based chips?08:04
wilee-nileeNot sure I just thought in general xrandr would be a place to start.08:04
snadgeyeah .. that output doesnt look healthy though.. it should say.. DVI, HDMI etc08:05
snadgenot.. a strange gamma error and a very basic Screen 0 with only one resolution08:05
wilee-nileeyou can try xrandr -s 1920x1200 and see if it works it will not stay of not, you have to save it08:05
snadgenot found in available modes08:06
wilee-nileeI figured as such08:06
snadgeif i disconnect the hdmi to the tv.. it would probably work08:06
snadgeis my guess.. but then i cannot output to tv of course08:06
wilee-nileewhat are you using to output to the tv?08:06
snadgehdmi08:07
snadgeand dvi to 1920x1200 samsung monitor08:07
snadgeit works with fglrx.. barely.. but i can at least configure, clone, seperate display.. select which is primary etc08:08
wilee-nileeI just bought a samsung tv and have not had a great amount of luck with hdmi, at least ease of travel anyway, so I bought an active usb, all I wanted was my movies to pay anyway.08:08
wilee-nileeI had to use a usb to hdmi converter though, no hdmi port on the laptop08:10
CaelumI have a problem with the cinnamon menu, when I click restart it goes back to the DM and autologs back in08:45
CaelumI think I need to fix that before I ship this box out08:45
ceborsomeone here with thinkpad + dock running saucy09:40
cebori use internal lcd + external lcd: when i close lid and reopen it, internal lcd does not get reactivated.09:42
Caelumlol this channel is useless10:10
BluesKaj_Hi folks10:27
kaddihi guys :)11:13
penguin42hey11:13
kaddiI bought a samsung laptop this week and, of course, I want to install ubuntu on it. Now the question is, how stable is saucy already?11:14
penguin42seems pretty good at the moment11:14
kaddiI'm not sure I wanna install 13.04 now and upgrade in 2 weeks, especially since this is a haswell processor and all11:14
kaddiwell that's nice to hear :)11:14
kaddido you happen to know what resolution it'll work with? I guess it depends on the flavour I pick? Was trying the kubuntu 13.04 live cd yesterday and the laptop has a 3200x1800 resolution and kde couldn't really handle it >.>11:15
penguin42I'd expect it to cope - I'm running it at 2x1920x1080 so that's not much more11:16
alankilalinux desktops to my knowledge do not currently have a proper scalable graphics support, but something manageable can probably be configured in any case.11:16
penguin42kaddi: But what do you mean by 'couldn't really handle it' - in what way?11:16
kaddiwell it was set to maximum resolution and I couldn't change the resolution... then the taskbar at the bottom was minimal, I could barely see it11:16
alankilakaddi: the answer is, you go to the various configuration utilities and start to scale up texts and dimensions.11:17
kaddiin the start menu, obviously someone had scaled the text size, but not the window size, so I could only see one entry of the start menu at a time and had to scroll through it to find the entry i want it11:17
alankilait'll probably never quite work 100 % right in all applications, but it should be possible to make it work well enough11:17
penguin42kaddi: OK, my experience with KDE is you can change pretty much everything if you find the right knob11:17
* alankila wonders if messing around with pixel dimensions will soon be a thing of the past, or if they just redefine pixel to mean "pixel as it would appear on 96 dpi display". Madness.11:18
kaddiyeah, my main concern is really that I couldn't change the resolution.. 3200x1800 is nice and all, but I'm more comfy with a lower resolution.. especially when I have to give talks and such, i need to be able to change the resolution to whatever the beamer can support11:18
penguin42kaddi: OK, go back a step - is that on a single monitor or across multiple displays?11:19
kaddiit's a single monitor11:19
penguin42wow, nice monitor :-)11:19
penguin42kaddi: OK, so my problem is I can't remember if KDEs new screen GUI came in on 13.04 or 13.1011:20
kaddiyeah, it's a nice machine. :)11:20
penguin42kaddi: On 13.10 if you bring up system settings-display configuration, and then click on the white icon with the arrows it brings up a list of display res11:20
kaddiis there anything unique to it? I'm running kubuntu 13.04 on my old laptop :p So I can check if it's present there11:20
penguin42kaddi: What monitor?11:20
kaddipenguin42, it's a samsung ativ 9 plus, it's a laptop, so I'm not quite sure how to answer your question. It's also a touch screen11:21
penguin42kaddi: Yeh thing is I can't remember when the new KDE screen setting stuff went in, if you click on display configuration and get a graphic of a monitor with 3 icons at the bottom (circle arrow/star/white blob) then it's the new one11:21
penguin42kaddi: If you get a thing with a lot of drop downs it's the old one11:21
kaddipenguin42, i was in the settings display configuration and the only resolutino in the list was 3200x180011:21
penguin42kaddi: OK, I'd go with 13.10 and see what happens - and anyway you're in +1 so I would say that!11:22
penguin42kaddi: But then I'd check the output of the xrandr command11:22
kaddihaha ok11:22
kaddiin any case, if i understood correctly i should go 13.10 for the haswell processor alone..11:22
penguin42generally best to use the latest with bleeding edge processor11:24
kaddiyeah11:24
kaddiand it looks like the kde gui was already in 13.0411:24
kaddii'll make a new bootable usb with 13.10 then :)11:24
penguin42kaddi: Does the touchscreen work out of curiosity?11:25
kaddiit worked11:25
kaddii didn't do much testing, but just some touching and moving11:25
penguin42kaddi: Did you try KDE in tablet mode?11:25
kaddii was quite surprised.. didn't expect it to work11:25
penguin42nod11:25
kaddino11:25
penguin42kaddi: What do the text console look like on that display?11:26
* penguin42 thinks of a 400column terminal....11:27
kaddiuhm, i don't remember.. I was only booting it up for a few minutes11:27
kaddimostly to see if booting ubuntu would brick the MB :p11:27
kaddi(spoiler: it didn't ;))11:27
penguin42haha yeh I think that was fixed a few revs ago11:29
kaddiwelll.... technically it's samsung's things to fi11:30
kaddix11:30
kaddihas the release candidate been out yet?11:34
kaddii can only find the beta2 download :s11:38
alankilathe beta2 is probably fine, just do the 100 MB update of new stuff after you have it installed... or during the install, as it may be11:43
kaddiok11:43
alankilaI've been running this before beta1 and I think it's worked well, so I'm hoping the experience will be good for you too11:47
kaddii;m downloading atm :)11:48
kaddi15 more minutes to go11:48
alankilathe only problem is with btrfs, there's something mighty wrong with the way btrfs receive works, and balance seems to be able to segfault, and ...11:48
alankilawell, it's kind of experimental but 3.11 is not a good kernel for btrfs11:49
kaddiyeah, i'm gonna go with ext4 :p11:49
alankilaThey really need to get this thing debugged. Nobody should use ext4 in non-critical use cases after this thing is reliable enough.11:50
kaddilol11:50
kaddiso ubuntu is moving from ext4 to btrfs?11:51
alankilaProbably everyone is ... Or should.11:51
kaddii haven't really been following development lately. >.> i've just used it :p11:51
BluesKaj_I don't understand the fascination with btrfs, there seems to be a laundry list of problems with it11:51
kaddibut wasn't it the same with ext4?11:51
penguin42BluesKaj_: If it can ever be got to work stabily, it's features are pretty neat11:51
penguin42kaddi: Not really, less of a big change11:51
alankilaatomic snapshots. send/receive based backups. Compression and data deduplication.11:52
penguin42BluesKaj_: you remove the need to have a separate LVM layer in a lot of cases, and you can do really need snapshot stuff11:52
alankilaI personally use btrfs for the backups capability. Every hour, I snapshot my live filesystems and send the difference from previous hour's backup to the backup server11:53
penguin42and snapshotting at the filesystem layer is much neater/safer than doing it at the block level in principal11:53
alankilaa minute or so later, it's done, and I rotate the server's backup.11:53
kaddiso is btrfs gonna be fixed before saucy is released? or is it more of a future plan :p11:53
alankilait has a "stable (= working) feature set".11:53
alankilabut I'm not sure if what I'm doing belongs to it11:54
* penguin42 has a machine running openSUSE that uses it, and it seems to hold together well - but haven't pushed it hard11:54
alankilamy problem is a memory leak. When it happens, the server loses gigabytes of memory per my backup run, and soon swaps itself to death11:54
alankilathere's been no data loss11:54
penguin42alankila: Nasty11:55
alankilayeh there's been a lot of memory leak related fixes in 3.12... But I was able to reproduce my issue with 3.12-rc411:55
alankilaI'm suspecting it might have something to do with compression. I am currently experimenting without compression and it would seem like that might have corrected the problem11:56
alankilabut in honesty it's too early to tell.11:56
alankilaIf it hangs together a few days without crashing, then I'm pretty sure that fixed it11:56
alankilaor well, worked around it11:56
alankilaalso this stupid ubuntu kernel defaults to deadline i/o scheduler. It's got a really poor behavior when doing i/o heavy tasks. Starvation of readers is commonplace, "ls" can take forever...11:58
alankilawell, not forever, but waiting for 30 seconds to get ls on a dir with a few files is just not reasonable11:58
alankilaShould probably try to contribute to that bug about whether default is cfq or deadline, it's been going on for at least 4 years11:59
kaddilol, mebbe i should stick to proven and safe installs... Just started by downloading the wrong iso XD12:02
andryhi, found an error in the gdm init script, is this known?12:27
andry..ubuntu gnome12:28
ranma42_I noticed a weird behavior of combining diacritics (in particular, it looks like gedit and libreoffice are not consistent in drawing them). is this the right place to ask for help in investigating which one is wrong and why?12:28
cgtdkandry: I'm not sure that Ubuntu Gnome is supported in this channel12:29
andrythought so :)12:29
andrysorry12:29
andrygoogling for the bug tracker12:29
cgtdkandry: #ubuntu-gnome12:30
ranma42_apparently libreoffice does not show combining diacritics in some fonts (my guess is that it only shows them in fonts which define those glyphs explicitly), while gedit always shows them, but sometimes it combines them to the left, sometimes to the right12:34
penguin42ranma42_: Apparently as in there's already a bug open for it or apparently as you're hitting this problem?12:45
ranma42_I'm hitting it. I did not manage to find this bug (I found some other bugs with libreoffice+combining diacritics, so I might have missed it)12:47
ranma42_using liberation as font, I get no diacritics in libreoffice and diacritics shown on the character following the diacritic in gedit; using ubuntu mono as font, I get the diacritics as expected both in libreoffice in gedit12:51
ranma42_I found this because liberation is the default font in libreoffice, while "Ubuntu Mono" is the default one in gedit. there seem to be quite a lot of fonts showing one or the other behavior12:55
penguin42I'll be honest I don't know how any of the diacritic stuff works12:55
penguin42ranma42_: Perhaps try asking on the libreoffice channels?12:55
ranma42_and for the wrong position in gedit? shall I ask in harfbuzz?12:56
penguin42is it just gedit or other gnome apps?12:56
ranma42_the terminal seems to be ok12:59
ranma42_oops, no sorry, I was wrong. gnome-terminal has exactly the same problem as gedit (I forgot to switch the font)13:02
charpandnlhi there :)13:24
charpandnlhow can I, running 13.10, downgrade php to 5.4?13:24
penguin42ranma42_: Right, so I'd ask in one of the general Gnome places, or maybe Pango (does it still do internationalisation stuff?)13:24
BluesKaj_kl13:35
=== mibofra is now known as mibofra_smart
=== BluesKaj_ is now known as BluesKaj
=== mibofra_smart is now known as mibofra
c_kornhello, how can I run songbird (precompiled i386 executable) on amd64 in ubuntu 13.10? there is not ia32-libs package any longer. and trying to run songbird-bin from terminal gives the confusing error: bash: ./songbird-bin: No such file or directory14:59
c_kornfile recognizes the exe as following: ./songbird-bin: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.9, stripped15:00
Daekdroomc_korn, ia32-libs is still available for me.15:02
c_kornDaekdroom: huh? https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ia32-libs/+publishinghistory deleted in saucy: obsolete transitional package15:03
DaekdroomHm. That is correct. I still have it installed only because I have a package that - still - requires it.15:06
c_kornyeah, this is also my problem. songbird needs it.15:15
c_kornok, seems I first have to add i386 support at all: sudo dpkg --add-architecture i38615:25
eagles0513875_has anyone else gotten flash working in firefox with gnash or something else15:31
eagles0513875_i dunno if the browser is the issue or the flash plugin itself15:31
bekkseagles0513875_: Someone did, I bet. But whats your specific issue?15:35
eagles0513875_bekks: facebook games are not picking up that i have gnash installed15:35
eagles0513875_and even with the proprietary flash it still seems to not find it in firefox15:35
eagles0513875_was just about to try chromium15:35
bekkseagles0513875_: Thats correct. gnash does not support things requiring modern flash versions.15:35
bekkseagles0513875_: Use Chrome and PepperFlash.15:36
=== em is now known as qman
eagles0513875_thanks will try that bekks  :)15:36
eagles0513875_bekks:  chromium is working with the proprietary flash15:37
bekksThats why I said: use Chrome and PepperFlash.15:37
=== qman is now known as em
bekksThe proprietary flash on Linux is outdated.15:38
eagles0513875_ahhh15:40
eagles0513875_is there pepperflash for firefox15:41
eagles0513875_bekks: is it an extension15:41
bekkseagles0513875_: No there isnt.15:41
bekksPepperFlash is for the PepperAPI in google chrome.15:42
eagles0513875_im not finding it in chromium15:43
eagles0513875_ahh could it be that im using chromium and not chrome15:43
eagles0513875_or in a way are they the same15:43
bekkseagles0513875_: They are not the same.15:45
bekkseagles0513875_: Use chrome, not chromium.15:46
eagles0513875_whats the difference15:49
bekkschrome supports PepperFlash, chromium dont.15:54
eagles0513875_ahh ok16:00
maxbWell, ish.16:02
maxbChromium does support Pepper, it just doesn't ship with PepperFlash16:02
bekksThats what I said.16:03
maxbYou said that Chromium does not support PepperFlash16:04
bekksI know. And thats true. I did not say chromium doesnt support the PepperAPI.16:04
maxbThat's not entirely true, if you ppint Chromium at a copy of PepperFlash, it works16:04
maxb*point16:05
kaddiheya, anyone here from the group I was talking to this morning about screen resolution and fontsize?16:52
kaddihttp://imagebin.org/27351016:52
kaddii've made an upload here. On the left, is the control panel showing that there's only one elective resolution. In the middle is quassel as it opens by default. Note the font size is actually good, but the window proportions are quite off.. Finally, since the question was asked, on the right you have the terminal as it opened per default :)16:53
penguin42kaddi: Hey16:56
kaddiheya :)16:56
penguin42kaddi: OK, what does xrandr say,   also what graphics driver are you using?16:56
kaddibut it runs. ;) It runs just fine.. talking to you from saucy now :)16:56
penguin42great!16:57
kaddixrandr: Failed to get size of gamma for output default16:57
kaddiScreen 0: minimum 3200 x 1800, current 3200 x 1800, maximum 3200 x 180016:57
kaddidefault connected primary 3200x1800+0+0 0mm x 0mm16:57
kaddi   3200x1800       0.0*16:57
penguin42kaddi: xrandr for me looks something like: http://paste.ubuntu.com/6227530/16:57
kaddihow do i check the graphics driver again16:57
penguin42kaddi: probably the best way is if you pastebin your /var/log/Xorg.0.log16:58
kaddiok16:58
penguin42I thought even the Nvidia drivers did xrandr these days16:59
kaddihttp://paste.ubuntu.com/6227541/17:00
kaddihere you go17:00
* penguin42 reads17:00
kaddii have no dedicated graphic card in it, it's intel hd400017:00
penguin42hmm17:02
kaddii have to boot with nomodeset still, btw.. not sure if that makes a difference17:03
kaddiif I don't do that i get a completely grey screen17:03
penguin42kaddi: OK, so I'm a bit surprised it does list some other modes and says it can't use them - not quite sure wise17:03
penguin42kaddi: You could try #ubuntu-x - but I'd file bugs on both that and the fact you need nomodeset17:03
kaddiok17:04
kaddiit's not version specific.. i was having the same issues with 13.0417:04
kaddiso it's not a regression, is what I'm saying, I guess :p17:05
penguin42kaddi: KDE's GUI just passes on stuff directly from xrandr, so it's not KDEs fault17:05
penguin42heck I want that display....17:05
kaddisamsung ativ 9 ;)17:05
penguin42kaddi: Only some of the models, I've already looked for it :-)17:05
kaddii'm still trying to get someone from samsung to commit to saying that if it gets borked they'll replace it :p17:05
penguin42kaddi: Better not bork it then!17:06
kaddicause otherwise I will have wasted a whole LOT of money!17:06
kaddiwell it's the UEFI-bug... I'm scared.17:06
kaddibut since I can run ubuntu fine from live-cd, i'm gonna guess it's gonna install fine as well ;)17:06
penguin42kaddi: That was a pretty specific bug, and it only happened if booted in UEFI mode17:07
penguin42kaddi: One thing you might try doing as far as your screen res, is trying to use xrandr to manually add some more mode lines17:07
kaddipenguin42: i'd like a dual boot windows8 - ubuntu, so i would be wanting to keep the uefi mode17:08
kaddii've never done that before, do you know the commands of the top of your head or should i go read man? :p17:08
penguin42I don't know the uefi magic17:08
penguin42kaddi: IMHO on the machines that had the bricking problem it only happened if you went into the bios and explicitly enabled uefi mode, and it was already dead having booted it off the thumb image; it wasn't the installation that did it17:09
penguin42kaddi: so IMHO if it still works you're *probably* ok!17:09
kaddithere's been a work-around in the linux kernel for half a year.. i would just like samsung to step up and fix the sh** on their end too :p17:10
penguin42kaddi: As I say, I think if your laptop is in uefi mode and you've survived a reboot then I think they already have17:11
penguin42kaddi: However, if you find yourself with an ultra hd brick, please send the panel to ....17:11
kaddihahaha, i'll keep that in mind :)17:11
penguin42now, when do they get 24" monitors with that res17:13
kaddithat'd be insane o.o17:14
kaddibut it's surely coming :p17:15
penguin42kaddi: Why insane? I'd go for the same number of pixels but being larger I could actually use them!17:15
kaddiah, ok.. i thought you meant the same pixel density but on 24"17:16
penguin42no, I'm happy to just go with the same number of pixels17:17
kaddimy previous laptop did a maximum of 1024x768 :p17:17
kaddiyou can imagine the difference to now :D17:17
penguin42haha yes17:17
penguin42kaddi: It might be interesting to chat to the guys in #kde about issues you see - certainly please report anything to their bugzilla about stuff that doesn't work right on a screen like that17:18
kaddiand in wait i pretty much did the opposite, went from plus 3kgs to something around 1kg17:18
kaddithat's even more confusing17:18
kaddifirst few times I picked the laptop up, I was almost throwing it, because I was expecting the thing to be thrice as happy17:19
kaddii've posted in ubuntu-x for some help... I'm afraid if I make the bug report as it is, it's prolly not gonna contain a lot of the info they need.. Waiting for their feedback before reporting it17:19
kaddii'll drop by kde as well17:19
kaddithough is this kde or kubuntu?17:20
penguin42kaddi: Generally kde, only report kubuntu stuff if it's about ubuntu packaging or settings17:20
kaddiok17:20
zeepanyone know a good weather applet that works with  13.10?17:24
penguin42only knows the KDE applet YAWP which is great17:25
zeepsame here heh17:25
zeepi miss it with unity17:25
=== kubuntu is now known as Guest91975
=== Guest91975 is now known as kaddi
wilee-nileezeep, You might try a aconky17:40
wilee-nileeconky*17:40
zeephm that's not a idea17:41
zeepthanks17:41
wilee-nileehmm yes it is lol.17:42
elfy:)17:45
wilee-nileewhat up elfy17:50
elfyhi wilee-nilee - all good here - you too I trust :)17:50
wilee-nileeexcellent. ;)17:51
elfyalways good to hear :)17:52
=== mibofra is now known as mibofra_smart
=== mibofra_smart is now known as mibofra
penguin42anyone else running saucy in a kvm guest?19:52
penguin42(and wth has it just done the DKMS build of nvidia modules on my ATI machine)19:53
ikoniawhy are you using nvidia modules if you are running in kvm ?19:53
penguin42that's the host that's got the nvidia stuff19:54
penguin42and I'm not using it!19:54
ikoniaahh I see, so the guest shouldn't be doing it, but it is19:54
penguin42no no, 2 separate questions19:56
penguin42(host: built nvidia modules but shouldn't be using it) (guest: hanging at reboot)19:56
ikoniaare the nvidia packages installed by default on the host ? that seems odd if so19:57
penguin42ikonia: Well I seem to have nvidia-319-updates installed and nvidia-common, but I don't know why19:57
ikoniathat seems very odd19:58
penguin42nod19:58
ikoniacan't be healthy either to load the wrong modules19:59
penguin42doesn't seem to have loaded it19:59
penguin42oh, right - if I try and remove nvidia-319-updates it removes libopencv-dev that seems unreasonable20:00
penguin42is this because it's got some CUDA stuff added?20:00
* penguin42 doesn't understand this - it doesn't show up as having any rdepends on vidia-319-updates20:02
penguin42http://paste.ubuntu.com/6228181/20:03
ikoniapenguin42: seems stupid20:04
penguin42agreed - but I don't even know what to report it against20:05
ikoniaI see your point20:05
penguin42ah20:06
penguin42if I try a dpkg --purge on nvida-319-updates I get   libopencv-ocl2.4 depends on libopencl1; however:    Package libopencl1 is not installed.   Package nvidia-319-updates which provides libopencl1 is to be removed.20:06
* penguin42 installs ocl-icd-libopencl120:07
penguin42that's better20:08
penguin42I'd have expected it to install that when I removed the nvidia one since it also provides that20:09
zeeptab should switch between the apps in dash and arrow keys for categories20:44
zeepis there a way to change it? can't find it in keyboard shortcuts20:44
user82_hi. is it correct that the daily builds are now release candidates and should equal the final builds, if nothing unexpected comes along?22:04
=== sam113101 is now known as sam113101_afk
=== sam113101_afk is now known as sam113101
penguin42has anyone else done an install from CD recently - do you get any wallpaper on the login screen?22:31
FernandoMiguelpenguin42: I just tested latest livecd and it worked22:35
penguin42FernandoMiguel: Hmm I just tested the latest livecd and it didn't!22:35
penguin42FernandoMiguel: I get a kind of grid pattern instead of any pretty backdrop22:39
FernandoMiguelcan't tell22:39
FernandoMigueldidn't test it much22:39
FernandoMiguelwas just trying to install it OVER a 12.04.3 install22:40
FernandoMigueland it failed22:40
penguin42oh, it's installed apparently ok for me (I was installing it over an old saucy install)22:41
FernandoMiguelpenguin42: I was trying to do it the hardER way22:42
FernandoMiguelusing grub-grml and booting from ISO from GRUB22:42
penguin42you mean manual ?22:42
FernandoMiguelofc the installer pegged with the mounted disk22:42
penguin42pegged?22:43
FernandoMiguelstuck22:43
FernandoMigueltwice22:43
penguin42hmm22:45
snadgeis there a channel for mir development?23:04
snadgei've obviously already tried #mir ;)23:04
trismsnadge: there is an #ubuntu-mir23:05
AlecTaylorhi23:59

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!