[14:55] mhall119: ping [15:01] jose: pong [15:01] mhall119: hey, wanted to know what would it take to translate community.ubuntu.com (apart from translators) [15:01] ugh, it's Wordpress, so "a lot" is the best answer I can give [15:03] also, I don't know if you have a while now - I'd like to talk some things with you as part of the Canonical Community Team, from the LoCo Council side [15:15] mhall119: ^ [15:20] jose: sure, on IRC or Hangout? [15:20] jose: I'm in calls for the next hour, but free after tha [15:21] IRC should be it [15:21] I'm here for another 40mins, then school calls [15:21] jose: PM or #ubuntu-loco-teams? [15:22] mhall119: I'm inviting you to #ubuntu-lococouncil :) [17:38] jose, unfortunately I need to cancel the Q&A [17:38] sorry [17:38] I am going to move it to another slot, I keep getting conflicts [21:59] mhall119: would http://developer.ubuntu.com/api/devel/ubuntu-13.10/c/Unity-7.0.html throwing an internal service error be something you would be involved in? [22:06] jono: sure, let me know what you figure out to be the best time [22:29] thanks jose [22:50] I'm wondering about something. If someone starts a group on Facebook that is obviously directed at the Ubuntu operating system and community, then it is still protected by Canonical? [22:52] In this particular case, the group was given the name Ubuntu Norge, which is the name of our loco. It's working out just fine, but I would like to know what the legal situation is in those cases.