caribou | Morning | 07:39 |
---|---|---|
smb | Morning | 07:40 |
erle- | jsalisbury, now 3.11.5 failed one wake up | 08:00 |
erle- | but it may have been another bug | 08:00 |
=== shadeslayer_ is now known as shadeslayer | ||
erle- | jsalisbury, now it failed twice in a row | 10:54 |
erle- | i will install 3.12 again | 10:54 |
ppisati | debian/rules.d/0-common-vars.mk: | 11:05 |
ppisati | sharedconfdir := $(CURDIR)/debian.master/config | 11:05 |
ppisati | debian/scripts/config-check: | 11:05 |
ppisati | my $checks = "$commonconfig/enforce"; | 11:05 |
apw | ppisati, yes | 11:05 |
ppisati | so, even a topic branch is tied to the enforce in debian.master | 11:05 |
ppisati | just noticed it | 11:06 |
apw | ppisati, yes deliberatly so | 11:06 |
ppisati | ah k | 11:06 |
apw | it may be a fool idea, but the idea behind that is we collect the knowledge of the critical components for ubuntu in one place | 11:06 |
apw | of course that does fall appart when your topic branches are based of some old shit version | 11:07 |
ppisati | ok, so it's by design, i see | 11:07 |
apw | yeah i think the jury is still out on whether it was a good idea or not, but it is deliberate | 11:07 |
ppisati | no prob, i just stumbled on it and i wondered why it was so | 11:08 |
cking | brendand, I've updated the bug report for the fwts suspend/resume duration logging, if you can give it a quick test that would be useful :-) | 11:57 |
=== psivaa is now known as psivaa-lunch | ||
brendand | cking, superb - i'll test them asap | 12:08 |
=== psivaa-lunch is now known as psivaa | ||
ppisati | brb | 14:30 |
rtg | has anyone done a 13.04->13.10 upgrade recently ? re: bug #1242210 | 15:19 |
ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1242210 in linux (Ubuntu) "Failed to install linux kernel" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1242210 | 15:19 |
apw | hmmm, i would be supprised if that was a common issue as that is one of the standard tests isn't it? one which had a tick next to it on the iso tracker | 15:20 |
rtg | apw, yeah, but I've not done it personally so was just making sure. | 15:21 |
smb | Could it bee another full /boot | 15:21 |
* apw probabaaly has a raring VM lying about i could clone and try it i guess | 15:21 | |
smb | It seemed in the past those error happened always after release for such reasons... | 15:21 |
rtg | just out of sheer paranoia... | 15:22 |
apw | smb, worth asking in the bug i recon | 15:22 |
smb | apw, Oh, hm in the report there is at least an error related to the nvidia binary drivers I guess | 15:26 |
smb | run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/update-nvidia exited with return code 1 | 15:27 |
rtg | smb, I don't think taht would cause his dependency problems though | 15:27 |
smb | linux-image-generic depends on linux-image-extra-3.11.0-12-generic; however: | 15:28 |
smb | Package linux-image-extra-3.11.0-12-generic is not configured yet. | 15:28 |
smb | So extra fails and thus the image fails on dependencies | 15:28 |
smb | ah no not extra but linux-image, and the rest of dependency issues caused by that | 15:34 |
rtg | has anyone had 'top' segfault with a 3.11 kernel ? | 15:41 |
apw | rtg, not seen that here ever that i reall | 15:42 |
apw | recall | 15:42 |
rtg | hmm | 15:42 |
* smb has not either | 15:42 | |
rtg | I've noticed it on my local server as well as tangerine. | 15:43 |
smb | Does it stay persistent after observing it or is the next incantation working? | 15:44 |
rtg | smb, it restarts just fine | 15:44 |
rtg | it sometimes takes awhile | 15:44 |
rtg | to crash I mean | 15:44 |
smb | Sounds like a real pain to figure out | 15:45 |
rtg | in other words, sucks to be me ? | 15:45 |
smb | nah, more like some silent corruption which is hard to figure out | 15:46 |
rtg | its 12.04 user space with an LTS kernel | 15:46 |
smb | At least it is multiple servers which should rule out hw failure | 15:47 |
=== chuck_ is now known as zul_ | ||
=== mdeslaur is now known as chuck_ | ||
=== chuck_ is now known as mdeslaur | ||
apw | rtg, we seem to be missing the repo mirrors for trusty on gomeisa et al, i think you own that replication job ? | 17:14 |
rtg | apw, ack | 17:17 |
hallyn | rtg: to get CONFIG_USER_NS enabled in trusty, do i need to send a patch to ubuntu-kernel@? Or is it better to bribe you on thursday? | 17:17 |
rtg | hallyn, I prefer bribes :) | 17:18 |
rtg | hallyn, but send a patch anyways so I remember to do it | 17:18 |
hallyn | rtg: thanks, will do | 17:19 |
rtg | hallyn, debian.master/config/config.common.ubuntu:CONFIG_USER_NS=y ? | 17:23 |
hallyn | right | 17:24 |
rtg | hallyn, its already enabled then. it'll be in the first kernel I upload (hopefully today) | 17:24 |
hallyn | woohoo! | 17:24 |
hallyn | rtg: thx. will do some testing once i see it built | 17:25 |
=== psivaa is now known as psivaa-afk | ||
=== chuck_ is now known as zul | ||
infinity | Are you sure you can't fire sconklin? | 19:27 |
infinity | *cough* | 19:29 |
infinity | sconklin: (Forgive my grumpy sense of humour today, I'm meant to be having a day off) | 19:30 |
=== ara is now known as Guest23418 | ||
* rtg -> EOD | 20:52 | |
coredump | So, I checked out the repo for saucy but I can't find a tag for 3.10.17, is the naming different or something? | 21:04 |
bjf | coredump, are you looking for an upstream stable version? we don't have those tags in our repos. | 21:08 |
coredump | I am trying to get/compile the most recent 3.10 ubuntu patched kernel available. | 21:09 |
coredump | kernel.ubuntu.com has a 3.10.17-saucy package | 21:10 |
coredump | http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v3.10.17-saucy/ | 21:10 |
bjf | coredump, why 3.10 and not 3.11 which is what saucy was released with? | 21:10 |
coredump | If I tell you, you will probably laugh at me :) | 21:11 |
coredump | I still wary of odd numbered kernels. | 21:11 |
coredump | also, 3.10 is deemed 'longterm' | 21:12 |
bjf | coredump, ok, but saucy is 3.11 and that's getting the stable updates. not 3.10 | 21:12 |
bjf | coredump, and upstream makes no distinction between even and odd numbered releases | 21:13 |
coredump | yeah, I know | 21:13 |
coredump | anyway, I don't see that on the git tags either (3.11) | 21:13 |
bjf | coredump, you need to look at Ubuntu-3.11.0-x.y tags | 21:14 |
coredump | so 0-12.18 is the latest package | 21:20 |
coredump | nice. | 21:20 |
coredump | thanks | 21:20 |
bjf | coredump, yes, np | 21:20 |
coredump | any difference using ubuntu-saucy{-signed}? | 21:21 |
bjf | coredump, -signed is for secure boot | 21:23 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!