=== psivaa-afk is now known as psivaa [08:21] hi i have used kernel-3.10,and enabled framebuffer but when i try to run a sample qt application in at91sam9x5ek board using same kernel that says http://pastebin.com/YZxgptL4 can you tell mw what is that issues [10:00] Hello all... i understand i am asking a repeated question... but i am looking out for a easier solution. i followed https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Nexus7/Installation to get my nexus running with ubuntu. The ubuntu installer looks for a different URL to download packages [10:01] and manual steps are going for a hang... nothing is getting copied... is there a way to get ubuntu nexus installer installing from a local bootimg and .img files? [10:19] infinity: (or anyone): I made an image from the saucy arm64 tarball at http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-core/releases/13.10/release/ubuntu-core-13.10-core-arm64.tar.gz and booted it with my existing-working kernels. It does a load of upstart stuff and hangs at: [10:19] [ 14.415224] init: startpar-bridge (procps-virtual-filesystems-started) goal changed from stop to start [10:19] anyone got any idea what that might mean? [10:29] nope [10:36] hi i have used kernel-3.10,and enabled framebuffer but when i try to run a sample qt application in at91sam9x5ek board using same kernel that says http://pastebin.com/YZxgptL4 can you tell mw what is that issues [10:46] hrw: do you have the magic runes you made that linux-boot .axf from? [10:46] I only ever used yours so have no idea how to maker a new one [10:47] hi any idea about my issues [10:47] I just tried booting with img-foundation from http://releases.linaro.org/13.09/openembedded/aarch64/ and that doesn;t get far at all and backtraces [10:47] wookey: you mean Image -> axf ones? [10:47] yes [10:48] moment [10:48] I have a checkout of boot-wrapper-aarch64 which may be important [10:50] wookey: http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=openembedded/meta-linaro.git;a=blob;f=meta-linaro/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-linaro-fastmodel.inc;h=284f912ca5d5a9b29345eb6786fadfca837438b6;hb=HEAD [10:50] wookey: check do_compile_append() [10:50] I want aarch64 hardware... [10:50] cheers. [10:51] yes. me too. some lucky people have some now... [10:51] this is how youi know if you are important or not :-) [10:55] if you say so ;D [10:55] wookey: check demo tuesday at linaro connect [10:59] * XorA has not aarch64 goodness :-( [10:59] the schedule has teu afternoon mostly empty [10:59] tue === doko_ is now known as doko [14:30] doko: riku: OK. I can boot the image if I don't run upstart [14:32] wookey: perhaps some kernel option that is needed by upstart is not enabled in linaro kernel? [14:32] maybe, except that it worked fine with raring image [14:32] so what's changed? I guess the default kernel has, so maybe some assumptions [14:33] this one is 3.8.0 [14:33] using the current linaro OE release img.axf barfs quickly with a backtrace [14:34] I should probably try latest model too [14:35] wookey: note that img.axf is for fast model while img-foundation.axf is for foundation model [14:39] OK. I wondered what the diff was [14:39] I think I tried the latter - lets check [14:41] OK. prom,iosing - that just wants: Please append a correct "root=" boot option [14:41] how do I edit the command line in a .axf? [14:41] you don't [14:41] you rebuild your axf [14:42] OK. that's what I feared [14:42] incidentally, different command line is the only difference between those to axf files [14:42] right. I had a selection like that in feb for 'boot to init.sh', 'run upstart with debug' etc [14:43] I have 'kcmt' kernel command line modification tool' here, which maybe helpful [14:44] I assume we are using a dtb in the above .axf files? [14:45] oops right, the dtb file inside the axf is different too [14:46] OK. I'll have a poke abut with this - looks like it should be kickable [15:14] wookey: That sounds less like it's hung and more like you don't have a getty on your serial console. [15:14] wookey: Though, that last message from init is a bit odd-sounding, I suppose. [15:19] Ah OK, that's possible [15:21] I guess that's /etc/init/console.conf in upstart-world. which just runs exec /sbin/getty -8 38400 console [15:23] which is just the same as my raring img [15:33] wookey: If this is on a machine/vm with an actual serial console, you'll want an /etc/init/ttyAMA0.conf or ttyS0.conf or whatever. [15:34] OK. there isn;t one in the working image [15:34] wookey: Like http://paste.ubuntu.com/6283597/ for instance. [15:34] Though, if /dev/console is actually the right thing, then nevermind. [15:34] Is this for a Foundation Model? [15:37] yes [15:37] I'm trying to fish the options out of the working axf - thenI might have some idea what's what [15:44] I believe apw got ubuntu-core booting on a Foundation Model the other day in a fit of experimentation and boredom. Not sure if he had to do anything fancy to get there. [15:44] apw: Or am I on crack? [15:48] infinity, indeed, i'm doccing it at the moment [18:15] OK. I've grokked how to get kernel command lines in and out of .axfs [18:16] and Iwas just about to complain that it still hansg with upstart, but after impressive wait I have a prompt :-) [18:17] I appear to be in business [18:17] OK. so I guess the conclusion is that saucy doesn;t boot with 3.8.0 on vexpress, but does with 3.11 [18:18] The secret arm internal tool modify_commandline.sh ( load of objdump and dtc runes) ought to get a wider airing - it's exceedingly handy for this sort of thing [21:17] Any Tegra 2 guys here right now? [21:55] infinity, doko: so I booted http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-core/releases/13.10/release/ubuntu-core-13.10-core-arm64.tar.gz but any attempt to use apt just complains that libstcd++ is not present. Is that expected? [21:56] it does seem not to be present [21:57] presenably if I jam http://ports.ubuntu.com/pool/main/g/gcc-4.8/libstdc++6_4.8.2-1ubuntu2_arm64.deb in things should work better [22:03] Is there a porting guide to get Ubuntu onto Android tablets natively? (deep wishing.... haha....) [22:04] I've tried following several Tegra 2 guides, but never had luck booting my tablet into Ubuntu. [22:05] wookey, I never did see that [22:07] I'll copy the tarball and image which I am using, but it will take until tomorrow [22:08] OK. cheers. [22:09] hmm in fact dpkg says libstdc++6:arm64 is installed. [22:10] but apt-get update says: pt-get: error while loading shared libraries: libstdc++.so.6: cannot open shared object file [22:11] aha /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libstc++.so.6 is a link to /usr/aarch64-linux-gnu/lib/libstdc++.so.6 which is missing [22:13] looks like toolchain build issue [22:15] not here [22:18] wookey: I tested it and didn't have that issue. Did you do something curious to it? [22:21] nope, just unpacked [22:22] what version of libstdc++6 have you got? [22:23] 4.7.3-1ubuntu1 here. The 4.7.3-1ubuntu2 on ports seems to have a real /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.18 in it [22:23] (base)adconrad@cthulhu:~/core$ ls usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6* -l [22:23] lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 Oct 11 20:16 usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6 -> libstdc++.so.6.0.18 [22:23] -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 975016 Oct 11 20:27 usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.18 [22:23] wookey: ^-- I see nothing wrong with the above, so I'm questioning how you unpacked it. [22:24] (That was a fresh unpack of a wget of the above URL you gave) [22:24] hmm. I have got those files [22:25] Your symlink sounds suspiciously like it would have come from a cross toolchain. Which is impossible in the core tarball itself. [22:25] err, 4.7.3 ??? [22:25] wookey: http://paste.ubuntu.com/6285690/ [22:26] wookey: Whatever you've done, it didn't come from my tarball. :P [22:27] I really did just do: tar -C $MOUNT -xzf $TARBALL [22:27] (inside losetup mount to make a .img disk image) [22:28] And there was nothing previously existing in said directory? [22:31] it gets formatted then mounted - looks farily robust. I'll poke about a bit and see what's what [22:33] wookey, see http://people.canonical.com/~doko/tmp/arm64/ this one has a saucy host, and a trusty chroot, my sync will need about on hour [22:33] wookey: And so you don't think I'm crazy, on real hardware: [22:33] http://paste.ubuntu.com/6285718/ [22:34] what do you get for dpkg -l | grep libstdc ? [22:34] wookey: That's at the end of that paste. [22:35] right. OK. I'm clearly not running what I think I'm running. [22:36] thanks for the reality check [22:36] wookey: Well, I'd have noticed if this was broken, given that "chroot in and run apt-get a bit" is basically *the* test case for ubuntu-core validation. :) [22:37] indeed. no apt is serious [22:49] OK. obvious and embarassing s/raring/saucy/ error spotted. trying again... [23:25] wookey, sync finished, http://people.canonical.com/~doko/tmp/arm64/