=== liam_ is now known as Guest35623 | ||
slangasek | doko_: I'll go ahead and upload it | 00:26 |
---|---|---|
geofft | Hi folks. Almost any use of LD_AUDIT on amd64 on Precise/Quantal causes a segfault due to a bug in libc6 that's been fixed upstream | 00:28 |
geofft | The patch is fairly tiny (it just checks for null, mostly). Is it reasonable to expect an SRU for this? | 00:28 |
geofft | This bug makes latrace, for instance, completely useless | 00:28 |
infinity | geofft: Is there a bug filed? With a pointer to the upstream fix? | 00:28 |
infinity | geofft: Expecting an SRU for something I haven't heard of until today is probably wishful thinking. But I can certainly include it in my next SRU round if I know about it. | 00:29 |
geofft | Not yet. Just wanted to check it was worth doing so, or whether libc6 is too scary to be worth doing non-security SRUs for | 00:29 |
geofft | inifinity: Yeah, I'm totally happy to file a bug then describing it. Thanks! | 00:29 |
sarnold | hey geofft :) | 00:29 |
geofft | Oh, bad phrasing on my part, "expect" = "expect that a bug will be useful", not "expect it'll automatically get fixed" | 00:30 |
geofft | hi sarnold! | 00:30 |
infinity | geofft: File a bug and point me to it. I do SRU glibc occasionally, as you can spot from the changelog. | 00:30 |
infinity | geofft: I won't SRU *just* for minor bugs like that, but if there are some easy cherrypicks I can do to make pepole happy at the same time as fixing more serious bugs, I'll do it. | 00:31 |
geofft | Do you want the standard SRU format [Impact] etc.? | 00:31 |
slangasek | yes :) | 00:31 |
infinity | geofft: If you're willing to do the full SRU template, go nuts. Saves me the effort. | 00:31 |
=== freeflying_away is now known as freeflying | ||
slangasek | doko_: well, or I would upload it, except it doesn't pass its test suite | 00:41 |
slangasek | which is puzzling, because the error is obvious, the test is looking for a file in the build dir that it needs to look for in the source dir | 00:41 |
slangasek | doko_: the tests are broken with glib2.0 (>= 2.37.2), there's some goofy g_test_get_filename() function here that doesn't work. | 00:48 |
slangasek | which relies on setting G_TEST_SRCDIR, which nothing does. | 00:50 |
=== freeflying is now known as freeflying_away | ||
geofft | infinity: Filed LP #1243473. Let me know if you need more detail. | 01:01 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 1243473 in eglibc (Ubuntu) "LD_AUDIT is broken on amd64" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1243473 | 01:01 |
geofft | Relatedly, LD_AUDIT is the awesomest thing ever, and latrace is like ltrace that actually works. (Well, modulo that bug.) | 01:01 |
em | what kernel is the latest ubuntu using? | 01:03 |
sarnold | em: saucy's kernel version in the package name is 3.11.0-12.19 | 01:07 |
sarnold | em: "Ubuntu 13.10 includes the 3.11.0-12.19 Ubuntu Linux kernel which was based on the v3.11.3 upstream Linux kernel. " https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SaucySalamander/ReleaseNotes | 01:09 |
infinity | geofft: That should be enough, thanks. | 01:10 |
sarnold | geofft: cool, thanks for the fun new tool recommendation :) | 01:11 |
slangasek | doko_: ok, pango1.0 uploaded finally | 01:14 |
=== _salem is now known as salem_ | ||
=== salem_ is now known as _salem | ||
Logan_ | doko_: Are you around? | 01:49 |
Logan_ | Or cjwatson? | 01:50 |
infinity | Logan_: Just ask your question... | 01:50 |
Logan_ | Bleh, okay. Thought it merited their specific attention for specific reasons. :P Is 14.04 deriving from unstable or testing? Because doko_'s email says that syncs are running from unstable. | 01:51 |
Logan_ | But I thought LTS releases derive from testing. | 01:51 |
infinity | It's from unstable. Now that we have proposed-migration, syncing from testing doesn't buy us much, and tends to just slow us down. | 01:52 |
Logan_ | Alright, cool. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LTS should be updated, then. | 01:52 |
Logan_ | Why is ubuntu-dev-tools's syncpackage script defaulting to syncing from testing, then? | 01:52 |
infinity | Because someone didn't get the memo, I suspect. | 01:53 |
infinity | I'll fix that. | 01:53 |
Logan_ | It doesn't seem that it was specifically set to that for trusty. I wonder if there's a config in there for every x releases deriving from testing. | 01:55 |
infinity | if ubu_info.is_lts(ubu_info.devel()): | 01:55 |
infinity | dist = 'testing' | 01:55 |
infinity | That bit just needs to go away. | 01:55 |
Logan_ | Oh, yup. | 01:55 |
Logan_ | Want me to file a bug, or are you going to handle it? | 01:56 |
infinity | I'll fix it right now. But for now, you can just use '-d unstable' | 01:57 |
infinity | Oh, xnox already fixed it. Which is why I can't find the bits in bzr. :P | 02:01 |
infinity | Logan_: It's correct in bzr, it's just not been uploaded yet. I assume bdrung will get around to pushing it to Debian and syncing soon. | 02:02 |
Logan_ | Okay, awesome. Thanks for your help, Adam! | 02:03 |
infinity | Or maybe I'll upload it to Debian now, so more people don't end up confused. | 02:03 |
infinity | bdrung: Were you planning an ubuntu-dev-tools upload to sid? Mind if I do one? | 02:03 |
Logan_ | You might cause a conflict! :P | 02:04 |
=== freeflying_away is now known as freeflying | ||
=== ION is now known as ion | ||
=== freeflying is now known as freeflying_away | ||
Noskcaj | Is it ok to merge stuff from unstable now, due to proposed-migration? | 05:18 |
=== freeflying_away is now known as freeflying | ||
sarnold | Noskcaj: yes, that was discussed a few hours ago, and syncing from unstable is now the new desired state | 05:41 |
Noskcaj | sarnold: ok, thanks for the info. | 05:41 |
sarnold | Noskcaj: ubuntu-dev-tools's syncpackage script has apparently been fixed in bzr already, just not re-packaged yet | 05:41 |
pitti | Good morning | 05:42 |
sarnold | morning pitti :) | 05:43 |
ScottK | Noskcaj: Unless someone is known to be inactive, up until DIF you should check with the last person to touch a merge before doing it. | 05:43 |
ScottK | pitti: Your upower patch worked great. I look forward to testing the SRU when it's ready. | 05:43 |
ScottK | Thanks. | 05:43 |
pitti | ScottK: nice; I'll prepare one today then | 05:43 |
sarnold | ScottK: DIF? | 05:43 |
ScottK | Debian Import Freeze. | 05:43 |
sarnold | thanks :) | 05:44 |
pitti | doko_: there's also a bug for it, debian bug 724842 | 05:46 |
ubottu | Debian bug 724842 in src:cracklib2 "cracklib2: FTBFS: error connecting to "www.oasis-open.org" (Connection timed out)" [Serious,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/724842 | 05:46 |
Noskcaj | ScottK: don't worry, i have asked myself ;) | 05:46 |
Noskcaj | smb: Do you plan to upload a newer dahdi-linux any time soon? | 06:15 |
Noskcaj | pitti: bug 1079605 | 06:16 |
ubottu | bug 1079605 in initramfs-tools (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Please sync with the latest 0.113 from Debian testing" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1079605 | 06:16 |
pitti | doko_: fixed cracklib uploaded to Debian, will autosync | 06:16 |
pitti | Noskcaj: yeah, infinity wanted to have a look at some point, but I guess he was busy | 06:16 |
Noskcaj | ok, thanks for the info | 06:18 |
pitti | Noskcaj: we have a quite a large delta, and some of it is hopefully not required any more, etc. | 06:18 |
pitti | Noskcaj: so if you feel like looking into it and making a first assessment of our delta, please feel free :) | 06:18 |
Noskcaj | pitti: I would have no idea where to start | 06:19 |
pitti | Noskcaj: ah, that's fine; I thought you asked because you considered doing the merge | 06:19 |
Noskcaj | Not for something that big, i was just checking that it hadn't been forgotten | 06:20 |
Noskcaj | That said, if anyone has merges for me to do, i've finished with all the packages that are in my name | 06:22 |
pitti | Noskcaj: if you want to steal some of mine, I'd be in your debt :) (but perhaps avoid aptdaemon) | 06:25 |
=== iahmad_ is now known as iahmad | ||
=== jamesh__ is now known as jamesh | ||
pitti | ScottK: upower SRU uploaded and bug updated for SRU, FYI | 06:49 |
geofft | Agh, I'm confused about multiarch. Why do libc6-i386 and libc6:i386 both exist? | 06:52 |
slangasek | geofft: libc6:i386 is just the native build of libc6 for i386. libc6-i386 is a "biarch" (or "multilib") build of libc6, packaged for amd64, because some things aren't yet solved using multiarch | 06:53 |
slangasek | like, the compiler itself | 06:53 |
geofft | So I legitimately need both? OK | 06:55 |
slangasek | you legitimately need both if you have packages installed that depend on each :) | 06:56 |
Noskcaj | My requestsync keeps breaking, so would someone mind syncing visp and osgearth? | 07:05 |
bkerensa | software-properties-gtk seems to be epic broken in trusty | 07:10 |
bkerensa | its crashing pretty rapidly | 07:10 |
Noskcaj | bkerensa: It didn't open for me last time i tried | 07:11 |
bkerensa | Noskcaj: exactly it didnt open and whoopsie dialog popped up | 07:11 |
bkerensa | a quick look in syslog now shows a line a second of software-properties-gtk crashing and whoopsie sporadically trying to report it | 07:12 |
bkerensa | looks like there is not software-properties-gtk candidate for trusty either | 07:12 |
bkerensa | aptsources.distro.NoDistroTemplateException: Error: could not find a distribution template for Ubuntu/trusty | 07:12 |
bkerensa | thats the issue | 07:12 |
Noskcaj | pitti: I've merged gpgme1.0 for you, have you got time to review the branch? | 07:14 |
pitti | Noskcaj: sure | 07:14 |
Noskcaj | plus you should be safe to sync visp | 07:15 |
Noskcaj | https://code.launchpad.net/~noskcaj/ubuntu/trusty/gpgme1.0/1.4.3/+merge/192293 | 07:15 |
Noskcaj | I'll try and work on psqlodbc now | 07:15 |
pitti | Noskcaj: oh, did the DD take the autopkgtest fix? | 07:18 |
pitti | Noskcaj: ah no, visp needs a merge | 07:19 |
Noskcaj | pitti: Looks like it from the changelog | 07:19 |
pitti | Noskcaj: plus, it never built on i386 for us due to a test failure | 07:19 |
cjwatson | what entry in the Debian visp changelog suggests that they took our change? | 07:20 |
pitti | Noskcaj: nope, I filed debian bug 726983 much later | 07:20 |
ubottu | Debian bug 726983 in visp "visp: autopkgtest failure due to stderr output from test program" [Normal,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/726983 | 07:20 |
cjwatson | even a cursory debdiff makes it clear they didn't. Please put more effort into verification or else don't request syncs | 07:21 |
cjwatson | otherwise you're throwing away other developers' work | 07:21 |
Noskcaj | crap, i was looking at a different package as well, i am sorry for wasting yourtime | 07:21 |
pitti | Noskcaj: gpgme uploaded, thanks | 07:25 |
bkerensa | Noskcaj: I found the problem its python-apt well slangasek found it :) but I am going to fix it | 07:26 |
Noskcaj | thanks bkerensa | 07:26 |
Noskcaj | pitti: no problem, i shouldn't have copy/pasted the chagelog though | 07:26 |
pitti | Noskcaj: oh, copy&pasting them is fine in general (everyone does that anyway), it just sometimes needs some trimming for the slightly different context | 07:27 |
Noskcaj | pitti: gpgme is FTNFSing, give me a minute to disable the bad (gnupg2) test | 07:31 |
Noskcaj | *FTBFS | 07:31 |
pitti | Laney: can you please add an autopkgtest override for bzr-builddeb? This has never worked, and is now blocking python-apt from propagating (new version fixes a lot of things due to the added trusty template) | 07:48 |
pitti | bkerensa: ^ FYI | 07:48 |
bkerensa | :D | 07:49 |
=== freeflying is now known as freeflying_away | ||
Noskcaj | pitti: It might be better if you fix the ftbfs for gpgme1.0 since my only fix is disable dh_auto_test (which fully works) | 08:06 |
Laney | pitti: okay, but "never worked"> someone should look into that, of course | 08:07 |
pitti | Laney: yes, of course; but it shouldn't block the propagation | 08:07 |
pitti | Laney: once the sync/build/binNEW rush settles down a bit, I'm planning to go through/fix/poke people all of the failures | 08:07 |
Laney | well, it's correct that it does as that is how the integration is specified | 08:08 |
Laney | https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/view/Saucy/view/AutoPkgTest/job/saucy-adt-bzr-builddeb/ | 08:09 |
Laney | why can't I see the details in the jobs? | 08:09 |
Laney | can in trusty | 08:09 |
pitti | Laney: right, but bzr-builddeb was failing in saucy, and it's not the new python-apt which breaks bzr-builddeb | 08:11 |
pitti | Laney: hm, I don't know why the later saucy builds are broken in that way | 08:12 |
Noskcaj | cody-somerville: Do you plan to keep maintaining catfish in debian? | 08:18 |
Noskcaj | If so, it really needs an upload. if not, please file a wnpp bug | 08:18 |
didrocks | pitti: ah, bzr-builddeb was already failing? | 08:18 |
didrocks | we don't have that traced, I was trying to reproduce… (but can't on my installed saucy machine) | 08:19 |
didrocks | and yeah, python-apt doesn't change a thing tried | 08:19 |
didrocks | Laney: pitti: I was tracking it as this is one of the last piece blocking us to resume releasing things to trusty | 08:20 |
didrocks | (we can't run the tests as add-apt-repository is failing as we don't have latest python-apt) | 08:20 |
bkerensa | Has trusty patch pilots officially kicked off yet? | 08:20 |
pitti | didrocks: you mean bzr-builddeb or p-apt? | 08:20 |
pitti | didrocks: ah, so p-a | 08:20 |
didrocks | yeah, p-a | 08:21 |
bdrung | infinity: i can do the upload now. do you want to add yourself and do the upload to unstable? | 08:22 |
Laney | I added the force-badtest | 08:31 |
Laney | but I don't think I'm a fan of "it wasn't me that broke the tests, so let's ignore them" | 08:32 |
Laney | We should have noticed when they started failing in saucy and fixed it then | 08:32 |
Laney | Not that I can actually reproduce the failure under run-adt-test :( | 08:32 |
pitti | no? I can | 08:53 |
Laney | I got it in a plain chroot | 08:54 |
Laney | missing python-distro-info test-dep but then there's one more failure | 08:54 |
ogra_ | pitti, Laney i guess bug 1243573 is for one of you :) | 08:59 |
ubottu | bug 1243573 in Ubuntu system image "Timezone setting is gone after upgrade to Ubuntu Touch touchy" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1243573 | 08:59 |
Laney | Ubuntu Touch touchy | 08:59 |
* Laney blinks | 08:59 | |
ogra_ | haha | 08:59 |
pitti | bug in our "synced" system-image writable-files mode? | 09:04 |
ogra_ | pitti, probably, i didnt research it, there were so many errors with that upgrade | 09:05 |
ogra_ | (apps all vanished, system-image-cli didnt allow me to switch channels etc) | 09:06 |
pitti | ogra_: (followed up to the bug) | 09:07 |
ogra_ | thx | 09:08 |
bdrung | where to report recipe build failures to (that are caused by the build infrastructure)? | 09:08 |
* ogra_ guesses against launchpad | 09:08 | |
cjwatson | bdrung: launchpad-buildd | 09:09 |
=== freeflying_away is now known as freeflying | ||
bdrung | thanks | 09:09 |
cjwatson | bdrung: but check the existing reports, there are a few standard ones in there that are blocked on host upgrades | 09:09 |
Laney | ogra_: I think the upgrade wiped out more than it should have | 09:10 |
Laney | I lost my accountsservice settings too | 09:10 |
ogra_ | my U1 account stayed | 09:10 |
Laney | e.g. greeter background and it showed me the first run tutorial | 09:10 |
ogra_ | and my wallpaper too | 09:10 |
ogra_ | same for language | 09:11 |
Laney | I said greeter backgroudn on purpose | 09:11 |
Laney | the unity background stayed, and that is in gsettings | 09:11 |
ogra_ | all apps were gone for me ... | 09:11 |
Laney | also had a new SSH host key, but I can't remember if that's expected when using phablet-flash | 09:11 |
popey | Laney: you lost data when going from saucy to trusty? | 09:13 |
Laney | my home directory is intact | 09:14 |
bdrung | cjwatson: i found the bug already reported: it is bug #1089615 | 09:14 |
ubottu | bug 1089615 in launchpad-buildd "Source builds fail for packages with "3.0 (quilt)" format and unapplied patches" [Low,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1089615 | 09:14 |
ogra_ | popey, i lost all apps here, data stayed | 09:15 |
popey | hmm | 09:15 |
ogra_ | (i didnt have to newly log in to G+ but had to reinstall the app) | 09:15 |
=== psivaa is now known as psivaa-afk | ||
=== freeflying is now known as freeflying_away | ||
Laney | pitti: argh, finally got it | 09:37 |
Laney | If you don't have libalgorithm-merge-perl installed then dpkg-mergechangelogs generates conflicts in some situations when it doesn't if you have it installed | 09:38 |
Laney | One of which is in the bzr-builddeb testsuite | 09:38 |
Laney | It's a Recommends of dpkg-dev | 09:39 |
pitti | Laney: ah, so somehow libalgorithm-merge-perl made it into my VM test, but not into your's? | 09:39 |
Laney | I must have had both python-distro-info and libalgorithm-merge-perl installed for the tests to succeed, but the jenkins VMs didn't | 09:40 |
Laney | so there's a difference somewhere between run-adt-test and those | 09:41 |
pitti | so they need to become test deps? | 09:41 |
Laney | in terms of dep installation | 09:41 |
Laney | and that, yes (well, I'm not sure if libalgorithm should actually be a real dep?) | 09:41 |
Laney | It's an implementation detail of dpkg-dev, but bzr-builddeb relies on calling that program to merge changelogs | 09:42 |
pitti | ah, so that's what one would need to uninstall to get back the old conflict markers | 09:44 |
Laney | old ones? | 09:45 |
pitti | I find that automatic changelog merging often sorts wrongly, and it's much less obvious what it damaged | 09:45 |
Laney | you mean within one entry? | 09:45 |
pitti | no, I mean it mis-sorts the older ubuntu entries in between the debian ones | 09:46 |
cjwatson | I often let it merge but then use "bzr shelve --destroy" to throw away the mis-sorting / other changes | 09:47 |
pitti | (often, anyway) | 09:47 |
cjwatson | particularly for changelogs in very old packages that contain misformatted junk at the bottom but I don't think it makes sense to reformat that in an Ubuntu delta | 09:47 |
pitti | but then again, it's been a while since I actually used bzr for merging, so maybe that got fixed | 09:47 |
Laney | Oh, well the testsuite allegedly checks for that | 09:49 |
Laney | Anyway, I'll just add them as test-deps I think | 09:49 |
=== freeflying_away is now known as freeflying | ||
cjwatson | pitti: FYI I rejected entangle as it was mistakenly uploaded to saucy. Not sure whether you get notified as the sponsor | 09:57 |
alexbligh | Is there a way to make specific files in a .deb that are in /etc **NOT** conffiles? I have a directory similar to a .d directory which contains a bunch of stuff put there by the package and also a bunch of stuff put there by users. I don't want to delete the directory on package removal or I'll lose the user's stuff (so I don't really want to symlink out of /etc). However, I do want the individual files the pack | 09:58 |
alexbligh | age installed to be removed (because the new version tends to install other files with slightly different names). What's the best way to do this? | 09:58 |
pitti | cjwatson: argh, thanks; autofingers still need readjustment.. | 09:58 |
pitti | cjwatson: reuploaded to trusty | 09:58 |
cjwatson | alexbligh: Use dpkg-maintscript-helper's tools to manage the upgrade changes | 09:58 |
cjwatson | alexbligh: And keep them as conffiles | 09:59 |
pitti | cjwatson: yes, I got a rejection mail | 09:59 |
alexbligh | cjwatson, are they on Lucid? | 09:59 |
cjwatson | alexbligh: (note that you can use debian/foo.maintscript to make this fairly easy; see dh_installdeb(1)) | 09:59 |
cjwatson | alexbligh: It would be quicker for you to check than me, if you have a setup | 09:59 |
alexbligh | cjwatson, thanks, will do. | 09:59 |
cjwatson | alexbligh: But apparently not; on lucid the correct thing to do is to simulate the same actions by hand in maintainer scripts | 10:00 |
cjwatson | (carefully) | 10:00 |
alexbligh | cjwatson, complete brainfart here, target is Precise these days. Not enough tea. | 10:01 |
cjwatson | precise has dpkg-maintscript-helper so it's all much easier | 10:01 |
cjwatson | https://wiki.debian.org/DpkgConffileHandling if you need to backport to earlier releases | 10:01 |
alexbligh | cjwatson, thanks once more | 10:03 |
shadeslayer | tseliot: ping | 10:06 |
mardy | didrocks: hi! Any idea why this is failing? https://code.launchpad.net/~mardy/signon/packaging/+merge/190911 | 10:06 |
shadeslayer | tseliot: I was looking at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-prime/+bug/1224098 and preinst.in seems a bit weird to me, line 19-20 | 10:07 |
ubottu | Ubuntu bug 1224098 in nvidia-prime (Ubuntu) "xserver wont start after nvidia-prime installation" [Undecided,Confirmed] | 10:07 |
shadeslayer | -s returns true if the file exists and size is greater than zero, but then there's a ! before it ... why? | 10:07 |
didrocks | mardy: reusty is not there yet, we are working on it | 10:09 |
tseliot | shadeslayer: let me have a look | 10:11 |
shadeslayer | ack | 10:11 |
tseliot | shadeslayer: it's obvious a bug (some leftover I assume) | 10:16 |
tseliot | *obviously | 10:16 |
shadeslayer | ack :) | 10:16 |
shadeslayer | tseliot: want to sponsor a upload ? :D | 10:16 |
shadeslayer | also, shouldn't checking -s suffice? | 10:17 |
tseliot | shadeslayer: I'll request an SRU for precise and saucy and upload. I'll need some help testing the fix (so that the SRU team can approve it) | 10:18 |
tseliot | yep | 10:18 |
tseliot | that's why I said "leftover" | 10:18 |
shadeslayer | roger roger | 10:18 |
* shadeslayer goes back to looking at bugs | 10:19 | |
infinity | pitti: I'll be doing a bi-directional merge of initramfs-tools in the next week or two. It's high on my list. | 10:20 |
pitti | infinity: ah, you can do changes in Debian, too? convenient | 10:21 |
infinity | bdrung: I did a bzr snapshot upload of ubuntu-dev-tools to Ubuntu, but whenever you do the Debian upload, you can just sync over that. | 10:21 |
infinity | pitti: I should hope I can, I've been upstream for it since it was written. | 10:21 |
bdrung | infinity: okay, i will do the debian upload now. do you want to SRU that fix to saucy? | 10:21 |
infinity | (Granted, not a very active upstream since maks took over) | 10:22 |
infinity | bdrung: I'm not terribly picky about SRUing it back, since I run the devel release, but if you want to push it back to saucy and maybe precise, go nuts. | 10:22 |
* pitti sets up trusty LP apport retracers | 10:28 | |
=== freeflying is now known as freeflying_away | ||
tseliot | shadeslayer: are you available to test a package locally? | 11:05 |
shadeslayer | tseliot: not the nvidia-prime one :P | 11:06 |
=== doko_ is now known as doko | ||
shadeslayer | because I don't have a nvidia card | 11:06 |
shadeslayer | I just noticed the bug in another channel, and decided to investigate | 11:06 |
tseliot | shadeslayer: oh, never mind then | 11:06 |
=== MacSlow is now known as MacSlow|lunch | ||
mdeslaur | infinity: how did you fix mysql on arm64? | 11:46 |
cjwatson | mdeslaur: was it an ICE or similar? | 11:46 |
mdeslaur | cjwatson: yeah | 11:47 |
cjwatson | mdeslaur: some of the builders have reliability issues; looks like he gave it back on birch, which is the best of them | 11:47 |
mdeslaur | cjwatson: ah, cool. good to know, thanks | 11:48 |
* mdeslaur gives birch a cookie | 11:48 | |
cjwatson | (birch has heat issues or something else that means we sometimes have to power it down for a bit, but it at least doesn't have random segfaults ...) | 11:48 |
mdeslaur | cjwatson: what kind of hardware are they? | 11:49 |
cjwatson | can't answer here just yet I'm afraid | 11:50 |
=== psivaa-afk is now known as psivaa | ||
cjwatson | OK, I think the remaining bits of the Perl 5.18 transition (aside from waiting for builds and a few more no-change uploads) are (a) libdr-tarantool/i386 FTBFS (b) gdal FTBFS (c) libmongodb-perl FTBFS | 12:41 |
ScottK | pitti: upower SRU verified. Thanks again for the quick turnaround. | 12:54 |
pitti | ScottK: nice, thanks | 12:54 |
=== MacSlow|lunch is now known as MacSlow | ||
=== _salem is now known as salem_ | ||
=== freeflying_away is now known as freeflying | ||
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | ||
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
=== freeflying is now known as freeflying_away | ||
=== liam_ is now known as Guest50369 | ||
ScottK | cjwatson: Just to double check before I accept this, you're OK with a grub2 SRU to fix the Kubuntu UEFI problem, right? http://launchpadlibrarian.net/154805913/grub2_2.00-19ubuntu2_2.00-19ubuntu2.1.diff.gz | 17:38 |
slangasek | are Kubuntu the only ones setting GRUB_DISTRIBUTOR? | 17:41 |
ScottK | slangasek: I think Studio might have done so too, but (and I didn't follow the details) there's some partial Kubuntu specific support for this already, so it's an easy fix, but for other flavors it'd be more complex. | 17:44 |
slangasek | mmk | 17:44 |
ScottK | I know Colin discussed it with shadeslayer and apachelogger before fixing in trusty, but (IIRC) he said the Kubuntu team needed to do the SRU. | 17:45 |
gdos | !bug 1243839 | 18:14 |
ubottu | bug 1243839 in dwww (Ubuntu) "does not install completely. " [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1243839 | 18:14 |
gdos | !bug 1243859 | 18:16 |
ubottu | bug 1243859 in dhelp (Ubuntu) "does not install completely (similar to #1243839)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1243859 | 18:16 |
doko | barry, any update on the component mismatches? from my side we should make sure that both pypy and python-cffi build on arm64 before promoting it | 18:40 |
barry | doko: i agree with that. i haven't done anything on it yet. maybe tomorrow | 18:42 |
=== salem_ is now known as _salem | ||
slangasek | bah, why does top in trusty clear the screen on exit? who thought that was a good idea? :P | 20:07 |
slangasek | ev: so I have a strange issue here with apport; the crash file that I've managed to generate for unity8 on goldfish is missing a 'Package' field, which means apport-retrace will refuse to process it | 20:20 |
slangasek | ev: have you heard of such a bug, or do you have any idea what might cause it? | 20:20 |
ev | slangasek: have you run it through apport-cli yet? | 20:22 |
ev | something needs to call add_package_info or whatever the function is | 20:22 |
ev | whoopsie-upload-all will do this as well | 20:22 |
slangasek | hmm, is that something that needs to be run on the target system, I guess? | 20:23 |
slangasek | or at least, on some system where /usr/bin/unity8 exists | 20:24 |
geofft | isn't this the -R option to apport-retrace? | 20:25 |
geofft | apport-retrace --gdb doesn't work for me on /var/crash files, but --gdb -R does | 20:25 |
slangasek | well, since I'm cross-retracing it, I don't want it to wind up with package information from my host system | 20:25 |
slangasek | (particularly since unity8 isn't installed at all) | 20:26 |
slangasek | ev: so running apport-cli on it on the target system seems unlikely to finish any time soon | 20:29 |
slangasek | geofft: and -R seems to be insufficient, it still complains about the missing Package field | 20:30 |
ev | slangasek: yeah, you need to collect the additional data (via apport-cli or whoopsie-upload-all) on the phone itself | 20:30 |
slangasek | ev: hmm, challenging. :) | 20:30 |
ev | :) sorry | 20:31 |
slangasek | ev: yeah, apport-cli doesn't want to finish here (dies with 'Killed'), probably running out of memory | 20:32 |
ev | eep | 20:32 |
slangasek | perhaps I should spin up an emulator with a touch more than 90MB of RAM | 20:32 |
ev | emulator? is that actually working for touch stuff? | 20:32 |
slangasek | ev: no, if it were working I would not be trying to get a backtrace from unity8 ;) | 20:33 |
cjwatson | ScottK: Yes, I'm fine with it. It'll need a grub2-signed upload afterwards. | 20:33 |
slangasek | but I do have a shell on it | 20:33 |
ev | :D | 20:33 |
slangasek | and am trying to get us to the next step | 20:33 |
ScottK | cjwatson: Thanks. | 20:33 |
stgraber | slangasek: based on what I'm seeing on real devices, I gues you'd need at least 512MB to have the emulator emulate something vaguely close to reality | 20:43 |
slangasek | quite possible :) | 20:43 |
slangasek | in fact, maybe trying to run it in 96MB of RAM is why unity8 segfaulted ;) | 20:43 |
slangasek | interesting, updating the config did not cause it to run with more RAM | 20:44 |
stgraber | considering it's taking almost 200MB on a physical device, that'd be a safe bet ;) | 20:44 |
slangasek | xnox: do you know how to get more than 96MB of RAM out of goldfish? | 20:44 |
slangasek | ah, guess it's just -memory | 20:48 |
rampageRipper | hello world,has anyone saved this page: books4electricians.blogspot.com? | 20:48 |
slangasek | cjwatson: what does the click run-user hook do on startup? I'm seeing it do a whole lot of nothing here on goldfish and blocking the session startup, and I'm wondering if that's overall emulator slowness or miscellaneous system brokenness or what | 21:09 |
cjwatson | slangasek: It runs user hooks, which among other things is necessary to make .desktop files for preinstalled apps work properly | 21:12 |
cjwatson | slangasek: It shouldn't be doing anything especially exotic - you can look at the hooks in /usr/share/click/hooks/ with "User-Level: yes" | 21:12 |
slangasek | ok | 21:13 |
cjwatson | Which should be click-desktop, content-hub, upstart-app-launch-desktop at the moment (and click-desktop basically arranges to stub itself if upstart-app-launch-desktop is present) | 21:13 |
slangasek | well, now I just hung the emulator by running 'sync' | 21:13 |
slangasek | so yay | 21:13 |
cjwatson | I don't know what content-hub does | 21:13 |
slangasek | right, it's the content-hub that was runnnig | 21:14 |
slangasek | I wound up killing it to see | 21:14 |
=== Sweetshark is now known as NSA | ||
=== NSA is now known as Sweetshark | ||
ScottK | cjwatson: Who has to take care of uploading grub2-signed? | 21:32 |
cjwatson | ScottK: anyone really | 21:36 |
=== freeflying_away is now known as freeflying | ||
=== freeflying is now known as freeflying_away | ||
saiarcot895 | What exactly is a debdiff? Is it just the diff of the sources? | 23:20 |
infinity | saiarcot895: Yeah, it's a diff between two source packages. | 23:36 |
infinity | saiarcot895: Or, that's the most common use of the tool and the term. You can also debdiff binaries, which is handy. :) | 23:36 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!