[05:51] ^^ systemtap is in core but not on any images, this is a safe change of a python dep to a python:any dep for cross-build support [05:52] wgrant: Does graphicsmagick already build-dep on autotools-dev correctly? [05:52] wgrant: Oh, I suppose it must have if it was copying config.sub by hand. [05:52] infinity: Yep, note how it used to symlink config.sub [05:52] It builds on amd64 now, at least. [05:52] wgrant: Look at you, being all MOTU and uploadey. [05:53] It's been altogether too long. [05:53] Thanks === Noskcaj10 is now known as Noskcaj [09:25] stgraber, is there any reason why system image was disabled in crontab ? we now have a half done touch image ... [09:25] * ogra_ runs the system-image generator manually since people are waiting for tests since last night [13:57] ogra_, lool: oops, forgot to turn it back on. I had it disabled when I was creating saucy-surfaceflinger to avoid any image disappearing during the copy [13:58] ah, great [13:59] * ogra_ thought it was just an oversight === doko_ is now known as doko [19:09] stgraber: ah right, great [19:34] webkit is the current blocker for a big build-dep chain on arm64, so a review would be good [19:34] amazing how much stuff goes through browser engines [19:35] lookin' [19:38] accepted [19:39] ta [19:41] may need to run on birch, but I'll let it run on twombly for now [19:41] this does require a respin of the images [19:42] cjwatson: how much longer do you guys plan to continue making aarch64 changes for packages on the ISOs? [19:42] the image cron jobs don't appear to be stopped yet [19:43] AIUI that's planned for today, right? [19:43] not totally sure [19:43] I thought I'd heard Monday at one point [19:43] but CBW [19:44] I'm not exactly sure - I guess we can stop when we need to stop but it'd be nice to be able to keep going over the rest of the weekend at least [19:45] ok [19:45] however, with the exception of a kernel, I think we have most of a LAMP stack-type workload now [19:45] whoo [19:46] And looks like the bootstrap archive is entirely superseded, I think [19:46] oh, nice [19:47] I did a spot check and saw 3000+ Arch: aarch64 binary packages the other day [19:47] not bad [19:47] webkit is on the way round a ridiculously complicated set of intertwined cycles - if we could make it to the end of those and undo the hacks it would be nice [19:47] but not the end of the world if we can't [19:48] We've published 2097 arm64 builds (i.e. counted by source package) to the release pocket so far [19:49] Probably ought to do something with the ubuntu-meta currently in -proposed - force the arm64 uninstallables, or drop it [19:50] It actually probably ought to be refreshed since I bet the available set in minimal/standard has grown [19:52] * cjwatson moves webkit/powerpc to sagari [20:01] hm, I was going to add an arm64 build to ubuntu-core/saucy-, but we don't have a livefs builder for it [20:01] shame we haven't had time to start doing that in LP yet [20:27] slangasek, infinity wrote in his email Sun evening [20:27] ok [21:01] cjwatson: I'll do ubuntu-core/saucy when I get to London. [22:12] could someone please accept digikam? It's the previous upload done right [22:14] yofel: Done. [22:14] thanks! [22:27] infinity: What builder were you planning to use for it? [22:27] I mean, I assume we don't want to do it just as a one-off [22:34] cjwatson: I had originally planned to do it as a one-off, but adding a livefs setup to one of the boards would be trivial. [22:34] cjwatson: And I was going to suggest birch, until it started acting up an hour ago... [22:36] I guess we'll see if that carries on or if it's just having a bad night [22:38] Well, the old boards haven't ever died during build-dep install... [22:39] So a one of the old two, or even a revived old-birch could work. [22:40] * infinity nods.