| === cprov-afk is now known as cprov | ||
| === charles_ is now known as charles | ||
| === zenitraM^away is now known as zenitraM | ||
| === zenitraM is now known as zenitraM^away | ||
| === zenitraM^away is now known as zenitraM | ||
| === zenitraM is now known as zenitraM^away | ||
| === zenitraM^away is now known as zenitraM | ||
| === zenitraM is now known as zenitraM^away | ||
| yolanda | hi, is there any way to generate credentials for launchpad for more than one week? | 09:49 |
|---|---|---|
| wgrant | yolanda: You tell Launchpad how long they should last when you authorise them in your web browser. | 09:50 |
| yolanda | wgrant, yes, but maximum period that allows is a week | 09:50 |
| wgrant | yolanda: "Until I Disable It" | 09:50 |
| yolanda | oh | 09:51 |
| yolanda | bad morning, sorry :( | 09:51 |
| wgrant | Heh :) | 09:51 |
| geser | wgrant: Hi, I noticed that the FTBFS page lists now also "Cancelled builds". Do they need a different handling than the usual FTBFS or the same? (don't remember seeing there a cancelled build listed before) | 09:54 |
| wgrant | geser: Anyone who can retry a build can also manually cancel it. That normally happens if you know it's going to fail, or take out a builder, or something like that. | 09:56 |
| wgrant | The status has been around for a few months, but I only noticed it wasn't on the FTBFS page during the arm64 bootstrap. | 09:56 |
| cjwatson | wgrant: Might be worth them having a different abbreviation, for searching. (X) maybe? | 10:02 |
| cjwatson | geser: Indeed, the one build listed as cancelled there was cancelled because it hung. | 10:02 |
| wgrant | cjwatson: Yeah, I was going to make them X until I saw that the template just took the first character, so it would have required more alterations than I had time for immediately. But I'll do it soon. | 10:03 |
| wgrant | Also the CSS seems to have disappeared in one of my merges. | 10:03 |
| === zenitraM^away is now known as zenitraM | ||
| === zenitraM is now known as zenitraM^away | ||
| === zenitraM^away is now known as zenitraM | ||
| === dpm is now known as dpm-afk | ||
| czajkowski | cjwatson: ello is there a mail to the TB waiting to go through from pleia ... | 17:01 |
| === zenitraM is now known as zenitraM^away | ||
| === zenitraM^away is now known as zenitraM | ||
| teolemon | Hi | 22:05 |
| teolemon | I'm a French translator, and I have a tiny issue: I gave maintainor rights to a random guy, on a project we're managing | 22:06 |
| teolemon | the project is https://launchpad.net/ubuntumanualautomated | 22:07 |
| teolemon | the guy is named… | 22:07 |
| teolemon | https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-translator | 22:07 |
| teolemon | (yes, you can have a laugh at my expense :-) ) | 22:07 |
| teolemon | the request would be to shirt the maintainer to the proper ubuntu-translators team | 22:08 |
| splatter | Need recipe help... | 23:36 |
| wgrant | splatter: What's the issue? | 23:37 |
| splatter | Recipe is https://code.launchpad.net/~damien-moore/+recipe/codeblocks-daily | 23:37 |
| splatter | Need to run a script in rules called update_revision.sh to get the svn revision number to include in start page and about page | 23:39 |
| splatter | But update_revision.sh needs to be able to access either bzr or svn repo to do this. | 23:40 |
| wgrant | Only the source package is built in the presence of the bzr repository, and debian/rules is not run there, except for debian/rules clean. | 23:41 |
| wgrant | You're not meant to run arbitrary commands as part of a recipe. | 23:42 |
| splatter | So if I put a bzr info blah blah in rules clean: it should work? | 23:42 |
| wgrant | Uhhh | 23:43 |
| wgrant | Work? Likely. Not be evil? Unlikely. | 23:43 |
| wgrant | You'd have to be very careful. | 23:43 |
| splatter | It does look like our script gets called during the source package run, but it still doesn’t work. Here https://launchpadlibrarian.net/154048162/buildlog.txt.gz | 23:46 |
| splatter | Search for "found revision" | 23:46 |
| wgrant | Indeed. Have you tried test building with bzr-builder locally? | 23:46 |
| splatter | Understand concern about not being evil. Do you know what other project do to put rev info in their apps for nightly builds? | 23:48 |
| wgrant | splatter: I'm not sure. I've seen several just include the package version, though, to make it clear exactly which build it is. | 23:49 |
| splatter | Havent tried bzr-builder (wince). Will investigate. Code::Blocks gets lots of bug reports on their forums, including the svn revno is important. | 23:50 |
| wgrant | You can include the svn revno in the package version. | 23:50 |
| splatter | My last resort is to replace the auto bzr import with a manual one where I run the update_revision.sh script and then commit | 23:51 |
| splatter | I was trying to use svn-revno but got error message. Is that supposed to work for an auto imported branch? | 23:52 |
| wgrant | It should, but maybe it doesn't quite work on Launchpad yet. | 23:53 |
| wgrant | It might have been added in recipe format 0.4, which isn't quite there yet. | 23:53 |
| splatter | So for now I am using the bzr revno in the package name. Users are kind of a mess anyway, and probably wouldn't know how to get version number from package filename. Hence the need to get into start page / about box | 23:54 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!