=== cprov-afk is now known as cprov === charles_ is now known as charles === zenitraM^away is now known as zenitraM === zenitraM is now known as zenitraM^away === zenitraM^away is now known as zenitraM === zenitraM is now known as zenitraM^away === zenitraM^away is now known as zenitraM === zenitraM is now known as zenitraM^away [09:49] hi, is there any way to generate credentials for launchpad for more than one week? [09:50] yolanda: You tell Launchpad how long they should last when you authorise them in your web browser. [09:50] wgrant, yes, but maximum period that allows is a week [09:50] yolanda: "Until I Disable It" [09:51] oh [09:51] bad morning, sorry :( [09:51] Heh :) [09:54] wgrant: Hi, I noticed that the FTBFS page lists now also "Cancelled builds". Do they need a different handling than the usual FTBFS or the same? (don't remember seeing there a cancelled build listed before) [09:56] geser: Anyone who can retry a build can also manually cancel it. That normally happens if you know it's going to fail, or take out a builder, or something like that. [09:56] The status has been around for a few months, but I only noticed it wasn't on the FTBFS page during the arm64 bootstrap. [10:02] wgrant: Might be worth them having a different abbreviation, for searching. (X) maybe? [10:02] geser: Indeed, the one build listed as cancelled there was cancelled because it hung. [10:03] cjwatson: Yeah, I was going to make them X until I saw that the template just took the first character, so it would have required more alterations than I had time for immediately. But I'll do it soon. [10:03] Also the CSS seems to have disappeared in one of my merges. === zenitraM^away is now known as zenitraM === zenitraM is now known as zenitraM^away === zenitraM^away is now known as zenitraM === dpm is now known as dpm-afk [17:01] cjwatson: ello is there a mail to the TB waiting to go through from pleia ... === zenitraM is now known as zenitraM^away === zenitraM^away is now known as zenitraM [22:05] Hi [22:06] I'm a French translator, and I have a tiny issue: I gave maintainor rights to a random guy, on a project we're managing [22:07] the project is https://launchpad.net/ubuntumanualautomated [22:07] the guy is named… [22:07] https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-translator [22:07] (yes, you can have a laugh at my expense :-) ) [22:08] the request would be to shirt the maintainer to the proper ubuntu-translators team [23:36] Need recipe help... [23:37] splatter: What's the issue? [23:37] Recipe is https://code.launchpad.net/~damien-moore/+recipe/codeblocks-daily [23:39] Need to run a script in rules called update_revision.sh to get the svn revision number to include in start page and about page [23:40] But update_revision.sh needs to be able to access either bzr or svn repo to do this. [23:41] Only the source package is built in the presence of the bzr repository, and debian/rules is not run there, except for debian/rules clean. [23:42] You're not meant to run arbitrary commands as part of a recipe. [23:42] So if I put a bzr info blah blah in rules clean: it should work? [23:43] Uhhh [23:43] Work? Likely. Not be evil? Unlikely. [23:43] You'd have to be very careful. [23:46] It does look like our script gets called during the source package run, but it still doesn’t work. Here https://launchpadlibrarian.net/154048162/buildlog.txt.gz [23:46] Search for "found revision" [23:46] Indeed. Have you tried test building with bzr-builder locally? [23:48] Understand concern about not being evil. Do you know what other project do to put rev info in their apps for nightly builds? [23:49] splatter: I'm not sure. I've seen several just include the package version, though, to make it clear exactly which build it is. [23:50] Havent tried bzr-builder (wince). Will investigate. Code::Blocks gets lots of bug reports on their forums, including the svn revno is important. [23:50] You can include the svn revno in the package version. [23:51] My last resort is to replace the auto bzr import with a manual one where I run the update_revision.sh script and then commit [23:52] I was trying to use svn-revno but got error message. Is that supposed to work for an auto imported branch? [23:53] It should, but maybe it doesn't quite work on Launchpad yet. [23:53] It might have been added in recipe format 0.4, which isn't quite there yet. [23:54] So for now I am using the bzr revno in the package name. Users are kind of a mess anyway, and probably wouldn't know how to get version number from package filename. Hence the need to get into start page / about box