| rsalveti | lool: ^? | 00:00 |
|---|---|---|
| ralsina | lool: it does look pretty harmless | 00:00 |
| lool | popey: Yeah, or from T | 00:01 |
| lool | popey: technically we can still land tomorrow morning in archive or -updates, with paperwork for SRU | 00:01 |
| lool | or starting friday or monday in T | 00:02 |
| lool | Saviq: unity8-fake-env's new mock dir is harmless, yes? | 00:02 |
| lool | Forgot to note it here but I published unity8 to proposed a while ago | 00:05 |
| popey | lool: so we'll do system updates for phone? | 00:05 |
| popey | I mean, the crucial thing for me is that a sales person or user who has a phone they flash with image 100 (or whatever ends up being 'final') can update to get the fixes | 00:06 |
| sil2100 | popey: I'm testing the new qtorganizer5-eds aaand... | 00:06 |
| popey | (apologies if this is all well known, I haven't seen many discussions about post-13.10 updates to touch) | 00:06 |
| sil2100 | popey: it seems I can save an alarm, but I can't edit it or disable it :| | 00:07 |
| lool | popey: yup | 00:07 |
| lool | popey: TBH the next days are not crystal clear to me either | 00:07 |
| lool | and the update frequency is also unclear | 00:07 |
| lool | every week, every month etc. | 00:08 |
| lool | but we will update the stable imge | 00:08 |
| lool | I dont know whether we'll update *stable* or *devel* every month for instance | 00:08 |
| Saviq | lool, yeah, it's just about AP tests | 00:09 |
| popey | right | 00:09 |
| popey | so for core apps we're golden because we can deliver updates through the store | 00:09 |
| lool | popey: exactly | 00:09 |
| popey | but for system components like the ones above we're really stuck | 00:09 |
| lool | popey: note that I'd like to tighten the way they get into an image | 00:10 |
| popey | hence me being keen to get them in 100 | 00:10 |
| lool | popey: it shouldn't stop users getting the latest from app store | 00:10 |
| lool | popey: via click updater | 00:10 |
| popey | yeah, we'll gate core apps | 00:10 |
| lool | popey: but right now we have no way to gate | 00:10 |
| lool | right | 00:10 |
| popey | they can't be updated by the core apps devs | 00:10 |
| popey | well we do | 00:10 |
| lool | well at the appstore level, right | 00:10 |
| popey | sergio has added them all to the store under a separate email account | 00:10 |
| popey | so we can manually update | 00:10 |
| popey | which is okay for now | 00:10 |
| popey | clearly not long term sustainable solution, and doesn't fix the issue in hand | 00:11 |
| sil2100 | popey: I'm not really sure about releasing the new qtorganizer5-eds - I set an alarm for like 1 minute ago and it didn't do anything, also, removing, disabling and editing alarms doesn't seem to work | 00:11 |
| sil2100 | popey: so clearly there seems to be something wrong here | 00:11 |
| popey | it wont do anything | 00:12 |
| popey | until you have charles' bits in | 00:12 |
| popey | which should trigger a notification | 00:12 |
| sil2100 | I thought charles bits were only about informing about alarms on the indicator | 00:12 |
| sil2100 | Ah, ok | 00:12 |
| sil2100 | Still, not being able to disable an alarm is a big problem IMO | 00:12 |
| popey | renato fixed saving in eds, charles enabled notification from indicator-datetime | 00:12 |
| sil2100 | If we get the bits that charles has, people will be stuck with alarms once they create them | 00:13 |
| popey | i dont know where the broken bit is with regards to editing alarms | 00:13 |
| popey | whether thats in clock or eds or somewhere else | 00:13 |
| sil2100 | Hi charles_ | 00:14 |
| sil2100 | lool: what do you think? Should we publish the qtorganizer5-eds fix for saving new alarms, even though there is no possibility of later editing, disabling, deleting of those? | 00:21 |
| popey | well, "no possibility" can be fixed ☻ | 00:21 |
| sil2100 | Indeed ;) | 00:21 |
| lool | sil2100: well... | 00:22 |
| sil2100 | But will we be able to do that before release? | 00:22 |
| popey | indeed | 00:22 |
| lool | sil2100: I'll ask back: what was didrocks recommendation? | 00:22 |
| lool | I think he wanted a working story; it seems it's half working | 00:22 |
| lool | net improvement | 00:22 |
| lool | but still partial, another landing etc. | 00:22 |
| sil2100 | lool: I guess, ok, so let's leave that for tomorrow - if Didier ACKs it in the morning, we can instantly publish it since it's tested anyway | 00:23 |
| lool | I think we will have to document a known bug in either case | 00:23 |
| lool | sil2100: we have it staged; if a 101 goes out tomorrow morning, e.g. for the critical download manager thing, then we can revisit and include this one | 00:23 |
| lool | worst case, it comes in the first update | 00:23 |
| popey | Sounds reasonable. | 00:23 |
| sil2100 | Indeed | 00:24 |
| sil2100 | lool: do you need help in anything else right now? | 00:24 |
| lool | sil2100: I'm good! | 00:25 |
| lool | sil2100: we can test the download-manager in PPA in a few | 00:25 |
| lool | for system-updates and for clicks | 00:25 |
| lool | I intend to jsut test for click | 00:25 |
| lool | as a side thing | 00:25 |
| lool | (and with system-image when the next image comes out) | 00:26 |
| lool | gosh, unity8 in release pocket from DB, waiting on publisher | 00:26 |
| lool | cyphermox: around? | 00:30 |
| lool | rsalveti: around? | 00:33 |
| lool | Now's the time | 00:33 |
| sil2100 | What do we need to test? | 00:36 |
| lool | sil2100: Just about to kick #100 | 00:36 |
| sil2100 | \o/ | 00:36 |
| lool | sil2100: if you like to test download-manager, it just finished: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-unity/+archive/daily-build/+build/5110456 | 00:36 |
| lool | cyphermox, rsalveti: Last chance! | 00:37 |
| rsalveti | lool: yup | 00:38 |
| lool | rsalveti: Do you want to kick the build? | 00:38 |
| lool | I was seconds away of pressing enter on it :-) | 00:38 |
| rsalveti | lool: haha, go for it | 00:38 |
| lool | == Building #100 == | 00:38 |
| rsalveti | \o/ | 00:38 |
| sil2100 | lool: installing and checking! | 00:38 |
| lool | I need to agree: \o/ | 00:39 |
| lool | ralsina: I tested the change with a click install; it only outputs a (worrying) warning now: 2013-10-17 00:41:19,288 - WARNING - QObject::connect: No such signal SystemNetworkInfo::onlineStateChange(bool) | 00:41 |
| lool | ralsina: it used to output it before too | 00:41 |
| lool | it's almost not verbose enough | 00:42 |
| lool | but we can tweak these | 00:42 |
| lool | will see how system-update goes when it's out | 00:42 |
| lool | Good night everyone! | 00:43 |
| sil2100 | lool: testing here as well, will confirm if I get the same thing | 00:45 |
| lool | Ok; gone now! | 00:45 |
| sil2100 | lool: goodnight! | 00:45 |
| lool | Thanks everyone for the hard work! I'm sure this will be a great image | 00:46 |
| ralsina | lool: good night! | 00:47 |
| sil2100 | lool: confirming, I get the same warning - but no other DEBUG messages finally \o/ | 00:49 |
| asac | +1 | 00:51 |
| asac | well done | 00:51 |
| * asac crosses fingers | 00:51 | |
| sil2100 | Awesome | 00:54 |
| sil2100 | Ok guys, see you tomorrow | 00:55 |
| rsalveti | will wait and test :-) | 01:06 |
| cyphermox | rsalveti: hey! | 01:24 |
| cyphermox | I'm back, what's up? | 01:24 |
| cyphermox | ah, cool, build 100 | 01:25 |
| === charles_ is now known as charles | ||
| rsalveti | cyphermox: yup | 01:44 |
| plars | rsalveti: shouldn't it be done by now? | 02:25 |
| plars | rsalveti: oh, it is, nm :) | 02:25 |
| rsalveti | plars: flashing :-) | 02:26 |
| plars | rsalveti: well, gallery autopilot tests all passed at least on maguro for the first time in a while... that's a good sign, it looks like we still got a systemsettle error | 02:27 |
| rsalveti | plars: hm, weird | 02:27 |
| rsalveti | plars: the mediaplayer one is an issue with the test itself | 02:27 |
| plars | rsalveti: mediaplayer had a crash in maliit-server again :( | 02:27 |
| plars | rsalveti: I thought a fix for that was going in already | 02:28 |
| rsalveti | plars: where is the crash? | 02:28 |
| rsalveti | just saw the systemsettle, but probably because of udev | 02:28 |
| plars | rsalveti: on mako: http://reports.qa.ubuntu.com/smokeng/saucy/touch_mir/mako/100:20131017:20131015/4765/mediaplayer-app-autopilot/ | 02:29 |
| rsalveti | oh, ok | 02:29 |
| plars | rsalveti: on maguro it just had some failures | 02:29 |
| rsalveti | yeah | 02:30 |
| rsalveti | hm, is it the same crash? | 02:30 |
| rsalveti | let me get some info | 02:30 |
| plars | rsalveti: confirmed - system-udevd on the systemsettle | 02:30 |
| plars | rsalveti: argh - unity8 23 failures on mako | 02:31 |
| rsalveti | wtf | 02:31 |
| plars | rsalveti: https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/saucy-touch_mir-mako-smoke-unity8-autopilot/ | 02:32 |
| plars | looks like couldn't connect? | 02:33 |
| plars | let me flash here too | 02:33 |
| rsalveti | seems fine for me | 02:33 |
| rsalveti | got just _usr_lib_arm-linux-gnueabihf_upstart-app-launch_desktop-hook.32011.crash | 02:35 |
| plars | notes-app still about the same it seems - 1 failure (seems to hover between 1 and 2) | 02:40 |
| plars | rsalveti: oh very nice - webbrowser finally down to 0 failures (except systemsettle) on maguro! | 02:40 |
| rsalveti | great | 02:41 |
| rsalveti | wow, unity8 failed for both mir and SF | 02:42 |
| rsalveti | and producing a unity8 crash | 02:42 |
| rsalveti | seems something is still not right with unity8 then | 02:43 |
| rsalveti | plars: failures with maguro as well | 02:57 |
| plars | rsalveti: yeah :( | 02:58 |
| rsalveti | plars: did you try running the tests locally? | 02:58 |
| plars | rsalveti: not yet, need to check on my flash... I'm flipping back and forth between this and saucy iso tests | 02:58 |
| plars | we got a respin a while ago, so everything has to be redone | 02:59 |
| plars | ok, starting now | 02:59 |
| plars | (the tests, not the flash) | 03:00 |
| rsalveti | cool | 03:00 |
| plars | rsalveti: ok, found the unity8 problem | 03:11 |
| plars | rsalveti: http://paste.ubuntu.com/6249034/ | 03:11 |
| rsalveti | plars: hm, but what changed to cause that? | 03:12 |
| plars | rsalveti: phablet-click-test-setup is pulling in gi there I guess? not sure why it would need or want to rather than use the one installed on the system though | 03:17 |
| rsalveti | right | 03:17 |
| plars | rsalveti: let me try something locally, if it works there may be an easy fix | 03:18 |
| plars | s/fix/workaround | 03:18 |
| plars | because if that's the only thing causing it to fail, then the failure is bogus | 03:19 |
| rsalveti | yup | 03:19 |
| plars | rsalveti: nm, I think that's just something I'm seeing locally, but I have a newer phablet-tools than what's in the lab | 03:20 |
| rsalveti | plars: right | 03:21 |
| plars | rsalveti: I removed the /home/phablet/autopilot/gi dir locally and now I'm seeing something more like what we see in the jenkins results, but I see nothing happening on the screen | 03:21 |
| rsalveti | plars: I'm just trying to run autopilot locally without phablet-tools | 03:21 |
| rsalveti | yeah, seems it just hangs | 03:21 |
| plars | boo :( | 03:21 |
| rsalveti | plars: and there's a crash | 03:22 |
| rsalveti | autopilot unity8 -> crash | 03:22 |
| rsalveti | let me get the st | 03:22 |
| rsalveti | plars: did you get the maliit-server crash locally? | 03:23 |
| plars | rsalveti: not on this run at least, this time I just got unity8 crashing | 03:23 |
| rsalveti | right | 03:23 |
| rsalveti | same here | 03:23 |
| rsalveti | argh, unity8-dbgsym is still based on the older version | 03:24 |
| rsalveti | unity8-dbgsym : Depends: unity8 (= 7.83+13.10.20131016.1-0ubuntu1) but 7.83+13.10.20131016.2-0ubuntu1 is to be installed | 03:24 |
| rsalveti | plars: do you have the bug number for the previous maliit issue? | 03:29 |
| plars | rsalveti: https://bugs.launchpad.net/mir/+bug/1233988 maybe? | 03:30 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1233988 in maliit-framework (Ubuntu) "With Mir enabled: platform-api apps crash with SIGABRT in __gnu_cxx::__verbose_terminate_handler(), thrown from mir::client::DisplayConfiguration::copy_to_client()" [High,Fix committed] | 03:30 |
| rsalveti | BFD: Warning: /home/phablet/crash/gdb/CoreDump is truncated: expected core file size >= 1736704, found: 61440. | 03:30 |
| rsalveti | argh | 03:30 |
| plars | rsalveti: we may have to get it locally, there are some issues with apport blocking us from using the tool that waits until it knows the crash file is complete | 03:31 |
| plars | and uploaded | 03:31 |
| rsalveti | right, was able to get it from mako's results | 03:32 |
| rsalveti | plars: http://paste.ubuntu.com/6249098/ | 03:32 |
| rsalveti | raw = 0xfe3010 "QUbuntu: Could not create application instance" | 03:32 |
| rsalveti | seems different | 03:33 |
| rsalveti | let me get dbg from qt | 03:33 |
| rsalveti | plars: guess this maliit-server could be related with the unity8 crash | 03:41 |
| plars | rsalveti: maybe... I think at least one result I looked at (mediaplayer) had maliit crash and not unity8 though | 03:42 |
| rsalveti | oh, right | 03:42 |
| rsalveti | plars: http://paste.ubuntu.com/6249122/ | 03:42 |
| plars | rsalveti: that's the more complete version of the previous one right? | 03:44 |
| rsalveti | plars: seems so | 03:44 |
| rsalveti | plars: I think after that fix it's now failing without crashing inside mir or platform-api | 03:47 |
| rsalveti | qtubuntu refuses to start the app, which causes the crash | 03:48 |
| rsalveti | let me try to reproduce it here | 03:48 |
| rsalveti | plars: mediaplayer-app is the first test case | 03:56 |
| rsalveti | plars: I believe what happened is that unity8 wasn't read yet when maliit-server started | 03:56 |
| rsalveti | causing that crash | 03:56 |
| rsalveti | there's a sleep 2 in there already, might just not be enough | 04:00 |
| rsalveti | let me open the bug at least | 04:00 |
| rsalveti | plars: bug 1240793 | 04:04 |
| ubot5 | bug 1240793 in ubuntu-touch-session (Ubuntu) "maliit-server crashes when starting because qtubuntu cannot create the application instance" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1240793 | 04:04 |
| rsalveti | now to debug unity8 | 04:05 |
| plars | rsalveti: did you try it with a longer sleep? | 04:07 |
| plars | it seems a bit terrible to have to put a sleep in an upstart job to wait for something to start | 04:09 |
| rsalveti | plars: yeah, wasn't able to reproduce it yet | 04:11 |
| rsalveti | guess it depends on the system load during first boot | 04:12 |
| rsalveti | plars: so I guess this is not fatal, but it's annoying as we'll get the crash | 04:13 |
| plars | rsalveti: yeah | 04:13 |
| plars | rsalveti: one thing to be aware of, even though that's the first test in the chain, it *does* reboot before running the test. So it's already been rebooted once | 04:14 |
| rsalveti | plars: hm, ok | 04:15 |
| rsalveti | plars: #3 0x41d8aa74 in g_log (log_domain=<optimized out>, log_level=log_level@entry=G_LOG_LEVEL_ERROR, format=0x418491c0 "No GSettings schemas are installed on the system") at /build/buildd/glib2.0-2.38.0/./glib/gmessages.c:1025 | 04:36 |
| rsalveti | unity8 | 04:36 |
| rsalveti | too many changes comparing with 99 | 04:37 |
| rsalveti | we should spin more images, not less | 04:37 |
| plars | rsalveti: more images with fewer changes you mean | 04:38 |
| plars | right? | 04:38 |
| rsalveti | plars: yeah | 04:38 |
| plars | yes | 04:38 |
| rsalveti | otherwise it's hard to track down regressions | 04:38 |
| plars | rsalveti: it still seems hard to me to really track what *exactly* changed from one image to the next, especially when you have changes in click, changes in packages, changes might be in android, or scripts... | 04:39 |
| rsalveti | indeed | 04:40 |
| plars | rsalveti: it takes a while for a change to make it all the way through from a merge proposal to the image, when that process is expensive it encourages trying to get a lot into an image at once | 04:40 |
| rsalveti | plars: exactly, but then it's hard to track down differences | 04:41 |
| rsalveti | for a good CI we'd have tons of images | 04:41 |
| rsalveti | and proper changelog between them | 04:42 |
| plars | rsalveti: agree, but what I'm saying is that for that to happen, we need to be able to propagate a change pretty quickly from an approved merge proposal to an image | 04:42 |
| rsalveti | plars: yeah, we need to eliminate the current process and replace with a better one | 04:43 |
| rsalveti | more automated one | 04:43 |
| rsalveti | and try to keep at least the same quality | 04:43 |
| rsalveti | plars: finally, the bt http://paste.ubuntu.com/6249310/ | 04:45 |
| rsalveti | had to install a few qt dbg packages | 04:45 |
| rsalveti | #4 0x417fe118 in g_settings_set_property (object=0x96a818, prop_id=<optimized out>, value=<optimized out>, pspec=<optimized out>) at /build/buildd/glib2.0-2.38.0/./gio/gsettings.c:487 | 04:47 |
| rsalveti | schema_id = 0x9042b0 "com.canonical.Unity.Dash" | 04:47 |
| rsalveti | #3 0x41d8aa74 in g_log (log_domain=<optimized out>, log_level=log_level@entry=G_LOG_LEVEL_ERROR, format=0x418491c0 "No GSettings schemas are installed on the system") at /build/buildd/glib2.0-2.38.0/./glib/gmessages.c:1025 | 04:47 |
| rsalveti | now why this only happens with autopilot I'm not yet sure | 04:48 |
| rsalveti | plars: bug 1240801 | 04:54 |
| ubot5 | bug 1240801 in unity8 (Ubuntu) "autopilot unity8 fails with "No GSettings schemas are installed on the system"" [Critical,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1240801 | 04:54 |
| rsalveti | plars: weird, it fails for me with 99 as well | 05:18 |
| plars | rsalveti: probably something the unity guys are going to need to investigate in the morning | 05:19 |
| rsalveti | plars: yeah, how are you testing unity8? | 05:19 |
| plars | maybe Saviq? | 05:19 |
| rsalveti | just installed 99, installed the autopilot package, stop unity8 and autopilot run unity8 | 05:19 |
| rsalveti | plars: yeah, sent an email already | 05:19 |
| plars | rsalveti: I don't have anything other than the ap tests and general usage | 05:20 |
| rsalveti | what(): bind: Address already in use | 05:20 |
| rsalveti | argh, seems it's because of mir now | 05:20 |
| rsalveti | yeah, failing hard here, let me do a clean flash again | 05:22 |
| didrocks | rsalveti: thanks for looking at this one, let me flash and have a look as well | 05:25 |
| * didrocks looks at unity8 commits | 05:25 | |
| rsalveti | didrocks: yeah, the results are bad basically because it failed to start the first one already | 05:26 |
| rsalveti | for unity8 | 05:26 |
| didrocks | is it the same on the image? unity8 doesn't start at all then? | 05:26 |
| rsalveti | didrocks: seems unity8 is working fine, but can trigger the autotest based tests | 05:27 |
| didrocks | interesting | 05:27 |
| rsalveti | didrocks: http://reports.qa.ubuntu.com/smokeng/saucy/touch_mir/mako/100:20131017:20131015/4765/unity8-autopilot/ | 05:27 |
| rsalveti | *can't | 05:27 |
| didrocks | hum, no "com.canonical.Unity.Dash" | 05:28 |
| didrocks | fth? | 05:28 |
| * didrocks flashes his device | 05:29 | |
| rsalveti | yeah, didn't get, maybe I'm missing something when starting unity8 here | 05:29 |
| rsalveti | just did stop unity8; autopilot run unity8 | 05:29 |
| didrocks | rsalveti: and you can reproduce locally? | 05:30 |
| rsalveti | trying to find a crash that's not corrupted from the dashboard | 05:30 |
| didrocks | yeah | 05:30 |
| rsalveti | didrocks: flash 100 and test | 05:30 |
| didrocks | rsalveti: download in progress | 05:30 |
| didrocks | rsalveti: gsettings get com.canonical.Unity.Dash scopes is working for you? | 05:30 |
| rsalveti | I tested here and got that crash which I reported | 05:30 |
| rsalveti | didrocks: reflashing as well | 05:31 |
| didrocks | hum, I don't see anything changing for this in unity8 trunk… | 05:31 |
| didrocks | only libunity is accessing that property, but we didn't change it IIRC | 05:32 |
| * didrocks checks | 05:32 | |
| didrocks | rsalveti: I didn't get any crash file | 05:38 |
| rsalveti | didrocks: with autopilot? | 05:38 |
| didrocks | without right now | 05:38 |
| rsalveti | right, it fails only with autopilot it seems | 05:38 |
| didrocks | so, turning the image rw | 05:39 |
| didrocks | gsettings get com.canonical.Unity.Dash scopes | 05:39 |
| didrocks | ['music.scope', 'home.scope', 'applications.scope', 'video.scope'] | 05:39 |
| didrocks | sounds good at least | 05:39 |
| rsalveti | good | 05:40 |
| didrocks | (rebooting and launching unity8 AP) | 05:40 |
| didrocks | rsalveti: ok, getting the crash | 05:43 |
| didrocks | the crash file is small though… | 05:43 |
| didrocks | (too small to be valid) | 05:43 |
| rsalveti | didrocks: hm | 05:43 |
| rsalveti | trying here as well | 05:43 |
| rsalveti | at least dbgsym packages are in sync now | 05:45 |
| didrocks | rsalveti: yeah… I'm retracing this crash, but with 4 frames, I have few hopes | 05:45 |
| rsalveti | didrocks: what is the size? | 05:47 |
| didrocks | 600k | 05:47 |
| rsalveti | mine is 4.6M | 05:47 |
| didrocks | yeah, sounds better | 05:47 |
| didrocks | (got until 11M) | 05:47 |
| rsalveti | also got the maliit-server one at the same time | 05:48 |
| didrocks | rsalveti: same, maliit was supposed to be workeded, but not fixed AFAIK | 05:48 |
| didrocks | it's launching after unity8 + 2s | 05:48 |
| rsalveti | didrocks: got it | 05:48 |
| rsalveti | yeah | 05:48 |
| didrocks | workarounded* | 05:49 |
| rsalveti | didrocks: got the same crash at least http://paste.ubuntu.com/6249493/ | 05:50 |
| rsalveti | it might be an issue when bringing unity8 down and up or similar | 05:50 |
| rsalveti | let me try just one test | 05:50 |
| didrocks | rsalveti: yeah, I wonder if it's not an environment issue | 05:50 |
| didrocks | rsalveti: same crash here | 05:52 |
| didrocks | (not so busted then) | 05:52 |
| rsalveti | yeah | 05:52 |
| didrocks | == ProcEnviron ================================= | 05:52 |
| didrocks | LANGUAGE=en_US:en | 05:52 |
| didrocks | LD_LIBRARY_PATH=<set> | 05:52 |
| didrocks | TERM=linux | 05:52 |
| didrocks | PATH=(custom, no user) | 05:52 |
| didrocks | XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=<set> | 05:52 |
| didrocks | LANG=en_US.UTF-8 | 05:52 |
| didrocks | SHELL=/bin/bash | 05:52 |
| didrocks | seems quite small | 05:52 |
| rsalveti | indeed | 05:52 |
| * didrocks reboots and look at the unity8 autostarted proc env | 05:52 | |
| rsalveti | missing the QT stuff | 05:53 |
| didrocks | right | 05:53 |
| rsalveti | didrocks: way more stuff | 05:54 |
| didrocks | right | 05:54 |
| rsalveti | maybe autopilot is cleaning up the env? | 05:54 |
| rsalveti | weird | 05:54 |
| didrocks | rsalveti: well, we would have the issue for long ago | 05:54 |
| didrocks | autopilot didn't change | 05:54 |
| rsalveti | right | 05:54 |
| didrocks | phablet-tools changed, but for downloading from another server | 05:54 |
| didrocks | nothing in phablet-test-run | 05:54 |
| rsalveti | yeah, and autopilot works fine for other test cases | 05:55 |
| didrocks | right | 05:55 |
| * didrocks looks at the image diff, just in case | 05:55 | |
| didrocks | knowing the changes in, the only ones that can be linked are unity8 and ubuntu-touch-session | 05:56 |
| didrocks | oh, we changed the upstart job for unity8 | 05:56 |
| didrocks | maybe the way phablet-test-run invokes it isn't the right one anymore? | 05:56 |
| rsalveti | maybe | 05:57 |
| rsalveti | but then it's something in the upstart side | 05:57 |
| rsalveti | as I called autopilot run unity8 directly | 05:57 |
| rsalveti | as phablet | 05:57 |
| didrocks | rsalveti: "initctl start unity8" | 05:57 |
| didrocks | I don't know upstart session side, but shouldn't it be just start unity8? | 05:57 |
| rsalveti | sorry, not upstart side, autopilot side | 05:57 |
| rsalveti | my brain is useless already | 05:57 |
| rsalveti | "already" :-) | 05:57 |
| didrocks | rsalveti: heh ;) are you using autopilot directly or phablet-test-run? | 05:58 |
| rsalveti | I belive so | 05:58 |
| rsalveti | autopilot directly | 05:58 |
| didrocks | ah, yeah, can be in autopilot then | 05:58 |
| rsalveti | had the same results with phablet-test-run though | 05:58 |
| didrocks | right, so maybe the way autopilot starts unity8 isn't right | 05:58 |
| * didrocks really hopes we'll find something around that, it really seems a testing env issue | 05:58 | |
| didrocks | thomi: hey, around? | 05:59 |
| didrocks | veebers: as well ^ | 05:59 |
| rsalveti | autopilot run unity8.application_lifecycle.tests.test_application_lifecycle.ApplicationLifecycleTests.test_app_moves_from_unfocused_to_focused | 05:59 |
| thomi | a little bit | 05:59 |
| rsalveti | is already enough for the crash | 05:59 |
| didrocks | thomi: we can't start unity8 with autopilot in image 100, we are getting weird crash (like no gsettings schema) | 05:59 |
| didrocks | thomi: the unity8 upstart job changed, can it be autopilot needs to be adapated? | 06:00 |
| thomi | hmmm. unity8 is crashing, or autopilot? | 06:00 |
| didrocks | thomi: unity8, because of no gsettings schema | 06:00 |
| rsalveti | autopilot is triggering a crash in unity8 :-) | 06:00 |
| thomi | didrocks: the autopilot test suite might need to be changed, yeah | 06:00 |
| didrocks | but it seems a lot of environment variables are missing | 06:00 |
| thomi | AIUI, the test suite basically does 'initctl set-env QT_LOAD_TESTABILITY=1 && start unity8' | 06:01 |
| thomi | then looks for the autopilot interface | 06:01 |
| thomi | so if the upstart job has changed such that that won't work any more, then someone will need up update the test suite | 06:01 |
| thomi | veebers would know more about hat | 06:01 |
| thomi | *that | 06:01 |
| didrocks | hum grep -r initctl /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/unity8/* | 06:01 |
| didrocks | (nothing) | 06:01 |
| rsalveti | but 1240801 btw | 06:02 |
| rsalveti | bug 1240801 | 06:02 |
| ubot5 | bug 1240801 in unity8 (Ubuntu) "autopilot unity8 fails with "No GSettings schemas are installed on the system"" [Critical,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1240801 | 06:02 |
| didrocks | rsalveti: hum, sorry? ;) | 06:02 |
| didrocks | ah | 06:02 |
| didrocks | :) | 06:02 |
| rsalveti | :-) | 06:02 |
| didrocks | rsalveti: my brain isn't wired up as well | 06:02 |
| didrocks | I'm pretty sure it's an env issue, digging… | 06:03 |
| rsalveti | didrocks: yeah | 06:03 |
| thomi | didrocks: tests/autopilot/unity8/shell/tests/__init__.py line 273 | 06:04 |
| thomi | is where it's launched | 06:04 |
| thomi | I gotta go now though, but that should get you started :-) | 06:04 |
| didrocks | thomi: yeah, I was just around that place! thanks :) | 06:04 |
| didrocks | rsalveti: even QT_LOAD_TESTABILITY isn't in the env though | 06:07 |
| rsalveti | didrocks: right | 06:08 |
| didrocks | oh oh | 06:08 |
| didrocks | let me check something | 06:08 |
| didrocks | (the phone is so long to reboot…) | 06:12 |
| didrocks | hum no, theory busted :/ | 06:13 |
| didrocks | rsalveti: we added a rewpan in the upstart job, I was thinking it can interfere with what autopilot was doing | 06:14 |
| didrocks | but no | 06:14 |
| rsalveti | right | 06:14 |
| didrocks | rsalveti: so that we run autopilot the same way, you just log as phablet and autopilot run …? | 06:15 |
| rsalveti | yup | 06:15 |
| rsalveti | ssh | 06:15 |
| rsalveti | autopilot run | 06:15 |
| rsalveti | after stop unity8 | 06:15 |
| didrocks | ok, same here | 06:15 |
| didrocks | yeah, so confirm in job logs: | 06:16 |
| didrocks | __pthread_gettid -2 | 06:17 |
| didrocks | WARNING: QApplication was not created in the main() thread. | 06:17 |
| didrocks | loaded the dummy plugin | 06:17 |
| didrocks | loaded the Linux plugin | 06:17 |
| didrocks | Registered the AalSensorPlugin types | 06:17 |
| didrocks | Loading testability driver. | 06:17 |
| didrocks | Missing "com.canonical.Unity.Lenses" schema | 06:17 |
| didrocks | (process:3161): GLib-GIO-ERROR **: No GSettings schemas are installed on the system | 06:17 |
| rsalveti | yeah, wrong env | 06:17 |
| didrocks | so, at least, we know it's trying to load with the right env | 06:17 |
| didrocks | Loading testability driver. | 06:17 |
| didrocks | but can't get to schema (probably due to env, right) | 06:17 |
| rsalveti | wonder if this is because of the setcap hack | 06:18 |
| didrocks | well, at this point, let's try all possibilities, but nice catch :) | 06:18 |
| rsalveti | but it was dropped later on | 06:19 |
| didrocks | we don't have the version with the drop one in the image | 06:19 |
| didrocks | so let's try dropping it | 06:19 |
| rsalveti | right, but it's part of lxc-android-config | 06:20 |
| rsalveti | https://launchpadlibrarian.net/153936414/lxc-android-config_0.113_0.114.diff.gz | 06:20 |
| didrocks | oh yeah | 06:20 |
| didrocks | ok, /me rm | 06:21 |
| rsalveti | holy, that's an ugly hack | 06:21 |
| didrocks | yeah, it was after the discussion that we can't convey setcap as the filesystem is ext2 and we generate tarballs | 06:21 |
| didrocks | so doing that on every boot (yeah :/) | 06:21 |
| rsalveti | right, but in the end we don't need setcaps at all | 06:21 |
| rsalveti | we decided that all apps should have score 0 (default) | 06:22 |
| veebers | didrocks: hey I'm kind of around now | 06:22 |
| didrocks | rsalveti: oh, really? | 06:22 |
| rsalveti | and just set to a higher value when moving them to background | 06:22 |
| didrocks | making sense | 06:22 |
| didrocks | we go to the extreme everytime we do an hack… happy that we have more reasonable values | 06:22 |
| rsalveti | otherwise unity8 would have a higher priority (from the out of memory killer perspective) than init | 06:22 |
| rsalveti | it'd kill first upstart and then unity8 :P | 06:23 |
| veebers | didrocks, rsalveti: hey will this command flash build 100 on my device? phablet-flash ubuntu-system --channel devel-proposed | 06:23 |
| didrocks | veebers: right, please do it ;) | 06:23 |
| veebers | I would like to see if I can help with this issue | 06:23 |
| rsalveti | yeah | 06:23 |
| didrocks | that would be really appreciated :) | 06:23 |
| veebers | cool, flashing now | 06:23 |
| didrocks | rsalveti: heh, well, I keep hearing the shell is the most important piece of the system for 3 years, so I'm unsure (j/k) ;) | 06:24 |
| rsalveti | didrocks: haha :-) | 06:24 |
| rsalveti | didrocks: did it help? | 06:24 |
| didrocks | rsalveti: all tests fail, I don't see unity8 starting but not crashing either | 06:26 |
| didrocks | let me see if it's not the powerd/display off thing | 06:26 |
| rsalveti | didrocks: maybe because of the mir socket | 06:26 |
| rsalveti | check /run/user/32.../mir_... | 06:26 |
| didrocks | rsalveti: I have no mir socket (without unity8 running) | 06:27 |
| didrocks | that's not expected? | 06:27 |
| rsalveti | right it's fine, I just got in a situation where the test was failing because the socket was still there | 06:27 |
| didrocks | ok | 06:27 |
| didrocks | interesting, I even don't see anything anymore in .cache/upstart/unity8.log | 06:28 |
| didrocks | like if it doesn't even try starting unity8 | 06:28 |
| rsalveti | weird | 06:28 |
| rsalveti | maybe trying removing the respawn now? | 06:28 |
| didrocks | self.grid_size = int(os.getenv('GRID_UNIT_PX')) | 06:28 |
| didrocks | TypeError: int() argument must be a string or a number, not 'NoneType' | 06:28 |
| didrocks | for all tests running | 06:28 |
| didrocks | rsalveti: yeah, let's see | 06:28 |
| didrocks | hum, not better | 06:29 |
| * didrocks reboots to ensure | 06:29 | |
| rsalveti | in dev mode, you cannot update the unity8 package because of this bind mount | 06:29 |
| rsalveti | it'll try to replace it and fails with 'busy' | 06:30 |
| didrocks | yeah, it's annoying for testing | 06:30 |
| didrocks | ok rebooted | 06:30 |
| didrocks | so stopping the shell | 06:30 |
| rsalveti | slow reboots... | 06:30 |
| rsalveti | so annoying | 06:30 |
| didrocks | sudo -u phablet -i sh -lc "initctl stop unity8" | 06:30 |
| didrocks | powerd-cli display on bright | 06:31 |
| didrocks | (just to ensure it's not getting off) | 06:31 |
| plars | not sure if you tried it already, but just out of curiosity I tried removing the setcap hook hack, doesn't look like it's making a difference for me | 06:31 |
| didrocks | plars: yeah, we're just doing that, ok. so you confirm :/ | 06:32 |
| didrocks | plars: you see that in the tests only as well, right? not when using the image? | 06:32 |
| plars | didrocks: feel free to try it too, I just removed the file under /etc/init/boot-hooks and reran | 06:32 |
| didrocks | rsalveti: yeah, so really nothing… | 06:32 |
| didrocks | plars: confirming | 06:33 |
| didrocks | why I don't see anything in the upstart log to try running unity8? | 06:33 |
| didrocks | ah, only running one test at least, tried to start it | 06:35 |
| didrocks | with the same error thugh | 06:35 |
| didrocks | though* | 06:35 |
| didrocks | veebers: so, for clarity, the issue seems that unity8 isn't loaded with the same env than the system one | 06:35 |
| didrocks | we are getting: | 06:35 |
| didrocks | Loading testability driver. | 06:35 |
| didrocks | Missing "com.canonical.Unity.Lenses" schema | 06:35 |
| didrocks | the schema exists if you try by end | 06:36 |
| popey | morning phabulous people! | 06:36 |
| didrocks | (and that's what is making unity8 crashing) | 06:36 |
| didrocks | hey popey | 06:36 |
| didrocks | popey: can you upgrade to image 100 and test as much as you can it? (we have an issue, but we start thinking it's a test environment issue) | 06:37 |
| popey | doing right now | 06:37 |
| didrocks | if you get unity8 disappearing and not reapparing, ring the alarm bell :) | 06:37 |
| didrocks | thanks! | 06:37 |
| popey | http://popey.com/~alan/phablet/device-2013-10-17-073526.png \o/ 100 | 06:37 |
| didrocks | :) | 06:37 |
| popey | although technically we're way beyond 100 given we reset the counter a couple of months back | 06:37 |
| popey | but lets not mention that ☻ | 06:37 |
| didrocks | sshhhhh ;) | 06:38 |
| veebers | didrocks: ah ok odd, there is some patching/mocking happening with the autopilot tests but this looks very broken | 06:38 |
| rsalveti | right guys, guess you're all on top of this issue already | 06:38 |
| rsalveti | will get some sleep | 06:38 |
| didrocks | rsalveti: sure, enjoy! we'll have good news when you wake up :) | 06:38 |
| didrocks | rsalveti: thanks for the initial debugging! | 06:38 |
| rsalveti | yeah :-) | 06:38 |
| rsalveti | np, later and good luck :-) | 06:39 |
| didrocks | thanks ;) | 06:39 |
| popey | network indicator shows not connected, but i have an ip address in ifconfig | 06:41 |
| plars | right, I think I'm going to go get some sleep too... back later | 06:41 |
| popey | (and network works) | 06:41 |
| didrocks | plars: see you later! thanks :) | 06:41 |
| didrocks | popey: maybe a crash? It's working here | 06:41 |
| popey | http://popey.com/~alan/phablet/device-2013-10-17-074119.png | 06:41 |
| popey | i am connected to that wifi access point | 06:41 |
| popey | nothing in /var/crash.. hmmm | 06:42 |
| didrocks | weird | 06:42 |
| didrocks | popey: on a fresh intall, I connected for the first time (and it worked) | 06:42 |
| didrocks | ok, let's keep those in mind | 06:42 |
| popey | this was an upgrade from 99 | 06:42 |
| didrocks | popey: maybe it will be better to have a complete wipe out? | 06:42 |
| didrocks | as people will install that image (maybe) from scratch :) | 06:42 |
| didrocks | and we told we don't really support upgrades | 06:43 |
| popey | yeah, i usually test both | 06:43 |
| didrocks | ah ok ;) | 06:43 |
| * popey reflashes clean | 06:48 | |
| jibel | lool, I tested the upgrader, no big problem so far. main issue is you cannot resume or restart an upgrade if you exit system-settings | 06:56 |
| jibel | lool, but from all the tests I did, I couldn't brick the pohne | 06:56 |
| jibel | *phone | 06:56 |
| didrocks | hey jibel ;) | 06:56 |
| jibel | Bonjour didrocks, ça va? | 06:57 |
| didrocks | jibel: bof, la folie depuis ce matin, et toi? | 06:57 |
| jibel | didrocks, ça va mais j'ai testé jusque minuit et demi et n'ai pas entendu le reveil :/ | 06:57 |
| didrocks | jibel: ça va, c'est encore tôt de toute manière là :) | 06:58 |
| didrocks | jibel: in case you didn't follow, there is no way to run unity8 AP tests on image 100. It seems to work well on the image, but we are getting a crash on a schema not being installed (which is installed) | 06:58 |
| didrocks | looking at the env of the crashed unity8 process, it's very poor (not a lot of env variable) | 06:59 |
| didrocks | we tried to disable multiple things between the 2 images (setcap, respawn…) | 06:59 |
| jibel | didrocks, okay, I'm flashing 100, is there anything you want me to verify? | 06:59 |
| didrocks | jibel: first, that the image itself is fine | 07:00 |
| didrocks | then, if you can help on this AP test front | 07:00 |
| didrocks | veebers: flashing finished? | 07:00 |
| veebers | didrocks: only just now, now installing tests | 07:00 |
| popey | didrocks: missing indicator clock on first clean flash | 07:00 |
| veebers | didrocks: the internet here is slow :-) | 07:00 |
| didrocks | popey: I guess the same random crash? (it appears here) | 07:02 |
| popey | yeah, expect so, will reboot and see | 07:02 |
| jibel | popey, was the date indicator present? | 07:05 |
| jibel | popey, nm, I read it as no time on screen lock, this is bug 1239710 but we cannot find a way to reporduce | 07:06 |
| ubot5 | bug 1239710 in indicator-datetime (Ubuntu) "indicator-datetime missing" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1239710 | 07:06 |
| popey | yes, on second boot | 07:06 |
| veebers | didrocks: right, I know what's causing it in the autopilot code, now to figure out how to fix it' | 07:11 |
| popey | clean flash, connected to wifi, and again i see no tick next to the access point I am connected to.. http://popey.com/~alan/phablet/device-2013-10-17-081224.png | 07:12 |
| didrocks | veebers: oh, can you expand it? are you sure it's due to autopilot? | 07:12 |
| didrocks | veebers: and that we don't have that in the finale image? | 07:12 |
| didrocks | (and why it's starting to be triggered now) | 07:12 |
| didrocks | popey: ah, the tick | 07:13 |
| didrocks | popey: let me check | 07:13 |
| didrocks | let me get a shell first :) | 07:13 |
| didrocks | popey: can you try to downgrade indicator-network? | 07:13 |
| veebers | didrocks: yeah, there was code added that sets some more env details that appear to be incorrect causing it to crash, if I remove that one line, it works fine | 07:14 |
| popey | ya | 07:14 |
| popey | do you know what version I need? | 07:14 |
| didrocks | veebers: any reference/diff to point me to (just removing the line)? I wonder why we didn't get it before though | 07:14 |
| didrocks | popey: 0.5.1+13.10.20131011-0ubuntu1 | 07:14 |
| popey | k | 07:14 |
| didrocks | thanks! | 07:14 |
| popey | np | 07:14 |
| veebers | didrocks: it looks like the code was introduced unity8 trunk revno 470 | 07:15 |
| didrocks | but I tried to downgrade unity8… | 07:15 |
| * didrocks looks | 07:15 | |
| didrocks | veebers: we don't ship rev 470 | 07:16 |
| * didrocks checks again | 07:16 | |
| didrocks | oh, we do ship it | 07:16 |
| veebers | didrocks: phew, I thought I had screwed something up there :-\ | 07:16 |
| didrocks | ;) | 07:16 |
| didrocks | ah, so I didn't downgrade the autopilot package | 07:17 |
| didrocks | let me try | 07:17 |
| veebers | didrocks: I suspect that should work for you | 07:17 |
| popey | didrocks: downgraded indicator-network, i still see no tick | 07:19 |
| didrocks | veebers: \o/ | 07:19 |
| didrocks | popey: hum, is that a regression really from image 100? | 07:19 |
| didrocks | veebers: my hero! I tried downgrading half of the image but the autopilot tests, thinking we didn't ship tihs | 07:19 |
| popey | seems not | 07:19 |
| popey | i have a 99 phone next to it | 07:20 |
| didrocks | ok, ok good news then | 07:20 |
| popey | also not showing icon | 07:20 |
| veebers | didrocks: heh no worries. Sorry I didn't catch this earlier. How old is build 100? | 07:20 |
| * popey reflashes | 07:20 | |
| didrocks | popey: hum, so maybe a toolkit upgrade? Can you try on other apps having the same tick? | 07:20 |
| didrocks | veebers: well, few hours, no worry :) | 07:20 |
| veebers | didrocks: you can re-create the unity8 crash with this command: start unity8 XDG_DATA_DIRS=/usr/share/unity8/mocks/data/applications/ | 07:20 |
| didrocks | veebers: this unity8 commit wasn't supposed to land | 07:20 |
| popey | didrocks: will look | 07:20 |
| didrocks | veebers: right, wrong XDG_DATA_DIRS :) | 07:21 |
| veebers | didrocks: ah right, that makes sense why I had 99 then :-) | 07:21 |
| veebers | didrocks: yeah | 07:21 |
| didrocks | veebers: you're going to propose a patch? | 07:22 |
| veebers | didrocks: Yep I could do, do you know what the correct directory is? I was going to hitup Saviq or mzanetti and ask them otherwise | 07:23 |
| sil2100 | Morning | 07:24 |
| sil2100 | Damn, yesterday I upgraded my desktop and I can't properly boot into graphical mode anymore | 07:24 |
| didrocks | veebers: I think you should append /usr/share/ at least | 07:25 |
| didrocks | ok, /me reflashes the image | 07:29 |
| popey | didrocks: reflashing again, this time clock appears fine and so does the network tick | 07:32 |
| popey | http://popey.com/~alan/phablet/device-2013-10-17-083228.png | 07:32 |
| didrocks | popey: the network tick? | 07:33 |
| didrocks | but but but | 07:33 |
| didrocks | time clock -> ok, it's the crash | 07:33 |
| didrocks | but the network tick | 07:33 |
| * didrocks is puzzled | 07:33 | |
| popey | odd isnt it? | 07:33 |
| didrocks | really puzzled | 07:33 |
| didrocks | yeah :) | 07:33 |
| popey | but not a regression | 07:33 |
| didrocks | right | 07:34 |
| popey | as my 99 phone has it too | 07:34 |
| didrocks | popey: TBH, I'm happy, the unity8 issue is figured out | 07:34 |
| didrocks | it's not the image | 07:34 |
| didrocks | I can take my coffee after 2h30 of stress :) | 07:34 |
| popey | heh | 07:34 |
| Saviq | jeez | 07:40 |
| Saviq | didrocks, sorted? | 07:40 |
| veebers | Saviq: I'll have a MR for you in a moment :-) | 07:40 |
| didrocks | kind of, we know it doesn't impact the image at least :) | 07:41 |
| Saviq | wth happened there? | 07:41 |
| didrocks | Saviq: your commit… | 07:41 |
| didrocks | Saviq: look at the ue-leads ML | 07:41 |
| Saviq | didrocks, yeah, but what about it? it was just prepending to X_D_D? | 07:41 |
| * Saviq hates g... | 07:42 | |
| didrocks | Saviq: yeah, I'm puzzled through the code, that's why I didn't think about this commit being a problem at first | 07:46 |
| didrocks | Saviq: we prepend many directory on the real install | 07:46 |
| didrocks | directories* | 07:46 |
| Saviq | didrocks, but it's empty on the phone? | 07:46 |
| didrocks | and it still look for the last one | 07:46 |
| didrocks | Saviq: /usr/share/glib-2.0/schemas/ is not empty | 07:46 |
| Saviq | didrocks, yeah, but XDG_DATA_DIRS is | 07:47 |
| didrocks | Saviq: oh, but if it's empty | 07:47 |
| Saviq | didrocks, but as soon as we put *something* there | 07:47 |
| didrocks | it looks in /usr/share :p | 07:47 |
| Saviq | yeah exactly | 07:47 |
| didrocks | welcome to glib ;) | 07:47 |
| Saviq | so when empty - we need to put both our override *and* /usr/share... | 07:47 |
| Saviq | eh | 07:47 |
| didrocks | yep | 07:47 |
| didrocks | Saviq: you didn't try the AP tests? (nor lool I guess?) | 07:48 |
| Saviq | didrocks, I did, but obviously on desktop it worked | 07:48 |
| didrocks | argh, always test on phone please :/ | 07:48 |
| Saviq | didrocks, and on device I must've had some weird env that it went fine | 07:48 |
| veebers | Saviq: the os.getenv("XDG_DATA_DIRS") returned None, but it's initctl get-env that we're interested in | 07:49 |
| didrocks | Saviq: at least, it doesn't impact the image, that's all what counts. I got a ton of stress, but at least, I can enjoy coffee now :) | 07:49 |
| Saviq | veebers, aaah | 07:49 |
| Saviq | veebers, ap on device doesn't run under upstart... | 07:49 |
| Saviq | didrocks, sorry about htat | 07:49 |
| didrocks | Saviq: well, I'm happy about the resolution, a little bit sorry that a fix for desktop screwed us though, but that's fine | 07:50 |
| didrocks | also, nothing in the landing plan… | 07:50 |
| didrocks | or maybe #265 | 07:50 |
| didrocks | but not really clear about the other change | 07:50 |
| Saviq | yeah I dropped the ball there, sorry | 07:51 |
| Saviq | just wanted to see -ci getting better | 07:51 |
| didrocks | well, again, the image is good | 07:51 |
| didrocks | which is what is important :) | 07:51 |
| didrocks | the tests are running here | 07:51 |
| didrocks | I'll report the result | 07:51 |
| Saviq | oh btw | 07:51 |
| didrocks | Saviq: I just downgraded to previous -autopilot package | 07:51 |
| Saviq | phablet@ubuntu-phablet:~$ initctl get-env XDG_DATA_DIRS | 07:51 |
| Saviq | /usr/share/ubuntu-touch-surfaceflinger:/usr/local/share/:/usr/share/ | 07:51 |
| Saviq | wonder what surfaceflinger is doing there ;) | 07:52 |
| didrocks | ok, so upstart/direct ap launch issue | 07:52 |
| didrocks | interesting indeed :) | 07:52 |
| didrocks | Ran 22 tests in 416.930s | 07:53 |
| didrocks | FAILED (failures=5) | 07:53 |
| Saviq | didrocks, previous ap might have some failures in notifications | 07:53 |
| Saviq | didrocks, not sure when stuff got released | 07:54 |
| didrocks | Saviq: ok, so let me take your latest and adding the env by hand | 07:54 |
| Saviq | didrocks, yeah, just export it before starting AP | 07:54 |
| Saviq | didrocks, if you get any .crash that's more than 1MB, I'll be interested, too | 07:55 |
| didrocks | Saviq: yeah, the only ones I got was the our lovely gsettings schema missing | 07:55 |
| veebers | Saviq, didrocks: https://code.launchpad.net/~veebers/unity8/ap_env_fix_1240801/+merge/191567 (I'm just running all the tests now locally, the couple I did try worked) | 07:57 |
| didrocks | veebers: doing the same, running all tests | 07:57 |
| didrocks | (with just changing the env) | 07:57 |
| Saviq | veebers, yeah, this looks right | 07:58 |
| Saviq | if only we had CI automation... | 07:59 |
| Saviq | oh wait... | 07:59 |
| didrocks | Saviq: well, I would love to as well not having to be changed in a manual tester running the tests as well. I think we have to cope with it for now and be systematic in our approach meanwhile | 08:00 |
| didrocks | Saviq: I raised that as a top priority FYI | 08:00 |
| didrocks | jibel: popey: so, apart from those issues, happy with that image? | 08:03 |
| popey | so far.. still fiddling | 08:04 |
| jibel | didrocks, nothing utterly broken so far | 08:05 |
| * didrocks crosses fingers | 08:05 | |
| didrocks | then, we'll need ogra_ for finale results on maguro | 08:05 |
| didrocks | Ran 22 tests in 484.981s | 08:05 |
| didrocks | FAILED (failures=1) | 08:05 |
| didrocks | Saviq: ^ | 08:05 |
| didrocks | ERROR: unity8.shell.tests.test_lock_screen.TestLockscreen.test_pin_screen_wrong_code(Native Device) | 08:05 |
| didrocks | it's a flacky test IIRC | 08:06 |
| didrocks | (or a race, unity8 didn't restart) | 08:06 |
| didrocks | anyway, it's good enough for me | 08:06 |
| Saviq | didrocks, what's the ap error? | 08:06 |
| didrocks | raise NoSuchProcess(pid, None, 'no process found with pid %s' % pid) | 08:06 |
| didrocks | NoSuchProcess: no process found with pid 8268 | 08:06 |
| didrocks | oh, an unity8 crash | 08:06 |
| didrocks | hum, was an older one | 08:07 |
| Saviq | yeah | 08:07 |
| Saviq | didrocks, but yeah - that means u8 crashed on startup | 08:07 |
| didrocks | Saviq: yeah, seems to match the time | 08:07 |
| Saviq | and I didn't get anything from the backtrace yet | 08:07 |
| didrocks | anyway, we'll figure it out | 08:07 |
| Saviq | didrocks, how big the .crash file? | 08:07 |
| didrocks | Saviq: 50k :p | 08:07 |
| didrocks | not sure you would be interested, 2 frames ;) | 08:07 |
| Saviq | didrocks, yeah, *not* useful :/ | 08:08 |
| Saviq | didrocks, and both ?? | 08:08 |
| didrocks | well, sure, not retraced yet | 08:08 |
| didrocks | but for 2 frames, it's probably a loop in the mainloop | 08:08 |
| didrocks | Saviq: ok, will dogfood now, if I get an interesting stack, I'll keep you posted | 08:08 |
| Saviq | didrocks, not gonna get retraced I'm afraid | 08:08 |
| Saviq | didrocks, both of those frames are in android libs afaict | 08:09 |
| didrocks | yeah | 08:09 |
| Saviq | for which we don't have dbg symbols | 08:09 |
| didrocks | anyway, we'll see in the long term, I don't see anything blocking us for now :) | 08:09 |
| popey | didrocks: yeah, seems okay. | 08:11 |
| didrocks | popey: not ok, stellar! :) | 08:11 |
| didrocks | we have less tests in total in the dashboard though | 08:11 |
| didrocks | jibel: popey: do you know why? ^ | 08:12 |
| popey | nope | 08:12 |
| jibel | didrocks, don't ask me about the dashboard. Are the tests still running? | 08:13 |
| didrocks | jibel: if so, they are stuck for a long time | 08:13 |
| didrocks | maguro is running | 08:14 |
| didrocks | but not mako | 08:14 |
| jibel | didrocks, there are jobs call mir-maguro-smoke-something, maybe that's it? | 08:14 |
| jibel | I don't know | 08:14 |
| jibel | psivaa, ^^ | 08:14 |
| didrocks | maguro has the right total number | 08:15 |
| didrocks | not mako | 08:15 |
| didrocks | ah ubuntu-ui-toolkit | 08:15 |
| didrocks | same for dialer-app | 08:16 |
| Saviq | didrocks, confirmed, veebers's fix is working, shall I merge? | 08:17 |
| didrocks | Saviq: please do (we won't rebuild it though) | 08:17 |
| * ogra_ might be a few min late to the meeting, my magurto download says it still needs 15min | 08:17 | |
| ogra_ | (flashing before the meeting today) | 08:18 |
| Saviq | didrocks, yeah I know | 08:18 |
| psivaa | didrocks: jibel: just kicked off the ui-toolkit job, i dont see any issues with mako dialer | 08:18 |
| didrocks | psivaa: maguro dialer | 08:19 |
| didrocks | and terminal/rssreader | 08:19 |
| didrocks | the total of tests ran are 1 | 08:19 |
| psivaa | didrocks: i've kicked them off already :) | 08:19 |
| didrocks | great :) | 08:20 |
| didrocks | it's interesting that total tests run: 288 | 08:21 |
| didrocks | total test failed: 39 | 08:21 |
| didrocks | if I count manually, the pass rate is 86.4 | 08:21 |
| didrocks | not 92.4 | 08:21 |
| didrocks | I think they don't use the right total tests run | 08:21 |
| mardy | hi! Can someone please fix or delete this job? http://10.97.0.26:8080/job/signon-ui-daily/label=pbuilder/53/ | 08:22 |
| didrocks | mardy: that would be for fginther I guess | 08:22 |
| mardy | didrocks: thanks | 08:22 |
| mardy | fginther: ^ | 08:22 |
| mardy | fginther: I think it's using some obsolete PPAs for Qt5 | 08:22 |
| Saviq | veebers, hmm did you try your patch on the desktop? | 08:22 |
| veebers | Saviq: oh, yes I tried at least one test | 08:23 |
| veebers | Saviq: I'll re-run now | 08:23 |
| Saviq | veebers, try uninstalled as well, I'm getting some complaints | 08:23 |
| veebers | Saviq: uninstalled? | 08:23 |
| veebers | Saviq: oh unity8 uninstalled | 08:23 |
| Saviq | veebers, not from a package | 08:23 |
| Saviq | veebers, yeah, after make -C builddir install | 08:23 |
| Saviq | veebers, and PYTHONPATH=tests/autopilot autopilot run unity8... | 08:24 |
| veebers | Saviq: trying now | 08:24 |
| vila | mardy: it's finished already | 08:26 |
| vila | *it | 08:26 |
| veebers | Saviq: I'm doing something dumb, "make -C builddir install" doesn't work for me, what do I need to do from a fresh branch? | 08:26 |
| didrocks | jibel: popey: oh, something to try on that image: opening/closing a lot of apps | 08:26 |
| Saviq | veebers, ./build | 08:27 |
| didrocks | jibel: popey: the slowdown should be fixed | 08:27 |
| popey | k | 08:27 |
| veebers | Saviq: ah of course | 08:27 |
| Saviq | veebers, you might need ./build -s if you have a really clean env (like deps not installed) | 08:27 |
| popey | i have 10 apps open and it feels a bit sluggish | 08:28 |
| mardy | vila: yes, but I mean to ask to change the job's configuration | 08:28 |
| veebers | Saviq: ack | 08:28 |
| mardy | vila: it always fails | 08:28 |
| t1mp | 22:06:19 < fginther> t1mp, I discovered one problem was the oom killer was killing qmlscene and autopilot before the test completed, the workaround was to split up the tests | 08:29 |
| t1mp | fginther: is that something that https://code.launchpad.net/~gerboland/unity-mir/fix-leaks/+merge/191449 might fix? | 08:30 |
| vila | mardy: ha, you'll need fginther then indeed | 08:30 |
| vila | mardy: I had a brief look at the job config but no ppa is directly mentioned there so that needs move knowledge that I have for now | 08:30 |
| mardy | vila: ok, np, thanks for the investigation. I'll follow-up with fginther | 08:31 |
| vila | mardy: ack | 08:31 |
| didrocks | lool: ogra_: around? | 08:35 |
| didrocks | asac: ? | 08:35 |
| ogra_ | didrocks, on my way, it just finished the download | 08:36 |
| didrocks | ok :) | 08:36 |
| veebers | Saviq: is this the complaint you're getting? Please install unity8 or copy data/unity8.conf to /home/leecj2/.config/upstart | 08:39 |
| veebers | well, not with leecj2 of course :-) | 08:39 |
| Saviq | veebers, no, it can't find the process | 08:39 |
| veebers | oh :0 | 08:39 |
| Saviq | veebers, maybe my env is broken again... | 08:39 |
| veebers | Saviq: did you do anything with the unity8.conf for upstart to find it/ | 08:40 |
| Saviq | veebers, yeah, I have unity8 installed | 08:40 |
| Saviq | veebers, and I had it copied, too | 08:41 |
| Saviq | veebers, let me restart my terminal, maybe my env is broken again | 08:41 |
| Saviq | ok that didn't help | 08:43 |
| * Saviq reboots | 08:43 | |
| Saviq | veebers, http://paste.ubuntu.com/6250028/ | 08:49 |
| veebers | Saviq: I did have to make one line fix to get running, now I see this in the log: Unable to activate "camera-app.desktop" | 08:49 |
| veebers | Saviq: yeah, heh that's the oneline I did to fix it | 08:49 |
| Saviq | veebers, that means the XDG path isn't set up right | 08:49 |
| veebers | Saviq: did you ok htat previous MR? | 08:49 |
| Saviq | veebers, not merged yet | 08:49 |
| veebers | ah ok | 08:49 |
| veebers | Saviq: I've changed it to needs review | 08:50 |
| veebers | need to fix this first | 08:50 |
| Saviq | veebers, k | 08:50 |
| Saviq | veebers, so it's working installed - from both package and local PYTHONPATH= | 08:50 |
| Saviq | veebers, but has issues with uninstalled | 08:50 |
| Saviq | veebers, it's late for you, shall we take over? | 08:50 |
| Saviq | veebers, thanks for being on guard for the original issue | 08:50 |
| veebers | Saviq: nw, also thank rsalveti and didrocks who originally brought it to my attention :-) | 08:51 |
| veebers | Saviq: I'll see if I can fix it quickly, if not I'll hand over | 08:52 |
| Saviq | veebers, thanks | 08:52 |
| didrocks | yw veebers, thanks! | 08:55 |
| psivaa | popey: didrocks: ive noted down some information about the AP testing of the core apps on 99 in the doc | 08:55 |
| psivaa | https://docs.google.com/a/canonical.com/document/d/1EepnzbV6b0aqvdevB19_Fp2gmjwLDNEo6F3lcv0VhVY/edit# | 08:55 |
| didrocks | psivaa: ah, excellent! thanks a lot :) | 08:56 |
| psivaa | didrocks: yw :) | 08:56 |
| jibel | didrocks, confirmed, it is faster. I started all the preinstalled apps, but then init uses crazy amount of memory and the system starts swapping | 08:56 |
| didrocks | jibel: yeah, we still have the upstart mem leak | 08:56 |
| didrocks | but I'm still happy with have the libunity-mir mem leak under control | 08:57 |
| veebers | Saviq: d'oh was trivial fix have pushed latest if you would like to try agin | 09:02 |
| veebers | again* | 09:02 |
| Saviq | veebers, cool, thanks | 09:05 |
| lool | Hi | 09:06 |
| Saviq | veebers, +1 | 09:08 |
| vila | lool: hi ! Slept enough ? | 09:09 |
| sil2100 | Hello! | 09:09 |
| didrocks | sil2100: you're back \o/ | 09:09 |
| sil2100 | didrocks: still on the tty though... doing another reboot in a moment | 09:10 |
| didrocks | sil2100: good luck with your hunt! | 09:10 |
| t1mp | psivaa: perhaps https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1239646 should go in the doc as well | 09:11 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1239646 in Ubuntu UI Toolkit "CI fails most tests on UITK trunk" [Critical,In progress] | 09:11 |
| t1mp | psivaa: I'm still waiting for a CI run to see if it was fixed by a mir update | 09:11 |
| lool | vila: lalala | 09:11 |
| lool | vila: yeah it's ok | 09:12 |
| vila | lool: :) | 09:12 |
| lool | but I ignored the alarm clock | 09:12 |
| psivaa | t1mp: ok, CI run with image 100 has finished | 09:12 |
| t1mp | psivaa: do you have a url for that? | 09:12 |
| psivaa | http://reports.qa.ubuntu.com/smokeng/saucy/touch_mir/ | 09:12 |
| t1mp | thanks | 09:13 |
| ogra_ | didrocks, lool, asac, popey, from maguro POV the image looks fine | 09:13 |
| ogra_ | i filed bug 1240875 | 09:13 |
| ubot5 | bug 1240875 in unity8 (Ubuntu) "Need to reboot the phone to have it pick up a new language setting" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1240875 | 09:13 |
| ogra_ | but thats not maguro specific | 09:13 |
| didrocks | ogra_: \o/ | 09:14 |
| veebers | Saviq: hmm I don't seem to have this dir on my desktop: /usr/share/unity8/mocks/data, I've installed unity8 + fakenv + autopilot tests etc. | 09:14 |
| t1mp | psivaa: wow. looks like ubuntu-ui-toolkit has 52/52 passes :D | 09:14 |
| t1mp | hmm 2 fails on maguro | 09:15 |
| t1mp | on systemsettle-before and systemsettle-after. I don't know what that is | 09:15 |
| Saviq | veebers, it's in fake-env | 09:16 |
| Saviq | veebers, from trunk, though | 09:16 |
| veebers | Saviq: ah ok | 09:16 |
| Saviq | veebers, as in you need 20131016 | 09:16 |
| Saviq | .1 I think | 09:16 |
| veebers | Saviq: ah ok, thanks | 09:17 |
| Saviq | veebers, yeah, just checked - it's there | 09:17 |
| Saviq | veebers, hrm | 09:18 |
| Saviq | http://packages.ubuntu.com/saucy/amd64/unity8-fake-env/filelist disagrees | 09:18 |
| === vrruiz_ is now known as rvr | ||
| Saviq | veebers, but it's there if you open https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-unity/+archive/daily-build/+build/5110290 | 09:19 |
| Saviq | the fake-env deb | 09:19 |
| Saviq | veebers, aaanyway - we'd know - if it's not there - ap on desktop will fail miserably | 09:19 |
| psivaa | t1mp: systemsettle failure doesn't look related to ubuntu-ui-toolkit tests | 09:20 |
| psivaa | the systemsettle test fails before the uitoolkit tests run | 09:20 |
| Saviq | veebers, and it's fine http://10.97.0.26:8080/job/autopilot-testrunner-otto-saucy/1248/ | 09:20 |
| ogra_ | and bug 1240881 | 09:21 |
| ubot5 | bug 1240881 in webbrowser-app (Ubuntu) "scrolling is very jumpy on maguro" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1240881 | 09:21 |
| t1mp | psivaa: on this MR the tests just failed https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-sdk-team/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/ci-test/+merge/190906 | 09:21 |
| lool | jibel: thanks for the testing | 09:21 |
| t1mp | psivaa: do you know how I can see which image was used for those tests? if it is image 100 they should have passed | 09:21 |
| veebers | Saviq: ok, perhaps I have an older package | 09:21 |
| Saviq | veebers, thanks! | 09:21 |
| veebers | Saviq: I ask because of this (probably not urgent) from our discussion yesterday/this morning: https://code.launchpad.net/~veebers/unity8/ap_make_use_of_helpers_in_tests/+merge/191575 | 09:22 |
| psivaa | t1mp: let me take a look | 09:22 |
| t1mp | psivaa: thanks | 09:22 |
| Saviq | veebers, yeah, will look at it asap | 09:22 |
| Saviq | veebers, although we need to take a step back and see what can we abstract / what should move into ap (like all the upstart business) etc. | 09:22 |
| veebers | Saviq: sweet thanks, it's pre-req branch is still "needs-review" so if you get the chance that would be awesome too :-) | 09:22 |
| veebers | Saviq: ah, I haven't had the chance to talk to you about that | 09:23 |
| cjwatson | lool: how's timing looking? we're looking at releasing everything else in early afternoon (maybe around 1pm local?, but not going to set a fixed time), and it'd be good if the touch images were ready when we do :) | 09:23 |
| veebers | I was talking with thomi earlier (the other day?) and autopilot 1.4 will handle all/most of the upstart stuff. Which is why I didn't go into the trouble of abstracting etc. that stuff to much at all | 09:24 |
| Saviq | veebers, ok cool | 09:24 |
| Saviq | veebers, so, like tomorrow ;D | 09:24 |
| veebers | so soon we'll be able to go through and update those to be much nicer | 09:24 |
| veebers | Saviq: ^_^ | 09:24 |
| psivaa | t1mp: both mako and maguro are running image 100 | 09:27 |
| didrocks | ogra_: do you see an improvement thanks to unity-mir? | 09:32 |
| didrocks | cjwatson: I'm handling it | 09:32 |
| asac | cjwatson: seems we have our final image, so should be good. check with didrocks etc. | 09:33 |
| didrocks | cjwatson: image 100 will be the one | 09:33 |
| t1mp | psivaa: I don't understand why this one passes http://reports.qa.ubuntu.com/smokeng/saucy/touch_mir/maguro/100:20131017:20131015/4767/ubuntu-ui-toolkit-autopilot/ | 09:33 |
| asac | didrocks: dont say too much :) | 09:33 |
| asac | lol | 09:33 |
| didrocks | ;) | 09:33 |
| t1mp | psivaa: and this fails most of the tests https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/generic-mediumtests-runner-maguro/2530/? | 09:33 |
| t1mp | psivaa: shouldn't they be the same? | 09:33 |
| didrocks | cjwatson: so, we need to discuss release note, we have some infos, where should we paste them? | 09:33 |
| asac | didrocks: can we retry a few things like notes-app etc.? | 09:33 |
| asac | maybe the dashboard can look even nicer for 100 | 09:33 |
| didrocks | psivaa: ^ | 09:33 |
| cjwatson | didrocks: can you edit https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SaucySalamander/ReleaseNotes directly (just watch out for edit conflicts as several people are editing on and off)? | 09:34 |
| psivaa | didrocks: ack, will run them | 09:34 |
| asac | 100 is running on maguro :) | 09:34 |
| cjwatson | didrocks: There's an empty section for Ubuntu Touch there waiting for your input :-) (feel free to rename it though) | 09:34 |
| psivaa | t1mp: not sure why they differ.. need to take a deeper look at the medium tests | 09:34 |
| didrocks | cjwatson: sure, doing it, a section sounds good | 09:34 |
| sil2100 | didrocks: any testing needed? I'm on with a shell now and flashing my device right now | 09:35 |
| didrocks | cjwatson: can you tell us when the announce will be made? We are just a promotion away | 09:35 |
| didrocks | sil2100: please dogfood like crazy ;) | 09:35 |
| didrocks | thanks psivaa | 09:35 |
| t1mp | psivaa: is there a way to see if this fix https://code.launchpad.net/~gerboland/unity-mir/fix-leaks/+merge/191449 is present in image 100? | 09:36 |
| ogra_ | eeek ! | 09:36 |
| * ogra_ found an RC bug on maguro :( | 09:36 | |
| cjwatson | didrocks: My aversion to picking a time isn't paranoid secrecy, it's because we've found that if we nominate an exact time then people tend to try to stick to it even if things are going wrong | 09:36 |
| ogra_ | root@ubuntu-phablet:/# ls -lh /var/log/syslog | 09:37 |
| ogra_ | -rw-r----- 1 syslog adm 352M Oct 17 11:37 /var/log/syslog | 09:37 |
| ogra_ | root@ubuntu-phablet:/# | 09:37 |
| asac | ogra_: thats system updates | 09:37 |
| ogra_ | grows ~100M per minute | 09:37 |
| cjwatson | didrocks: not before 1pm London time | 09:37 |
| cjwatson | didrocks: hopefully not long after that | 09:37 |
| didrocks | cjwatson: right, I mean, just tell us in advance so that we can promote | 09:37 |
| ogra_ | and i cant connect to WIFI anymore | 09:37 |
| t1mp | psivaa: so if unity-mir has r > 129 | 09:37 |
| ogra_ | and in fact syslog gets about 100 lines from NM per second | 09:38 |
| cjwatson | didrocks: do you have any mirror propagation delays we need to be concerned about? | 09:38 |
| asac | ogra_: i am connected on wifi | 09:38 |
| didrocks | ogra_: are you really not connected? there is a bug with the tick not showing randomly | 09:38 |
| cjwatson | didrocks: (and promote to where?) | 09:38 |
| didrocks | ah | 09:38 |
| ogra_ | asac, switch wifi off and on a few times | 09:38 |
| ogra_ | at some point it stops listing any networks at all | 09:38 |
| didrocks | ogra_: can you answer to cjwatson? ^ (I think we don't have mirrors, right?) | 09:38 |
| ogra_ | no, we dont | 09:38 |
| didrocks | cjwatson: promote to the stable channel | 09:39 |
| cjwatson | didrocks: so if we just give you ten minutes' warning or something? | 09:39 |
| ogra_ | cjwatson, i also wouldnt know what "promotion" means in case of touch ... since we will just roll forward | 09:39 |
| didrocks | ogra_: don't you tell "promoting an image"? :) | 09:39 |
| asac | ogra_: i dont think the fact that NM goes down after stressing it a new issue | 09:39 |
| didrocks | I heard it from you | 09:39 |
| asac | or is it? | 09:39 |
| ogra_ | didrocks, right, to the devel channel from devel-proposed | 09:39 |
| asac | i had this at least one time in previous days | 09:39 |
| ogra_ | asac, definitely new | 09:40 |
| ogra_ | i never had that before | 09:40 |
| asac | ogra_: i had it :) | 09:40 |
| ogra_ | root@ubuntu-phablet:/# ls -lh /var/log/syslog | 09:40 |
| ogra_ | -rw-r----- 1 syslog adm 595M Oct 17 11:40 /var/log/syslog | 09:40 |
| asac | didnt wsee th syslog, but the "cant see any wifi network anymore) | 09:40 |
| ogra_ | and my disk will be full in about 30min or so | 09:40 |
| asac | ogra_: yeah. yo must be in an awful race | 09:40 |
| asac | or something | 09:40 |
| didrocks | cjwatson: so yeah, 10 minutes is fine :) | 09:40 |
| asac | ogra_: can you reboot and see how often you can trigger | 09:40 |
| asac | ? | 09:40 |
| didrocks | cjwatson: well, if ogra is around | 09:40 |
| ogra_ | i get 100s of lines into syslog per minute | 09:40 |
| asac | sure, we know that by now | 09:40 |
| ogra_ | ah, and now i cant wake it up from sleep anymore | 09:41 |
| ogra_ | (it was only on for like 20min) | 09:41 |
| asac | ogra_: your boot is busted obviously... try if you can reproduce anything like that when you boot again etc. | 09:42 |
| asac | ogra_: and capture what you see of course | 09:42 |
| asac | logs etc. | 09:42 |
| ogra_ | and its glowing at the top ... nearly cant touch it | 09:42 |
| asac | so one can investigate | 09:42 |
| ogra_ | reboot is also not possible | 09:42 |
| asac | jibel: are you guys on testing #100? | 09:42 |
| ogra_ | http://paste.ubuntu.com/6250220/ | 09:43 |
| asac | jibel: you might want to keep an eye on what ogra is describing above | 09:43 |
| jibel | asac, yes, we do | 09:43 |
| ogra_ | thats the stream of messages in syslog | 09:43 |
| jibel | asac, that's what I'm trying to reproduce ATM | 09:43 |
| asac | ok | 09:43 |
| jibel | asac, but cannot on mako | 09:43 |
| asac | ogra_: is that a fresh --no-backup install? | 09:43 |
| asac | jibel: i dont have it on maguro either, but i did a system update | 09:43 |
| ogra_ | asac, yes | 09:43 |
| asac | ok let me do that then too | 09:44 |
| ogra_ | i have 2 APs in the house and moved between them (i usually do that for a test) ... and i have a wlan free spot in the house where i usually go to test if it switches back and forth ... | 09:44 |
| ogra_ | after being out of wlan range and getting back into range this started | 09:44 |
| asac | jibel: ^ | 09:45 |
| asac | well, let me first flash a no-backup one | 09:45 |
| ogra_ | the spam started after being in the wlan free spot and switching wifi off and on again | 09:45 |
| jibel | asac, ok, I'll have to find a place without wifi | 09:46 |
| ogra_ | when being back in range i got a WPA dialog but no AP listings anymore | 09:46 |
| asac | jibel: i feel it might be a on/off thing etc. | 09:46 |
| asac | rather than roam | 09:46 |
| ogra_ | jibel, use tinfoli | 09:46 |
| ogra_ | wrap the phone in it, and leave it for a moment | 09:46 |
| ogra_ | that should shield you from all networks | 09:47 |
| psivaa | t1mp: i think the devices have unity-mir r 129 | 09:47 |
| psivaa | ahh you needed > 129 | 09:48 |
| t1mp | psivaa: actually I needed >= 129 | 09:48 |
| t1mp | so 129 should be good | 09:48 |
| ogra_ | ok, phone is back up ... let me walk through the house to see if i can trigger it again | 09:49 |
| jibel | hm, unity8 crashed when I went out of range | 09:52 |
| didrocks | popey: thanks! I was about adding that one ;) | 09:52 |
| popey | ☻ | 09:52 |
| popey | didrocks: are you taking from that doc and putting somewhere else? | 09:53 |
| ogra_ | asac, jibel, so i can reproduce the behavior in the UI, but this time it doesnt spam syslog | 09:54 |
| jibel | ogra_, what exactly do you do, I'll try on mako | 09:54 |
| didrocks | popey: yeah, putting it on the wiki release page as soon as I can get a lock on it :) | 09:56 |
| popey | coolio | 09:56 |
| ogra_ | jibel, i have one AP upstartis and one downstairs ... and a WLAN free spot in one bathroom ... i want from upstairs to downstairs, watch the signal degrade and watch it picing up the new AP (wehich makes the signal go to 100% again) ... then i go to the bathroom and watch wlan go away and see the 3G icon appear | 09:57 |
| ogra_ | at that piont i get a WPA PW popup | 09:57 |
| jibel | ogra_, the unity8 crash I saw might be a duplicate of bug 1239394, I'm uploading the crash and will do more 'out of range' tests | 09:57 |
| ubot5 | bug 1239394 in Unity 8 "unity8 crashed with SIGSEGV in gtk_menu_tracker_item_get_attribute_value()" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1239394 | 09:57 |
| ogra_ | typing in the PW doesnt connect (Edge icon stays (little E in the panel) | 09:58 |
| ogra_ | then switching off and on wlan triggers it | 09:58 |
| jibel | ogra_, okay, I don't have any AP in my bathroom, but it probably doesn't matter :) | 09:58 |
| ogra_ | lol | 09:59 |
| ogra_ | i dont have wlan in one of my bathrooms | 09:59 |
| didrocks | popey: dpm: feel free to edit it directly as well | 09:59 |
| ogra_ | seems the pipes shield that room very well | 09:59 |
| sil2100 | hm, is there an option to save images in our webbrowser-app? | 10:02 |
| didrocks | sil2100: maybe ask osomon? | 10:02 |
| popey | dont think so | 10:03 |
| didrocks | popey: how do you take all your screenshot btw? | 10:03 |
| popey | mirfbdump | 10:04 |
| didrocks | popey: hum, is that installed by default? | 10:04 |
| popey | no | 10:04 |
| didrocks | command not found | 10:04 |
| popey | its a script | 10:04 |
| popey | one mo | 10:04 |
| popey | http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~popey/+junk/phablet-flash-wrapper/view/head:/mirfbdump | 10:05 |
| popey | Jean-Baptiste wrote it, I modded it so it autouploads to my webspace and opens the image using xdg-open | 10:05 |
| ogra_ | jibel, asac, while i can reproduce the strange UI behavior, i cant really reproduce the syslog spam, lets put that one under "driver hiccup" until we see it again | 10:05 |
| didrocks | popey: oh nice! | 10:05 |
| popey | also his script shrinks the image, i wanted full-size ones | 10:05 |
| didrocks | /dev/$FBDEV ${PICDIR}/fb | 10:06 |
| didrocks | waow ;) | 10:06 |
| didrocks | ok, it's really a dump :) | 10:06 |
| popey | yeah! | 10:07 |
| lool | cjwatson: sorry I was picking up my son at school | 10:07 |
| lool | cjwatson: we're good | 10:07 |
| lool | cjwatson: in terms of images, we're sticking with our latest #100 | 10:07 |
| lool | cjwatson: we've assessed the remaining high prio issues, and they will be delivered in updates now | 10:07 |
| * popey pops out to run an errand. back in an hour or less | 10:07 | |
| didrocks | popey: enjoy! | 10:08 |
| * popey doesn't enjoy dentists ☻ | 10:08 | |
| jibel | didrocks, http://people.canonical.com/~j-lallement/touch/mirfbdump original version without upload to popey's place :) there is a request to include it into phablet-tools | 10:08 |
| didrocks | jibel: we definitively should | 10:08 |
| didrocks | popey: don't enjoy then and good luck! | 10:08 |
| didrocks | :) | 10:08 |
| lool | popey: ouch | 10:09 |
| ogra_ | is it expected that my icons under "installed" re-oder themnselves all the time (thats on mako) | 10:10 |
| ogra_ | ah, now it stopped | 10:10 |
| ogra_ | that looked weird | 10:10 |
| lool | So image 100 is the one with the highest pass rate ever on touch_mir images | 10:11 |
| ogra_ | (wild icon shuffling that stops and starts over etc ... having stock ticker as first icon, then shorts ,, and in the end the browser again) | 10:11 |
| lool | ogra_: yeah that's painful | 10:12 |
| lool | ogra_: worst is when the clicks dont show up | 10:12 |
| ogra_ | yeah | 10:12 |
| ogra_ | but it went on this time | 10:12 |
| ogra_ | for about a minute | 10:12 |
| ogra_ | even with the click being there | 10:12 |
| ogra_ | but i guess as long as it stops we're fine | 10:12 |
| dpm | didrocks, done (editing release notes). That's all I could think of | 10:13 |
| didrocks | dpm: thanks :) | 10:13 |
| Saviq | didrocks, btw, shall we release unity8 and rerun its suite on #100? | 10:20 |
| didrocks | Saviq: no need to release it. I just did my test results locally | 10:20 |
| psivaa | t1mp: ok, on maguro the tests succeeded | 10:20 |
| didrocks | Saviq: let's not touch anything right now :) | 10:21 |
| Saviq | didrocks, I mean for smoke ;) | 10:21 |
| Saviq | didrocks, but ok :) | 10:21 |
| asac | ogra_: sounds right | 10:21 |
| Saviq | didrocks, btw, seems we found the crasher: bug #1240866 | 10:21 |
| ubot5 | bug 1240866 in Unity 8 "unity8 crashed with SIGSEGV in getenv()" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1240866 | 10:21 |
| ogra_ | whee | 10:21 |
| asac | i am sure we are not 100% robust on maguro wrt wifi | 10:21 |
| Saviq | didrocks, getenv is not thread safe | 10:21 |
| ogra_ | with pittis fix maguro feels snappier actually | 10:21 |
| t1mp | psivaa: ah cool, that's an improvement :) now let's see whats up with mako | 10:21 |
| * ogra_ just replaced udevd with the fixed one | 10:21 | |
| didrocks | Saviq: oh, the story repeat! (we had exactly the same in unity7 2 years ago ;)) | 10:22 |
| didrocks | Saviq: nice catch! | 10:22 |
| Saviq | didrocks, :D | 10:22 |
| psivaa | t1mp: mako failed to unlock screen.. looking at why this has happened | 10:22 |
| didrocks | Saviq: no way to run the smoke test without an image being built (hence no release ;)) | 10:22 |
| t1mp | psivaa: mako still seems to have the same problem. https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/generic-mediumtests-runner-mako/2578/testReport/junit/ubuntuuitoolkit.tests.gallery.test_gallery/ButtonsTestCase/test_buttons_standard_button_/ | 10:22 |
| sil2100 | ;D | 10:22 |
| t1mp | psivaa: a problem when setting up the app | 10:22 |
| t1mp | psivaa: ah that could explain it | 10:22 |
| asac | Saviq: thats a multi-threading issue? | 10:22 |
| Saviq | asac, yes | 10:23 |
| Saviq | asac, both unity8 and Mir try to getenv() concurrently | 10:23 |
| Saviq | asac, and that fails | 10:23 |
| Saviq | asac, it's a rare occurence - but is most probably the cause for our last unity8 test failures | 10:23 |
| ogra_ | bah | 10:24 |
| ogra_ | nowe it got super slow again :/ | 10:25 |
| asac | Saviq: so if we retry it might succeed? | 10:25 |
| asac | "if its rare" :) | 10:25 |
| Saviq | asac, well, if you run just the one failing test it will pass - if you run the whole suite, you'll probably get the same again in some other tests | 10:26 |
| Saviq | asac, rare seems to mean ~5% | 10:26 |
| Saviq | in that case | 10:26 |
| Saviq | asac, trick is, I had better success on maguro, where slower CPU seems to help (or less threads?) | 10:27 |
| Saviq | asac, but at least we know the cause now - we couldn't get a trace of this for a while now | 10:27 |
| * ogra_ files bug 1240911 | 10:31 | |
| ubot5 | bug 1240911 in unity8 (Ubuntu) "swiping the camera-app away to get back to the home sceen on maguro causes a hanging animation for several seconds on maguro" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1240911 | 10:31 |
| asac | Saviq: yeah MT is tricky to debug and do right | 10:36 |
| asac | well done | 10:36 |
| davmor2 | ogra_: I thought there was already one on the camera app cause lag in the system | 10:43 |
| ogra_ | davmor2, well, then someone can duplicate it :) | 10:44 |
| davmor2 | ogra_: I would but I can't remember the bug jibel ^ is it one that you filed I know someone gave me a link to a bug when I mentioned it | 10:45 |
| ogra_ | bah #ubuntu-release-party is really empty | 10:45 |
| * ogra_ cant remember a release wheer we were below 100 people in there at that time of day | 10:46 | |
| Saviq | let's fix! | 10:47 |
| ogra_ | it is usually around 200 spiking to 3-400 at tiome of the actual release | 10:47 |
| ogra_ | even here are more people | 10:47 |
| Laney | ogra_: you should get dholbach to social media about it | 11:14 |
| Laney | if you want it busy :P | 11:14 |
| kalikiana | who could tell me about locale details in Jenkins images? I have an i18n unit test using gettext and cannot get it to pass https://code.launchpad.net/~kalikiana/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/xdglocale/+merge/188359 | 11:16 |
| didrocks | dpm: not meeeeeee! ;) | 11:17 |
| dpm | :) | 11:17 |
| kalikiana | it never picks up translations even though eg. en_US is installed, files are where they should be | 11:17 |
| ogra_ | Laney, i guess an entry in the topic on #ubuntu (like we ususally have) would help too | 11:19 |
| Laney | maybe | 11:20 |
| Laney | creepy, my ubuntu phone just randomly illuminated | 11:20 |
| ogra_ | does anyone remember the bug # for the black wallpaper on maguro ? | 11:20 |
| t1mp | psivaa: did you discover something related to the mako screen not unlocking? | 11:25 |
| t1mp | ogra_: is it this one? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1227783 | 11:25 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1227783 in ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu Saucy) "Black backround image -CrossFadeImage does not set the sourceSize for the images" [Critical,In progress] | 11:25 |
| sil2100 | Sad, but I only see people talking about Ubuntu Touch on the release party | 11:25 |
| sil2100 | What about desktop?! | 11:25 |
| ogra_ | t1mp, thanks ... | 11:25 |
| t1mp | ogra_: the fix is ready for UITK for a while now, but couldn't merge because of CI issues in UITK. And it seems that Unity8 fixed it outside of UITK so it did not seem urgent enough for a manual merge | 11:26 |
| psivaa | t1mp: not yet, it could be due to bug 1238298. retunning the job seeing some other missing dep issues on other devices | 11:32 |
| ubot5 | bug 1238298 in jenkins-launchpad-plugin "touch tests failing because unlock screen fails" [Critical,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1238298 | 11:32 |
| t1mp | psivaa: the error messages there are not exactly the same as what we get in UITK, but the cause may be related | 11:37 |
| kalikiana | the second part with .ProcessSearchError definitely looks like the failure in uitk we get | 11:39 |
| kalikiana | the main problem is, it looks identical to the mir-based error used to | 11:39 |
| * kalikiana idly wonders why lock isn't disabled during test runs | 11:41 | |
| t1mp | kalikiana: well the system should be as close to the "real" system when running the tests | 11:41 |
| t1mp | +"as possible" | 11:42 |
| t1mp | kalikiana: indeed, the last failure is exactly the same | 11:42 |
| t1mp | 6 File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/autopilot/introspection/__init__.py", line 271, in get_proxy_object_for_existing_process | 11:43 |
| t1mp | raise ProcessSearchError("Search criteria returned no results") | 11:43 |
| t1mp | autopilot.introspection.ProcessSearchError: Search criteria returned no results | 11:43 |
| didrocks | ogra_: can you promote the image to devel? | 11:47 |
| ogra_ | didrocks, already ? | 11:47 |
| didrocks | ogra_: yeah ;) | 11:47 |
| ogra_ | ok, releasing then | 11:48 |
| ogra_ | didrocks, asac, lool, popey 100/20131017 promoted | 11:50 |
| popey | ttp://popey.com/~alan/phablet/device-2013-10-17-125029.png \o/ | 11:50 |
| didrocks | thanks :) | 11:50 |
| asac | nice one! | 11:50 |
| popey | mail sent | 11:53 |
| * ogra_ is shocked by #ubuntu-release-party ... so quiet ... still didnt hit 100 people | 11:54 | |
| === alan_g is now known as alan_g|lunch | ||
| popey | Everyone switched to Mint/Arch apparently | 11:55 |
| ogra_ | yeah :/ | 11:55 |
| sil2100 | Sad... | 12:00 |
| sil2100 | I guess most of the people on that channel are interested in Ubuntu Touch from what I see | 12:01 |
| popey | seems so | 12:01 |
| ogra_ | yeah | 12:01 |
| sil2100 | No one cares about the desktop anymore! | 12:02 |
| * sil2100 runs away in tears | 12:02 | |
| * popey steals sil2100's laptop | 12:03 | |
| sil2100 | :O | 12:03 |
| lool | ogra_: \o/ | 12:07 |
| didrocks | ogra_: oh, stupid question, but in 100:20131017:20131015, the last 20131015 is the last rebuild of the android side? | 12:23 |
| ogra_ | yep | 12:23 |
| didrocks | ok, I'm not that stupid ;) | 12:24 |
| didrocks | thanks | 12:24 |
| ogra_ | not sure why stgraber doesnt actually use the package version stamp though | 12:24 |
| didrocks | yeah, as it's just one package… | 12:24 |
| lool | vila: nocheck dans DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS | 12:36 |
| === alan_g|lunch is now known as alan_g | ||
| alesage | fginther and others, tedg asking about T support already :) | 13:06 |
| fginther | alesage, do we have a name yet :-) | 13:06 |
| cjwatson | we do not | 13:06 |
| cjwatson | Jane is on it | 13:06 |
| cjwatson | I expect we'll have things minimally opened later today though PPAs may not quite work yet | 13:07 |
| alesage | tedg ^^ , sounds like we're waiting for an announcement of a name too ;) | 13:07 |
| tedg | Wait, isn't "Ted" enough? | 13:07 |
| alesage | the t-shirt would just look like tedg :) | 13:08 |
| fginther | alesage, tedg, we can start creating the lp 13.10 branches now and getting the cupstream2distro-config files updated | 13:08 |
| ogra_ | Tedg-ish Tapir ? | 13:08 |
| ogra_ | or would ted be the animal part ? | 13:08 |
| alesage | fginther, I leave it in your capable hands :) | 13:09 |
| tedg | fginther, So if I make the branches, does that screw you? Should I wait? | 13:09 |
| tedg | fginther, FYI, I have a script for it, so it's fast. | 13:09 |
| fginther | tedg, I think that's perfectly fine. sil2100, can you comment, can tedg start branching projects as he prefers? | 13:10 |
| fginther | tedg, sil2100, I think all we care about are the branch names so we can plug them into the config files | 13:11 |
| tedg | fginther, They'll all be "trunk.14.04" :-) | 13:12 |
| cjwatson | you should probably be branching for 13.10 and keeping 14.04 stuff on trunk | 13:12 |
| cjwatson | rather than branching for each release | 13:12 |
| cjwatson | as a general approach | 13:12 |
| fginther | tedg, what cjohnston said | 13:12 |
| tedg | We've been using teh LP symbolic names there. | 13:12 |
| tedg | So we realign those for what "trunk" is. | 13:12 |
| tedg | And Bazaar tracks those names as well. | 13:12 |
| fginther | oh | 13:12 |
| tedg | But this also means that things like MRs that were already queued, stay with that branch. | 13:13 |
| fginther | tedg, yeah that works (I'm looking at lp:upstart-app-launch which is just a link to lp:~indicator-applet-developers/upstart-app-launch/trunk.13.10) | 13:16 |
| didrocks | fginther: we only branch components having desktop support | 13:18 |
| didrocks | fginther: so for indicators touch only for instance, we don't branch, trunk will be T | 13:18 |
| didrocks | (and no support release) | 13:18 |
| didrocks | fginther: so no upstart-app-launch 13.10 | 13:19 |
| tedg | didrocks, Really? We're probably going to have to support demos, no? | 13:19 |
| didrocks | tedg: it will be the last stable image | 13:19 |
| didrocks | which can be T | 13:19 |
| didrocks | (like next week) | 13:20 |
| didrocks | we just won't promote image to stable that are not demoable ;) | 13:20 |
| fginther | didrocks, thanks for the correctino | 13:20 |
| fginther | correction | 13:20 |
| didrocks | tedg: don't complain, less support for you! :-) | 13:20 |
| didrocks | fginther: so, if you want to start diverging for components that are shipped in ubuntu desktop, please do :) | 13:20 |
| tedg | didrocks, It's not work for me, I just make kenvandine do it. | 13:21 |
| plars | didrocks: what was the outcome of the unity problems? | 13:21 |
| tedg | :-) | 13:21 |
| cjwatson | saucy announce is in mod queue, website being updated | 13:22 |
| didrocks | tedg: ahah ;) | 13:22 |
| didrocks | ogra_: do you need to do anything to push to stable? I guess stable points to saucy as devel points to saucy | 13:22 |
| didrocks | thanks cjwatson :) | 13:22 |
| ogra_ | didrocks, i dont know | 13:22 |
| ogra_ | didrocks, waiting for stgraber to clearify | 13:23 |
| didrocks | plars: so, it was autopilot unity8 tests | 13:23 |
| didrocks | yeah, let's wait for him :) | 13:23 |
| didrocks | plars: the environment which was running unity8 wasn't the right one (only during the tests) | 13:23 |
| ogra_ | didrocks, i suspect we cant do anything atm until we have a name for the new release | 13:23 |
| didrocks | right | 13:23 |
| ogra_ | so that devel can point there | 13:23 |
| didrocks | phablet-flash without any option works anyway | 13:23 |
| didrocks | plars: fixed in trunk, but didn't need a respin as it's only in the unity8-autopilot package | 13:24 |
| didrocks | fginther: you may need to adapt from https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DailyRelease/MovingNewRelease | 13:24 |
| * fginther reads to refresh memory | 13:33 | |
| mardy | fginther: hi! Can you have a look at the configuration of this job? http://10.97.0.26:8080/job/signon-ui-daily/label=pbuilder/53/ | 13:47 |
| mardy | fginther: it always fails, because it uses a very old version of Qt5 | 13:47 |
| fginther | mardy, is this job still needed? why are we doing a daily build? | 13:49 |
| fginther | mardy, just want to make sure this is still useful | 13:49 |
| mardy | fginther: I actually think it isn't useful at all | 13:50 |
| mardy | fginther: it has been failing since months, and no one complained (except because of the noise) | 13:51 |
| fginther | mardy, I'll check with victor, if he has no use for it, I'll disable | 13:52 |
| lool | so we're branching trunk to saucy? | 13:56 |
| ogra_ | lool, for what ? | 13:57 |
| lool | I dont know | 13:57 |
| ogra_ | lool, for phone stuff we shouldnt ... for desktop stuff we can | 13:57 |
| lool | I thought we were doing some saucy based updates first? | 13:57 |
| ogra_ | from whatever deskop SRUs are there that touch us | 13:58 |
| ogra_ | for touch related stuff T is the target | 13:58 |
| fginther | mardy, victor no longer has a use for that job, i've disabled it | 13:58 |
| mardy | fginther: thanks!! | 13:59 |
| lool | ogra_: I thought we were doing a couple of important landings in saucy-upates | 13:59 |
| lool | e.g. download-manager | 13:59 |
| ogra_ | lool, no | 13:59 |
| lool | so we're doing saucy based updates, but without any touch stuff? | 13:59 |
| lool | too bad | 13:59 |
| lool | delays the critical fixes some more | 14:00 |
| ogra_ | lool, we fix T so we can have an awesome first T image | 14:00 |
| lool | well we want that too | 14:00 |
| ogra_ | right | 14:00 |
| ogra_ | hire more people if you want both ;) | 14:00 |
| lool | but if we're going to roll the first updates from saucy, I'd want us to include the download-manager fix, especially if stable is a bit longer lived | 14:00 |
| ogra_ | lets focus resources on going forward | 14:00 |
| lool | it's not for many things | 14:00 |
| lool | really one from me :-) | 14:00 |
| ogra_ | if we make one exception we have to make it for all | 14:01 |
| lool | sure; we can ask people to file two landings | 14:01 |
| ogra_ | which defeats the purpose | 14:01 |
| lool | to discourage the saucy ones as being extra cost :-) | 14:01 |
| lool | or maybe another way to ask about it: what do we put in devel that we dont put in stable or vice-versa | 14:02 |
| ogra_ | lool, SRUs will have to sit in proposed for two weeks anyway ... we'll likely have the first T image faster (and since the plan is to not regress this vs saucy i would expect that to even be better) | 14:02 |
| lool | do touch SRUs have to sit 2 weeks? | 14:03 |
| lool | I was thinking put download-manager in proposed, test, put in -updates; it's seeded only in touch | 14:03 |
| ogra_ | they are SRUs | 14:03 |
| ogra_ | and fall under the rules the ubuntu TB made | 14:03 |
| lool | maybe we can challenge that rule for touch seeded stuff | 14:03 |
| ogra_ | we have no special rules approved by the TB for this | 14:03 |
| lool | it's not like we were landing and breaking desktops just hours ago ;-) | 14:04 |
| lool | we have special rules for unapproved | 14:04 |
| ogra_ | you can surely add it to the TB agenda for next meeting | 14:04 |
| lool | and for proposed | 14:04 |
| sergiusens | lool, ogra_ if we don't move to T now, we'll have the same pain from when we switched to saucy and to raring (although no PPAs this time :-D) | 14:04 |
| * ogra_ heard several upset voices about special treating touch already | 14:04 | |
| lool | sergiusens: we should move to T as soon as possible, and not allow anything to land in saucy that isnt in T | 14:04 |
| ogra_ | not sure we want to stirr that up further without involving the TB | 14:04 |
| lool | sergiusens: but if the first updates for a week are from saucy, I want a couple to land there | 14:04 |
| lool | like download-manager | 14:05 |
| ogra_ | sergiusens, i dont expect any pain | 14:05 |
| ogra_ | sergiusens, all our stuff is in the archive ... so the first T image will in fact just be the same as saucy | 14:05 |
| ogra_ | the archive just gets copied over as the first step | 14:05 |
| sergiusens | ogra_, yeah, if we switch asap :-) | 14:06 |
| lool | well we want the toolchain to settle first | 14:06 |
| ogra_ | and image build scripts just get "s/saucy/terrific/" | 14:06 |
| lool | I guess it's all ready, and just needs a series of upload | 14:06 |
| ogra_ | (or whatever that name will be) | 14:06 |
| lool | tasty | 14:06 |
| ogra_ | sergiusens, it will be as painless as switching desktop over is | 14:06 |
| didrocks | lool: we decided to not do that | 14:14 |
| didrocks | with rick, asac and so on | 14:14 |
| didrocks | so let's not please rediscuss it again :( | 14:14 |
| didrocks | see #ubuntu-release | 14:14 |
| ogra_ | right | 14:16 |
| didrocks | cjwatson: vila: lool: ogra_: sil2100: jibel: plars: psivaa: robru: cyphermox: I've deleted our landing meetup for today and tomorrow, let's enjoy the release, there is no need until T is setup. We can have specific discussions if needed :) | 14:21 |
| sil2100 | didrocks: ok! | 14:21 |
| ogra_ | ++ | 14:22 |
| sil2100 | didrocks: what about the releases we usually targetted 'on Friday'? | 14:22 |
| didrocks | sil2100: it's Friday/Monday, you can prepare, already, working on diverging desktop branches with fginther should take some time, (are you synced with him on it?) | 14:24 |
| lool | didrocks: I actually read that discussion and understood it the other way around | 14:26 |
| lool | didrocks: but thanks for clarifying | 14:26 |
| rsalveti | morrrrning | 14:29 |
| rsalveti | seems we released already | 14:29 |
| rsalveti | I may just get back to bed then | 14:29 |
| rsalveti | :P | 14:29 |
| sil2100 | didrocks: not yet, but we're syncing up slowly ;) | 14:30 |
| didrocks | rsalveti: please go! ;) | 14:31 |
| didrocks | rsalveti: full explanation on the puzzling issue on the ue-leads ML | 14:31 |
| lool | didrocks: so e.g. what's with the netlink filter 0day SRU? | 14:32 |
| ogra_ | rsalveti, habe a beer first *then* go to bed again | 14:32 |
| ogra_ | lool, wont be needed | 14:32 |
| fginther | didrocks, do you have a good idea of which projects are touch only? to double check the list before we branch them? | 14:33 |
| ogra_ | lool, tvoss found a possible proper fix we'll have in the first T image | 14:33 |
| didrocks | lool: so, from what I understood, if it's a fix for touch -> T, if it's a fix that is for desktop, we do the SRU round and will picked in next image respin | 14:33 |
| lool | I guess we should tell pitti then | 14:34 |
| rsalveti | ogra_: yeah :-) | 14:34 |
| lool | looking at the timeline in asac's email, I'm fine if the next *stable* image is like end of next week | 14:35 |
| rsalveti | didrocks: cool, thanks | 14:35 |
| lool | that is, landings resume tuesday from T, some crack might come in, gets fixed, image is promoted to stable relatively quickly | 14:35 |
| rsalveti | lool: T stable? | 14:35 |
| lool | rsalveti: Yeah | 14:35 |
| rsalveti | cool | 14:35 |
| lool | well | 14:35 |
| rsalveti | we'll we stop this landing process using this spreadsheet? | 14:36 |
| lool | I still have doubts everybody is on the same page | 14:36 |
| rsalveti | or is this something post-oakland? | 14:36 |
| lool | the latest back and forth seem to exclude saucy-updates now | 14:36 |
| didrocks | lool: I guess if he already tested and pushed -> ok | 14:36 |
| lool | except for some system-image tests we'll do in the next couple of days | 14:36 |
| didrocks | lool: but we shouldn't add any extra work now in this | 14:36 |
| lool | didrocks: well the only one I'm worried about is this download-manager thing | 14:36 |
| lool | didrocks: because it will affect upgrades *from* stable / 1.0 | 14:36 |
| lool | to possibly a long time in the future | 14:36 |
| lool | I dont want us to fix 20 issues in 1.0 via saucy-updates | 14:37 |
| didrocks | lool: what's the effect apart from log spam? | 14:37 |
| lool | but if the next image in *stable* channel is in 6 months, or even in a month, we dont really know whether it will work | 14:37 |
| lool | didrocks: slow downloads, huge logs | 14:37 |
| rsalveti | ogra_: this syslog issue is annoying | 14:37 |
| rsalveti | ogra_: can't we just put some limits in it? | 14:37 |
| lool | didrocks: possibly not being able to upgrade | 14:37 |
| ogra_ | rsalveti, yeah but i couldnt trigger it again | 14:37 |
| rsalveti | like, if we get a crazy process or something it'll quickly get most of the disk space | 14:38 |
| didrocks | lool: ok, I guess that case can be an exception if it's risking that | 14:38 |
| ogra_ | yea, we'll do that for T | 14:38 |
| rsalveti | right | 14:38 |
| lool | (also we have no syslog rotation) | 14:38 |
| lool | ok | 14:38 |
| rsalveti | yeah, that's bad | 14:38 |
| lool | didrocks: so we can discuss this tomorrow; mandel is working on a small update over what's in trunk | 14:39 |
| lool | didrocks: should come in later today | 14:39 |
| didrocks | lool: ok, let's see how it's consuming, but yeah, that case, as it's risking not being able to upgrade later, seems one we can accept | 14:39 |
| lool | didrocks: then we can test, upload to proposed, get it reviewed as a 0day SRU or similar, then roll a saucy update image to test system-image saucy updates, then move to T? | 14:39 |
| didrocks | lool: but no branch, we'll just distro-patch and dput | 14:39 |
| lool | didrocks: we can even take it from trunk and push to saucy-proposed and T | 14:40 |
| lool | whatever | 14:40 |
| didrocks | yeah, let's see that tomorrow | 14:40 |
| lool | didrocks: I'll be on leave tomorrow; do you think you could handle it? | 14:40 |
| lool | didrocks: I've tested my current change, sil2100 did too | 14:40 |
| lool | with click and systme-image | 14:40 |
| lool | log is now /too/ quiet :-) | 14:40 |
| lool | but things just worked as expected (almost nothign in log( | 14:40 |
| didrocks | lool: hum, what's the mandel's fix? | 14:40 |
| lool | didrocks: not super clear to me | 14:41 |
| didrocks | lool: do you think your change will be enough? | 14:41 |
| lool | didrocks: he had ambitious plans to fix this properly, but I made it clear this was a long term thing for T, that we wanted something short-term | 14:41 |
| sil2100 | It silences all the DEBUG info for sure | 14:41 |
| lool | didrocks: he said my fix was ok short-term, but that he wanted to put in a tweak I think | 14:41 |
| lool | didrocks: see #ubuntu-touch for the exact wording | 14:41 |
| didrocks | lool: ok, I think you'll have soon more infos from what I read | 14:43 |
| didrocks | just ensure we have the minimal/quite change | 14:43 |
| didrocks | don't want that we spend time to test 100 fixes | 14:43 |
| lool | exactly | 14:45 |
| lool | also the diff should be minimal to review | 14:45 |
| didrocks | right | 14:46 |
| sergiusens | lool, didrocks are the image builds stopped untile T? | 14:46 |
| === alan_g is now known as alan_g|lunch | ||
| sergiusens | until | 14:46 |
| === alan_g|lunch is now known as alan_g|tea | ||
| kalikiana | psivaa: any progress yet on the unlocking? | 14:46 |
| ogra_ | sergiusens, there will be a fes saucy rebuilds with whatever desktop SRUs happened | 14:47 |
| ogra_ | sergiusens, to test the stable upgrade mechanism | 14:47 |
| didrocks | sergiusens: so, we build image from saucy-updates (but not containing touch fix, it's only to test the infro) | 14:47 |
| ogra_ | sergiusens, our focus is fully on T for everyone though | 14:47 |
| didrocks | sergiusens: but yeah, image builds with next things for us will start only with T | 14:47 |
| psivaa | kalikiana: not yet | 14:47 |
| didrocks | Monday/Tuesday | 14:47 |
| didrocks | we hpoe : | 14:47 |
| didrocks | we hope :) | 14:47 |
| ogra_ | sergiusens, and image build are tecnically stopped since two months ... (automatic ones) ... we only build by hand | 14:48 |
| sergiusens | ogra_, didrocks well I was more into using the idle time into seeing if I could get app ap tests improved, and those aren't tied to any letter | 14:48 |
| lool | sergiusens: well | 14:48 |
| lool | sergiusens: you can cheat | 14:48 |
| kalikiana | psivaa: okay, just checking. the bug was set to "released" for some reason but there's no mr or comment | 14:48 |
| lool | sergiusens: you can upload some apps to appstore | 14:48 |
| didrocks | sergiusens: that would be excellent! :) | 14:48 |
| sergiusens | lool, click already cheats :-) | 14:48 |
| lool | right | 14:48 |
| psivaa | fginther: would you be able to take up this https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-sdk-team/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/ci-test/+merge/190906 | 14:48 |
| lool | so in reality, only the archive thing is stopped for some days | 14:48 |
| ogra_ | sergiusens, sounds fine ... | 14:48 |
| lool | but clicks keep moving on! | 14:48 |
| lool | how awesome/crazy is this?! | 14:48 |
| sergiusens | lool, also wanted to mention that we have to be extra careful with our SDK now | 14:49 |
| didrocks | yeah, but clicks will be the same packages in T | 14:49 |
| fginther | psivaa, yes | 14:49 |
| didrocks | there is no sery :) | 14:49 |
| psivaa | fginther: thanks v much | 14:49 |
| didrocks | sergiusens: don't tell me. backward compatibility forever now ;) | 14:49 |
| psivaa | kalikiana: sorry i was not very explicit when talking to fginther about that | 14:49 |
| sergiusens | didrocks, well that's the whole idea of the framework in click | 14:49 |
| sergiusens | :-) | 14:49 |
| sergiusens | didrocks, no deps, so there; base image has to be solid :-) | 14:50 |
| fginther | kalikiana, I'll catch up shortly, in a meeting at the moment | 14:50 |
| kalikiana | cool, thanks | 14:50 |
| didrocks | sergiusens: yeah ;) | 14:50 |
| === alan_g|tea is now known as alan_g | ||
| lool | sergiusens: very rigt | 14:58 |
| lool | sergiusens: we should invest in some tests to make sure we dont drop / break ABI/APIs | 14:58 |
| lool | sergiusens: It would be great if we could scan the appstore for this BTW | 14:58 |
| t1mp | I have a question about automatic merging of approved MRs | 15:01 |
| t1mp | this MR just got merged - https://code.launchpad.net/~fboucault/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/tabs_chevron_asset_update/+merge/190639 | 15:01 |
| t1mp | that's no problem - the MR is good - but I never saw a CI test report where all tests are passed. Just recently a jenkins Approved, without test report | 15:01 |
| t1mp | can someone explain me what's happening? are MRs being approved for merging manually? | 15:02 |
| rsalveti | didrocks: ogra_: lool: can we put the official release notes under https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Touch/ReleaseNotes ? | 15:04 |
| didrocks | rsalveti: if you want to copy/paste some part, please do. I think we should revisit the whole "known issues"? | 15:06 |
| rsalveti | didrocks: yup | 15:07 |
| didrocks | (like, we can remove power consumption/timezone) | 15:07 |
| didrocks | networking needs updating | 15:08 |
| didrocks | as well as telephony | 15:08 |
| rsalveti | yeah, needs to be updated completely | 15:09 |
| rsalveti | didrocks: where is the official release notes? I don't know if we moved stuff away from the gdoc document | 15:10 |
| didrocks | rsalveti: oh sure, one sec | 15:10 |
| didrocks | rsalveti: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SaucySalamander/ReleaseNotes#Ubuntu_for_phones | 15:10 |
| rsalveti | thanks | 15:10 |
| didrocks | yw ;) thank you! | 15:11 |
| lool | didrocks, rsalveti: Thanks for sorting it out, was in a HO | 15:42 |
| * lool moves into watching the news etc. | 15:43 | |
| === jfunk is now known as jfunk-afk | ||
| doanac | plars: was wondering - how much longer should we continue to run touch_ro testing? | 15:57 |
| doanac | ie - should we remove touch_ro and make touch_mir just be called "touch" | 15:58 |
| doanac | asac, ev ^^^ | 15:58 |
| plars | doanac: probably a wider discussion | 15:58 |
| doanac | yeah. probably mailing list is better. | 15:59 |
| ev | do the Mir guys see value on having that comparison continue? | 15:59 |
| plars | doanac: I'd like to learn from our renames and understand if there are more image variations coming like the flipped, system-image, mir, etc that would cause us to run more parallel types so that we can name things sensibly | 15:59 |
| plars | doanac: want to go ahead and land your touch branch changes? :) | 16:02 |
| doanac | plars: sure. you ready for it? | 16:03 |
| plars | doanac: well, the release is done, so nothing that should hold us back now | 16:03 |
| doanac | k. i'll do it now | 16:03 |
| plars | doanac: I know you already have a lot of the next pieces worked up, but if there's something you want me to take a look at, let me know | 16:04 |
| plars | doanac: now that I'm out from under the release testing, I have some cycles freed up | 16:04 |
| doanac | plars: i'll be sending out some doc/examples later today. feedback on those will be great | 16:04 |
| plars | doanac: cool | 16:05 |
| doanac | plars: or better yet - just relax the rest of the day. you've earned it! | 16:05 |
| plars | doanac: nah, the day is still young :) | 16:07 |
| doanac | plars: our first "saucy" bug: http://paste.ubuntu.com/6251765/ :) | 16:10 |
| lool | ev: it was for mir switch and for landing team; I dont think we need these, but perhaps asac can confirm | 16:10 |
| lool | asac: Ok to kill touch_ro runs? | 16:10 |
| plars | doanac: hah | 16:10 |
| plars | doanac: just need to update the package | 16:10 |
| doanac | wow setup_jenkins.py is much slower than normal | 16:14 |
| doanac | plars: I think I'll tag revno 68 as "13.10" so we have a historical checkpoint | 16:16 |
| doanac | of lp:ubunut-test-cases/touch | 16:16 |
| plars | doanac: good idea | 16:16 |
| doanac | plars: branch merged and jobs re-configured | 16:16 |
| === dpm is now known as dpm-afk | ||
| lool | didrocks: BTW I've retested the unity-mir thing, and it's indeed fast | 16:39 |
| lool | didrocks: I think I hadn't restarted my unity8 when I just upgraded the .deb (my bad) | 16:39 |
| didrocks | lool: excellent news :) | 16:45 |
| === alan_g is now known as alan_g|EOD | ||
| fginther | t1mp, sorry, just saw your message. https://code.launchpad.net/~fboucault/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/tabs_chevron_asset_update/+merge/190639 did pass CI, there is an approved message as the last comment from ps-jenkins | 17:14 |
| robru | didrocks, anything you want me to do today? | 17:24 |
| didrocks | robru: so no landing apart from SRU | 17:25 |
| robru | didrocks, what SRU? | 17:25 |
| didrocks | robru: can you look at things like desktopish? | 17:25 |
| didrocks | like compiz/nux/unity/indicators/hud | 17:25 |
| didrocks | you need to check that all bugs follow the SRU process | 17:25 |
| didrocks | or comply them to the SRU process if not ready | 17:25 |
| robru | didrocks, I don't know what you mean. what bugs? like you want me to check for recent trunk commits and then file SRUs for them? | 17:25 |
| didrocks | and test the proposed packages of course :) | 17:25 |
| didrocks | robru: you've never done a SRU? | 17:26 |
| robru | didrocks, yes I've done many SRUs. i just don't understand what SRUs there could possibly be on the day of release | 17:26 |
| didrocks | robru: look at http://people.canonical.com/~platform/cu2d/results | 17:26 |
| robru | didrocks, ok, otp brb | 17:26 |
| didrocks | you can see we have proposed unity and nux for instance | 17:26 |
| didrocks | (so upstream already have some nice fixes in trunk) | 17:27 |
| didrocks | you need to assess if they are good for SRUing in saucy | 17:27 |
| didrocks | and if so, the bugs needs to follow the SRU process | 17:27 |
| didrocks | robru: again, we are looking at desktop-only fixes | 17:27 |
| didrocks | we don't release anything (for now) for touch | 17:27 |
| didrocks | robru: oh, as well, I see that libfriends rebuilt with no change | 17:28 |
| didrocks | will be a good exercise and interesting to know why (it means there is a diff between trunk and if you build the source package from it) | 17:28 |
| fginther | asac, I would like to re-enable automerger for all projects. The only remaining disabled projects are unity8 and ubuntu-filemanager-app both of which have the same test failures for mir and ro with image 100 | 17:28 |
| didrocks | robru: sent me an email for any question, dinner time here, see you tomorrow! :) | 17:29 |
| * didrocks waves good evening! enjoy the release everyone :) | 17:29 | |
| cyphermox | fginther: hey | 20:10 |
| fginther | cyphermox, hi | 20:10 |
| cyphermox | fginther: delay that, I'm wondering if the issue I'm having isn't just slow things | 20:11 |
| cyphermox | alesage: hey | 20:35 |
| cyphermox | alesage: would you be able to check why https://code.launchpad.net/~larsu/libindicator/always-create-widgets/+merge/191701 doesn't seem to have been picked up by jenkins yet? | 20:35 |
| alesage | cyphermox, let's refer it to the CI team? | 21:06 |
| cyphermox | alesage_: yeah | 21:21 |
| alesage_ | cyphermox, I don't want to name names :) | 21:21 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!
