=== mythos_ is now known as mythos [00:58] hggdh, got the latest message? [00:58] on the mailing list [00:58] bdmurray, same question ^ === supercheetah is now known as Guest93700 === emma is now known as em === brainwash_ is now known as brainwash === elopio_ is now known as elopio [19:12] TheLordOfTime: from balloons? Yes, will answer as soon as possible. I think it is a good idea [19:12] hggdh, yeah there's continued discussion on it, i put in my two cents, but i've lurked the QA team's area for a while now, since occasionally bug triage questions come out outside the scope of ISOtesting [19:13] of course i put in my two-cents in #ubuntu-quality since GMail's not sending my emails today for some reason [19:13] but meh [20:44] hi i would like to assign a bug to a particular package but am not able to find which package the bug belongs too [20:44] can someone please help [20:44] asd, which bug [20:45] TheLordOfTimes it is Bug #1242907 [20:45] Launchpad bug 1242907 in Ubuntu "The Shutdown button does not work" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1242907 [20:45] this bug also affects me [20:47] fun - I'd file that against pm-utils or linux [20:47] asd: So it stops working but doesn't actually turn the power off ? [20:47] asd, ^ [20:48] for me the case is when i press the top right button and shutdown a window pops up with two huge buttons restart and shutdown [20:48] clicking on wither does nothing [20:49] and clicking on some where else in the screen dismisses the window [20:49] asd, do me a favor and test this in the command line: `sudo shutdown -r now` (tests restart) or `sudo shutdown -h now` (tests full shutdown and halt) [20:50] of course, assuming you aren't on your system right now :) [20:50] but if you are just test [20:50] (because if it's just those buttons not working that might be a more specific issue) [20:50] TheLordOfTime: I have tested these two commands and they work from a user who is sudoers list [20:51] asd: have you checked the logs? do you have something in the system log? [20:52] asimionov: could you please direct me to where I can find the logs, sry but I am new to ubuntu [20:53] do this: open a new console, type: tail -f /var/log/syslog [20:53] asd: and type some ENTERs [20:53] asd: then do you stuff and see what you get in the logs [20:53] asd: *your [20:55] asimionov: Oct 24 22:54:58 c490100005 gnome-session[1984]: WARNING: Unable to inhibit system: GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.AccessDenied: Operation not permitted [20:57] TheLordOfTime: it seems to be the buttons, i did what asimionov asked and in the logs i see ^ [20:57] wait, wasn't this a bug in 13.04? And 12.10, too? [20:57] i could've sworn i've seen this crop up in **every single release* [20:59] I have not used 13.04 or 12.10, I was using 12.04 and i updated to 13.10 a few days back [20:59] i was addressing everyone else, not just you [20:59] i've seen questions about this issue since 12.10 [20:59] on Ask Ubuntu and stuff [21:00] oh ok [21:00] TheLordOfTime: So this is a permission/session permission thing where it's not allowing the shutdown? [21:01] penguin42, dunno, i've only seen the people complaining on Ask Ubuntu about it, i haven't seen any bug resolutions for it [21:01] i mean, i could go digging, but... meh [21:01] penguin42, i'm also not a dev, and I personally have never had the bug [21:01] TheLordOfTime: Yeh I'm sure I hit it a few releases ago but can't remember how it resolved [21:01] (it works fine in my systems xD) [21:02] asd: The problem you are hitting sounds different to the bug you linked to - that bug sounds like it starts shutting down just never actually manages to turn the power off [21:02] ... be right back, I need to wage war against sbuild right now... (it's FTBFSing only on my system) [21:02] asd: But there again it's not too clear from the wording of that bug if it is that he's seeing [21:03] penguin42: okay i searched for my issue and found this bug, should i create a new one instead, thanks [21:03] asd: Yes, create a new one - if the shutdown -h now works then I suggest filing the bug against either unity or pm-utils [21:03] asd: (unity assuming you're running unity that is) [21:04] penguin42: how do i find if i am running unity, thanks [21:04] asd: Is it the 'normal' Ubuntu gui - with the ubuntu symbol at the top left that when you click it pops up a search box and buttons down the left side? [21:05] could be gnome-session, systemd/logind or policykit [21:05] brainwash: Indeed, but very non-trivial to track down [21:06] certainly I wouldn't know where to go from that point - feel free to suggest [21:06] penguin42: yes that is what I have. [21:07] asd: OK, Unless brainwash has some better ideas of package to pick then I'd file against pm-utils and see what happens [21:07] asd: AS long as you pick something reasonable then the guys who own it might be able to point in a better direction [21:07] penguin42: ok thanks I will do so [21:07] pm-utils is kinda wrong [21:07] ... and I'm back, apparently sbuild didn't take into account the PPA i told its schroots to add into it for the nginx builds... [21:08] brainwash: Ok, make a better suggestion [21:08] * penguin42 has to disappear for a while [21:08] brainwash: shall i choose unity then, thank you [21:09] well, gnome-session is throwing the waring [21:09] warning [21:10] well the thing is that is same warning being thrown every few seconds [21:10] i just realized this [21:11] what does "dbus-send --print-reply --system --dest=org.freedesktop.login1 /org/freedesktop/login1 org.freedesktop.login1.Manager.CanPowerOff" return? [21:12] yes, no or challenge [21:12] brainwash: dbus-send --print-reply --system --dest=org.freedesktop.login1 /org/freedesktop/login1 org.freedesktop.login1.Manager.CanPowerOff [21:12] returns method return sender=:1.3 -> dest=:1.77 reply_serial=2 string "challenge" [21:13] that means that there is are other active user session running at the moment, right? [21:13] yes i ran the command from a sudoer user [21:13] from my user i see this method return sender=:1.3 -> dest=:1.78 reply_serial=2 string "challenge" [21:14] mmh, how many sessions does "loginctl list-sessions" list? [21:15] it says o sessions listed [21:15] *0 [21:16] that is odd [21:17] brainwash: the sudoer user I have logged in only from the terminal using su [21:17] my user is the one currenty logged in physically [21:17] dont know if that makes a difference [21:18] again i am pretty new to ubuntu and linux in general so sry if it sounds silly :) [21:18] using su? [21:19] why that? [21:19] yes from the terminal i say su [21:19] why would your user that you're logged in as not already be in sudoers? [21:20] TheLordOfTime: that is the configuration from my office [21:20] my user is not in the sudoers list [21:21] i just know a user in the sudoers list that i am currently using to issue the shutdown command when i want to shutdown [21:23] so did you run the mentioned commands as normal user (your user account)? [21:25] yes the first one from my user account gives method return sender=:1.3 -> dest=:1.81 reply_serial=2 string "challenge" [21:25] and the loginctl list gives 0 sessions also run from my user [21:31] right, and that's a bit odd [21:31] it should at least list your current session [21:35] what does "cat /etc/pam.d/common-session | grep systemd" return? [21:36] brainwash: it returns nothing [21:36] oh [21:36] mmmmmh [21:36] it should return something [21:38] I'm looking for an existing bug report [21:38] it would maybe help to add that my user is linked to a kerberos account [21:46] asd: so, the entry for systemd is missing in your pam conf file [21:46] brainwash: yes it looks like that is the case [21:47] it's "session optional pam_systemd.so" [21:48] there is pam-auth-update to manage the modules, well, but I'm not that familiar with pam [21:48] brainwash: i have session optional with couple of other stuff [21:49] add it below the the pam_unix.so line [21:50] pam_unmask.so, pam_krb5.so minimum_uid=1000, pam_ldap.so and pam_ck_connector.so nox11 these are what i have [21:51] so add "session optional pam_systemd.so" [21:52] the block on the bottom is called "Additional" block [21:52] and the line belongs there [21:53] It's the only hint we got so far, maybe it does solve your issue [21:54] if no, you should file a bug report against gnome-session I guess and attach all the information we gathered [21:55] ok will add and see what happens [21:55] thank you for yout time [21:55] *your [21:57] hopefully the mystery gets solved now or soon :) [22:00] brainwash: i have added the line i guess i will have to restart for the changes to take effect [22:01] right, maybe a relog would be enough [22:01] but a restart won't hurt [22:03] ok doing a restart now [22:13] brainwash: it worked [22:13] great [22:14] thank you, the results of the command now are, method return sender=:1.3 -> dest=:1.77 reply_serial=2 string "yes" [22:15] SESSION UID USER SEAT c2 20006 abduljabbar.gulam seat0 1 sessions listed. [22:15] you should file a report, but against system and pam [22:15] and i can do a restart and shutdown [22:16] where can i do this report, thank you [22:16] on launchpad [22:17] to inform the devs about this issue, it might affect more people [22:17] people who upgraded to 13.10 [22:18] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+filebug [22:18] afterwards you can also add pam to the list of affected packages [22:21] brainwash, might be better for him to do `ubuntu-bug systemd` in the command line [22:21] then apport grabs things about it [22:21] right [22:22] asd: use `ubuntu-bug systemd` in the command line [22:23] without the ` characters [22:23] TheLordOfTime and brainwash from command line i get a message saysing Package systemd does not exist [22:23] a window pops up displaing this message [22:23] displaying [22:24] bleh [22:24] hmm [22:24] brainwash, systemd != in saucy [22:26] from the link brainwash sent i find "libpam-systemd" shall i choose this [22:26] yes [22:27] systemd is the meta build package name I assume [22:29] ok i did ubuntu-bug libpam-systemd [22:30] brainwash: Nice bit of debug [22:32] yes brainwash, thank you [22:32] penguin42: thanks, sadly 13.10 isn't fully compatible with systemd/logind yet [22:32] asd: you're welcome :) [22:33] penguin42: and on top o that, not well tested regarding systemd/logind [22:34] brainwash: But that is the default install isn't it? [22:35] yes, logind is now the default, it replaced consolekit (deprecated) [22:36] currently I'm trying to debug and understand bug 1184262 [22:36] Launchpad bug 1184262 in network-manager (Ubuntu) "[logind] stuck in PrepareForSleep, causing network and other services to not resume" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1184262 [22:36] brainwash: OK, interesting - I hadn't noticed consolekit went away [22:36] asd, what's the bug number on your bug that you filed (it should give you a link after its filed) [22:37] TheLordOfTime it is Bug #1244463 [22:37] Launchpad bug 1244463 in systemd (Ubuntu) "session optional pam_systemd.so missing from /etc/pam.d common-session file" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1244463 [22:38] asd: Did you go straight from 12.04 to 13.10 ? [22:39] penguin42: no i ran update-manager -d and it updated to 12.10, 13.04 and finally to 13.10 [22:39] o.o [22:39] i did this however one after the other immediately without changing anything in betweem [22:39] between [22:39] clean install would have saved you some time [22:41] well i did not want to lose my kerberos settings [22:41] but it looks like a clean install would have been better :) [22:42] asd: Hmm ok, that's interesting - could you add the detail about how you upgraded to your report please [22:44] penguin42 yes sure [22:50] brainwash: Really something somewhere should have done a lot of that session debug automagically rather than the thing just sulking [22:51] * penguin42 gulps at the loginctl kill-user parameter [22:53] I really dislike ubuntu's systemd abomination :/ [22:53] what have they done - picked just one part of it? [22:54] the parts which are needed like logind, udev,.. [22:54] and we ship systemd-shim, a simple wrapper for dbus calls [22:55] brainwash: In which direction do you dislike it, for going too far or not far enough? [22:55] and the usual ubuntu custom patches :D [22:55] going further would mean to replace upstart with systemd [22:56] well you said you disliked it - but I wondered what your preferred route was [22:57] the current one is the "right" one [22:58] we had to replace consolekit [23:49] brainwash: is this the same as bug 1243837 ? [23:49] Launchpad bug 1243837 in xfce4 (Ubuntu) "Restart in the main menu does a logout instead" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1243837 [23:50] penguin42, i think this is a different bug, looks like the user here is hitting shutdown or restart but then nothing happens, at least by their description... [23:51] it is related to bug 1184262 [23:51] Launchpad bug 1184262 in network-manager (Ubuntu) "[logind] stuck in PrepareForSleep, causing network and other services to not resume" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1184262 [23:53] ok [23:54] ^ this report is driving me mad anyway, people keep bumping it with "useless" comments or simply confirm the workaround over and over again [23:54] still no real debugging information