| apw | snadge, file the bug against the linux-image-NNN which is the broken one | 07:34 |
|---|---|---|
| apw | and say which you are running in the commentary | 07:34 |
| * apw yawns | 08:07 | |
| apw | morning ... | 08:07 |
| === fmasi_afk is now known as fmasi | ||
| * smb goes to get more tea | 09:23 | |
| tjaalton | apw: so, should I create a 'update i915_hsw to current 3.8.13.x' pull request first, and then the two new commits on top of that? | 11:00 |
| tjaalton | it's just a bit of manual work | 11:00 |
| apw | tjaalton, that going to be like commits | 11:04 |
| tjaalton | yeah | 11:04 |
| apw | 57 commits | 11:04 |
| apw | ? | 11:04 |
| tjaalton | right | 11:04 |
| apw | hmmm ... for SRU | 11:04 |
| tjaalton | they just keep piling up :) | 11:05 |
| tjaalton | bad kamal :) | 11:05 |
| apw | i guess if we have applied them | 11:05 |
| apw | already for 'master' then they should be on hte ubuntu version | 11:05 |
| tjaalton | yup | 11:06 |
| tjaalton | I'll try with a few to see how awkward it is.. | 11:06 |
| apw | tjaalton, ok thanks ... i guess | 11:07 |
| tjaalton | hmm, yesterday I got 57 commits as the diff, but only 37 now | 11:20 |
| tjaalton | ah, that's the pure stable tree diff.. raring has more | 11:33 |
| kamal | tjaalton, what'd I do? | 15:24 |
| kamal | tjaalton, apw ... should I be terrified about whatever it is that you're talking about here ... because I am! | 15:24 |
| apw | yes, you should indeed, you are getting the blame at least | 15:25 |
| kamal | apw, while I'm sure the blame is rightly directed . . . what exactly am I getting the blame for? :-) | 15:26 |
| apw | needing 37 patches for i915 in quantal | 15:26 |
| * kamal looks sideways at apw | 15:26 | |
| kamal | next you'll point out that we need 137 patches for i915 in precise! | 15:27 |
| apw | yeah the 37 in q is to avoid that in p i think | 15:33 |
| kamal | apw, are we really talking about quantal here? tjaalton mentioned raring above (and I maintain 3.8, not 3.5, anyway) . . . anyway... | 15:34 |
| tjaalton | kamal: no worries, just kiddin ;) | 15:35 |
| tjaalton | +g | 15:35 |
| kamal | I am of course open to suggestions, but it seems implausible that we could call any 37-patch set reasonable for application to "stable" | 15:35 |
| tjaalton | kamal: it's from your stable tree :) | 15:36 |
| kamal | oh oh, do I have this all backwards? | 15:36 |
| tjaalton | the diff .13..13.11 | 15:36 |
| kamal | oh. in that case . . . | 15:36 |
| kamal | I'm sure those patches are freaking awesome! . . . perfect code, fully worthy of stable! ;-) ;-) ;-) | 15:36 |
| apw | i think he was saying the quantal needs a bunch of fixes already applied in stable for raring, but on quantal, or something | 15:37 |
| apw | i am hoping some day he will send us a pull so we cna review | 15:37 |
| * kamal goes back to hiding under a rock then :-) | 15:37 | |
| tjaalton | so I went through the 57 commits that git claimed that is the diff between .13 and raring, but in fact a bunch of those were already in .13, so the diff between quantal i915_hsw and raring is around 36 commits | 15:38 |
| tjaalton | three only in raring, and one of those valid for haswell | 15:38 |
| kamal | tjaalton, I'm curious about the three only in raring (you mean they're in raring, but not in 3.8.13.11, right?) ... send me that list? | 15:39 |
| tjaalton | kamal: yeah I bet they are awesome, that's why I think it makes sense to merge to ubuntu/i915 in quantal :) | 15:39 |
| kamal | (not that that relates to your quantal project) | 15:40 |
| tjaalton | kamal: 0d0ecad2c0dd07e, e8c14411e539718, 0009bd009e9ec8b | 15:40 |
| kamal | tjaalton, thanks | 15:40 |
| tjaalton | the first one didn't make it upstream, actually | 15:44 |
| rtg | jjohansen, when Linus merges 'Apparmor bugfixes for 3.12' you should propose both patches for stable | 15:46 |
| jjohansen | rtg: ack, I will check if there is anything for stable. However I think all the bug fixes sent up lately have only been against the 3.12 pull request | 15:56 |
| rtg | jjohansen, oh, right. 13.10 is carrying the AA development branch. | 15:57 |
| jjohansen | yep | 15:58 |
| === rtg is now known as rtg-afk | ||
| === fmasi is now known as fmasi_afk | ||
| smoser | hey | 18:14 |
| smoser | stupid question | 18:14 |
| smoser | (familiar pattern when smoser speaks) | 18:14 |
| smoser | https://launchpadlibrarian.net/149319334/overlayfs_inotify.patch | 18:14 |
| smoser | on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/882147 | 18:14 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 882147 in coreutils (Ubuntu) "overlayfs does not implement inotify interfaces correctly" [Undecided,In progress] | 18:14 |
| smoser | could we have that ? if its functional? or help push it upstream ? | 18:15 |
| smoser | googling for CONFIG_INOTIFY_STACKFS doesn't really show anything | 18:15 |
| bjf | smoser, that's not implemented upstream, downstream or any of the tributaries | 18:19 |
| smoser | the patch is not. | 18:19 |
| smoser | overlayfs is upstream, right? | 18:19 |
| bjf | smoser, you are asking about inotify interfaces, right? | 18:19 |
| bjf | smoser, in overlayfs | 18:20 |
| smoser | overlayfs is upstream. right? | 18:20 |
| smoser | i'd like to have inotify support in overlayfs, because lots of stuff sucks without it. | 18:20 |
| smoser | i see that patch which seems to report that it is adding inotify to overlayfs | 18:20 |
| xnox | apw: ^ | 18:21 |
| xnox | smoser: no, it doesn't not work and has performance penalty. | 18:21 |
| smoser | doesnt work woudl be enough reason to not have it | 18:22 |
| smoser | :) | 18:22 |
| smoser | xnox, you've tried it thoug? | 18:22 |
| rtg-afk | smoser, overlayfs is not yet upstream | 18:22 |
| smoser | ah. ok. i had thought it got accepted. | 18:23 |
| rtg-afk | smoser, multiple attempts,. but no joy yet | 18:23 |
| smoser | right. ok. well, move along then, nothing to see here. | 18:24 |
| === rtg-afk is now known as rtg | ||
| smoser | i saw that patch and hoped magic inotify support materialized from the ether | 18:24 |
| smoser | xnox, you've tried it? | 18:25 |
| === sabayonuser2 is now known as Tuxkalle_ | ||
| === Tuxkalle_ is now known as Tuxkalle | ||
| * rtg -> EOD | 21:27 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!